Fedora Weekly News Issue 160
Welcome to Fedora Weekly News Issue 160 for the week ending January
25th, 2009.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FWN/Issue160
Announcements notes upcoming events and deadlines for Fedora 11.
PlanetFedora picks up on some communication problems in General and
shares How
Darren VanBuren ha scritto:
On 1/24/2009 9:59 AM, Paolo Leoni wrote:
Darren VanBuren ha scritto:
On 1/24/2009 9:20 AM, Paolo Leoni wrote:
Hi there,
here you can find a simple Fedora 11 alpha release banner for the
home
page:
María Leandro wrote:
Updated.
http://tatica.fedorapeople.org/EduSig/thumb_wallpaper3a.png
http://tatica.fedorapeople.org/EduSig/thumb_wallpaper3b.png
http://tatica.fedorapeople.org/EduSig/thumb_wallpaper3c.png
I think there is still some room for improvement, hope you don't mind (I
got a few
i wanted to help you in designing please contact me..
___
Fedora-art-list mailing list
Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
Nicu Buculei wrote:
María Leandro wrote:
Updated.
http://tatica.fedorapeople.org/EduSig/thumb_wallpaper3a.png
http://tatica.fedorapeople.org/EduSig/thumb_wallpaper3b.png
http://tatica.fedorapeople.org/EduSig/thumb_wallpaper3c.png
I think there is still some room for improvement, hope you
So far I have not heard from anyone from the Art team. I need a
representative to add to the call-in email ASAP.
John
John Poelstra wrote:
With the Alpha Release for Fedora 11 scheduled for Tuesday, February 3,
2009, this means it is time to meet again with representatives from each
of the
Hi John.
John Poelstra wrote:
So far I have not heard from anyone from the Art team. I need a
representative to add to the call-in email ASAP.
Whoops, I'll be happy to represent the design team at the
next release readiness meeting.
~m
___
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481478
Sarantis Paskalis paska...@di.uoa.gr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481476
Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481494
--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-26
07:36:05 EDT ---
(please do not forget your cvs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481494
--- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-26
08:47:18 EDT ---
(and the usual CCs please, see
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481494
--- Comment #7 from Michal Nowak mno...@redhat.com 2009-01-26 09:01:32 EDT
---
Package Change Request
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481472
Sarantis Paskalis paska...@di.uoa.gr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481472
Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481532
Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477416
--- Comment #24 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2009-01-26 12:28:53 EDT ---
Examining the fonts reveals that there are 33
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477416
--- Comment #25 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com 2009-01-26
12:38:54 EDT ---
If you'd ask me, it would be
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477408
--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2009-01-26 12:41:52 EDT ---
Looks OK to me. Once it's built, I'll finish
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477416
--- Comment #26 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-26
13:09:25 EDT ---
You can clearly put the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477416
Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481472
Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481478
Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481501
Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481501
Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477408
Michal Nowak mno...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481501
Sven Lankes s...@lank.es changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481494
Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476427
--- Comment #7 from Padmanabhan V. K. bugzillas+padremovethi...@gmail.com
2009-01-26 17:18:02 EDT ---
Created an
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481484
Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429901
Padmanabhan V. K. bugzillas+padremovethi...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481501
Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481478
--- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-26
17:48:39 EDT ---
New Package CVS Request
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481409
Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477476
Michal Nowak mno...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481472
--- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-26
17:50:00 EDT ---
New Package CVS Request
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481476
--- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-26
17:50:26 EDT ---
New Package CVS Request
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481472
--- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-01-26 17:56:06 EDT ---
cvs done.
--
Configure bugmail:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481472
Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481476
Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481478
Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Author: cchance
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/baekmuk-ttf-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv17869
Modified Files:
baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec
Log Message:
* Tue Jan 27 2009 Caius Chance ccha...@redhat.com - 2.2-17.fc11
- Resolves: rhbz#477332
- Fixed obsoletion of
Author: cchance
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/baekmuk-ttf-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv18491
Modified Files:
baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec
Log Message:
corrected -common-fonts obsoletion version number
Index: baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481070
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org
2009-01-26 20:49:17 EDT ---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481070
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481070
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org
2009-01-26 20:53:18 EDT ---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478662
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org
2009-01-26 20:53:10 EDT ---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478662
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org
2009-01-26 20:51:48 EDT ---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478662
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Author: nim
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/apanov-edrip-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv25060/devel
Modified Files:
.cvsignore sources
Added Files:
apanov-edrip-fonts-fontconfig.conf
apanov-edrip-fonts-license.patch apanov-edrip-fonts.spec
Author: nim
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/sil-andika-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv25698/devel
Modified Files:
.cvsignore sources
Added Files:
import.log sil-andika-fonts-fontconfig.conf
sil-andika-fonts.spec
Log Message:
andika-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481476
Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481478
Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044
Bug 477044 depends on bug 481478, which changed state.
Bug 481478 Summary: Renaming review: andika-fonts ⇒ sil-andika-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044
Bug 477044 depends on bug 481476, which changed state.
Bug 481476 Summary: Renaming review: charis-fonts ⇒ sil-charis-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044
Bug 477044 depends on bug 481472, which changed state.
Bug 481472 Summary: Renaming review: edrip-fonts ⇒ apanov-edrip-fonts
Author: nim
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/sil-charis-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv29227/devel
Modified Files:
.cvsignore sources
Added Files:
import.log sil-charis-fonts-fontconfig.conf
sil-charis-fonts.spec
Log Message:
charis-fonts
Our wishlist stood at 56 entries for last report. It has now reached the
76 entries watermark. The current fonts packagers are clearly unable to
cope with Fedora demands, fresh blood is needed before it moves into
3-digits land.
Well then in that case, you may be happy to hear that you have a
On Jan 15, 2009, at 8:17 AM, Mike McGrath wrote:
I have a small research project if someone is interested in taking
it up.
I want to know of Debian, Ubuntu, SuSE and the other major
distributions,
How many of them include DRBD by default or via some official channel.
Also, of people on
On Mon, 26 Jan 2009, Mike McGrath wrote:
I'd like to
diff --git a/manifests/servergroups/phx.pp
b/manifests/servergroups/phx.pp
index 312b378..038caea 100644
--- a/manifests/servergroups/phx.pp
+++ b/manifests/servergroups/phx.pp
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ class phx {
}
host {
On 2009-01-26 03:53:46 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
I'd like to
diff --git a/manifests/servergroups/phx.pp
b/manifests/servergroups/phx.pp
index 312b378..038caea 100644
--- a/manifests/servergroups/phx.pp
+++ b/manifests/servergroups/phx.pp
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ class phx {
}
host {
On 2009-01-26 03:56:06 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
Actually I want that to go to an external IP so it'd be more like:
host { 'mirrors.fedoraproject.org':
ip = '66.35.62.166',
}
+1 to this, then - Mike said it's so that mirrormanager will see PHX's
IP and redirect to the internal mirror.
On Mon, 2009-01-26 at 15:56 -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jan 2009, Mike McGrath wrote:
I'd like to
diff --git a/manifests/servergroups/phx.pp
b/manifests/servergroups/phx.pp
index 312b378..038caea 100644
--- a/manifests/servergroups/phx.pp
+++
Hi Infrastructure team,
Not sure if this inquiry belongs here or on websites, but I'll start
here. Personally my experience has been that the Fedora admins act on
requests for Fedora Hosted projects requests very quickly. Some
potential contributors may want or need more instantaneous results,
Hi Kyle,
On Fri, 2009-01-23 at 18:49 +, Kyle McMartin wrote:
* Fri Jan 23 2009 Kyle McMartin k...@redhat.com
- disable intel_iommu by default (enable with intel_iommu=on)
Why so?
We're pretty much guaranteed that no-one will enable this ... do we know
of specific hardware that this is
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 10:06:41AM +0530, Kedar Sovani wrote:
I applied it, but there wasn't enough in config-arm to make it build.
Rather than just ignore it, I filled in some of the blanks that seemed
relevant.
I have no idea what your specific machtype is, but I assumed the
versatile thingy
On 2009-01-26 at 12:36:52 -0500, Bernard Johnson
bjohnson80...@gmail.com wrote:
I need a ruling on whether tivodecode can be accepted into Fedora. It's
currently submitted to rpmfusion, but Kevin Koffler thought it might be
able to be accepted into Fedora proper.
There were three things
Tom spot Callaway wrote:
On 2009-01-26 at 12:36:52 -0500, Bernard Johnson
bjohnson80...@gmail.com wrote:
I need a ruling on whether tivodecode can be accepted into Fedora. It's
currently submitted to rpmfusion, but Kevin Koffler thought it might be
able to be accepted into Fedora proper.
Hi folkss;
I built a system with Fedora, I am willing to pay per time to get it converted
to a WEB Server, do you know anyone in San Jose, CA to help me? MY TELEPHONE IS
408-238-0160
THANKS
ALBERT
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe:
On Sun, 25 Jan 2009, Craig White wrote:
rpm -ivh \
http://linuxdownload.adobe.com/linux/i386/adobe-release-i386-1.0-1.noarch.rpm
and then...
yum install flash-plugin libflashsupport
No, you do not want to install libflashsupport for Flash 10, and indeed it
can cause problems if you do.
hi Great list,
It seems that the function gnome_sound_play() of libgnome dosen't work in
Fedora 10.
It seems that in libgnome/gnome-sound.c, there is a macro named
HAVE_ESD,
and if it is defined, the function will work, if it doesn't be defined, it
will just return.
Why this macro doesn't be
Thank you very much.
I just find that it is the konsole doesn't bell. gnome-terminal works well.
It is a problem of konsole.
2009/1/22 Tim ignored_mail...@yahoo.com.au
On Thu, 2009-01-22 at 07:38 +0800, 平天韩 wrote:
It seems that the PC speaker doesn't work in F 10, right?
The pcspkr
平天韩 wrote:
Why this macro doesn't be defined in Fedora 10?
Probably because ESD is deprecated in favor of PulseAudio.
That said, it would be possible to link libgnome against libesd which works
with PulseAudio just fine. I don't know why they decided not to.
Kevin Kofler
--
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 5:53 AM, johntartar no-reply...@fcp.surfsite.orgwrote:
Not for me.
I'm running a dual boot machine, Fedora 10 and Windows XP
Ext2IFS does not work.
Linux_reader does not work.
Both install ok, but don't work.
EXT2IFS occasionally locks Windows, if windows boots up
On Monday 26 January 2009 03:44:24 Anthony Messina wrote:
On Sunday 25 January 2009 19:21:26 Tom Horsley wrote:
Sometime when I wasn't looking hplip seems to have
gotten scanner support added for most of HP's
all-in-one products (too bad they didn't retrofit
support for their stand alone
On Sunday 25 January 2009 23:35:08 Ed Greshko wrote:
Anne Wilson wrote:
On Sunday 25 January 2009 15:17:51 Alan Cox wrote:
But who cares. You refill the cartridge a few times and then you buy a
new printer not a new cartridge. They cost the same near enough so who
cares if the cheap ink
Hi
When I use the squid proxy for http, Do I need the ip forward to disable?
Thank you
-
Now with a new friend-happy design! Try the new Yahoo! Canada Messenger--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe:
Charles Landau wrote:
Apparently Linux is known to have problems with the nVidia GeForce 7100;
I found this post:
https://fcp.surfsite.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=62357forum=12
I'm looking for the right driver in hopes that will fix the video problem.
It may be that kernel
Tom Horsley wrote:
On Fri, 23 Jan 2009 13:32:08 -0500
McGuffey, David C. wrote:
Update: Intermittent dns is still present.
I'd strongly suspect this is NM getting the resolv.conf file
correct on initial connect, then screwing it up on
subsequent DHCP lease renewal.
I get the no entries in
An idea is:
Boot the machine with a livecd, mount root filesystem, edit the fstab and
reboot the machine.
I hope helps you.
Regards,
- -
iarly selbir ( ski0s )
:wq!
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 9:29 AM, Dan Track dan.tr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I forgot to comment out a line in /etc/fstab,
Todd Zullinger wrote:
I do have NetworkManager starting my WPA wireless connection prior to
login
on my laptop.
I have been wanting to do that for ages - I still could not do it in F10 -
please tell us the magic recipe?
--
View this message in context:
Hi
I forgot to comment out a line in /etc/fstab, now when my machine
boots up it keeps dropping to a filesystem check and asks for teh root
password. My question is how can I get to edit the /etc/fstab file on
bootup or via grub?
Please help.
Thanks
Dan
--
fedora-list mailing list
On Mon, 26 Jan 2009 23:23:49 +1100
David Timms wrote:
Tom Horsley wrote:
On Fri, 23 Jan 2009 13:32:08 -0500
McGuffey, David C. wrote:
Update: Intermittent dns is still present.
I'd strongly suspect this is NM getting the resolv.conf file
correct on initial connect, then screwing
On Sunday 25 January 2009 10:17:51 Alan Cox wrote:
If you are doing any volume a decent colour laser is a huge cost saving.
Nowdays I have a laser - mostly because I can print to vinyl, print to
transfers without hassle and don't have the 'delights' of inkjet ink
being waterbased so impossible
On Sun, 2009-01-25 at 22:50 -0800, Paul Newell wrote:
Thanks for the suggestion, will try. My one question before I begin is I
kept seeing references to pulseaudio and something else like ASLA (some
four letter acryomn) that I can't relocate on the web (I'll do a better
search later). Does
On Mon, 2009-01-26 at 08:34 +, M A Young wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jan 2009, Craig White wrote:
rpm -ivh \
http://linuxdownload.adobe.com/linux/i386/adobe-release-i386-1.0-1.noarch.rpm
and then...
yum install flash-plugin libflashsupport
No, you do not want to install
On Mon, 2009-01-26 at 08:47 -0500, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jan 2009 23:23:49 +1100
David Timms wrote:
Tom Horsley wrote:
On Fri, 23 Jan 2009 13:32:08 -0500
McGuffey, David C. wrote:
Update: Intermittent dns is still present.
I'd strongly suspect this is NM getting
On Sun, 2009-01-25 at 22:39 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Aaron Konstam wrote:
If F!0 is already running all you have to do is provide a partion for the
XP. The XP Installer will format its partition. The F10 partion(s) and the
swap partition will stay as they are.
But the Winblow$
When I boot my F9 box it can have one of two different host names and I would
like to figure why this is.
One of the hostnames, hpnumber is the name set by the manufacturer and it's
probably in the BIOS. I think that the other one is set via dhcp. Our network
dhcp server is a Windows box. The
I was assuming that the numbers 55, 60, 85, etc were frame rates, they are
actually vertical refresh rates, and another individual told me where to find
them.
In my home directory there is a .config subdirectory and therein is a file
monitors.xml
It has the vertical refresh rate. I put the
O is photo printing. I get adequate results for everyday use using some
special
paper, but, it's not the same as a Canon Photo Printer, which can be
stunning.
I still have a photo printer for that one reason, but rarely use it.
But, you said something - I've never heard of printing on
Steve wrote:
When I boot my F9 box it can have one of two different host names
and I would like to figure why this is.
One of the hostnames, hpnumber is the name set by the manufacturer
and it's probably in the BIOS. I think that the other one is set via
dhcp. Our network dhcp server is a
Alan Cox wrote:
O is photo printing. I get adequate results for everyday use using some
special
paper, but, it's not the same as a Canon Photo Printer, which can be
stunning.
I still have a photo printer for that one reason, but rarely use it.
But, you said something - I've never
Is there any way to use nx to connect to the active session at the console of an
F10 wkst? If I walk away and leave it locked, I am hoping to connect to that
session
remotely?
Thanks!
jlc
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe:
I haven't done it, but I know the NX/FreeNX server can be put into a
mirroring mode, where it basically connects to a local VNC server to show
display :0
Matthew Nicholson
nichol...@eps.harvard.edu
Harvard University
FAS IT Research Computing
Dept. Of Earth and Planetary Science
On Mon, Jan
That sounds like fun. A bit difficult if you don't have the vinyl
cutting machine, but you run into the same problems with an ink jet.
I've not found any inkjet printable vinyl although I'm sure it exists
somewhere.
Now if only they made printable CD/DVDs that would work in a laser
printer.
Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
Alan Cox wrote:
laser print onto vinyl (with backing sheet) including alignment
marks
Feed resulting sheet into vinyl cutting machine
Tell machine to align to marks
Cut
Peel
Apply
Custom printed decals of any
Mikkel L. Ellertson mik...@infinity-ltd.com wrote:
Steve wrote:
When I boot my F9 box it can have one of two different host names
and I would like to figure why this is.
One of the hostnames, hpnumber is the name set by the manufacturer
and it's probably in the BIOS. I think
Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at writes:
Oliver Ruebenacker wrote:
I don't have a drive to write to DVD (only to CD). How can I upgrade
from F9 to F10?
Plenty of methods. Some have already been suggested:
* preupgrade
* netinstall
* HD install
also:
usb thumbdrive install.
Used
Steve zep...@cfl.rr.com wrote:
Mikkel L. Ellertson mik...@infinity-ltd.com wrote:
Steve wrote:
When I boot my F9 box it can have one of two different host names
and I would like to figure why this is.
One of the hostnames, hpnumber is the name set by the manufacturer
Even after I upgraded to F10, I'm still having problems and I have no idea
how to proceed. Most times when I print, I only get the top few inches of
the sheet. Afterwards, the job is still sitting in the queue and the hp
process is running off with half the cpu. Here's the process hierarchy:
1 - 100 of 196 matches
Mail list logo
