Re: [Fedora-legal-list] fwsnort vs. snort TM

2009-07-07 Thread Tom spot Callaway
On 07/07/2009 05:28 AM, Peter Vrabec wrote: Dear Fedora Legal, I'd like to push fwsnort into Fedora, but I'm afraid there might be problem with snort TM. http://www.snort.org/legal/snort-licensing/snort-trademark-guidelines I have contacted fwsnort upstream and I was told they

Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Mono update

2009-07-07 Thread Luis Villa
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Luis Villal...@tieguy.org wrote: On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Tom spot Callawaytcall...@redhat.com wrote: On 07/07/2009 08:32 AM, Paul W. Frields wrote: Just to make sure it's seen by the legal-minded, fwiw:

Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Mono update

2009-07-07 Thread Tom spot Callaway
On 07/07/2009 03:44 PM, Luis Villa wrote: On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Luis Villal...@tieguy.org wrote: On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Tom spot Callawaytcall...@redhat.com wrote: On 07/07/2009 08:32 AM, Paul W. Frields wrote: Just to make sure it's seen by the legal-minded, fwiw:

[Fedora-legal-list] Fedora Mozilla trademark agreement

2009-07-07 Thread Rahul Sundaram
Hi, I have heard it exists but haven't actually seen it. Shouldn't it be publicly available? Rahul ___ Fedora-legal-list mailing list Fedora-legal-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legal-list

Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Mono update

2009-07-07 Thread Luis Villa
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Tom spot Callawaytcall...@redhat.com wrote: On 07/07/2009 03:44 PM, Luis Villa wrote: On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Luis Villal...@tieguy.org wrote: On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Tom spot Callawaytcall...@redhat.com wrote: On 07/07/2009 08:32 AM, Paul W.

Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Mono update

2009-07-07 Thread Tom spot Callaway
On 07/07/2009 05:52 PM, Luis Villa wrote: So what coverage/license/protection do I, as a Fedora contributor but not a RH employee, get? You, individually? Probably none, although the likelyhood of Microsoft suing you, individually is very very very very very very low, since you are giving

Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Mono update

2009-07-07 Thread Luis Villa
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 5:59 PM, Tom spot Callawaytcall...@redhat.com wrote: On 07/07/2009 05:52 PM, Luis Villa wrote: So what coverage/license/protection do I, as a Fedora contributor but not a RH employee, get? You, individually? Probably none, Just checking. ;) although the likelyhood of

Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Mono update

2009-07-07 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 07/08/2009 03:43 AM, Luis Villa wrote: Sure, though of course we know they've gone around suing using companies before, so if I were a company-based contributor to Fedora (or a mirror) I'd be a bit twitchy. Then, it would be up to the company to consider joining OIN. You don't have to