Ray Strode wrote:
So we have this bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477191
Where the user noticed that larger cursors aren't animated. That's
always been true because we never finished the cursors at at the larger
sizes.
I was wondering if anyone would be willing to tackle
ANKUR ANAND wrote:
these are the wallpapers i made and forgot to attach in the previous
mail. aplogies for the same. anyways i would like to have your comments
and feedback on d wallpapers !
I believe you used the Flame filter from GIMP, right? Here are some
things I believe you can improve:
ANKUR ANAND wrote:
greetings to the members of fedora art mailing list..
Hi,
I am ankur anand and is currently new to the world of FOSS!!
recently i designed sum wallpapers and would like to share one of them
for your feedbacks and suggestions!!!
Due to its large attachment this message
note: I don't see on art.gnome.org of gnome-look.org categories for
cursor themes to propose something else as a base.
It's under X11 mouse themes [1] on gnome-look.org.
Martin
References:
[1]
http://www.gnome-look.org/index.php?xcontentmode=36PHPSESSID=fc360c0c1a3ada490a992c917403cd2d
Martin Sourada wrote:
note: I don't see on art.gnome.org of gnome-look.org categories for
cursor themes to propose something else as a base.
It's under X11 mouse themes [1] on gnome-look.org.
Thanks Martin, I must be blind or something :p
I see there some nice looking cursors, with a lot
Hi all,
I was perusing the Media Art page today looking for label and sleeve
art for the x86_64 architecture. NA is ordering LiveCDs and Install
DVDs for these arches in addition to the x86 media. My concern is
that there is not any artwork for the x86_64 architecture on the wiki
as of yet.
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 4:02 AM, Nicu Buculei nicu_fed...@nicubunu.rowrote:
ANKUR ANAND wrote:
greetings to the members of fedora art mailing list..
Hi,
I am ankur anand and is currently new to the world of FOSS!!
recently i designed sum wallpapers and would like to share one of them
2008/12/18 Mola pahnadayan mola...@gmail.com:
Hi all ,
thanks to all ;)
used blender 2.48.
On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 10:48 -0300, Erick Henrique wrote:
Hi Mola
You used which version of the Blender in these works?
Blender 2.48?
Thanks
\__/
(oo)
_|||_
erick
2008/12/17 Mola pahnadayan
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 11:53 PM, Mark mark...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey,
I was just looking through the art list for once in a while again and
i would like to suggest some ideas i have for fedora 11. Just to see
if they are possible to get in or if they don't even make a chance.
My idea for the
Hi Mark,
Mark wrote:
So what do you think about this?
Is it worth starting to make mockups?
We are going to wait until the F11 codename is decided on (in a couple
of weeks or so) until we decide what to do about the theme. A few of us
discussed this earlier and felt that if we all worked on
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 12:04 AM, Máirín Duffy du...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Hi Mark,
Mark wrote:
So what do you think about this?
Is it worth starting to make mockups?
We are going to wait until the F11 codename is decided on (in a couple of
weeks or so) until we decide what to do
Mark wrote:
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 12:04 AM, Máirín Duffy du...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Hi Mark,
Mark wrote:
So what do you think about this?
Is it worth starting to make mockups?
We are going to wait until the F11 codename is decided on (in a couple of
weeks or so) until we decide what
2008/12/20 susmit shannigrahi thinklinux@gmail.com:
Can anyone please send me a high resolution version of the three
screenshots embedded in the frontpage of the attched picture, namely a
plymouth screenshot, a login screen picture , a desktop screenshot.
Never mind the stretched
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 04:35:37PM -0800, Máirín Duffy wrote:
Mark wrote:
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 12:04 AM, Máirín Duffy du...@fedoraproject.org
wrote:
Hi Mark,
Mark wrote:
So what do you think about this?
Is it worth starting to make mockups?
We are going to wait until the F11
On Mon, 2008-12-22 at 22:29 -0600, Joe Nall wrote:
Can pungi put packages/groups in the iso that are not installed?
Context: I'm building spin using pungi that includes packages that get
installed in a second pass in a manner similar to firstboot. The
packages require a number of
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477407
--- Comment #4 from Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org 2008-12-22 02:58:37
EDT ---
There's already the mathml-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477406
--- Comment #4 from Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org 2008-12-22 02:59:27
EDT ---
+1, understood and agreed.
I wasn't
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477371
--- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2008-12-22
03:19:26 EDT ---
you never know when a font is
Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132
Bug 70132 depends on bug 458160, which changed state.
Bug 458160 Summary: [PATCH] Can't use .otf fonts via @font-face on Windows
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: RFE: warn on fonts installed outside %_fontbasedir
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477606
Summary: RFE: warn on fonts installed outside
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: mkfontscale produces syscalls with EINVAL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477607
Summary: mkfontscale produces syscalls with EINVAL
Author: nim
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv2993/devel
Modified Files:
.cvsignore fontpackages.spec import.log sources
Log Message:
1.13
Index: .cvsignore
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477055
--- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2008-12-22
07:31:42 EDT ---
fontpackages-1.13 has been
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477407
Ben Laenen bl.b...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476951
Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477551
Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477606
--- Comment #1 from Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi 2008-12-22 09:06:17 EDT
---
Both the policy and the implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477551
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2008-12-22
09:10:19 EDT ---
Well, the problem with
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477606
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2008-12-22
09:23:29 EDT ---
Even though the macro
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477473
Tomas Smetana tsmet...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477551
--- Comment #3 from Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi 2008-12-22 09:43:25 EDT
---
Maybe ask fontconfig developers if they'd
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477606
Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462038
--- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2008-12-22 11:03:52 EDT ---
In reply to comment #11.
It worked with
Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132
Bug 70132 depends on bug 458160, which changed state.
Bug 458160 Summary: [PATCH] Can't use .otf fonts via @font-face on Windows
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044
Bug 477044 depends on bug 477385, which changed state.
Bug 477385 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477385
Matthias Saou matth...@rpmforge.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477481
--- Comment #2 from Mathieu Bridon boche...@no-log.org 2008-12-22 17:32:24
EDT ---
Hi
First of all, I'd like to thank you
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477414
--- Comment #2 from Jameson imntr...@gmail.com 2008-12-22 17:39:56 EDT ---
These are symlinks.
--
Configure bugmail:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044
Bug 477044 depends on bug 477414, which changed state.
Bug 477414 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477414
Jameson imntr...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477486
Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477486
Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477481
Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462041
Bug 462041 depends on bug 462038, which changed state.
Bug 462038 Summary: Hotkeys has no response and Go To window couldn't
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462038
Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Hi,
Since there has been no more remarks on the clarified font package
naming rules discussed as part of
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_SIG_Fedora_11_packaging_changes_(2008-11-08)
I've queued the following for approval FPC-side:
[Drat. I *knew* I had forgotten to spam one list]
Hi all,
Since the discussion on font package splitting rules seems to be
exhausted, and since no one stepped up with an obviously better proposal
than mine, I've queued the following FPC-side:
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 05:13:35PM +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Dear all,
As some of you may know, after more than a month of consultation,
feedback and tweaking new font packaging guidelines have been approved
by FESCO.
Le lundi 22 décembre 2008 à 14:56 +0200, Sarantis Paskalis a écrit :
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 05:13:35PM +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Hi Sarantis,
As some of you may know, after more than a month of consultation,
feedback and tweaking new font packaging guidelines have been approved
by
Le lundi 22 décembre 2008 à 15:08 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot a écrit :
Le lundi 22 décembre 2008 à 14:56 +0200, Sarantis Paskalis a écrit :
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 05:13:35PM +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Hi Sarantis,
6. However, for fonts that are bundled in a software package with no
other
Le lundi 22 décembre 2008 à 15:53 -0900, Jeff Spaleta a écrit :
One thing, can you look over the fonts included in matplotlib and see
if there are any fonts which are not-duplicates of existing packaged
fonts?
Sure, just post the font names or filenames here or in the bug
(otherwise google
Jesse,
I'd like to help out here. I've been trying to get familiar with the
Infrastructure for a while now. Is there a ticket open for this that has more
details? I have yet to even shell into a box, so I'll be pinging you and
others for assistance if that's ok.
This will truly be a
On Mon, 2008-12-22 at 11:00 -0600, scott_coll...@dell.com wrote:
I'd like to help out here. I've been trying to get familiar with the
Infrastructure for a while now. Is there a ticket open for this that
has more details? I have yet to even shell into a box, so I'll be
pinging you and
I can't find the awesfx package for Fedora 10, and nothing in the Fedora or
RPMFusion repositories provides the file */asfxload or */sfxload
These executables are REQUIRED for loading samples into an EMU10k soundcard's
wavetable synth, and hence are required for hardware MIDI support.
Where
You'll need to run them as a command on a terminal, exactly as was entered
before.
--
This is an email sent via The Fedora Community Portal https://fcp.surfsite.org
https://fcp.surfsite.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?post_id=314267topic_id=65777forum=10#forumpost314267
If you think, this is
On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 09:56:19 +0100, Paul wrote:
I can't find the awesfx package for Fedora 10, and nothing in the Fedora or
RPMFusion repositories provides the file */asfxload or */sfxload
These executables are REQUIRED for loading samples into an EMU10k soundcard's
wavetable synth, and
Hi;
I am not getting any sound with my flash plugin.
When I follow the advice from:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Multimedia/Flash
I get the following message from yum:
Package flash-plugin-10.0.15.3-release.i386 installed and not available
Now what?
--
Regards Bill
Fedora 10, Gnome 2.24.2
Hi,
is there a way to have the fedora 10 KDE login window on the standard fedora
10 (with KDE) ?
i find the KDE login nicer than the standard GNOME login window.
thanks a lot.
--
Alain
---
Windows XP x64 SP2
PostgreSQL 8.3.5 / MS SQL
Alain Roger wrote:
For now i just found in Gnome the terminal features nice...lkike
transparent background... but the menu by itself is horrible as usual :-(
Konsole can also do transparent background (it's set up in your Konsole
color scheme), but only if you have desktop effects enabled in
Mail Lists wrote:
(1) Are the fedora KDE users moving back to gnome ? ... is KDE dead
or alive ?
Nope, I'm still using and comaintaining KDE, I don't see how KDE 4.1 is any
worse than 3.5. Well, there's a couple of missing features, but most of
those are coming back in 4.2. I don't think
On Mon, 2008-12-22 at 11:20 +0100, Alain Roger wrote:
Hi,
is there a way to have the fedora 10 KDE login window on the standard
fedora 10 (with KDE) ?
i find the KDE login nicer than the standard GNOME login window.
thanks a lot.
--
Alain
On Monday 22 December 2008 00:03:48 Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Except that he is trying to install yum. ;)
Duh! shouldn't work when I'm tired. Sorry!
Anne
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe:
On Sunday 21 December 2008 22:49:03 Marcelo Magno T. Sales wrote:
There's a bar at the bottom of the screen in gdm's login screen. In the
middle there's a combo box to select the session type (after typing the
user name, before entering the password). At least, that's how I
remember it, I've
On Mon, 22 Dec 2008, William Case wrote:
I am not getting any sound with my flash plugin.
When I follow the advice from:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Multimedia/Flash
I get the following message from yum:
Package flash-plugin-10.0.15.3-release.i386 installed and not available
It means you
Kevin Kofler wrote:
Nope, I'm still using and comaintaining KDE, I don't see how KDE 4.1 is
any
worse than 3.5. Well, there's a couple of missing features, but most of
those are coming back in 4.2. I don't think switching to GNOME makes any
sense, really, but of course you're free to
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 7:19 PM, M A Young m.a.yo...@durham.ac.uk wrote:
On Mon, 22 Dec 2008, William Case wrote:
I am not getting any sound with my flash plugin.
When I follow the advice from:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Multimedia/Flash
I get the following message from yum:
Package
Anne Wilson wrote:
On Sunday 21 December 2008 22:00:16 DB wrote:
Anne Wilson wrote:
On Sunday 21 December 2008 21:21:01 DB wrote:
Anne Wilson wrote:
On Sunday 21 December 2008 20:21:10 DB wrote:
error: Failed dependencies:
pygpgme is needed by
Message: 9 Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 17:03:48 -0700 From: Kevin Fenzi
ke...@scrye.com Subject: Re: PackageKit has eaten my system (again!)
To: fedora-list@redhat.com Message-ID:
20081221170348.42475...@ohm.scrye.com Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=us-ascii On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 22:13:46 +
On Monday 22 December 2008 06:02:54 Anne Wilson wrote:
No, there was a bar at the bottom, but as I described earlier, it gave only
language, keyboard layout, accessibility options and one that shows bootup
messages. I did look very carefully.
Yes, but did you look before, or after you plugged
attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20081222/9287985d/attachment.html
--
Message: 14
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 11:18:18 +0100
From: Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at
Subject: Re: is KDE dead - did Gnome win?
To: fedora-list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ran a yum update today that picked up these pages
selinux-policy noarch 3.5.13-34.fc10updates 613 k
selinux-policy-targeted noarch 3.5.13-34.fc10 updates 2.0 M
and saw this:
Updating : selinux-policy-targeted
28/104
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/22/2008 07:06 AM, Jyotishmaan Ray wrote:
Dear All FEDORA Users,
I am a new bir in fedora linux system as administrator.
Please tell me one thing.
In my fedora linux os server, i am not able to sshd service .
The thing is that, once
On Sun, 2008-12-21 at 19:06 -0600, Marc Schwartz wrote:
http://home.comcast.net/~marc_schwartz/FF2.png
You can see that the page looks just fine.
Here is the same page using FF 3.1 Beta 2, which I also DL'd from
Mozilla, just to be sure that the same behavior is still present. BTW,
this
Please read: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
snip
Permissions 0755 for '/etc/ssh/ssh_host_dsa_key' are too open.
It is recommended that your private key files are NOT accessible by others.
This private key will be ignored.
bad permissions :ignore key:
On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 13:53:04 +0100, DB wrote:
I tried installing them t'other way around:
[r...@localhost ~]# rpm -ivh
http://mirrors.tummy.com/pub/fedora.redhat.com/fedora/linux/releases/9/Everything/i386/os//Packages/pygpgme-0.1-8.fc9.i386.rpm
I've seen Dec 25, Dec 26 and Jan 9.
Where is the officoal date kept?
Steve.
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Steve wrote:
I've seen Dec 25, Dec 26 and Jan 9.
Where is the officoal date kept?
It was announced in fedora-announce list
http://lwn.net/Articles/308913/
You should be subscribed there.
Rahul
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe:
On Monday 22 December 2008, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 09:56:19 +0100, Paul wrote:
I can't find the awesfx package for Fedora 10, and nothing in the Fedora
or RPMFusion repositories provides the file */asfxload or */sfxload
These executables are REQUIRED for loading samples
Hi,
is there someone who tried Radeon HD 2600XT on Fedora 10 ?
i did not find the drivers. :-(
thx.
--
Alain
---
Windows XP x64 SP2
PostgreSQL 8.3.5 / MS SQL server 2005
Apache 2.2.10
PHP 5.2.6
C# 2005-2008
--
fedora-list mailing list
Hi,
Is there someone who experienced issue running Fedora 10 on VMWare 6.5 ?
for example when i switch on the effects for desktop, everything becomes
black or white... and i can reinstall the whole F10 :-(
thx for suggestions.
--
Alain
Hi all,
I found a little bug on acpi script that should check for the presence
of kpowersave or gnome-power-manager, before to issue the shutdown
command.
The script, located on /etc/acpi/action on fedora 9 use the awk command.
This is the peace of script that I think bugged
-- start code --
#
Rahul Sundaram sunda...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Steve wrote:
I've seen Dec 25, Dec 26 and Jan 9.
Where is the officoal date kept?
It was announced in fedora-announce list
http://lwn.net/Articles/308913/
You should be subscribed there.
Might I suggest this info be added to
Section Screen
Identifier Screen0
Device Videocard0
DefaultDepth 24
SubSection Display
Viewport 0 0
Depth 24
Modes 1280x720
Steve wrote:
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Steve wrote:
I've seen Dec 25, Dec 26 and Jan 9.
Where is the officoal date kept?
It was announced in fedora-announce list
http://lwn.net/Articles/308913/
You should be subscribed there.
Might I suggest this info be added to the wiki?
The Fedora
On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 08:44:28 -0500, Gene wrote:
Does anyone know where I can find an x86_64 awesfx package for Fedora 10?
It's marked dead.package. See:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/405131
That is bs Michael. There are a kajillion of those cards in the field. I
have
an Audigy2 value
Rahul Sundaram sunda...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Steve wrote:
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Steve wrote:
I've seen Dec 25, Dec 26 and Jan 9.
Where is the officoal date kept?
It was announced in fedora-announce list
http://lwn.net/Articles/308913/
You should be subscribed
On Mon, 2008-12-22 at 14:58 +0100, Alain Roger wrote:
Hi,
Is there someone who experienced issue running Fedora 10 on VMWare
6.5 ?
for example when i switch on the effects for desktop, everything
becomes black or white... and i can reinstall the whole F10 :-(
Unfortunately, the VMware
Hi,
I've got similar problem. Last week I tried to upgrade my FC8 to FC10 using
PreUpgrade, everything went fine, but after reboot I could not login into
Gnome. After clicking on my username and typing my password I was not logged in
but returned to the login screen, instead. The solution was
Steve wrote:
Is the wiki search a little wonky?
Yeah, the wiki search is known to be less than useful. Google likely
can provide better answers. EOL site:fedoraproject.org/wiki, for
example, yields the right page as the first result.
--
ToddOpenPGP - KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL:
Mike Cloaked wrote:
I have not tried the KDE 4.2 test version (in EPEL?)
No, in kde-redhat.
EPEL is Fedora packages which are not included in RHEL rebuilt for
RHEL/CentOS/Scientific Linux, it has nothing to do with this.
4.1.85 (4.2 Beta 2) is now in kde-redhat's testing repository. But please
On Monday 22 December 2008, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 08:44:28 -0500, Gene wrote:
Does anyone know where I can find an x86_64 awesfx package for Fedora
10?
It's marked dead.package. See:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/405131
That is bs Michael. There are a kajillion of
I have just purchased an ASUS P5Q motherboard and INTEL E8400 Core 2 DUO
processor and 4Gb of RAM.
Also a Seagate 500 Gb SATA drive.
I have ordered F10 64 from an online seller.
If anyone has knowledge of this combo I would deeply appreciate info.
Thanks and Happy Holidays.
Bob Karge
--
On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 9:54:37 -0500
Steve zep...@cfl.rr.com wrote:
Rahul Sundaram sunda...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Steve wrote:
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Steve wrote:
I've seen Dec 25, Dec 26 and Jan 9.
Where is the officoal date kept?
It was announced in
Armin Moradi wrote:
That argument is really old. Nowadays with the great work of the KDE
SIG, Fedora is
as much KDE centred as it is focused on GNOME. You see little to no
difference between
them these days!
Call me when system-config-* is written in Qt.
--
John Austin wrote:
I have this in mine
Pretty sure that its not all necessary !!
tarifa ~ 1001# cat /etc/sysconfig/desktop
DISPLAYMANAGER=KDE
This sets the display manager to KDM.
DESKTOP=XFCE
This sets the systemwide default desktop to XFCE. (It can be overridden per
user.) The original
Ian Pilcher wrote:
Armin Moradi wrote:
That argument is really old. Nowadays with the great work of the KDE
SIG, Fedora is
as much KDE centred as it is focused on GNOME. You see little to no
difference between
them these days!
Call me when system-config-* is written in Qt.
Imo, there
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 10:27:36AM -0500, Todd Zullinger wrote:
Steve wrote:
Is the wiki search a little wonky?
Yeah, the wiki search is known to be less than useful. Google likely
can provide better answers. EOL site:fedoraproject.org/wiki, for
example, yields the right page as the
-Original Message-
From: fedora-list-boun...@redhat.com [mailto:fedora-list-boun...@redhat.com] On
Behalf Of Beartooth
Sent: Saturday, December 20, 2008 3:42 PM
To: fedora-list@redhat.com
Subject: Re: Deactivating password request after screen lock
First off, any damn webgibberish
On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 13:53:04 +0100
DB freddog...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
Message: 9 Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 17:03:48 -0700 From: Kevin Fenzi
ke...@scrye.com Subject: Re: PackageKit has eaten my system
(again!) To: fedora-list@redhat.com Message-ID:
20081221170348.42475...@ohm.scrye.com
On Mon, 2008-12-22 at 05:06 -0800, Jyotishmaan Ray wrote:
Dear All FEDORA Users,
I am a new bir in fedora linux system as administrator.
Please tell me one thing.
In my fedora linux os server, i am not able to sshd service .
The thing is that, once I had to change the permissions of
1 - 100 of 199 matches
Mail list logo
