Ladies and gentlemen of the Royal Explorers Club! Your attention
please. It falls to me to be the host of our proceedings to-day, as we
celebrate a great achievement in the annals of this hallowed
organization -- the discovery of what is truly a magnificent specimen
among all FOSSdom. When Dr.
Folks,
If anyone here is running ZNC as an IRC bouncer for #f-d, you might be
interested in something I hacked together over the weekend:
http://www.jonmasters.org/pub/util/awayping/awayping.txt
(I'll clean it up some more when I have time). Basically, it lets you
have pings and messages
On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 09:54 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Nicu Buculei wrote:
I prefixed it with for me, i know it works for some people.
You might try compiling SANE 1.0.20. There were tons of changes
in-between 1.0.19 and 1.0.20. I don't see a F11 or F12 build for 1.0.20
in
==
The results in this summary consider Test Updates!
==
Summary of broken packages (by src.rpm name):
cabal2spec
db4o
dinotrace
gadget
llvm
Am Montag, den 08.06.2009, 20:47 + schrieb David Zeuthen:
Author: davidz
[snipped]
--- NEW FILE polkit-gnome.spec ---
Summary: PolicyKit integration for the GNOME desktop
Name: polkit-gnome
Version: 0.92
Release: 1%{?dist}
License: LGPLv2
URL:
Just noticed Canonical is pushing GRUB 2 as default in
Ubuntu 9.10 [1]. There are some hints on testing [2] and
from what I can see there are 40 bugs opened against
GRUB 2 in launchpad [3] v. zero in our Bugzilla.
Was wondering what's the plan for Fedora and GRUB 2 as I
can see there's quite old
Jesse Keating pisze:
On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 08:56 -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
Perhaps we could target some specific scanners on the first attempt?
We
might be able to get some hardware donated to the effort.
~spot, who has several scanners of varying age and quality in a box
I have a
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 14:58 +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote:
# for /usr/share/gnome/autostart
Requires: gnome-session
Great! This adds
gnome-session: 1.8 MB
control-center: 7.1 MB
GConf2: 5,5 MB
gnome-keyring: 2,3 MB
gnome-vfs2: 3.1 MB
You added at least ~ 22,8 MB overhead just
Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On 06/08/2009 03:15 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
Ah, so it is. Thanks! So now my only hurdle is the missing popt-devel
- any ideas?
That one looks like a genuine packaging bug. We don't use rpm-devel on
the builders so no one saw it.
The header files for popt
2009/6/9 Frank Murphy (Frankly3d) frankl...@gmail.com:
Hoping to package BlueJ.
http://www.bluej.org/about/what.html
Q1:
http://www.bluej.org/download/download.html
Downloadable jar file, (and use contents of)
or
http://www.bluej.org/download/source-download.html
Contains mix of
Am Dienstag, den 09.06.2009, 09:28 -0400 schrieb Matthias Clasen:
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 14:58 +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote:
# for /usr/share/gnome/autostart
Requires: gnome-session
Great! This adds
gnome-session: 1.8 MB
control-center: 7.1 MB
GConf2: 5,5 MB
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 16:06 +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote:
My anger is because people don't honor our packaging guidelines not even
if they are asked to do so. The guidelines are very clear in this case:
Multiple packages have files in a common directory but none of them
requires others.
Matthias Clasen wrote:
...
MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not
create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which
does create that directory.
MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other
packages. The rule of
On 06/09/2009 06:51 AM, Rich Megginson wrote:
Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
The header files for popt are in the main popt package in RHEL5/CentOS5
so that's what actually needs to be required in this instance, not
popt-devel.
Can I just do rpm --nodeps -Uvh rpm*.rpm?
That seems like it should
On Martes 09 Junio 2009 17:05:04 Kevin Kofler escribió:
drago01 wrote:
Or you can simply ship provide multiple video streams and switch them
based on the useragent. (this is very likely to be the end result,
even thought it sucks).
The user agent is the wrong way to check for support.
Colin Walters wrote:
If such a thing were to be implemented it'd probably be good to use it
to clean out the wishlist in general, like handling %clean and even
%build automatically (e.g. if we see a configure script, just assume
to call %{configure}, see a Makefile, just assume to call make,
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Kevin Koflerkevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Colin Walters wrote:
If such a thing were to be implemented it'd probably be good to use it
to clean out the wishlist in general, like handling %clean and even
%build automatically (e.g. if we see a configure script,
On 06/09/2009 07:20 AM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 16:06 +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote:
My anger is because people don't honor our packaging guidelines not even
if they are asked to do so. The guidelines are very clear in this case:
Multiple packages have files in a common
How could we document that when in doubt, clicking through to the full
review guidelines should be done?
After each item in the review guidelines, add a [more] link that
points to the relevant section in the packaging guidelines ?
--
Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
--
fedora-devel-list
MB == Mathieu Bridon (bochecha) boche...@fedoraproject.org writes:
MB After each item in the review guidelines, add a [more] link that
MB points to the relevant section in the packaging guidelines ?
Do you realize that the document already has footnotes doing exactly
that?
- J
--
Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at writes:
[...] If the bug is important enough to block one of our trackers,
we won't close it UPSTREAM, we'll even try to fix it on our own (and
then upstream our fix) if upstream doesn't come up with a fix soon
enough.
If you CLOSE/UPSTREAM it and force
MB After each item in the review guidelines, add a [more] link that
MB points to the relevant section in the packaging guidelines ?
Do you realize that the document already has footnotes doing exactly
that?
Wow !
Looks like I was not entirely awake when I looked at them, I missed
the
Hi,
I run the above system, and everything works fine (except perhaps for
SELinux[1]). I have created a /etc/rpm/platform containing
'i586-redhat-linux'.
Well, everything works except for one thing: yum. Installing with
'yum install name' no longer works, I must now instead explicitly
Hi - Are we likely to see a qt 4.5.1 update at some point for F10? There's a
bug fixed which makes my application very slow. Qt 4.5.1 draws long clipped
lines extremely slowly.
Thanks
Jeremy
--
http://jeremysanders.net/
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
I installed F-11 fedora-release* and did yum clean all ; yum update
I got YumRepo Error: All mirror URLs are not using ftp, http[s] or file.
This is a fully updated F-10 system. Manually filling in releasever and
basearch in fedora.repo for basearch and mirrorlist make no difference.
Jonathan Dieter wrote:
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 11:17 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
I installed F-11 fedora-release* and did yum clean all ; yum update
I got YumRepo Error: All mirror URLs are not using ftp, http[s] or file.
This is a fully updated F-10 system. Manually filling in releasever and
Jon Ciesla wrote:
I installed F-11 fedora-release* and did yum clean all ; yum update
I got YumRepo Error: All mirror URLs are not using ftp, http[s] or file.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498720
This is a fully updated F-10 system. Manually filling in releasever and
basearch in
On Tuesday 09 June 2009 18:11:37 Jeremy Sanders wrote:
Hi - Are we likely to see a qt 4.5.1 update at some point for F10? There's
a bug fixed which makes my application very slow. Qt 4.5.1 draws long
clipped lines extremely slowly.
Hi,
it's waiting in Bodhi...
Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at writes:
[...] If the bug is important enough to block one of our trackers,
we won't close it UPSTREAM, we'll even try to fix it on our own (and
then upstream our fix) if upstream doesn't come up with a fix soon
enough.
If you
James Antill wrote:
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 11:37 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
Jonathan Dieter wrote:
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 11:17 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
I installed F-11 fedora-release* and did yum clean all ; yum update
I got YumRepo Error: All mirror URLs are not using ftp,
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 5:56 PM, Paul Jakmap...@dishone.st wrote:
Hi,
I run the above system, and everything works fine (except perhaps for
SELinux[1]). I have created a /etc/rpm/platform containing
'i586-redhat-linux'.
Well, everything works except for one thing: yum. Installing with 'yum
USB is an irritating protocol that requires USB controllers to remain
active whenever a device is attached, even if that device is doing
nothing. This consumes unnecessary power and can prevent the system
going into deep idle states under some circumstances. The kernel
supports USB
Jon Ciesla wrote:
James Antill wrote:
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 11:37 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
Jonathan Dieter wrote:
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 11:17 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
I installed F-11 fedora-release* and did yum clean all ; yum update
I got YumRepo Error: All mirror URLs are
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 1:28 PM, SmootherFrOgZ wrote:
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 11:36 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
Mono-2.4 has been built for ppc64 in F11 and devel. So people should be
able to start rebuilding packages to include ppc64 as well as the other
arches. There's a few wrinkles to
Am Dienstag, den 09.06.2009, 20:00 + schrieb Michael Schwendt:
The following packages in the repository suffer from broken dependencies:
==
The results in this summary consider Test Updates!
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 16:56 +0100, Paul Jakma wrote:
Hi,
I run the above system, and everything works fine (except perhaps for
SELinux[1]). I have created a /etc/rpm/platform containing
'i586-redhat-linux'.
Well, everything works except for one thing: yum. Installing with
'yum install
Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On 06/09/2009 06:51 AM, Rich Megginson wrote:
Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
The header files for popt are in the main popt package in RHEL5/CentOS5
so that's what actually needs to be required in this instance, not
popt-devel.
Can I just do rpm --nodeps
Le mardi 09 juin 2009 à 10:20 -0400, Matthias Clasen a écrit :
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 16:06 +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote:
My anger is because people don't honor our packaging guidelines not even
if they are asked to do so. The guidelines are very clear in this case:
Multiple packages
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 10:17 PM, Orcan Ogetbiloget.fed...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 1:28 PM, SmootherFrOgZ wrote:
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 11:36 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
Mono-2.4 has been built for ppc64 in F11 and devel. So people should be
able to start rebuilding packages to
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 10:32 AM, Matthew Garrettm...@redhat.com wrote:
Through F12 I'm going to be slowly enabling autosuspend on various
pieces of USB hardware. The aim is to ensure that it's only enabled on
hardware that supports it.
As you move forward with this across the devicescape, how
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 14:55 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
Jon Ciesla wrote:
James Antill wrote:
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 11:37 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
Jonathan Dieter wrote:
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 11:17 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
I installed F-11 fedora-release* and did yum
On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 01:18:31PM -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
As you move forward with this across the devicescape, how are you
going to selectively enable devices to apply autosuspend to? Is this
done by a whitelisting of specific device ids? Or is this going to be
done based on a detected
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 22:39 +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 09.06.2009, 20:00 + schrieb Michael Schwendt:
The following packages in the repository suffer from broken dependencies:
==
The results in
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 5:11 PM, SmootherFrOgZ wrote:
I assume that no one have any mono packages to rebuilt.
then if so, i gonna request a push above packages.
Please do. This was F11-Target and I didn't even think this would not
be submitted ASAP and I had pushed gnome-guitar to updates. Now
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 14:55 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
Jon Ciesla wrote:
James Antill wrote:
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 11:37 -0500, Jon Ciesla
wrote:
Jonathan Dieter
wrote:
On Tue,
2009-06-09 at 11:17 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
I installed F-11
fedora-release* and did yum clean all ;
Compose started at Mon Jun 8 06:15:04 UTC 2009
New package erlang-erlsyslog
Syslog facility for Erlang
New package findbugs-contrib
Extra findbugs detectors
New package globus-gass-copy
Globus Toolkit - Globus Gass Copy
New package globus-rls-server
Globus Toolkit
rawhide report: 20090605 changes
Compose started at Fri Jun 5 06:15:04 UTC 2009
anaconda-11.5.0.53-1.fc12
rawhide report: 20090603 changes
Compose started at Wed Jun 3 06:15:03 UTC 2009
anaconda-11.5.0.59-1.fc11
It looks like the versions from .54 through .59 were dropped
in
On Tuesday, June 09 2009, John Reiser said:
It looks like the versions from .54 through .59 were dropped
in the changeover from fc11 to fc12. Version .54 was in:
[snip]
so I hope that the work of two weeks can be recovered soon.
(The changes were not in Monday's [20090608] rawhide report
for
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 20:22 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
Given you are
trying to update via. yum, just enabling updates-testing should be the
most fun :). Or you can always just download the above yum, and use yum
shell to update everything else and yum via. the local file.
And how do I
Hello,
Is it just me or is the torrent a bit slow. I typically download TV
shows at 1.5MB/s (MB, not Mb). 150-300MB in 4-5 minutes. This torrent is
sitting around 20-40KB/s... Anything I can do about that? Is the tracker
swamped or ???
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
T: 403.875.4613
--
On Tuesday 09 June 2009 08:45:27 pm Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
Hello,
Is it just me or is the torrent a bit slow. I typically download TV
shows at 1.5MB/s (MB, not Mb). 150-300MB in 4-5 minutes. This torrent is
sitting around 20-40KB/s... Anything I can do about that? Is the tracker
Conrad Meyer wrote:
I was getting speeds in excess of a few megabytes a second on the Fedora 11
torrents, I'm not sure why you're having trouble.
Yeah, I'm slightly confused, I downloaded a 5.5GB TV Series alongside it
at 1.5MB. It never increased after that completed...
--
Nathanael d.
On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 09:45:27PM -0600, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
Hello,
Is it just me or is the torrent a bit slow. I typically download TV
shows at 1.5MB/s (MB, not Mb). 150-300MB in 4-5 minutes. This torrent is
sitting around 20-40KB/s... Anything I can do about that? Is the tracker
Matt Domsch wrote:
On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 09:45:27PM -0600, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
Hello,
Is it just me or is the torrent a bit slow. I typically download TV
shows at 1.5MB/s (MB, not Mb). 150-300MB in 4-5 minutes. This torrent is
sitting around 20-40KB/s... Anything I can do about
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503617
Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458430
Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458430
--- Comment #13 from Parag pnem...@redhat.com 2009-06-09 02:45:53 EDT ---
Closing now as said earlier.
--
Configure
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456582
Bug 456582 depends on bug 458430, which changed state.
Bug 458430 Summary: Review Request: lcdf-typetools - Tools for
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503617
Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230662
--- Comment #16 from Bug Zapper fedora-triage-l...@redhat.com 2009-06-09
18:29:12 EDT ---
This message is a reminder that
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=272521
Bug 272521 depends on bug 272481, which changed state.
Bug 272481 Summary: Firefox confused by fonts with many styles
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331881
Bug Zapper fedora-triage-l...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428389
--- Comment #3 from Bug Zapper fedora-triage-l...@redhat.com 2009-06-09
19:21:57 EDT ---
This message is a reminder that
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431355
--- Comment #8 from Bug Zapper fedora-triage-l...@redhat.com 2009-06-09
19:29:22 EDT ---
This message is a reminder that
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433559
--- Comment #2 from Bug Zapper fedora-triage-l...@redhat.com 2009-06-09
19:35:46 EDT ---
This message is a reminder that
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436505
--- Comment #9 from Bug Zapper fedora-triage-l...@redhat.com 2009-06-09
19:42:42 EDT ---
This message is a reminder that
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437689
--- Comment #2 from Bug Zapper fedora-triage-l...@redhat.com 2009-06-09
19:47:25 EDT ---
This message is a reminder that
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441213
--- Comment #21 from Bug Zapper fedora-triage-l...@redhat.com 2009-06-09
20:01:57 EDT ---
This message is a reminder that
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444240
--- Comment #5 from Bug Zapper fedora-triage-l...@redhat.com 2009-06-09
20:27:18 EDT ---
This message is a reminder that
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441213
Lawrence Lim l...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450847
--- Comment #5 from Bug Zapper fedora-triage-l...@redhat.com 2009-06-09
21:33:08 EDT ---
This message is a reminder that
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454291
--- Comment #3 from Bug Zapper fedora-triage-l...@redhat.com 2009-06-09
21:58:03 EDT ---
This message is a reminder that
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454785
--- Comment #3 from Bug Zapper fedora-triage-l...@redhat.com 2009-06-09
22:00:27 EDT ---
This message is a reminder that
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454850
--- Comment #2 from Bug Zapper fedora-triage-l...@redhat.com 2009-06-09
22:01:10 EDT ---
This message is a reminder that
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455510
--- Comment #9 from Bug Zapper fedora-triage-l...@redhat.com 2009-06-09
22:06:12 EDT ---
This message is a reminder that
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457094
--- Comment #2 from Bug Zapper fedora-triage-l...@redhat.com 2009-06-09
22:17:11 EDT ---
This message is a reminder that
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441213
Yewei Shao ms...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466029
--- Comment #1 from Bug Zapper fedora-triage-l...@redhat.com 2009-06-09
22:54:36 EDT ---
This message is a reminder that
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466678
--- Comment #4 from Bug Zapper fedora-triage-l...@redhat.com 2009-06-09
22:56:34 EDT ---
This message is a reminder that
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478786
--- Comment #2 from Bug Zapper fedora-triage-l...@redhat.com 2009-06-09
23:28:13 EDT ---
This message is a reminder that
I created soem documentation on using Asterisk with Fedora Talk based on
my experience with getting it working this past weekend. If any of you
are interested in reviewing it, you can see it at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Bruno/Using_Asterisk_with_Fedora_Talk
Assuming you guys don't have
On Tue, 9 Jun 2009, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
I created soem documentation on using Asterisk with Fedora Talk based on
my experience with getting it working this past weekend. If any of you
are interested in reviewing it, you can see it at:
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 03:05 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
I created soem documentation on using Asterisk with Fedora Talk based on
my experience with getting it working this past weekend. If any of you
are interested in reviewing it, you can see it at:
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 7:17 PM, Ricky Zhouri...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On 2009-06-07 04:55:31 PM, Mat Booth wrote:
I'm more than happy to test changes for you. Stack Overflow sent me
some information (see below) does this make any sense to you?
Would you be interested in helping to make any
On Tue, 9 Jun 2009, Ricky Zhou wrote:
---
configs/web/fedoraproject.org/modRewrite.conf |3 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/configs/web/fedoraproject.org/modRewrite.conf
b/configs/web/fedoraproject.org/modRewrite.conf
index 037cd35..776d83e 100644
On 2009-06-09 05:11:57 PM, Mat Booth wrote:
Yes, I'd be interested in taking a look. Unfortunately my own TODO
list is pretty full too and I don't know an awful lot about OpenID
either, so it may take me some time to get up to speed. Maybe I could
find a weekend to dedicate to it.
Excellent,
Hello Everyone, I am Parag Radke. i recently completed my Bachelors’ in
Computer Sci. Engg. I am Interested in Operating Systems and Compiler
Design. I join this team because i want to contribute to the world of open
source and want to learn the open source tech. I am using fedora from some
It looks like my old fix didn't work because the other rewriterules
got processed first. This moves the redirects to a 00redirects.conf
file and gets rid of some old redirects along the way.
---
configs/web/fedoraproject.org/00redirects.conf | 18 ++
On 2009-06-09 03:20:11 PM, Ricky Zhou wrote:
It looks like my old fix didn't work because the other rewriterules
got processed first. This moves the redirects to a 00redirects.conf
file and gets rid of some old redirects along the way.
Actually, ignore this, this might be unnecessary, I think
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Ricky Zhouri...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On 2009-06-09 05:11:57 PM, Mat Booth wrote:
Yes, I'd be interested in taking a look. Unfortunately my own TODO
list is pretty full too and I don't know an awful lot about OpenID
either, so it may take me some time to get
On 2009-06-09 08:40:25 PM, Mat Booth wrote:
Thanks for the hints.
BTW, in the README there's one item missing in the prerequisites
section: You also need python-memchached.
Good catch - that was a very new feature we added last release, I've
added it to the README now.
Thanks,
Ricky
On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 11:22:24 -0400,
Eric Christensen e...@christensenplace.us wrote:
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 03:05 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
I created soem documentation on using Asterisk with Fedora Talk based on
my experience with getting it working this past weekend. If any of you
---
configs/system/iptables-template.conf.erb |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/configs/system/iptables-template.conf.erb
b/configs/system/iptables-template.conf.erb
index 0b33ff0..45bb9ee 100644
--- a/configs/system/iptables-template.conf.erb
+++
On 2009-06-09 05:24:01 PM, Ricky Zhou wrote:
Sorry, I meant koji1.stg.
---
configs/system/iptables-template.conf.erb |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/configs/system/iptables-template.conf.erb
b/configs/system/iptables-template.conf.erb
index
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 11:28 PM, Ricky Zhouri...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On 2009-06-09 05:24:01 PM, Ricky Zhou wrote:
Sorry, I meant koji1.stg.
---
+1
--
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D
On Tuesday 09 June 2009 04:24:01 pm Ricky Zhou wrote:
---
configs/system/iptables-template.conf.erb |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/configs/system/iptables-template.conf.erb
b/configs/system/iptables-template.conf.erb index 0b33ff0..45bb9ee 100644
Ricky Zhou wrote:
Those aren't removals, they're dashes that were already part of the
lines :-)
Score one for a monospace font making diffs much more legible. ;)
I've seen diffs like this in variable width fonts and they're awfully
hard to read.
--
ToddOpenPGP - KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 |
On Tuesday 09 June 2009 04:49:05 pm Ricky Zhou wrote:
On 2009-06-09 04:43:46 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
On Tuesday 09 June 2009 04:24:01 pm Ricky Zhou wrote:
---
configs/system/iptables-template.conf.erb |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git
On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 03:32:41PM -0400, Aristeu Rozanski wrote:
On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 02:39:27PM -0400, Aristeu Rozanski wrote:
Strangely, with fancy_debug disabled, only ppc64 build breaks.
How so? Can I see the build output in brew?
Hello everyone,
I have been attempting to install mysqltcl from several places on the web by adding their repositories, that never worked. I have downloaded the source and attempted to compile it by reading several web sites online, such as mysql sitehad something. None of these worked either. Is
1 - 100 of 304 matches
Mail list logo
