Alexandre Oliva wrote:
Some licenses do allow their own terms to be replaced by the GPL,
True, but these are very rare. GNU LGPL and the Brazilian LPG-AP v2,
so far unpublished, are the only examples that come to mind.
Most licenses that are compatible with the GPL are compatible just
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 02:20:34PM +0530, aakash sharma wrote:
See, one of the problems with open source is
.
THERE'S NO SUPPORT: The not-so-good news is that there's no single
source of information..
Aha but there is a single source of information. It is the source
M. Fioretti wrote, On 07/21/2008 03:06 PM:
This is related to the problem with Sqlite3 and php I posted earlier
today. I am working with Sqlite3 because I'd like to have single-file,
server-less databases which may be used both from php and from
OpenOffice.
The Php part is now solved, but I'm
I really could not care less what it is called, just
that the
bleedin' thing works.
If you don't care, then wouldn't object to calling
it GNU/Linux,
right?
A kind person posted the following at Distrowatch.com, you can check it out for
yourselves if you want to confirm it
quote
30 •
Hi All;
I'm working on several client Linux servers (Fedora, RH, CentOS, etc)
and I've setup my own profile like this:
I have my own special bashrc that I source on each box which amoung
other things has a alias for vi:
alias vi=/usr/bin/vim -u ~/.myvimrc
This works pretty nice since it
Anyone know of a ripper that has cddb support similar to grip but works with
file names better like juicer?
Thanks!
jlc
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
Anyone know of a ripper that has cddb support similar to grip but works with
file names better like juicer?
How specifically do you want filenames generated? For reference, here
are the options available when configuring grip for ripping and encoding:
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 9:37 AM, Christopher A. Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2008-07-20 at 08:15 -0400, Alex Katebi wrote:
Hi All,
I can not find laptop or desktop hardware that supports KVM
Virtualization (Intel-VT or AMD-V).
I like Dell laptops but there is no
On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 17:00 -0400, Alex Katebi wrote:
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 9:37 AM, Christopher A. Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2008-07-20 at 08:15 -0400, Alex Katebi wrote:
Hi All,
I can not find laptop or desktop hardware that
On Jul 21, 2008, Antonio Olivares [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I actually did not check all the pages, would you mind reposting them?
The links are at the end of this entry in the blong:
http://fsfla.org/blogs/lxo/2008-07-21-gnu+linux
I am a happy Linux User and it is definitely impossible to
måndagen den 21 juli 2008 skrev Les Mikesell:
Björn Persson wrote:
You're still talking as if your opponents want to name entire
distributions GNU/Linux. I'm not so sure that there really is anyone
who wants to name entire distributions GNU/Linux. Are you sure that
there are people who
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 23:33:17 +0200
Björn Persson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
måndagen den 21 juli 2008 skrev Les Mikesell:
Björn Persson wrote:
You're still talking as if your opponents want to name entire
distributions GNU/Linux. I'm not so sure that there really is anyone
who wants to
On Jul 21, 2008, Les Mikesell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alexandre Oliva wrote:
but it's a one way trip and that copy of such code no longer has its
original license terms.
Can you back this up? All the evidence I've got suggests the exact
opposite.
I thought you had just agreed with this
On Jul 21, 2008, Les Mikesell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The other 85% has nothing to do with GNU, and is usually the driving
force behind people bothering to install the GNU portions at all.
That is, I don't install a system so I can run cp or tar or the other
minor infrastructure components,
I actually did not check all the pages, would you mind
reposting them?
The links are at the end of this entry in the blong:
http://fsfla.org/blogs/lxo/2008-07-21-gnu+linux
Those links I saw, I was not sure, that is why I asked for them again.
Thank you for posting them :)
I am a happy
On Jul 21, 2008, Mark Haney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let's change grep to gnu/grep! Or bash to GNU/bash.
These are actually the names of the programs that are used in
GNU/Linux distributions.
The point I'm making is this. I have no trouble giving credit where
credit is due.
Good. Thank
Mark Haney wrote:
But this name change business is silly. I mean why stop there? Let's
change grep to gnu/grep! Or bash to GNU/bash. I could go on and on here.
Heh!
$ grep --version
grep (GNU grep) 2.5.1
Copyright 1988, 1992-1999, 2000, 2001 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free
On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 14:45 -0600, kevin kempter wrote:
Hi All;
I'm working on several client Linux servers (Fedora, RH, CentOS, etc)
and I've setup my own profile like this:
I have my own special bashrc that I source on each box which amoung
other things has a alias for vi:
alias
On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 20:53 +0200, Björn Persson wrote:
måndagen den 21 juli 2008 skrev Patrick O'Callaghan:
On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 15:23 +0200, Björn Persson wrote:
Tim wrote:
The majority will understand Linux as being an OS, the whole
thing,
one of the many OS distros that
On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 17:46 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
I want to do this so I have the settings I like while leaving the
settings as is for others who login with this same userid.
So you want the system to magically know it's you and not someone else?
poc
More's to the point
On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 20:53 +0200, Björn Persson wrote:
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Truth be told, normally I'm on the other side of this kind of argument.
I prefer exactness wherever possible. I've simply learned to save my
energies for things that matter, and that I might eventually
Alexandre Oliva wrote:
On Jul 21, 2008, Les Mikesell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alexandre Oliva wrote:
but it's a one way trip and that copy of such code no longer has its
original license terms.
Can you back this up? All the evidence I've got suggests the exact
opposite.
I thought you
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 3:41 PM, Antonio Olivares
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're still talking as if your opponents want to name
entire
distributions GNU/Linux. I'm not so sure
that there really is anyone who
wants to name entire distributions GNU/Linux.
Are you sure that there are
people
Kevin Martin wrote:
Are you sure that it's using it's own java? Just because it
installed it doesn't necessarily mean it's using it (one would think so
but...). It would be interesting to see what Zend is actually using
(you may be able to do this in the startup script with a set -x or
Antonio Olivares wrote:
You're still talking as if your opponents want to name
entire
distributions GNU/Linux. I'm not so sure
that there really is anyone who
wants to name entire distributions GNU/Linux.
Are you sure that there are
people who want to do this? Do you have any
On Jul 21, 2008, Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Linux is a trademark, please use it properly in combination with other
marks.
Oh, right! Thanks for reminding me of yet another reason why the
Linux(R) is shorter and more convenient. Linux(R) is a registered
trademark of Linus Torvalds in
yes there are. Linux is not an operating system. That is a fact. It is
common for people to refer to an OS as Linux but it is not factually
correct.
That is a matter of definition. It's as correct to them as it is wrong to
you.
Alan
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To
On Jul 21, 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Alexandre Oliva
So, if someone said I'm a Linux developer, you'd immediately know
that the person:
.. wrote some code that runs on the Linux OS.
And you're not the least concerned that Eric Paul Allman, Theo de
Raadt, and Richard M. Stallman
On Jul 21, 2008, Antonio Olivares [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
30 • Re post #23 (by Anonymous on 2008-07-21 20:19:06 GMT from Canada)
Gnu is but one portion of all
Nobody ever disputed that. It's like Linux. Except that Linux is
a much smaller portion than GNU. An order of magnitude so.
--
BTW, please also remind Telsa and also whoever's in charge of
linux(tm).org.uk that her home page and their front page don't abide
by http://www.linuxmark.org/attribution.php
Go read up on trademarks before making yourself look a complete and utter
muppet. Using a mark for its appropriate
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 12:59 PM, Mark Haney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martin Marques wrote:
max escribió:
No kernel update. Anyway, tried with the last 3 kernels and still had the
same problem.
Do you have that system as dual boot? If so, does Windows see it? If not,
then it's likely
How specifically do you want filenames generated? For reference, here
are the options available when configuring grip for ripping and encoding:
http://www.nostatic.org/grip/doc/ar01s04.html#gripswitches
Dario,
I tried the following:
~/Music/%A/%d/%t - %a.%x
And it didn't produce very nice
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 20:47:03 -0300
Alexandre Oliva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 21, 2008, Antonio Olivares [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
30 • Re post #23 (by Anonymous on 2008-07-21 20:19:06 GMT from Canada)
Gnu is but one portion of all
Nobody ever disputed that. It's like Linux.
On Jul 21, 2008, Antonio Olivares [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am not insulting anyone and if I did, I apologize,
No need to apologize. Just please understand that it is insulting,
and that fixing it is not an unreasonable request at all. Please
start giving credit to both projects, rather than
On Jul 21, 2008, Les Mikesell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, I still don't see how the GPL requirements are
technically removed once you've accepted the license that applies them
to any covered component of a work.
The requirements aren't removed. They don't have to be. You have
Oliver Sampson wrote:
Howdy,
I've just upgraded my Linux system from the motherboard up, and there
are just a couple of hic-coughs left to clear up before everthing gets
to be hunky-dory.
oliver,
i went back threw my old scanner files and from what i found and relate
to your system, i am
On Jul 21, 2008, Les Mikesell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alexandre Oliva wrote:
Alexandre Oliva wrote:
This is fundamentally contradictory. If you have to choose between
these two, you're choosing between promoting either FS or OSS.
It is a problem the GPL creates.
That's a red herring.
Alexandre Oliva wrote:
I've never, ever, misunderstood someone because they use the term
Linux.
So, if someone said I'm a Linux developer, you'd immediately know
that the person:
a) wrote some code present in linux-2.6.26.tar.bz2
...
Well, no-one has ever said that to me.
I probably
Rex Dieter wrote:
And when you say Fedora does not seem... keep in mind that these are
also generally DE specific, so Gnome, KDE, XFCE, (others) implement this
in different ways.
Sorry, I should have said KDE/Fedora.
I sometimes forget that not everyone sees the world through KDE eyes.
--
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
snip
Yes. See also http://noscript.net/
i did and it is now loaded
I have it enabled by default, and selectively allow scripts on trusted
pages. You can also allow scripts temporarily i.e. only for the current
session. Well worth having IMHO.
just went back to
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
snip
Try info bash to read up on the bash Shell,
i bees up on bash. i used it in cromix and later in unix.
i just was not aware that yum started out with current directory.
i was stuck in mandrake/driva when i could not get f4 to load and
never needed to use other
Björn Persson wrote:
Do you think the term (GNU/)Linux distribution means software
distribution which, in its entirety, is a version of (GNU/)Linux? It
could be taken that way, but I think it could also be intended as
software distribution built around (GNU/)Linux.
It is normally used to
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
How specifically do you want filenames generated? For reference, here
are the options available when configuring grip for ripping and encoding:
http://www.nostatic.org/grip/doc/ar01s04.html#gripswitches
I tried the following:
~/Music/%A/%d/%t - %a.%x
And it
On Sun, 2008-07-20 at 16:35 -0400, Kevin J. Cummings wrote:
All i need to do is a project on Linux. That's why I want to install
Fedora.
My project doesn't require latest features of FEDORA 9.
So, can u tell me which version of Fedora will work somewhat smooth
like
XP on my system.
Tim:
That's still alternating between mouse and keyboard. That's bad
ergonomics.
Menus should be a quick thing to do, that's *NOT. That's convoluted
and delaying.
Patrick O'Callaghan:
You can still use the menu as a menu. All I'm saying is that this is a
good alterantive when you can't
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 8:21 AM, Kevin Kofler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's because of gnome-keyring's designer's stupid arrogance not to allow
passwordless keyrings (unlike KWallet which empowers the user). Instead, we're
stuck with some PAM hackery which allows reusing the login password,
First, you'll probably want to use the following instead for ripping:
~/Music/%A/%d/%t - %a - %n.wav
Ripping produces files in WAV format. Using .%x as the extension
probably isn't what you want.
Sorry, Yeah I didn't change the rip format because I let it delete
the wav's.
Also, check the
Kevin J. Cummings wrote:
snip
I don't understand why. There are very *few* updates that require a
my old habits are hard to break. but i am not an old dog in my habits.
I find it helps the learning process.
what it is all about.
I usually try and upgrade, usually through yum first, and
On Jul 21, 2008, Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sticking a mark in the middle of other things in a way that causes
confusion generally needs that and may well need the permission of
the rights holder.
What if the trademarked term causes confusion by itself? What if it
was created to cause
On Jul 21, 2008, Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By what measurement - remembering that much of GNU is actually BSD and
other projects with bits nailed on or assimilated into the project.
For the 3rd time today, 4th in the thread, please see the links into
the blong, at the end of the most
On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 16:03 -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
So, if someone said I'm a Linux developer, you'd immediately know
that the person:
a) wrote some code present in linux-2.6.26.tar.bz2
b) wrote some code for your favorite application
c) maintains a package in your favorite distro
Alexandre Oliva wrote:
Aren't you obligated by accepting this license to observe its terms
which explicitly extend to the work-as-a-whole?
You're not even required to accept the license. Even if you do, it
grants you certain permissions over the whole and every part of it,
but it doesn't
The GPL meets both the FS and the OSS definition.
News to me. GPLv3 has clauses which are specifically aimed at certain
uses, and clauses which contain systematic biases in favour of people who
have certain long standing arrangements with Microsoft.
It's not IMHO an OSS licence. Free yes, OSS
Tim:
The majority will understand Linux as being an OS, the whole thing,
one of the many OS distros that are similar to each other (*), but not
understand it as referring to just the kernel.
Björn Persson:
And then you'll hear arguments like You think Windows is bloated? Linux is
*much*
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 23:06:35 -0300
Alexandre Oliva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 21, 2008, Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By what measurement - remembering that much of GNU is actually BSD and
other projects with bits nailed on or assimilated into the project.
For the 3rd time
On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 15:49 -0400, Mark Haney wrote:
(really, will someone kill this thread?)
I call Godwin's...
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ uname -r
2.6.25.10-86.fc9.i686
Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I
read messages from the public lists.
--
fedora-list
Kevin Kofler kevin.kofler at chello.at writes:
Alexandre Oliva aoliva at redhat.com writes:
If you find any such problems in BLAG 8 (never formally released)
or BLAG 9 (released easier today), please report them.
Here's some I found at a quick glance:
I've just installed Fedora 9 on my computer.
I got the following message:
The GNOME session manager was unable to lock the file
'/home/bonfim/.ICEauthority'. Please report this as a GNOME bug. Sometimes this
error may occur if the file's directory is unwritable, you could try logging in
via
On Tue, 2008-07-22 at 01:09 +, g wrote:
i just was not aware that yum started out with current directory.
It's not *yum* doing that, it's your command line interpreter.
Everything typed into it is a communicating with *it*. When you type
yum then type more stuff after it, is the CLI that's
Alexandre Oliva wrote:
This is fundamentally contradictory. If you have to choose between
these two, you're choosing between promoting either FS or OSS.
the GPL is the well-known instance.
The GPL meets both the FS and the OSS definition.
The GPL can only meet it under very limited
On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 19:36 -0700, Oz Bonfim wrote:
home/bonfim/.ICEauthority
It looks like you have somehow run or done something that changed the
permissions on some of the stuff in your directory.
I believe that if you chown these files in your home directory, you
should be able to clear
Seriously, you freaking people are never gonna agree, and that's fine. We
are not here to watch zealots clog up our inboxes with this garbage.
Take it off list, or meet in the alley out back and handle it with your
favorite dueling weapons or whatever, but PLEASE, SHUT UP.
Jeez!
--
fedora-list
g wrote:
and what do you do to stay operational? if you trash an install with
an upgrade then you are either taking time out to install your backup,
if you have one, or you are fighting to find out what is wrong with
upgrade.
Worst that has ever happened to me was my FC3 boot got trashed
Tim wrote:
On Tue, 2008-07-22 at 01:09 +, g wrote:
i just was not aware that yum started out with current directory.
It's not *yum* doing that, it's your command line interpreter.
right you are. after learning 25+ yrs ago, i do admit to having
forgotten a few things.
thanks for
On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 04:35 -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
The OSS movement cares about popularity and convenience, so an
esential part of this movement is to accept, endorse and promote the
use of software that denies users their freedoms, when that is
convenient and can lure in more users.
Kevin J. Cummings wrote:
snip
You think maybe I've just been lucky? B^)
yum is sweeter than cotton candy...
--
tc,hago.
g
.
in a free world without fences, who needs gates.
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe:
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 11:13:34AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
a friend who's just getting into development on Linux was reading
the gcc manual and ran across the variety of available debugging
formats here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.3.0/gcc/Debugging-Options.html
and
2008/7/21 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Seriously, you freaking people are never gonna agree, and that's fine. We
are not here to watch zealots clog up our inboxes with this garbage.
Take it off list, or meet in the alley out back and handle it with your
favorite dueling weapons or
CNN reports that leading climatologists and Al Gore have confirms that all
the hot air on this thread is accelerating global warming.
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
When logging in as root on an upgraded system, the desktop would not load
(gconf related errors), and there appeared to be no way to shutdown or
escape beyond hitting the system reset while seeing mostly a blank screen.
There was a difference noticed between a full-install and the upgrade from
Ed Greshko wrote:
CNN reports that leading climatologists and Al Gore have confirms that
all the hot air on this thread is accelerating global warming.
way to go ed. now you have given linux.whiz [what is that running down
his leg?] kid another thread...
--
tc,hago.
g
.
in a free world
2008/7/21 Oz Bonfim [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I've just installed Fedora 9 on my computer.
I got the following message:
The GNOME session manager was unable to lock the file
'/home/bonfim/.ICEauthority'. Please report this as a GNOME bug. Sometimes
this error may occur if the file's directory is
On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 21:59 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Seriously, you freaking people are never gonna agree, and that's fine.
We are not here to watch zealots clog up our inboxes with this
garbage.
Take it off list, or meet in the alley out back and handle it with
your favorite dueling
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 12:58 PM, rfjones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I upgraded to fedora 9, and now the vsftpd server no longer works
when I do a put, it goes to passive mode and just sits there
any help greatly appreciated
TIA
rfjones
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To
On Sun, 2008-07-20 at 18:07 +, g wrote:
Craig White wrote:
snip
AuthInfoRequired negotiate
got into /etc/cups/printers.conf in the printer definition and removing
the line completely solved it.
I have no idea how it got there
because you use a computer and it forgot 1st law?
max bianco wrote:
snip
Is the asterisk in the subject line supposed to confuse me? Its quite
now we have 5 'gnu/linux' threads.
will we see 6???
--
tc,hago.
g
.
in a free world without fences, who needs gates.
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe:
Craig White wrote:
On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 21:59 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Seriously, you freaking people are never gonna agree, and that's fine.
We are not here to watch zealots clog up our inboxes with this
garbage.
Take it off list, or meet in the alley out back and handle it with
your
Craig White wrote:
snip
#1 - the participants of this discussion are the best/brightest that
snip
Craig
well said, craig.
as long as i am in 3, why not 4. lol
--
tc,hago.
g
.
in a free world without fences, who needs gates.
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To
Ed Greshko wrote:
snip
Sure, why not? They all make about the same level of sense.
true. but, more sense than the *one* who got these 3 going.
--
tc,hago.
g
.
in a free world without fences, who needs gates.
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe:
On Tue, 2008-07-22 at 12:16 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
#1 - the participants of this discussion are the best/brightest that
Linux has to offer...Seriously. When these people are talking, I'm
paying attention even though I'm not significantly emotionally invested
in the subject.
Too bad
Craig White wrote:
On Tue, 2008-07-22 at 12:16 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
#1 - the participants of this discussion are the best/brightest that
Linux has to offer...Seriously. When these people are talking, I'm
paying attention even though I'm not significantly emotionally invested
in the
At the end of Xine installation got messages below;
Transaction Check Error:
file /usr/share/locale/cs/LC_MESSAGES/libxine1.mo from install of
xine-lib-1.1.12-2.fc8 conflicts with file from package xine-lib-1.1.8-4.fc8
file /usr/share/locale/de/LC_MESSAGES/libxine1.mo from install of
On Tue, 2008-07-22 at 11:19 +0930, Tim wrote:
Tim:
That's still alternating between mouse and keyboard. That's bad
ergonomics.
Menus should be a quick thing to do, that's *NOT. That's convoluted
and delaying.
Patrick O'Callaghan:
You can still use the menu as a menu. All I'm
On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 21:50 -0700, Barry wrote:
At the end of Xine installation got messages below;
Transaction Check Error:
file /usr/share/locale/cs/LC_MESSAGES/libxine1.mo from install of
xine-lib-1.1.12-2.fc8 conflicts with file from package xine-lib-1.1.8-4.fc8
file
On Tue, 2008-07-22 at 01:09 +, g wrote:
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
snip
Try info bash to read up on the bash Shell,
i bees up on bash. i used it in cromix and later in unix.
i just was not aware that yum started out with current directory.
Yet again: this has nothing to do with yum!
On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 05:59 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008, Tim wrote:
On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 14:20 +0530, aakash sharma wrote:
See, one of the problems with open source is
.
THERE'S NO SUPPORT:
Wrong, wrong, wrong!
there is, of course, the irony
Thomas Cameron wrote:
On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 21:50 -0700, Barry wrote:
At the end of Xine installation got messages below;
Transaction Check Error:
file /usr/share/locale/cs/LC_MESSAGES/libxine1.mo from install of
xine-lib-1.1.12-2.fc8 conflicts with file from package xine-lib-1.1.8-4.fc8
Craig White wrote:
snip
sometimes, I haven't a clue to references that you make - i.e. - 1st
law?
execute as instructed.
which is where i have found assembler to be better at than using an
'interpreter/compiler'.
if you can understand 'machine code', using assembler makes for a closer
On Jul 21, 2008, Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The GPL meets both the FS and the OSS definition.
News to me.
http://www.opensource.org/node/193
GPLv3 has clauses which are specifically aimed at certain uses
I guess it's pointless for me to ask you to substantiate this, since
you're
On Tue, 2008-07-22 at 00:28 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
I'm surprised that someone who's been using Shells as far back as
Cromix doesn't realize this, as it's absolutely fundamental to
understanding how the Shell works.
I'm surprised that an experienced user would make that mistake, too.
On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 21:09 -0700, Tod Merley wrote:
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 12:58 PM, rfjones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I upgraded to fedora 9, and now the vsftpd server no longer works
when I do a put, it goes to passive mode and just sits there
any help greatly appreciated
TIA
On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 21:59 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Seriously, you freaking people are never gonna agree, and that's fine.
We are not here to watch zealots clog up our inboxes with this
garbage.
Take it off list, or meet in the alley out back and handle it with
your favorite dueling
On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 21:47 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
the GPL is the one that most often does not permit freedom compared to
any other set of combinations
Just because it doesn't permit the freedom that *you* want to exploit...
All licenses will limit something that someone wants to do. This
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
does. No offence, but I'm surprised that someone who's been using Shells
as far back as Cromix doesn't realize this, as it's absolutely
fundamental to understanding how the Shell works.
no offense taken. simply a matter of thinking about yum, not shell and
passing of
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 16:41:28 PM -0400, Todd Denniston wrote:
M. Fioretti wrote, On 07/21/2008 03:06 PM:
I'm having problem to find applicable documentation which explains
how to connect to, and manage, an Sqlite 3 database with OpenOffice
2.3 on Fedora 8... there are several resources
On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 04:47 +0200, Björn Persson wrote:
I kept asking in the hope that at least some people would start thinking
about
whether their opponents even understood what meaning they put in the words. I
expected that some of the anti-GNU/Linux folks would say that Linux is the
* Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20080722 04:25]:
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 23:06:35 -0300
Alexandre Oliva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For the 3rd time today, 4th in the thread, please see the links into
the blong, at the end of the most recent posting
On Jul 21, 2008, Timothy Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
which was intended to run under Linux (or GNU/Linux, if you prefer).
Under Linux I'd say there's only firmware. On Linux I'd say there's
pretty much only GNU libc. On top of GNU libc, there are all those
applications intended to run on
On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 20:42 -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
On Jul 21, 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Alexandre Oliva
So, if someone said I'm a Linux developer, you'd immediately know
that the person:
.. wrote some code that runs on the Linux OS.
And you're not the least
Thanks, I will fix my kickstart file and try again :)
-Original Message-
From: Tim Wood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2008 5:22 PM
To: fedora-livecd-list@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Fedora-livecd-list] custom spin: %post section not being
executed
Don,
201 - 300 of 345 matches
Mail list logo
