2009/3/28 Ian Weller ianwel...@gmail.com:
See attached license. This comes with tremulous and (soon to be
packaged) tremfusion. tremulous currently deals with this license as
being non-free and removing it from the tarball.
I'd like to double check whether or not this is free, and if not, why
Note that, historically, suse has prohibited 'real' p2p in their
distro on very, very specious legal grounds. (Basically fear that it
is per se illegal even though this isn't true in the US, much less
elsewhere.) I assume (but have no specific information) that this is
just a variant of that.
I have not looked at the final draft, but as I understand it the purpose of
issuing eupl 1.1 was to make it osi compliant. So it *should* be good now.
Luis
On May 29, 2009 9:35 AM, Caolán McNamara caol...@redhat.com wrote:
On this list previously the EUPL v1.0 was considered unacceptable for
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Luis Villal...@tieguy.org wrote:
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Tom spot Callawaytcall...@redhat.com
wrote:
On 07/07/2009 08:32 AM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
Just to make sure it's seen by the legal-minded, fwiw:
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Tom spot Callawaytcall...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/07/2009 03:44 PM, Luis Villa wrote:
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Luis Villal...@tieguy.org wrote:
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Tom spot Callawaytcall...@redhat.com
wrote:
On 07/07/2009 08:32 AM, Paul W
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 5:59 PM, Tom spot Callawaytcall...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/07/2009 05:52 PM, Luis Villa wrote:
So what coverage/license/protection do I, as a Fedora contributor but
not a RH employee, get?
You, individually? Probably none,
Just checking. ;)
although the likelyhood
