-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi All,
I just added a request for a Wall paper for Fedora Security spin,
Just wanted to drop a line to you guys to let you know.
Thanks a lot.
- --
Regards,
Huzaifa Sidhpurwala, RHCE, CCNA (IRC: huzaifas)
Research and Development Lead,
Global Help
As I can't take photos of myself, here is an excellent photo taken by
Francesco Crippa with Martin and me at FUDCon:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/fcrippa/2841971331/
And a couple of photos by me with Martin talking about our projects:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/nicubunu/2834913723/
On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 15:41 +0300, Nicu Buculei wrote:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/fcrippa/2841971331/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/nicubunu/2834913723/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/nicubunu/2835751382/
My recommendation is: if you have the opportunity to meet another
member(s) of the
Hi all
I've almost done all the requirement for Solar Theme, leftin' me only the
no-wide Wallpaper.
If someone checks other materials leftin me, please, let me know.
U can find all here.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Artwork/F10Themes/Solar
As usual let me know ur guest.
Thanks
Samuele
--
Hi,
Since our deadline to choose a theme is Sep 21 I would like to make sure
before that point the criteria for selection are clear.
Our base requirements is that the theme must have all required artwork
needed for round 3.
We have not yet had a case where more than one theme met this
Some feedback on solar thus far:
Samuele Storari wrote:
Hi all
I've almost done all the requirement for Solar Theme, leftin' me only the
no-wide Wallpaper.
If someone checks other materials leftin me, please, let me know.
U can find all here.
On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 10:30 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote:
Some feedback on solar thus far:
- Where did the icons in the firstboot splash come from? We should be
using gnome-icon-theme or Echo icons ideally. However it's not clear to
me where this icons came from; we can't be using artwork
Hi Mairin,
The aurora U see was for all created by me, in no complex mode, as u can see in
the source file so u don't have to recreate it cos as I done all by myself it's
totally open.
I used the Cloud effect
http://www.gimpguru.org/Tutorials/SimulatedFog/
but I color the cloud, and then I
Well
I think the vote will be totally open to the whole community.
Why I think that?
Cos the graphic it's made for all, think about art, think about expression, it
comes from the inside need of someone to express to other, to comunicate.
I hope we don't think to elevate us over the other
Martin Sourada wrote:
On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 10:30 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote:
Some feedback on solar thus far:
- Where did the icons in the firstboot splash come from? We should be
using gnome-icon-theme or Echo icons ideally. However it's not clear to
me where this icons came from; we can't
Máirín Duffy wrote:
We could do:
- anyone who contributed a theme idea or artwork throughout the 3 round
process
- anyone who has contributed a design to the art team (via the design
queue, echo theme, or art theme process) in the past 6 months (the
fedora 9 release period)
- anyone who is
Samuele Storari wrote:
Hi Mairin,
The aurora U see was for all created by me, in no complex mode, as u can see in
the source file so u don't have to recreate it cos as I done all by myself it's
totally open.
I used the Cloud effect
http://www.gimpguru.org/Tutorials/SimulatedFog/
but I color
+1
2008/9/10 Samuele Storari [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well
I think the vote will be totally open to the whole community.
Why I think that?
Cos the graphic it's made for all, think about art, think about expression,
it comes from the inside need of someone to express to other, to comunicate.
I
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 5:30 PM, Máirín Duffy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- the background of the login window is too busy/distracting. Probably just
a nice dark gradient would look nice although I don't even know if this kind
of theming is possible with the new gdm.
Technically, it's possible to
Hi
http://molaora.com/data/files/Temp/security_spin_001.jpg
http://molaora.com/data/files/Temp/security_spin.jpg
Mola
---
Huzaifa Sidhpurwala wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi All,
I just added
at least 30% or 20% should be a community decision... right?
2008/9/10 Nicu Buculei [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Samuele Storari wrote:
Well
I think the vote will be totally open to the whole community.
Why I think that?
Cos the graphic it's made for all, think about art, think about
expression,
Hi,
I am Amrita Mukherjee ,currently pursuing B-tech from Dr.
B.C. Roy Engineering College. I am a member of DGPLUG group and
presently doing some artwork with the help of inkscape. I would be
highly delighted to be a member of this community and contribute some
projects.
Add more
2008/9/9 María Leandro [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
at least 30% or 20% should be a community decision... right?
Here's my view, as a Board member. I consider the multiple rounds of
discussion over the themes as a prolonged community decision. The
final artwork decision is a culminating event in a
Congratulations Samuel, our theme is more better then before round.
Continuous our great work.
--
Wolnei Cândido Tomazelli Junior (Charged)
Brazil Fedora Ambassador
Designer and TI
E-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux User #477062
___
Fedora-art-list
welcome.
--
Wolnei Cândido Tomazelli Junior (Charged)
Brazil Fedora Ambassador
Designer and TI
E-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux User #477062
___
Fedora-art-list mailing list
Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 10:36:04AM -0400, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?M=E1ir=EDn_Duffy_
wrote:
What do you all think?
Flip a coin. (kidding)
I don't doubt the existence of at least two of the three remaining
themes, and so I'm glad we're talking about this *now* instead of at the
last minute ;)
I'm
Hi Samuele,
On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 17:07 +0200, Samuele Storari wrote:
For the planet as u can see it's all maded by different layer and there
aren't part of not open material.
So don't worry, my works it's made right for their purpose, totally free and
open source.
Just to be specific,
On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 13:20 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote:
María Leandro wrote:
+1
2008/9/10 Samuele Storari [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think the vote will be totally open to the whole community.
Well, I think with a little over a week to go on the final decision, we
should maybe limit to
amrita mukherjee a écrit :
Hi,
I am Amrita Mukherjee ,currently pursuing B-tech from Dr. B.C. Roy
Engineering College. I am a member of DGPLUG group and presently doing
some artwork with the help of inkscape. I would be highly delighted to
be a member of this community and contribute some
Martin Langhoff wrote:
By naming the kickstart file as ks.cfg, anaconda would _always_ take
it, regardless of kernel boot options. This is not what was expected -
it is safer to give it a different name, and then use the boot menu
item to select it.
So what you're saying is that anaconda
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 8:48 PM, Jeroen van Meeuwen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So what you're saying is that anaconda picks up the kickstart file and runs
away with it, even when it has not been told it should do so?
I am fairly sure that it does, though today I've tested ~20 different
combination
Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 8:48 PM, Jeroen van Meeuwen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So what you're saying is that anaconda picks up the kickstart file and runs
away with it, even when it has not been told it should do so?
I am fairly sure that it does, though today I've tested
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 10:55 PM, Jeroen van Meeuwen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know it wasn't doing this before, and I'm not sure it's supposed to now.
I've not seen any changes related to kickstart loading other then for the
kickstart located on an NFS share... but then again I may have
Ladies and Gentlemen, please start your engines...
I'm happy to announce that we've another Education Spin ready for
download! It's not official, though: We've got trademark approval, but
please consider this only a preview for the upcoming F10 spins.
The Fedora 10 Education Math Spin will
Author: rbhalera
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lohit-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv31721
Modified Files:
.cvsignore lohit-fonts.spec sources
Log Message:
New Upstream Version: lohit-fonts-2.3.1
Index: .cvsignore
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79878
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 9 13:50:28 +
2008 ---
-dtardon: Regarding your last patch (from Wed Sep 3 07:24:00 + 2008)
I
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461617
Caolan McNamara [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461617
--- Comment #1 from Caolan McNamara [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-09 10:29:45
EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=316192)
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455981
Tony Fu [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458951
Tony Fu [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=423191
Tony Fu [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454232
Tony Fu [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455050
Tony Fu [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445176
Tony Fu [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139
Tony Fu [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230662
Tony Fu [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459451
Tony Fu [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458938
Tony Fu [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460090
Tony Fu [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441213
Tony Fu [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428427
Tony Fu [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=402321
Tony Fu [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=402331
Tony Fu [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444559
Tony Fu [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444563
Tony Fu [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=88583
User redflagzhulihua changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16792
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
A new bugs mailing-list fedora-i18n-bugs has been setup to track Fedora i18n
related bugs in bugzilla. It will also be used for autocc'ing (initialcc) of
i18n related Fedora packages.
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-i18n-bugs
The list will be fairly high traffic but give people
Mike McGrath wrote:
Collab1 is a server focused around our collaboration tools. Right now it
has some mailing lists and a sobby server. It will probably also have our
pastebin in the future once it gets ready.
Cool, definitely sounds like I need to ping you more online about this.
Next
Hi,
This is w.r.t to ticket #714[1].
As explained by mmcgrath, Fedora has a policy to remove _any_ hosted
projects that are
not altered or updated for last six months.
Here is the list of projects, which falls into this category and they
will soon be removed.
Mike McGrath ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
[1]https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/714
So I guess the best thing from here is to send an email to each group
notifying them of what has happened and why we'd like to remove their
project. tell them how to get the code off if
On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 20:33 +0530, susmit shannigrahi wrote:
As explained by mmcgrath, Fedora has a policy to remove _any_ hosted
projects that are
not altered or updated for last six months.
Hmmm -- this seems a little problematic. It's definitely possible to
have a mature project which
On Tue, 9 Sep 2008, Jeremy Katz wrote:
On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 20:33 +0530, susmit shannigrahi wrote:
As explained by mmcgrath, Fedora has a policy to remove _any_ hosted
projects that are
not altered or updated for last six months.
Hmmm -- this seems a little problematic. It's definitely
As explained by mmcgrath, Fedora has a policy to remove _any_ hosted
projects that are
not altered or updated for last six months.
I am pleasantly suprised to see that Opyum is not in that list. :-)
The thing with Opyum is that its functionality has been very nicely
ported to PackageKit by
On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 12:02:04PM -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote:
On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 20:33 +0530, susmit shannigrahi wrote:
As explained by mmcgrath, Fedora has a policy to remove _any_ hosted
projects that are
not altered or updated for last six months.
Hmmm -- this seems a little
On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 10:20:25PM +0530, Debarshi Ray wrote:
The thing with Opyum is that its functionality has been very nicely
ported to PackageKit by one of my friends during this year's Google
Summer of Code. Fedora 8 still caries Opyum, but its useless for
Fedora 9 and onwards. I just
On Tue, 9 Sep 2008, Ian Weller wrote:
On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 10:20:25PM +0530, Debarshi Ray wrote:
The thing with Opyum is that its functionality has been very nicely
ported to PackageKit by one of my friends during this year's Google
Summer of Code. Fedora 8 still caries Opyum, but its
On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 03:35:41PM -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
This is one of the things we're hoping to prevent with fedorahosted. The
hope is that the fedorahosted brand will be known for good, active
projects. Not vaporware.
We'll certainly be contacting the project members and let them
On Tue, 9 Sep 2008, Ian Weller wrote:
On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 03:35:41PM -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
This is one of the things we're hoping to prevent with fedorahosted. The
hope is that the fedorahosted brand will be known for good, active
projects. Not vaporware.
We'll certainly be
On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 02:35:56PM -0500, Matt Domsch wrote:
On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 12:02:04PM -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote:
On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 20:33 +0530, susmit shannigrahi wrote:
As explained by mmcgrath, Fedora has a policy to remove _any_ hosted
projects that are
not altered or
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 4:35 PM, Mike McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In general from the infrastructure side I'd say we want to keep the
barrier to enter low but the quality high. Certainly there's projects
that don't need to be updated every 6 months but we can identify those and
deal
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:fedora-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robin Norwood
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 6:11 PM
To: Fedora Infrastructure
Subject: Re: Removal of old projects from fedorahosted.
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 4:35 PM, Mike McGrath [EMAIL
On Tue, 9 Sep 2008, Robin Norwood wrote:
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 4:35 PM, Mike McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In general from the infrastructure side I'd say we want to keep the
barrier to enter low but the quality high. Certainly there's projects
that don't need to be updated every 6
On Tue, 9 Sep 2008, Brett Lentz wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:fedora-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robin Norwood
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 6:11 PM
To: Fedora Infrastructure
Subject: Re: Removal of old projects from fedorahosted.
On
On Tue, 9 Sep 2008, Brett Lentz wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:fedora-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robin Norwood
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 6:11 PM
To: Fedora Infrastructure
Subject: Re: Removal of old projects from fedorahosted.
On
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 9:34 PM, Mike McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nope, the terms of use are already pretty clear. And no one has provided
a compelling reason to keep these projects around, just lots of
suggestions on how to keep them around. Deleted is what we want, not
delisted or
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:fedora-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike McGrath
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 6:37 PM
To: Fedora Infrastructure
Subject: RE: Removal of old projects from fedorahosted.
On Tue, 9 Sep 2008, Brett Lentz wrote:
On Tue, 9 Sep 2008, Robin Norwood wrote:
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 9:34 PM, Mike McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nope, the terms of use are already pretty clear. And no one has provided
a compelling reason to keep these projects around, just lots of
suggestions on how to keep them around.
On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 20:34 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Tue, 9 Sep 2008, Robin Norwood wrote:
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 4:35 PM, Mike McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In general from the infrastructure side I'd say we want to keep the
barrier to enter low but the quality high. Certainly
On Tue, 9 Sep 2008, Jeremy Katz wrote:
On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 20:34 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Tue, 9 Sep 2008, Robin Norwood wrote:
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 4:35 PM, Mike McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In general from the infrastructure side I'd say we want to keep the
barrier to
On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 22:11 -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote:
On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 20:34 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Tue, 9 Sep 2008, Robin Norwood wrote:
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 4:35 PM, Mike McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In general from the infrastructure side I'd say we want to keep the
On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 21:02 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Tue, 9 Sep 2008, Robin Norwood wrote:
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 9:34 PM, Mike McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nope, the terms of use are already pretty clear. And no one has provided
a compelling reason to keep these projects
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 21:02 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Tue, 9 Sep 2008, Robin Norwood wrote:
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 9:34 PM, Mike McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nope, the terms of use are already pretty clear. And no one has
On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 21:20 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
I don't see why that project would get removed. I really think I'm
getting misunderstood here.
I think that part of the misunderstanding is that I don't see six
months as equivalent to stale. We're not even to the seven year
point of RHEL
On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 21:33 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 21:02 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Tue, 9 Sep 2008, Robin Norwood wrote:
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 9:34 PM, Mike McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nope, the terms
On Tue, 9 Sep 2008, Jeremy Katz wrote:
On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 21:20 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
I don't see why that project would get removed. I really think I'm
getting misunderstood here.
I think that part of the misunderstanding is that I don't see six
months as equivalent to stale.
On Tue, 9 Sep 2008, Jeremy Katz wrote:
Backups, time to maintain, bandwidth for the backups, testing when we make
changes, people to notify should our Infrastructure get compromised again,
etc, the unknown.
Backups really are equivalent to disk space. Testing for changes --
maybe. But
On Tue, 9 Sep 2008, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Tue, 9 Sep 2008, Jeremy Katz wrote:
Backups, time to maintain, bandwidth for the backups, testing when we make
changes, people to notify should our Infrastructure get compromised again,
etc, the unknown.
Backups really are equivalent to
On Tue, 9 Sep 2008, Jeremy Katz wrote:
On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 21:33 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 21:02 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Tue, 9 Sep 2008, Robin Norwood wrote:
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 9:34 PM, Mike McGrath
On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 15:36 -0700, Conrad Meyer wrote:
Is this license ok for a package in Fedora (i.e. metasploit)? The full text
can be found here[0].
[0]: http://metasploit.com/svn/framework3/trunk/documentation/LICENSE
PS: I'm not subscribed to fedora-legal so please CC replies to me.
--- On Mon, 8/9/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: fedora-list Digest, Vol 55, Issue 69
To: fedora-list@redhat.com
Date: Monday, 8 September, 2008, 8:51 PM
Send fedora-list mailing list submissions to
fedora-list@redhat.com
Thought I would forward this so anyone not on the announce lists know
what is going on.
Mike Chambers
Madisonville, KY
The best lil town on Earth!
Forwarded Message
From: Jesse Keating [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-to: fedora-list@redhat.com
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL
On 08Sep2008 21:04, Kevin J. Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alan Evans wrote:
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 6:40 AM, Steven Tardy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
kwhiskerz wrote:
man hostid
On my Fedora 9...
$ hostid
Now I haven't bothered to check any other machines, but my initial
Cameron Simpson wrote:
On 08Sep2008 21:04, Kevin J. Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alan Evans wrote:
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 6:40 AM, Steven Tardy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
kwhiskerz wrote:
man hostid
On my Fedora 9...
$ hostid
Now I haven't bothered to check any other machines,
Reply below V V
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 2:51 PM, Johnathan Hegge
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Forwarded Message
From: Bjørn Tore Sund [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using
Fedora. fedora-list@redhat.com
To:
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 1:09 AM, Mikkel L. Ellertson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem has partially returned. In my case, I have
# ls /dev/cdrom*
/dev/cdrom1
#
And I do the following:
# cd /dev
# ln -s ./cdrom1 cdrom
that solves the problem until a new reboot. After a new reboot, I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cameron Simpson wrote:
On 08Sep2008 21:04, Kevin J. Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Alan Evans wrote:
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 6:40 AM, Steven Tardy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
kwhiskerz wrote:
man hostid
On my Fedora 9...
$ hostid
Now I haven't bothered
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 10:12 AM, Bing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am new to this and seeking advice.
I downloaded the 6 CD images ok and run the checksum and they all were ok.
I burned the images to CD and only CD 1 and 6 show no errors on the media
check.
I re-burnt CD 2 to see if
Ed Greshko wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cameron Simpson wrote:
On 08Sep2008 21:04, Kevin J. Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Alan Evans wrote:
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 6:40 AM, Steven Tardy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
kwhiskerz wrote:
man hostid
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 5:20 PM, Björn Persson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On a typical setup ntpdate runs first (and exits) and syncs the clock close
but not exactly on. If this is not done and the time is off by more than
a certain amount then ntpd *WON'T* be able to sync things, and will exit
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 1:55 PM, Tim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At booting, ntpdate fails to start, and also the following command
fails:
# /sbin/service ntpdate start
ntpdate: Synchronizing with time server: [FAILED]
The log messages are:
Sep 7 12:50:50 localhost
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 4:05 PM, Roger Heflin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At booting, ntpdate fails to start, and also the following command
fails:
# /sbin/service ntpdate start
ntpdate: Synchronizing with time server: [FAILED]
#
The log messages are:
Sep 7 12:50:50
On Tuesday 09 September 2008 10:04:46 Paul Smith wrote:
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 1:55 PM, Tim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At booting, ntpdate fails to start, and also the following command
fails:
# /sbin/service ntpdate start
ntpdate: Synchronizing with time server:
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Tony Molloy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At booting, ntpdate fails to start, and also the following command
fails:
# /sbin/service ntpdate start
ntpdate: Synchronizing with time server: [FAILED]
The log messages are:
Sep 7 12:50:50
On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 02:05 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote:
Thought I would forward this so anyone not on the announce lists know
what is going on.
Mike Chambers
Madisonville, KY
The best lil town on Earth!
You can join here:
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-announce-list
1 - 100 of 225 matches
Mail list logo
