Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Please define effective license (for the love of consistency)

2009-12-13 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 20:45:11 -0800, Julius wrote: ps. My email is more of a personal tangential thought I'm having and not really relevant to Orcan's original questions since it doesn't have any implications for what to put in the RPM license tag! Still, what to put in the License: tag has

Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Please define effective license (for the love of consistency)

2009-12-13 Thread Richard Fontana
On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 20:29:57 -0800 Julius Davies juliusdav...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Maybe the overall master copyright license for the Fedora compilation causes every single GPL+ compatible file inside Fedora to be licensed as GPL+ ? So every LGPL, BSD, MIT file which *can* be relicensed

Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Legal aspects of fedora based appliances

2009-12-13 Thread Fabian Deutsch
Am Mittwoch, den 09.12.2009, 19:19 -0500 schrieb Paul W. Frields: On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 10:22:07PM +0100, Fabian Deutsch wrote: Am Mittwoch, den 09.12.2009, 16:14 -0500 schrieb Paul W. Frields: On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 09:57:10PM +0100, Fabian Deutsch wrote: Hello. Fedora