Fedora Project - This week announced [1] the availability of Fedora 11
Leonidas and its spins. These spins provide different flavours of
Fedora 11 targeting specific users and applications.
The fourth consecutive release of Fedora Electronic Lab is part of
those spins, offering the best hardware
Paul Jakma wrote:
On Tue, 9 Jun 2009, Warren Togami wrote:
setarch i386 chroot /path/to/i586root
Do this and yum will behave properly.
Ok, that should improve things if I want to do a series of installs.
Thanks!
It's still extra typing though. Also, any ideas on having the x86_64
kernel
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 17:17:07 -0400, Jeremy wrote:
[1] So, the gory history for those who might be interested. Eight years
ago (!), we decided that the advantage of not having to rerun lilo after
changing the config file as you can just read the config file off the
filesystem with grub was
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 17:06:50 -0500, Matt wrote:
Fedora Rawhide-in-Mock Build Results for x86_64
using the first rawhide of the Fedora 12 development cycle, cut on 6/8/2008.
Full logs at http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/FixBuildRequires/
audacious-1.5.1-8.fc12 (build/make) ertzing
Op donderdag 11-06-2009 om 10:25 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Richard
W.M. Jones:
mingw32-libxslt-1.1.24-7.fc12 (build/make) epienbro,rjones
This is quite strange. Has there been a change to /usr/bin/install
recently? The Makefile is doing:
/usr/bin/install -c -m 644 exslt.h
Hello All!
I've got some issues with Xogr on F-11. On order to fix (or properly
describe them in bugzilla, at least) I need to change some parameters
of Xorg, and the only way to make it (AFAIK) is to change values in
xorg.conf. Also I need to restart X as usial (ctrl+alt+backpsace)
So I have the
Hi,
2009/6/11 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com
Hello All!
I've got some issues with Xogr on F-11. On order to fix (or properly
describe them in bugzilla, at least) I need to change some parameters
of Xorg, and the only way to make it (AFAIK) is to change values in
xorg.conf. Also I need to
2009/6/11 Oscar Osta Pueyo oostap.lis...@gmail.com:
Hi,
* How to enable traditinal ctrl+alt+backpsace behaviour ?
http://ryanler.wordpress.com/2009/06/11/controlaltbackspace-shortcut-does-not-restart-the-x-server-in-fedora-11/
Unfortunately, I don't use nor Gnome, neither KDE.
--
With best
Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Tue, 09 Jun 2009 23:30:37 -0400, James wrote:
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 20:22 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
Given you are
trying to update via. yum, just enabling updates-testing should be the
most fun :). Or you can always just download the above yum, and use yum
I think the Fedora release notes mention that if you run the tool
system-config-display, it will automatically generate an xorg.conf for
you.
From the Common F11 Bugs, under Miscellaneous problems with Intel
graphics adapters :
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_F11_bugs#intel-misc-gfx
On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 09:08:00 -0500, Jon wrote:
1. yum upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
2. yumdownloader --repoid=updates-testing yum
cat EOL | yum shell
upgrade
install yum-3.2.23-3.fc11.noarch.rpm
run
EOL
#1 means you'll get all the other updates from updates-testing,
2009/6/11 Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com:
I'm interested. Migration to texlive was discussed here before. Died after
nobody wanted to try to inspect licences of all the packages, IIRC.
Well, it's not so much that (Tom Callaway actually did go through a
number of the files packaged). The
On Thursday, June 11 2009, Michael Schwendt said:
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 17:17:07 -0400, Jeremy wrote:
[1] So, the gory history for those who might be interested. Eight years
ago (!), we decided that the advantage of not having to rerun lilo after
changing the config file as you can just read
On Sun, 7 Jun 2009 12:09:24 -0300, Paulo wrote:
I would create a symbolic link audacious - audacious2, so the previous
bin can still be called.
AFAIK, this is not done in Debian/Ubuntu either. The .desktop file has
been renamed, too, and additionally the Fedora --vendor fedora has had
to be
JL == Jussi Lehtola jussileht...@fedoraproject.org writes:
JL On 06/02/2009 07:27 AM, Jindrich Novy wrote:
New version texlive-2008 (to be in f12): one single texlive package
generating 3944 subpackages / 1065 MiB
JL Oh. My. God.
Please read the whole thread; that was the initial proposal,
I don't know if this is the right place to ask, sorry if it isn't
I want to upgrade my fedora 10 to the new release, but i've read that the
new driver for nvidia cards is presenting some issues
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_F11_bugs#nouveau-suspend
NM == Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net writes:
NM I didn't see this before but I can only agree with the replies:
NM this is an insane plan. Nobody is ever going to review properly a
NM 2.7 MiB spec file, updating will be hell, etc.
Isn't it nice, then that the final plan is
hi,
In Apache Benchmark:
Ubuntu was able to sustain more than 58% more requests per second than Fedora
11
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=articleitem=fedora11_ubuntu904_perfnum=2
-thanks-
regards,
--
Polycommander, Erkowit, Urquiola, Andros Patria, Cason, Aegean Sea, Prestige,
...
--
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 10:38 AM, Richard W.M. Jonesrjo...@redhat.com wrote:
(Posting here because the fedora-ppc list is a bit overrun with spam
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/fedora-ppc/ )
Does anyone know what 'console=...' parameter I should give the Fedora
PPC kernel to get it to
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 12:20 AM, Bruno Wolff IIIbr...@wolff.to wrote:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 07:44:24 +0530,
Rahul Sundaram sunda...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On 06/11/2009 07:39 AM, Bojan Smojver wrote:
Bojan Smojver bojan at rexursive.com writes:
Maybe I missed something, but it seems
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 3:43 AM, Jeff Spaletajspal...@gmail.com wrote:
Why did you cherry pick the bad news instead of the summary?
Likely for the same reasons we have a bug tracker instead of a 'what
works list'. But I agree, Fedora performed quite favourably especially
taking into
The question becomes what is significantly different in the Apache
test? Is the Apache test essentially a network i/o test? What is
significantly different here that would not end up being tracked to an
upstream kernel networking stack regression? Is the apache performance
collatoral damage
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 2:58 AM, OscarSokersoke...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't know if this is the right place to ask, sorry if it isn't
This is more for issues related to the development of Fedora rather
than end-user questions
I want to upgrade my fedora 10 to the new release, but i've read
On Thu, 11 Jun 2009, OscarSoker wrote:
I don't know if this is the right place to ask, sorry if it isn't
I want to upgrade my fedora 10 to the new release, but i've read that the new
driver for nvidia
cards is presenting some issues
2009/6/12 Christoph Höger choe...@cs.tu-berlin.de:
Without knowing how exactly the benchmark works I
would guess that most of those apache requests are
kernel calls so SELinux _might_ make a huge difference
here.
Shouldn't be overly hard to test as phoronix-test-suite is available
in Fedora's
Eric Springer wrote:
2009/6/12 Christoph Höger choe...@cs.tu-berlin.de:
Without knowing how exactly the benchmark works I
would guess that most of those apache requests are
kernel calls so SELinux _might_ make a huge difference
here.
Shouldn't be overly hard to test as phoronix-test-suite
Le jeudi 11 juin 2009 à 12:17 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III a écrit :
NM == Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net writes:
NM I didn't see this before but I can only agree with the replies:
NM this is an insane plan. Nobody is ever going to review properly a
NM 2.7 MiB spec file,
On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 09:17 -0500, Jud Craft wrote:
I think the Fedora release notes mention that if you run the tool
system-config-display, it will automatically generate an xorg.conf for
you.
From the Common F11 Bugs, under Miscellaneous problems with Intel
graphics adapters :
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 9:51 AM, Eric Springererik...@gmail.com wrote:
Likely for the same reasons we have a bug tracker instead of a 'what
works list'. But I agree, Fedora performed quite favourably especially
taking into consideration the database benchmarks.
The problem with knowing that
Le jeudi 11 juin 2009 à 20:38 +0300, Jussi Lehtola a écrit :
On Fedora 11
$ yum search fonts|wc -l
467
Actually
$ repoquery --repoid=rawhide --whatprovides font(*) | sed s
+-[0-9]*:.*++g|wc -l
233
And every single package listed here was re-done for F11 because we only
introduced the means
Le jeudi 11 juin 2009 à 19:17 +0100, Jonathan Underwood a écrit :
2009/6/11 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net:
The amount of work can probably be reduced by killing the source
packages (we have srpms for that) and only shipping the most recent font
formats (TEX people like to ship
On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 19:33 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
It's useful to be able to run Fedora on qemu-system-ppc, if only
because it allows me to track down build problems that only affect the
ppc builders. (Which in fact is what got me into this in the first
place).
btw, we don't
On 06/11/2009 06:28 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Sun, 7 Jun 2009 12:09:24 -0300, Paulo wrote:
I would create a symbolic link audacious - audacious2, so the previous
bin can still be called.
AFAIK, this is not done in Debian/Ubuntu either. The .desktop file has
been renamed, too, and
On 06/04/2009 12:29 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009 18:31:27 -0300, Paulo wrote:
Hi.
As I don't have the time to maintain audacious any more I'm orphaning the
following packages:
audacious
audacious-plugins
libmowgli
mcs
The last two are dependencies which, as far as I am
On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 14:34 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
I should probably investigate and come up with a more comprehensive,
hand-holdy note.
My recollection is that s-c-d is not installed by default, but it does
have --set and --noui switches that allow you to turn off any attempts
to
Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
All Phoronix Test Suite[1] tests run in *local* host. NO net.
Basically the apache test do:
download http://archive.apache.org/dist/httpd/httpd-2.2.11.tar.gz
and
http://www.phoronix-test-suite.com/benchmark-files/apache-ab-test-files-1.tar.gz
then compile
On 06/11/2009 02:17 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
True, though over and over again I see things where I wish they'd at
least dig into the discrepancies they find, rather than just reporting
numbers.
Seconded, I mean, wtf is this?
with the test profiles that stress the system disk, Fedora 11
Em 10-06-2009 21:09, Kevin Kofler escreveu:
Petrus de Calguarium wrote:
Please post the bug number to this list, so that we can
correctly refute the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505100
I just closed it as NOTABUG.
Kevin Kofler
Why in Fedora 1 to 9 it works ?
James M. Leddy wrote:
On 06/11/2009 02:17 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
True, though over and over again I see things where I wish they'd at
least dig into the discrepancies they find, rather than just reporting
numbers.
Seconded, I mean, wtf is this?
with the test profiles that stress the
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 10:44 AM, Xose Vazquez
Perezxose.vazq...@gmail.com wrote:
then compile apache ; exec it and run ab:
$ ab -n 50 -c 100 http://localhost:8088/test.html
So did they use the phoronix-test-suite that is packaged as part of
fedora and used fedora packaged apache binaries?
Jeff Spaleta wrote:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 10:44 AM, Xose Vazquez
Perezxose.vazq...@gmail.com wrote:
then compile apache ; exec it and run ab:
$ ab -n 50 -c 100 http://localhost:8088/test.html
So did they use the phoronix-test-suite that is packaged as part of
fedora and used fedora
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 09:49:03PM +0300, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 19:33 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
It's useful to be able to run Fedora on qemu-system-ppc, if only
because it allows me to track down build problems that only affect the
ppc builders. (Which in fact
Eric Sandeen wrote:
I don't know much about apache but I bet a default ./configure winds up
with different builds depending on the build environment, which in this
case is probably dictated by whatever the default generic OS intall
contains.
And this is useful how? Geez.
Me, I'd rather
Peter Lemenkov wrote:
Unfortunately, I don't use nor Gnome, neither KDE.
Then Ctrl+Alt+BkSp is supposed to be already working... It's supposed to be
disabled by GNOME, or by KDE if custom keyboard layouts are enabled (and
there you can also set the xkb option as in GNOME), it's enabled at boot
Here's a list of topics for tomorrow's FESCo meeting, taking place in
#fedora-meeting on freenode at 17:00UTC.
160 Announce EOL date for F-9
162 Milestone Adjustment Proposal
161 Proposal for fedora-release version-release naming for rawhide
For more complete details, please visit
Hello,
I recently upgraded my raid array from 4 to 5 disks,
and mount no longer shows lv names but is /dev/dm-* style instead.
My setup is lvm on softraid
blkid, cat /proc/mounts, df, etc.. are all affected
How can I recover the normal behavior? Is it really caused by my
upgrade?
I recreated
Am Donnerstag, den 11.06.2009, 20:54 -0400 schrieb Josh Boyer:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 8:39 PM, Christoph
Wickertchristoph.wick...@googlemail.com wrote:
Some updates are processed after a day, others not for two weeks.
I'm a bit confused where your date is coming from. 2 weeks seems
- Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote:
Well, there are languages we would support fine that don't have a
specific language-support group (most anything that uses a Latin-1
like
charset, and no specific input method.) Moreover, the groups that are
installed aren't actually recorded
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 15:23:25 -0700
Christopher Aillon cail...@redhat.com wrote:
On 04/27/2009 03:07 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
On Monday 27 April 2009 04:54:56 pm Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 16:15:27 +0200
Karsten Hoppkars...@redhat.com wrote:
...snip...
This should fix
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 8:00 PM, Matthew Garrett m...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 05:03:56PM -0500, King InuYasha wrote:
Well, not necessarily Mac OS X itself. Wouldn't the Darwin kernel
require
it anyway? I have been installing Chameleon so I could boot the
regular
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 01:37:08PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
I tried to do an updates push earlier this week and it hit some
errors. That needs to be fixed and resumed. I won't be able to get
to this until Sunday at the earliest. If Jesse or Luke want to fix
that up, it might help.
I fixed
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501854
Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102652
User nmailhot changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466029
Göran Uddeborg goe...@uddeborg.se changed:
What|Removed |Added
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=69129
User kpalagin changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477450
Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Jesse Keating wrote:
On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 23:20 +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
Sure.
What repo?
I have a couple fedora-infra-related ones,
but none that contain that file, and a few quick
searches didn't show me the light.
Oh, it's in puppet, wasn't sure if you had puppet access. Sorry I was
Hi list,
I don't know if this belongs to here, redirect me, if I'm wrong...
After running 'yum info cmake', the result is:
Name : cmake
Architektur : x86_64
Version: 2.6.4
Ausgabe: 1.fc10
Grösse : 6.4 M
Repo : updates
Trying to install failed, because the 1.fc10. With
On Thu, 11 Jun 2009, Thomas Spura wrote:
Hi list,
I don't know if this belongs to here, redirect me, if I'm wrong...
After running 'yum info cmake', the result is:
Name : cmake
Architektur : x86_64
Version: 2.6.4
Ausgabe: 1.fc10
Grösse : 6.4 M
Repo : updates
On Thu, 11 Jun 2009, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Thu, 11 Jun 2009, Thomas Spura wrote:
Hi list,
I don't know if this belongs to here, redirect me, if I'm wrong...
After running 'yum info cmake', the result is:
Name : cmake
Architektur : x86_64
Version: 2.6.4
Ausgabe: 1.fc10
Am Donnerstag, den 11.06.2009, 17:45 +0200 schrieb Seth Vidal:
On Thu, 11 Jun 2009, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Thu, 11 Jun 2009, Thomas Spura wrote:
Hi list,
I don't know if this belongs to here, redirect me, if I'm wrong...
After running 'yum info cmake', the result is:
Name
I just pushed a couple fixes for MM live. The metalinks for F11 ISOs
were failing to get created, because the code had a hard-coded length
check when parsing the CHECKSUM file, based on the md5 and sha1
lengths; obviously SHA256 checksums are longer. Whoops. Fixed on
bapp1, so in a couple
Hi Infrastructure Team,
At your earliest convenience please fill the name of the additional
person from your team that would like to attend the Fedora 11
Retrospective. This meeting will be a conference call to talk about the
good and not so good of the Fedora 11 release cycle in with the
On Thu, 11 Jun 2009, John Poelstra wrote:
Hi Infrastructure Team,
At your earliest convenience please fill the name of the additional person
from your team that would like to attend the Fedora 11 Retrospective. This
meeting will be a conference call to talk about the good and not so good of
Mike -
The whole thing here is that you need to have an *additional* person
there. So we need another infrastructure person to volunteer to
attend.
On 6/11/09, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 11 Jun 2009, John Poelstra wrote:
Hi Infrastructure Team,
At your earliest
On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 09:54 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 06/11/2009 09:50 AM, Robert Wuest wrote:
I just installed F11 on my laptop and fired up firefox, and for grins
went to the Red Hat magazine link, clicked on a video on the right side
there and it said I needed a plugin. So I
On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 11:13:00 +,
davide lists4dav...@gmail.com wrote:
so do you mean I should format my disk, prepare the two layer configuration
(lvm and dmcrypt) as I prefer and then simply install over it, after
mounting the prepared disk (probably I should choose: substitute
Frank Millman wrote:
Kevin Kofler wrote:
Frank Millman wrote:
My next step was going to be to install the Ralink driver
downloaded from
their site, but I thought I would check here first to see
if there are any
other suggestions.
The driver from the Ralink site is
In attempting to install Fedora 11, I ran into an issue with an IDE ZIP drive.
When it got to the section on disk partition, it would crash with an error
about
the Zip disk. I had to physically disconnect the Zip to get it to work?
My lab has Zips in each computer as hdb, but we seldom use
On 10 Jun 2009 at 22:06, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
Date sent: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 22:06:03 -0500
From: Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to
To: Michael D. Setzer II mi...@kuentos.guam.net
Copies to: fedora-list@redhat.com
Subject:
On Wednesday 10 June 2009 23:07:17 Phil Meyer wrote:
Jim wrote:
F10
What is the name of the UPS Linux application that you can monitor APC
Battery Backup ?
There are also the nut packages. Its more general and handles a variety
of UPS.
Good Luck!
http://www.networkupstools.org/
On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 01:08 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
Remember /boot can't be lvm nor encrypted, nor for the time being
ext4.
Is there any point it being anything more than ext2? It's hardly used,
only during bootup and when installing a new kernel.
--
[...@localhost ~]$ uname -r
On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 11:59 -0700, Rick Stevens wrote:
If I might make a stupid suggestion...go get one of those CD drive
cleaning disks and try it. It may be that the lens on the drive is
just dusty. That can lead to all kinds of silly weirdness.
If you can avoid it, like cleaning it some
On Thursday 11 June 2009 05:17:41 Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 10:41:25 -0400,
David dgbo...@comcast.net wrote:
I thought that the OP was using real diagnostics. The BIOS or the
testing software from the HD manufacturer. Not some cute little utility
from 'some one out
On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 16:48 +1000, Michael D. Setzer II wrote:
In attempting to install Fedora 11, I ran into an issue with an IDE
ZIP drive. When it got to the section on disk partition, it would
crash with an error about the Zip disk. I had to physically disconnect
the Zip to get it to
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 5:20 AM, Robert Wuestrwues...@wuest.org wrote:
A new/inexperienced user is gonna have an unpleasant
HUH? experience with it.
If you're watching non-free codecs, you have to install the non-free
repositories first.
Richard.
--
fedora-list mailing list
2009/6/10 James Bridge ja...@xmas.demon.co.uk:
F11 seems only to have microphone input. I could record from line input
in F10, using audacity. (Gnome sound recorder always gave problems.) F11
has simplified the audio controls to the point that it seems impossible
to activate the line input.
On 06/10/2009 09:44 PM, Gerry Maddock wrote:
Hello all,
I have been using qemu-kvm via the virtual machine manger on Fedora 10 and
have had no problems (works great love it!). I just downloaded and
installed Fedora 11 64 bit on a new server and logged in as a normal user
and started the
On 11 Jun 2009 at 16:36, Tim wrote:
From: Tim ignored_mail...@yahoo.com.au
To: Community assistance, encouragement,
and advice for using Fedora. fedora-list@redhat.com
Organization: I'm Spartacus!
Date sent: Thu, 11 Jun 2009
I just did this and it worked for me.
ssh a...@p.q.r.s
p.q.r.s is the ip address of the remote pc.
Both pc have openssh-server,openssh-client installed.
--- On Sun, 6/7/09, Rick Sewill rsew...@cableone.net wrote:
From: Rick Sewill rsew...@cableone.net
Subject: Re: ssh tutorial
To:
On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 09:10 +0100, Sharpe, Sam J wrote:
2009/6/10 James Bridge ja...@xmas.demon.co.uk:
F11 seems only to have microphone input. I could record from line input
in F10, using audacity. (Gnome sound recorder always gave problems.) F11
has simplified the audio controls to the
Thanks.
I did this and it works for me.
ssh a...@ipaddress
But if I do
ssh ipaddress
ssh: connect to host ipaddress port 22: No route to host
--- On Sun, 6/7/09, Chris Tyler ch...@tylers.info wrote:
From: Chris Tyler ch...@tylers.info
Subject: Re: ssh tutorial
To: Community assistance,
gmspro wrote:
I did this and it works for me.
ssh a...@ipaddress
But if I do
ssh ipaddress
ssh: connect to host ipaddress port 22: No route to host
I would try
ssh -v ipaddress
and
ssh -l abc ipaddress
--
Timothy Murphy
e-mail: gayleard /at/ eircom.net
tel:
--- On Sat, 6/6/09, Timothy Murphy gayle...@eircom.net wrote:
From: Timothy Murphy gayle...@eircom.net
Subject: Re: ssh tutorial
To: fedora-list@redhat.com
Date: Saturday, June 6, 2009, 6:49 PM
Uwe Kiewel wrote:
yourname=linux user account // Am i
correct?
yourserver=??
No.
On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 12:18 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
Wellwhen I login from the console everything needed to use the input
methods is already started. No need to manually start anything...
[egres...@f10 packages]$ ps -eaf | grep scim
egreshko 9260 1 0 09:32 ?00:00:00
I would try
ssh -v ipaddress
This does not work.
It says permission denied after giving the password three times.
and
ssh -l abc ipaddress
Giving the same password this works.
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe:
2009/6/11 gmspro gms...@yahoo.com:
--- On Sat, 6/6/09, Timothy Murphy gayle...@eircom.net wrote:
From: Timothy Murphy gayle...@eircom.net
Subject: Re: ssh tutorial
To: fedora-list@redhat.com
Date: Saturday, June 6, 2009, 6:49 PM
Uwe Kiewel wrote:
yourname=linux user account // Am i
ssh -l yourusername yourserver
Sorry,It is also correct.
I also think,it is a wrong format.
Correct format is :
ssh yourn...@yourserver
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines:
--- On Thu, 6/11/09, Sharpe, Sam J sam.sharpe+lists.red...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Sharpe, Sam J sam.sharpe+lists.red...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: ssh tutorial
To: Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.
fedora-list@redhat.com
Date: Thursday, June 11, 2009, 4:18 PM
2009/6/11 gmspro gms...@yahoo.com:
I would try
ssh -v ipaddress
This does not work.
It says permission denied after giving the password three times.
and
ssh -l abc ipaddress
Giving the same password this works.
Is your username on the machine you are ssh'ing from the same as
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:19:27 -0400, Matthew wrote:
On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 08:17 +0200, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
Hello,
I'm having some update problems:
rpm -Uhv
http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/releases/11/Fedora/i386/os/Packages/fedora-release-11-1.noarch.rpm
under my fresh f11 install, my multifunction samsung scx-4826fn
printer just magically showed up under System - Admin - Printing,
but it's definitely not printing properly (among other things,
double-sided isn't working). under f10 (if memory serves), i needed
to manually install the proper
Hi
Has anyone had a problem with F11 x86_64 and nfs4 mounts?
I run a Centos 5.3 nfs server which is working
fine using nfs4 with a fully updated F10 machine
I installed F11 yesterday on a second machine with full updates
On the F11 machine when I mount, either by hand, or autofs/NIS the
Is your username on the machine you are ssh'ing from the
same as your
username on the machine you are ssh'ing to?
Never, usernames are different.
If your username locally is USERLOCAL, then ssh -v
ipaddress is
equivalent to ssh -v userlo...@ipaddress or ssh -v -l
USERLOCAL
ipaddress
I failed. I installed fedora-release-11-xxx and rpmfusion-{free,nonfree}-
release-11-xx rpms. This completely broke yum, because the format of
fedora.repo is not understood with F10 yum.
Try updating to F11 yum? No good either, needs python-2.6.
So how is it done?
--
fedora-list mailing
2009/6/11 gmspro gms...@yahoo.com:
Is your username on the machine you are ssh'ing from the
same as your
username on the machine you are ssh'ing to?
Never, usernames are different.
Well that is why ssh -l abc ipaddress and ssh a...@ipaddress work
for you, but ssh ipaddress won't.
You are
Hello,
I am using Fedora 10 now.
What's the command to upgrade Fedora 10 to Fedora 11?
What are the new features Fedora 11 is giving today?
1.Does Fedora 11 support ext4 filesystem?
2.In Fedora 11 ,is there any way to change gdm theme?
3.Any problem like Could not detect stabilization wait for
file (man ssh_config for details)
That's a long tutorial.I will read this if possible.
However thanks for your reply.
--
Sam
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines:
Hello Fedora-list,
darkice-0.19 is in the distribution for Fedora 11 - but it is
compiled without lame support - why?
Own compilation on Fedora 11 of darkice-0.19 fails - seems a bug in
a cpp module.
Any help?
--
Best regards,
Martin
2009/6/11 Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com:
I failed. I installed fedora-release-11-xxx and rpmfusion-{free,nonfree}-
release-11-xx rpms. This completely broke yum, because the format of
fedora.repo is not understood with F10 yum.
Try updating to F11 yum? No good either, needs python-2.6.
1 - 100 of 266 matches
Mail list logo
