Hello, everyone
I want to delete a build from a tag, How should I do ?
example, the tag tms2.0 have following build:
-
b43-fwcutter-011-5.tms2 michaelw 2009-06-19 09:52:18 complete
On 06/17/2009 12:17 PM, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 9:52 AM, Bill Nottinghamnott...@redhat.com wrote:
I'm thinking specifically with people with Centrino stickered
laptops of unclear vintage who may not realize that they have a 64bit
capable machine even when they do. The
2009/6/18 Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com
Josef Bacik, Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:27:34 -0400:
Btrfs will not be as stable as ext4 currently is for at least another
year, so it is still very much just for testing. I am very interested
in hearing about bugs and getting them fixed, however there will
On 06/17/09 21:17, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 9:52 AM, Bill Nottinghamnott...@redhat.com wrote:
- Atom is the only currently produced 32-bit x86 chip of note; optimize
for what's currently available
Just as an aside, can we do anything to help people identify whether
their
On 18/06/09 04:09, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
I was more asking if there were perl packagers interested in
packaging/maintaining those packages. I can probibly find time to do it
sometime, but I thought someone else might be more quickly able to do
so. ;)
Thanks.
kevin
Would it be any benefit
On 06/18/2009 04:41 AM, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
No particular reason with a traceable track record, but I've understood
that anything that is not composed with pungi or livecd-tools will be
blocked as they are the blessed and preferred tools for the job(s).
You use whatever tool you want
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 6:33 AM, Kevin Fenzike...@scrye.com wrote:
On Thu, 18 Jun 2009 05:58:45 +0200
Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 8:04 PM, Kevin Fenzike...@scrye.com wrote:
perl(Geo::OSM:EntitiesV3)
perl(Geo::OSM::OsmReaderV5)
perl(Geo::OSM::EntitiesV5)
On 06/18/2009 10:13 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
On 18/06/09 04:09, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
I was more asking if there were perl packagers interested in
packaging/maintaining those packages. I can probibly find time to do it
sometime, but I thought someone else might be more quickly able to do
so. ;)
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 10:40:56PM +0200, Farkas Levente wrote:
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 09:09:45PM +0200, Farkas Levente wrote:
so what's our position now?
it seems upstream wouldn't like to (and probably can't solve without
break
The desktop spin in F11 still had language groups, AFAIK.
Actually I removed them all at the very end of the F10 cycle (and then reverted
the change for the f10 branch of spin-kickstarts).
So they are only for localized spins and fedora-install-fedora.ks(?) now.
Jens
--
fedora-devel-list
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 6:49 PM, Chris Adamscmad...@hiwaay.net wrote:
Once upon a time, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com said:
Really we just need the moral equivalent of %exclude for autoreqprovs.
Yeah, I said that years and years ago, but RPM didn't want it.
Just for info, PLD some time ago
- We don't really support i586 in any meaningful matter
What does this mean? Does Fedora not run on i586? Why was there a
mass-rebuild for i586 if it doesn't work?
I know of *no one* in the community who tests on i586 to ensure that it
works. (If this drags them out of silence, so be
On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 12:53 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
In F-11 the samba4 package provides subpackages for libtalloc and
libtdb.
In rawhide we have split these packages out on their own as these 2
packages are finally released independently also upstream.
I'd like to split these out of the
At some point in the next few weeks this kernel will land in rawhide.
I will try and make sure btrfs-progs-0.19 goes out at the same time.
The new btrfs-progs isn't essential for running the new format, so if
you just install the kernel you will be fine, but obviously some of
the commands may
I'm not sure I understand why not. Are you saying that if RedHat
decided that RHEL7 was to support Sparc , there'd be no interest in
making that a primary arch?
ppc/ppc64 is supported in RHEL. It is no longer a primary arch in Fedora.
Sorry? I thought it was still primary until after F-12.
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 06:14:33PM -0400, Chris Ball wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 01:52:26PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
- Build all packages for i686 (this requires cmov)
This cuts out AMD Geode ...
That's not true; Geode has cmov, and should be compatible with
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 01:52:26PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
- Build all packages for i686 (this requires cmov)
This cuts out AMD Geode ...
That's not true; Geode has cmov, and should be compatible with gcc's i686.
It does work - I have CentOS 5.3 installed currently
On Tue, 2009-06-16 at 16:57 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
Ve haf zer technology, already. :) it's just a case of adding code to
more apps to take advantage of the awesomeness of PolicyKit, and I
believe this is scheduled to happen.
I still have one fairly serious gripe with PolicyKit: If one
On Thu, 7 May 2009 17:26:23 +0200, Michael wrote:
Dependency chaos. Some packagers have started with adding
Requires: %{_libdir}/pkgconfig
instead of the good old Requires: pkgconfig. Not only is this dependency
expensive -- the filelists metadata must be loaded and parsed -- it doesn't
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 5:39 AM, Peter Robinsonpbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
At some point in the next few weeks this kernel will land in rawhide.
I will try and make sure btrfs-progs-0.19 goes out at the same time.
The new btrfs-progs isn't essential for running the new format, so if
you just
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 6:58 PM, Jeff Spaletajspal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 2:28 PM, James Hubbardjameshubb...@gmail.com wrote:
Trying to berate people into using x86_64 as I've seen in this and
other threads has gotten annoying.
Berate? I'm not trying to berate anyone.
Jens Petersen (peter...@redhat.com) said:
The desktop spin in F11 still had language groups, AFAIK.
Actually I removed them all at the very end of the F10 cycle (and then
reverted the change for the f10 branch of spin-kickstarts).
Although, given that the translations are in the main
Gerd Hoffmann (kra...@redhat.com) said:
On 06/17/09 19:52, Bill Nottingham wrote:
P4 2.4Ghz Athlon 3400+Core2Duo E6850 Atom N270
march=i686/ -1.1% +2.0% +0.9% +0.6%
mtune=generic
march=i586/ +0.3% -0.3% -0.2%
On Wednesday 17 June 2009 20:46:30 Peter Robinson wrote:
I'm not sure I understand why not. Are you saying that if RedHat
decided that RHEL7 was to support Sparc , there'd be no interest in
making that a primary arch?
ppc/ppc64 is supported in RHEL. It is no longer a primary arch in
On Wednesday 17 June 2009 15:17:28 Jesse Keating wrote:
On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 15:14 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
I thought an official spin could only be a live image. i.e., once you
start letting the user choose packages in anaconda, it can't be an
official spin anymore. At least, I'm pretty
Chitlesh GOORAH wrote:
Hello there,
We have some doubt about the Requires: of a default localization.
For example, eclipse-texlipse needs aspell
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506431
By default I chose aspell-en,
# For Spell-Check (choosing default : English)
Requires:
Chitlesh GOORAH wrote:
Hello there,
We have some doubt about the Requires: of a default localization.
For example, eclipse-texlipse needs aspell
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506431
By default I chose aspell-en,
# For Spell-Check (choosing default : English)
Requires:
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 8:02 PM, Ingvar Hagelund
ing...@redpill-linpro.comwrote:
As one of many, I'm the semi-happy owner of an Apple iPhone. The iPhone and
the iPod Touch's media player db is well supported under Linux, using tools
like libgpod, and iFuse or sshfs for access. Until recently,
Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) said:
I know of *no one* in the community who tests on i586 to ensure that it
works. (If this drags them out of silence, so be it!) It is certainly not
part of the QA matrix for testing RCs. On the kernel side, I doubt the
kernel
team even has
Ralf Corsepius (rc040...@freenet.de) said:
*That's* what I mean by we don't really support i586 in any meaningful
manner.
You seem to be speaking in terms of You == RH.
No, period - I haven't seen anyone in the community say that they're
testing it on i586-class hardware.
Bill
--
On Thu, 2009-06-18 at 10:52 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Chitlesh GOORAH (chitlesh.goo...@gmail.com) said:
Hello there,
We have some doubt about the Requires: of a default localization.
For example, eclipse-texlipse needs aspell
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506431
On Thu, 2009-06-18 at 11:58 +0200, Nils Philippsen wrote:
As it is, malware need only sit in the background and wait for e.g. a
PolicyKit-enabled user manager to acquire the authorization for user
creation to be able to easily install a backdoor account.
Nils, this is somewhat inaccurate
Hi,
This is an accurate description of how things work, thanks to Matthias
for clearing things up on this list. There's more background information
about this particular thing here
http://hal.freedesktop.org/docs/polkit/
http://hal.freedesktop.org/docs/polkit/PolicyKit-1.8.html
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Bill Nottinghamnott...@redhat.com wrote:
Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) said:
I know of *no one* in the community who tests on i586 to ensure that it
works. (If this drags them out of silence, so be it!) It is certainly not
part of the QA matrix for
Martin Langhoff (martin.langh...@gmail.com) said:
To note: it _is_ reported as a 586, so at least ancillary work in
yum/anaconda/rpm will be needed so that installing F12 on these
supported but not quite 686 CPUs is possible, avoiding the hackery
of installing it on a true 686 and then
On Thu, 2009-06-18 at 10:08 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
[1] doesn't mean a mass rebuild won't happen for RHEL6. Also doesn't
mean that it will. Hand-wavy can't talk about unreleased products...
While not speaking in definitives, and while not speaking /for/ Red Hat,
it is extremely unlikely
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Bill Nottinghamnott...@redhat.com wrote:
+arch_compat: geode: i686
...
That should do the trick. :)
Cool. Didn't know we had that compat mechanism available.
Back to my humid cave then...
m
--
martin.langh...@gmail.com
mar...@laptop.org -- School Server
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 8:08 PM, Lennart Poetteringmzerq...@0pointer.de wrote:
Gah. Allowing packages to pierce the firewall just makes the firewall
redundant.
True
A firewall is an extra layer of security that
simply hides the actual problem.
Um!? Layered security is a _good thing_. *All*
On Thu, 18 Jun 2009, Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 8:08 PM, Lennart Poetteringmzerq...@0pointer.de wrote:
Gah. Allowing packages to pierce the firewall just makes the firewall
redundant.
True
A firewall is an extra layer of security that
simply hides the actual problem.
On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 22:19 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
perhaps it's best if we just agree to agree?
well that just doesn't sound like the f-d-l spirit at _all_. :D
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
Compose started at Thu Jun 18 06:15:14 UTC 2009
New package 389-ds-base
389 Directory Server (base)
New package 389-dsgw
389 Directory Server Gateway (dsgw)
New package eclipse-veditor
Eclipse-based Verilog/VHDL plugin
New package ghc-utf8-string
Haskell UTF8 layer
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 5:58 AM, Nils Philippsenn...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2009-06-16 at 16:57 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
Ve haf zer technology, already. :) it's just a case of adding code to
more apps to take advantage of the awesomeness of PolicyKit, and I
believe this is scheduled to
On Thu, 2009-06-18 at 19:09 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 11:02:22AM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
The retained authorization is only valid for the subject that obtained
it, which will typically be a process (identified by process id and
start time) or a canonical
(@all: See fedora-list for previous postings.)
Am Donnerstag, den 18.06.2009, 11:17 +0530 schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
I had already did a remix based on LXDE a release before and I had the
kickstart and a working image a while earlier. The survey was done on
this list just to gauge interest in it
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 07:09:29PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 11:02:22AM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
The retained authorization is only valid for the subject that obtained
it, which will typically be a process (identified by process id and
start time) or a
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 7:09 PM, Richard W.M. Jonesrjo...@redhat.com wrote:
Can the malware inject code into the process which gained the
authentication (eg. using ptrace)?
Also, using a new PackageKit the worst you'll be able to do is install
signed software from already configured repos.
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 03:02:53PM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Thu, 2009-06-18 at 19:09 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 11:02:22AM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
The retained authorization is only valid for the subject that obtained
it, which will typically be
Here's a list of topics for tomorrow's FESCo meeting, taking place in
#fedora-meeting on freenode at 17:00UTC.
#167 Feature: F12X86Support -
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/F12X86Support
#168 Feature: NFSClientIPv6 -
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/NFSClientIPv6
#169 Feature:
If one application acquires an authorization it automatically authorizes all
other
applications running on the same desktop -- and I think that is a
potential attack vector for malware.
maybe this is about sudo and a like things
but PolicyKit is designed AFAIK to be much fine grained, it does
On Thu, 2009-06-18 at 20:53 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 07:09:29PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 11:02:22AM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
The retained authorization is only valid for the subject that obtained
it, which will typically be
On 06/18/2009 03:08 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote:
(@all: See fedora-list for previous postings.)
Am Donnerstag, den 18.06.2009, 11:17 +0530 schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
I had already did a remix based on LXDE a release before and I had the
kickstart and a working image a while earlier. The
I give up trying to reason with you. Bye.
don't be offended, I myself was from those who had disabled the
feature in mandriva [when it was mandrake]
but I'm not a typical user because
* I have fast internet at home [which most people in my country don't]
* I keep iso files and loop back them
Am Donnerstag, den 18.06.2009, 16:59 -0400 schrieb TK009:
On 06/18/2009 03:08 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote:
(@all: See fedora-list for previous postings.)
Am Donnerstag, den 18.06.2009, 11:17 +0530 schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
I had already did a remix based on LXDE a release before and I
On 06/18/2009 02:41 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote:
There is no SIG yet because A SIG needs APPROVAL from the board. But
there already are couple of people interested: Marc Wiriadisastra, Simon
Wesp, Sebastian Vahl and two people from the LXDE team who have joined
Fedora recently but are still
Am Donnerstag, den 18.06.2009, 16:04 -0700 schrieb Toshio Kuratomi:
On 06/18/2009 02:41 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote:
There is no SIG yet because A SIG needs APPROVAL from the board. But
there already are couple of people interested: Marc Wiriadisastra, Simon
Wesp, Sebastian Vahl and two
Hi,
On Thu, 2009-06-18 at 21:11 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 03:02:53PM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Thu, 2009-06-18 at 19:09 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Can the malware inject code into the process which gained the
authentication (eg. using ptrace)?
On 06/19/2009 12:38 AM, Christoph Wickert wrote:
You never tried to convey anything to me. Back in Februar I asked for
your ks and you said you wanted to post it to fedora-devel. This never
happened.
I got distracted with other things. Mine wasn't that different anyway.
It was the almost
Bill Nottingham wrote:
Ralf Corsepius (rc040...@freenet.de) said:
*That's* what I mean by we don't really support i586 in any meaningful
manner.
You seem to be speaking in terms of You == RH.
No, period - I haven't seen anyone in the community say that they're
testing it on i586-class
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485873
Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485873
--- Comment #4 from Manilal libreg...@gmail.com 2009-06-18 02:33:12 EDT ---
Tested Fedora 11 GA and works fine.
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485873
--- Comment #5 from Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com 2009-06-18 02:38:55
EDT ---
Thanks!!
--
Configure bugmail:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483391
Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490373
Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487061
--- Comment #4 from Akihiro Nomura sacred...@hotmail.com 2009-06-18 07:01:37
EDT ---
In fedora 11, CJK ambiguous width
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501854
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org
2009-06-18 07:51:13 EDT ---
lcdf-typetools-2.78-1.fc10
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501854
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501854
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org
2009-06-18 07:54:05 EDT ---
lcdf-typetools-2.78-1.fc11
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501854
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505757
--- Comment #5 from Daniel Novotny dnovo...@redhat.com 2009-06-18 09:39:28
EDT ---
knmhn12x.pcf.gz: the same for 64bit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505757
--- Comment #6 from Akira TAGOH ta...@redhat.com 2009-06-18 10:19:39 EDT ---
Hmm, it may be just a packaging bug. the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467982
Andy Lindeberg alind...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Problem in freetype causes navit to crash unless freetype is built
with -fno-strict-aliasing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506840
Summary:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506840
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468193
Thomas Fitzsimmons fitz...@fitzsim.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468193
--- Comment #10 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-06-18 21:14:18
EDT ---
But uming should be used by default for
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468193
--- Comment #11 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-06-18 21:17:47
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #8)
Java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468193
Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468193
Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468193
--- Comment #12 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-06-18 21:21:03
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #11)
(In reply to
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468193
--- Comment #13 from Caius 'kaio' Chance ccha...@redhat.com 2009-06-18
21:33:42 EDT ---
AFAIK according to Mailhot, this
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506840
udo udo...@xs4all.nl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Here is a really successful project from where I live that Fedora might
benefit from.
http://calagator.org/
http://code.google.com/p/calagator/
It is different from the traditional calendaring/Outlook type solution
that has been under discussion, but it is extremely easy for people to
add
Also avaliable at:
Minutes:
http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/Fedora-Meeting/2009/Fedora-Meeting.2009-06-18-20.01.html
Log:
http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/Fedora-Meeting/2009/Fedora-Meeting.2009-06-18-20.01.log.html
20:01 fedbot` Meeting started Thu Jun 18 20:01:09 2009 UTC. The chair is
On Thu, 18 Jun 2009, John Poelstra wrote:
Here is a really successful project from where I live that Fedora might
benefit from.
http://calagator.org/
http://code.google.com/p/calagator/
It is different from the traditional calendaring/Outlook type solution that
has been under discussion,
Hey guys, I need to schedule a 2-3 hour cvs outage. Any time work better
or worse for any of you in the next week or so?
-Mike
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
It's sure worth a look. Susmit, what do you think?
This is interesting. I am looking at it.
Thanks.
--
Regards,
Susmit.
=
ssh
0x86DD170A
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/user:susmit
=
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 20:30:47 -0700
Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wolfgang.rupprecht+gnus200...@gmail.com wrote:
stan gr...@q.com writes:
This whole incident has me looking into email hosting and private
domain names. Both are very cheap right now. Hosting using someone
else's domain can be
la, 2009-06-13 kello 00:04 -0500, Casey Bennett kirjoitti:
The title says it all--I'm having choppy mic input in this one program,
Mumble, a VoIP program that uses the Speex library, to the point that
I'm completely incomprehensible. But mic input is fine in all other
programs, like
I'm looking into using a hosting service in order to have my own email
domain, and possibly a website. This is a completely new area for me
and so I would appreciate any tips from those in the know.
I've tentatively narrowed to the three providers below:
Hi, I get the following:
gpg --verify *-CHECKSUM
gpg: Signature made Fri 05 Jun 2009 04:53:07 PM CDT using RSA key ID D22E77F2
gpg: Good signature from Fedora (11) fed...@fedoraproject.org
gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
gpg: There is no indication
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 3:20 PM, Tom Horsleytom.hors...@att.net wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 15:05:40 -0800
Kam Leo wrote:
F11 is full of new annoyances. Have you checked the firewall settings
since you installed F11?
Among the things in my checklist for new installs is completely
disabling
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 17:30:43 -0700,
Dave Stevens g...@uniserve.com wrote:
I have used glxgears for several years, most recently on F7. I've just
moved to F11 x86_64 on a new hard drive and the system is now up to
date. When I run glxgears I get the gear display in the yop left corner,
On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 17:30 -0700, Dave Stevens wrote:
date. When I run glxgears I get the gear display in the yop left
corner, just as I expect but instead of getting the frame rate display
in the terminal window I get endless ream of this:
CS section size missmatch start at
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 17/06/2009 23:47, Aaron Konstam a écrit :
On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 21:45 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Wednesday 17 June 2009 20:18:41 Mike Cloaked wrote:
Anne Wilson-4 wrote:
Unfortunately under F10 at least it cannot/will not use the saved key.
Mail Lists-3 wrote:
On 06/16/2009 10:36 PM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
If the concern is applications needing to determine whether bind is
configured for a chroot or not, I think the application should be
checking /etc/sysconfig/named for the ROOTDIR variable.
Excellent suggestion ...
2009/6/17 Globe Trotter itsme_...@yahoo.com:
Hi, I get the following:
gpg --verify *-CHECKSUM
gpg: Signature made Fri 05 Jun 2009 04:53:07 PM CDT using RSA key ID D22E77F2
gpg: Good signature from Fedora (11) fed...@fedoraproject.org
gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted
On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 18:24 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
I run system-config-printer as root, and it either hangs
forever or tells me I'm not authorized when I want to do
something like change printer default options.
This is due to PolicyKit:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447266
On Thu, 2009-06-18 at 09:05 +0100, Tim Waugh wrote:
On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 18:24 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
I run system-config-printer as root, and it either hangs
forever or tells me I'm not authorized when I want to do
something like change printer default options.
This is due to
On 6/17/09 10:26 PM, Giuseppe Fuggiano wrote:
On 2009/6/17 Gijsi...@bsnw.nl wrote:
On 6/17/09 11:15 AM, Giuseppe Fuggiano wrote:
Do you have haldaemon and messagebus services running?
Yea, both are running just fine.
You can try:
mv ~/.gnome2 ~/.gnome2.old
and restart the GNOME session
В Чтв, 18/06/2009 в 00:44 -0300, Itamar Reis Peixoto пишет:
koji is the fedora build system
there are a 2.6.30 compiled in koji.
I am using F10. Would it be safe for me to install
kernel-2.6.29.5-84.fc10 from koji? Or even kernel-2.6.30-6.fc12 keeping
in mind I'm no tester? :-)
--
Misha
1 - 100 of 232 matches
Mail list logo
