I found a very strange omission for the qt4-devel package. The path to
qt4-devel binaries (/usr/lib/qt4/bin) isn't automatically added to $PATH
like qt3's are.
Additionally, when I removed the qt3-devel package, the path to qt3-devel
binaries (/usr/lib/qt-3.3/bin) isn't automatically removed from
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Rajeesh K Nambiar
rajeeshknamb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.atwrote:
Michal Nowak wrote:
Anyone's aware of terminal emulator like gnome-terminal, rxvt,
etc being capable of Indic scripts like
Hi, I'm Scruffy, the Fedora Janitor.
Today (and likely, over the next few days/weeks), I'll be going through
and making minor changes to packages in rawhide (and only in rawhide)
where there are cases of unnecessary duplicate directory ownership.
Please do not be alarmed!
As an example example:
On Tue, 23 Jun 2009, Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 9:10 PM, Mathieu Bridon
(bochecha)boche...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
RPM has seen a lot of improvements in speed and memory consumption
Are there any improvements on recovery of unexpectedly failed
transactions, such as OOM,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/26/2009 06:07 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Tom spot Callaway wrote:
Hi, I'm Scruffy, the Fedora Janitor.
Today (and likely, over the next few days/weeks), I'll be going through
and making minor changes to packages in rawhide (and only in
Alexander Boström wrote:
Den 2009-06-25 13:07, Simon Andrews skrev:
If all anaconda upgrades are going to be online
Anaconda upgrades initiated through Preupgrade do not require a network
connection.
They will if one of the conditions for upgrading is going to be access
to the updates
On 06/26/2009 04:04 PM, Simon Andrews wrote:
Alexander Boström wrote:
Den 2009-06-25 13:07, Simon Andrews skrev:
If all anaconda upgrades are going to be online
Anaconda upgrades initiated through Preupgrade do not require a
network connection.
They will if one of the conditions for
Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Fri, 26 Jun 2009 03:05:41 -0500, King wrote:
I found a very strange omission for the qt4-devel package. The path to
qt4-devel binaries (/usr/lib/qt4/bin) isn't automatically added to $PATH
like qt3's are.
Additionally, when I removed the qt3-devel package, the
On Fri, 26 Jun 2009, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Fri, 26 Jun 2009 06:30:01 -0400, Stephen wrote:
I think he's just talking about clearing up unnecessary duplication
(like with his php-pear example) that confuses the yum dependency checker.
Hmmm? Tom's announcement doesn't mention any such
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/26/2009 06:07 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Tom spot Callaway wrote:
Hi, I'm Scruffy, the Fedora Janitor.
Today (and likely, over the next few days/weeks), I'll be going through
and making minor changes to packages in
On Fri, 26 Jun 2009 12:42:57 +0200, Ralf wrote:
be fixing cases where the duplicate directory ownership is
acceptable, like much of the perl structure, so you don't have to worry
about that.
Well, ... he just has committed patches in which he does exactly the
opposite.
He already
On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 07:44 -0400, Seth Vidal wrote:
Preupgrade has access to the network BEFORE the anaconda run, that's the
whole point. It processes the pkg lists and downloads all the needed pkgs
beforehand.
So the anaconda run won't need network access b/c all the pkgs are taken
On Fri, 26 Jun 2009, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 07:44 -0400, Seth Vidal wrote:
Preupgrade has access to the network BEFORE the anaconda run, that's the
whole point. It processes the pkg lists and downloads all the needed pkgs
beforehand.
So the anaconda run won't need
26 2009 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 0.13-1
- auto-update to 0.13 (by cpan-spec-update 0.01)
- added a new br on perl(Test::Moose) (version 0)
qt-4.5.2-2.fc12
---
* Fri Jun 26 2009 Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org - 4.5.2-2
- take current qt-copy-patches snapshot (20090626
On Fri, 26 Jun 2009, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
Hi,
yum got really slower a few days ago on F10, so I investigated and found that:
(3.2.23) #yum list updates
real1m28.446s
user1m24.553s
sys 0m0.546s
(3.2.21) #yum list updates
real0m7.621s
user0m6.673s
sys 0m0.390s
this
On Fri, 26 Jun 2009, Seth Vidal wrote:
On Fri, 26 Jun 2009, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
Hi,
yum got really slower a few days ago on F10, so I investigated and found
that:
(3.2.23) #yum list updates
real1m28.446s
user1m24.553s
sys 0m0.546s
(3.2.21) #yum list updates
real
On Jun 26, 2009, at 9:11 AM, Seth Vidal wrote:
On Fri, 26 Jun 2009, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
Hi,
yum got really slower a few days ago on F10, so I investigated and
found that:
(3.2.23) #yum list updates
real1m28.446s
user1m24.553s
sys 0m0.546s
(3.2.21) #yum list updates
real
On Fri, 26 Jun 2009, Joe Nall wrote:
just for fun:
set color=never in your yum.conf
and run it again.
No time difference here (2:23-2:26) for color=never on yum 3.2.23. More than
2 minutes of cpu time on a 3.1GHz E8400. Downgraded to 3.2.21-2 from koji and
the same 'yum list updates'
Hello Folks,
I fired up pidgin via the cmd line and get the following error:
$ pidgin
(pidgin:25897): GStreamer-CRITICAL **: gst_element_register: assertion
`g_type_is_a (type, GST_TYPE_ELEMENT)' failed
ERROR: Caught a segmentation fault while loading plugin file:
Seth Vidal wrote:
and if you can make this happen every time with 3.2.23 if you could
please run:
time yum -d 3 list updates | grep 'time:'
You were not talking to me, but I tried and
look at this: (added -C to avoid net access)
# time yum -C -d 3 list updates --disablerepo=atrpms\* |
On Fri, 26 Jun 2009, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
It is really CPU intensive. I see some unicode related stuff in the changelog
and my memory goes to years ago (RedHat 8?) when the UTF8 enabled grep
got a similar slowdown (the lib was then improved after that).
Hm, made other experiments
On Fri, 26 Jun 2009, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
Seth Vidal wrote:
and if you can make this happen every time with 3.2.23 if you could
please run:
time yum -d 3 list updates | grep 'time:'
You were not talking to me, but I tried and
look at this: (added -C to avoid net access)
# time yum -C
Hello Folks,
Sorry for the hijacking of another thread. I fired up pidgin via the cmd
line and get the following error:
$ pidgin
(pidgin:25897): GStreamer-CRITICAL **: gst_element_register: assertion
`g_type_is_a (type, GST_TYPE_ELEMENT)' failed
ERROR: Caught a segmentation fault
On Jun 26, 2009, at 9:49 AM, Seth Vidal wrote:
On Fri, 26 Jun 2009, Joe Nall wrote:
just for fun:
set color=never in your yum.conf
and run it again.
No time difference here (2:23-2:26) for color=never on yum 3.2.23.
More than 2 minutes of cpu time on a 3.1GHz E8400. Downgraded to
Seth Vidal wrote:
run:
time yum -d 3 --disablerepo=\* --enablerepo=ROB10\* \
--enablerepo=updates list updates | grep 'time:'
and post that output.
Just pasted something similar in another mail, where the time is 1:30
as there are more repositories enabled than in this
Seth Vidal wrote:
On Fri, 26 Jun 2009, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
Seth Vidal wrote:
and if you can make this happen every time with 3.2.23 if you could
please run:
time yum -d 3 list updates | grep 'time:'
You were not talking to me, but I tried and
look at this: (added -C to avoid net
On Jun 26, 2009, at 10:25 AM, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
Seth Vidal wrote:
On Fri, 26 Jun 2009, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
Seth Vidal wrote:
and if you can make this happen every time with 3.2.23 if you could
please run:
time yum -d 3 list updates | grep 'time:'
You were not talking to me, but
On Fri, 26 Jun 2009, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
I have a hint and it points to the same rpms in more than one repo
hypothesis.
yum -d 5 lists a lot of
excluding for cost: firefox-3.0.11-1.fc10.i386 from updates
excluding for cost: gnome-session-2.24.3-1.fc10.i386 from updates
[...]
I see
Joe Nall wrote:
On Jun 26, 2009, at 10:25 AM, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
Seth Vidal wrote:
On Fri, 26 Jun 2009, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
Seth Vidal wrote:
and if you can make this happen every time with 3.2.23 if you could
please run:
time yum -d 3 list updates | grep 'time:'
You were
Milan Crha wrote:
On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 12:32 -0500, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
If I file this, should it be against evolution-mapi, or libical?
Hi,
and thanks, it's already filled under this bug:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=580706
Milan
Meh, google must not index
On Jun 26, 2009, at 10:35 AM, Seth Vidal wrote:
On Fri, 26 Jun 2009, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
I have a hint and it points to the same rpms in more than one repo
hypothesis.
yum -d 5 lists a lot of
excluding for cost: firefox-3.0.11-1.fc10.i386 from updates
excluding for cost:
Yeah I just caught that, and started a new one already ! Sorry about the grief.
ASD.
On 06/26/2009 11:02 AM, David wrote:
On 6/26/2009 11:01 AM, Aly Dharshi wrote:
Hello Folks,
I fired up pidgin via the cmd line and get the following error:
$ pidgin
(pidgin:25897): GStreamer-CRITICAL
On 6/26/2009 1:04 PM, Aly Dharshi wrote:
Yeah I just caught that, and started a new one already ! Sorry about the
grief.
ASD.
On 06/26/2009 11:02 AM, David wrote:
On 6/26/2009 11:01 AM, Aly Dharshi wrote:
Hello Folks,
I fired up pidgin via the cmd line and get the following error:
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 9:29 AM, Jussi Lehtola
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 18:07 +0200, Iain Arnell wrote:
okay, not actually broken, but this is definitely messing with (some
of the) perl structure (and perl-DBIx-Class-EncodedColumn already
requires
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 11:48 AM, Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu wrote:
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 9:29 AM, Jussi Lehtola
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 18:07 +0200, Iain Arnell wrote:
okay, not actually broken, but this is definitely messing with (some
of
emacs-23.0.93-5.fc12
thank you thank you thank you. huzzah
-benjamin
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 4:11 AM, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.comwrote:
On Fri, 26 Jun 2009 03:05:41 -0500, King wrote:
I found a very strange omission for the qt4-devel package. The path to
qt4-devel binaries (/usr/lib/qt4/bin) isn't automatically added to $PATH
like qt3's are.
17:32:01 zodbot jds2001: #170 (Rename Desktop live image to
GNOME live image) - FESCo - Trac -
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/170
17:32:06 Kevin_Kofler This one is my proposal. See the ticket for
the rationale.
[cut]
17:34:03 Kevin_Kofler It stops misleading users about the contents
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 02:22:44PM -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Over the past three years, I have yet to know what is the official
xterm spec. Everyone seems to follow whatever they want.
Some history:
I use a home-grown application that is exclusively terminal-based. It
relies on
Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
lzma-sdk-java is good but on the other hand, lzma's java SDK is called
SevenZip.
That's just its internal name. It's not officially called anything other
than LZMA SDK.
I'd like to remind everyone that unlike perl, tcl/tk, ... ; the word
java doesn't need to take part in
Fernando Nasser wrote:
Not all under our control, not all authors still around etc. And these
fails are subtle and sometimes only detected too late. The truth is that
the regexp syntax is almost impossible (actually, I believe it is
impossible) if the prefix is not there.
There isn't enough
On Fri, 26 Jun 2009, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
17:32:01 zodbot jds2001: #170 (Rename Desktop live image to
GNOME live image) - FESCo - Trac -
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/170
17:32:06 Kevin_Kofler This one is my proposal. See the ticket for
the rationale.
[cut]
17:34:03 Kevin_Kofler
King InuYasha wrote:
Yes I have. I was unable to build Mozilla with the cairo-qt option because
it was unable to detect Qt4's moc.
It's supposed to look for moc-qt4, if it doesn't, that's upstream's
failure.
Kevin Kofler
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
Seth Vidal wrote:
Furthermore, I was being flippant b/c I thought the claim that Kevin was
making was a bit over the top. Misleading? That implies intent and no one
is intending to mislead anyone.
Huh? You can accidentally mislead somebody. I never claimed it was
intentional!
That said, after
2009/6/26 Seth Vidal skvi...@fedoraproject.org:
I suggest everyone cut the drama. We're talking about whether or not the
live cd is labeled as 'gnome desktop' or leaving it as it currently is which
says: 'fedora 11 desktop edition: featuring the gnome desktop'.
I see a very big difference. I
John5342 wrote:
I see a very big difference. I look at
http://fedoraproject.org/en/get-fedora and i see a Fedora 11 Desktop
Edition which somewhere in the small print says it features Gnome.
Anyone at a glance could easily believe that this is the one and only
desktop that Fedora provides (it
On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 23:59 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
That's kinda the point, there should be no one default in the first place.
We have 2 perfectly functional primary live spins, they should get equal
treatment.
They are not equal, and they shouldn't get equal treatment. The Fedora
Project
Just curious... Is the KDE liveCD considered a Spin or an official
release image?
-Adam
--
http://maxamillion.googlepages.com
-
() ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments
--
Guido Grazioli wrote:
From wikipedia:
Version 8.0 was also the second to include the
Bluecurvehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bluecurve desktop
theme http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theme_%28computing%29. It used a
common theme for GNOME-2 and KDE 3.0.2 desktops, as well as
OpenOffice-1.0. KDE
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 05:18:52PM -0500, Adam Miller wrote:
Just curious... Is the KDE liveCD considered a Spin or an official
release image?
KDE Live ISOs are official, last time I checked.
--
Ian Weller i...@ianweller.org
GnuPG fingerprint: E51E 0517 7A92 70A2 4226 B050 87ED 7C97 EFA8
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Ian Welleri...@ianweller.org wrote:
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 05:18:52PM -0500, Adam Miller wrote:
Just curious... Is the KDE liveCD considered a Spin or an official
release image?
KDE Live ISOs are official, last time I checked.
If it is official, I think it
Kevin Kofler wrote:
As Orcan's and John's reply show, I'm far from the only one who thinks the
current naming of the GNOME-based spin is misleading and biased (which was
another thing the opponents to my proposal claimed during the meeting).
...and they're just the ones annoyed enough to speak
Jesse Keating wrote:
They are not equal, and they shouldn't get equal treatment. The Fedora
Project has a default install, which features a desktop, which currently
is gnome. Renaming things in a website will not change that. If you
want to change that, you've got quite a bit different of a
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Matthew
Woehlkemw_tr...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
I too would like to see KDE treated as a first-class citizen, rather than
blindly pushing Gnome to the ignorant masses.
The problem with this is that you are now pushing two things blindly
at ignorant masses,
2009/6/27 Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at
Guido Grazioli wrote:
From wikipedia:
Version 8.0 was also the second to include the
Bluecurvehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bluecurve desktop
theme http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theme_%28computing%29. It used a
common theme for GNOME-2 and KDE
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 5:40 PM, Jesse Keatingjkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
Looking even farther in the future to where we have AutoQA functioning,
we can treat critical-path packages differently in the real rawhide.
Packages outside of critical-path will have autoqa tests done on them in
an
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 6:25 PM, Adam Millermaxamill...@gmail.com wrote:
If it is official, I think it should at least get placed on the same
web page as the gnome/default one like it used to.
We're well aware that the current download page is deficient. The
design team is actively working to
Please do not quote my e-mail address unobfuscated in message bodies.
Adam Miller wrote:
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
I too would like to see KDE treated as a first-class citizen, rather than
blindly pushing Gnome to the ignorant masses.
The problem with this is
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Seth Vidal wrote:
I suggest everyone cut the drama. We're talking about whether or not the
live cd is labeled as 'gnome desktop' or leaving it as it currently is which
says: 'fedora 11 desktop edition: featuring the gnome desktop'.
I don't see the need for
Seth Vidal wrote:
On Fri, 26 Jun 2009, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
- A topic was brought up to FESCo. It was concerning an unease of an
important fraction of our members.
and I disagree with that fraction.
- You may not find it an important issue personally. But that doesn't
change the fact that
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 05:27:12PM -0500, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
Kevin Kofler wrote:
As Orcan's and John's reply show, I'm far from the only one who thinks the
current naming of the GNOME-based spin is misleading and biased (which was
another thing the opponents to my proposal claimed during
Matthew Garrett wrote:
Gnome in Fedora simply gets more development effort, has more
documentation based around it and therefore deserves to be the default.
Pretending that KDE has the same level of support does nothing to
benefit KDE.
There is a self-fulfilling prophecy in there.
--
Jon Stanley wrote:
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 8:17 PM, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
There is a self-fulfilling prophecy in there.
Prophecy? Prophecy implies something that will happen in the future,
vs. something that is a fact now.
Then call it a vicious circle if you want, his point will still
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 19:18:42 -0600,
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
Currently, a number of folks (myself included) thinks that Fedora
should have in their target demographic users who are new to Linux in
general and Fedora in particular. The sort of people who read a review
Yikes. I
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 07:44:48PM -0500, inode0 wrote:
When I look at a directory listing and see
Fedora-11-x86_64-Live.iso
Fedora-11-x86_64-Live-KDE.iso
it is pretty clear to KDE users which image they want. How about we
give the poor Gnome users the same courtesy and indicate which
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 03:27:30AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Matthew Garrett wrote:
It's not the project's role to lift non-default software to the same
level of involvement as the default software.
That's a premise I don't agree with. The non-default software has many
users (see below),
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 03:38:11 +0200,
Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Seth Vidal wrote:
Fedora contributors elected representatives.
The word representative contains represent. You're supposed to represent
the opinions of the people who elected you, not just your own.
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
Yikes. I wouldn't recommend Fedora to casual computer users. I would (and
have) recommend starting with Ubuntu and if they become interested in
particpating, suggest that Fedora is great for that.
It may be, that in the F12 time frame, Fedora will have fewer issues
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 03:38:11AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
The word representative contains represent. You're supposed to represent
the opinions of the people who elected you, not just your own.
We have secret ballots. How is one to know which group of people actually
voted for you or not?
Matthew Garrett wrote:
How many of those users are potential Fedora users?
If we present KDE as a fully-supported choice, most of them. If we present
it as that hobby project those amateurs in KDE SIG do, few of them. Take
your pick.
You're presenting a false choice. Given current resources,
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 04:10:16AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Matthew Garrett wrote:
It's not a default if you're providing a choice.
I see no reason why we can't provide a choice of 2 desktops.
How is a non-Linux user supposed to choose? We've optimised the Linux
install procedure to the
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 04:22:34AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Matthew Garrett wrote:
You're presenting a false choice. Given current resources, it's not
possible to support both Gnome and KDE to the same level.
Unjustified claim.
Not in the slightest. We have a finite quantity of
Adam Miller wrote:
As I have brought up to Kevin Kofler in IRC, I think before we did
something like that we would need to first look into having the KDE
SIG spawn up documentation that matches the gnome-centric docs
As I replied to you on IRC, I think it's the Docs Team's responsibility to
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
Please no. I am sick enough of that in real world politics.
Representatives are supposed to do what they think is best, not what the
majority of (less informed) people want. I want representatives that are
going to lead the project, not make decisions based on opinion
On 6/26/09, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Adam Miller wrote:
As I have brought up to Kevin Kofler in IRC, I think before we did
something like that we would need to first look into having the KDE
SIG spawn up documentation that matches the gnome-centric docs
As I replied
Adam Miller wrote:
The Docs team is currently generating Documentation for the Fedora
Desktop which in the current state of Fedora, is Gnome centric.
If it's really just that, then we just need to declare there to be 2 default
desktops and the Docs folks will feel responsible for providing docs
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 10:00 PM, Kevin Koflerkevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
If the people don't think a politician is properly protecting their
interest, than the next election cycle they should vote for someone else.
And this is not possible if all the big parties
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507637
--- Comment #4 from Caius 'kaio' Chance ccha...@redhat.com 2009-06-26
02:38:03 EDT ---
I have checked the whole process of
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507151
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org
2009-06-26 23:00:12 EDT ---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507151
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
We're heading to Michigan tomorrow morning early, back late 7/4. As
in previous years, I'll have exceedingly limited email and network
connectivity (I have to sit in the front yard of the cottage and sniff
wireless off an unsuspecting neighbor 100yds away). If anything goes
boom with MM, there
On 2009-06-26 04:59:02 PM, Matt Domsch wrote:
My Austin, TX thermometer at home today: 107.
Arcadia, MI high for next week: 76.
Nice - have a great trip :-)
If you're around a bit tonight, mind taking a look to see if there's
anything abnormal with mirrormanager now? We just rebuilt all of the
90 isn't unusual. 70 crawlers, 6 app servers with wsgi, and cron jobs on bapp1
could easily account for that.
--
Matt Domsch
Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO
linux.dell.com www.dell.com/linux
-Original Message-
From: Ricky Zhou ri...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Fri, 26 Jun
On 2009-06-26 10:59:44 PM, Matt Domsch wrote:
90 isn't unusual. 70 crawlers, 6 app servers with wsgi, and cron jobs
on bapp1 could easily account for that.
Ah, OK maybe we need to look at adjusting our limits then.
Thanks, and enjoy your trip,
Ricky
pgpxjpNPyaD1a.pgp
Description: PGP
On 2009-06-25 09:29:14 PM, Ricky Zhou wrote:
Hi, as some of you noticed (good!), you might start getting prompted to
verify SSH host keys on bastion. This is because we have temporarily
disabled the system-wide ssh_known_hosts file as we are rebuilding a
bunch of machines today. Once
Just giving a heads up - as the final stage of the web app refactoring
(https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1464), I'm about
to push some commits which delete a ton of old/unused files from
puppet. My apologies if I was a bit overzealous and deleted anything
that was still being
davide ha scritto:
Alessandro Boggiano boggiano at gmail.com writes:
The problem is that, at the startup, the volume is quite low, even if I
set it to the max volume with the applet; so, all the times, I have to
start alsamixergui and set the right value.
Ciao Alessandro,
I solved the same
Rahul Tidke wrote:
Hello,
I am configuring Fedora Core 6 and CentOS5.3 for automatic SSH
authentication, ssh version is OpenSSH_4.3p2, OpenSSL 0.9.8b, I have
executed following commands but still both systems prompt me for
passwords instead of using public keys.
ssh-keygen -b 1024 -t
On 06/26/2009 11:33 AM, Alessandro Boggiano wrote:
Thanks Davide,
I tried it: it's ok! Very good piece of sw!
It's in autostrart right now! ;)
It's a pity that gnome-volume applet can't do it!
It will, in the next release.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/VolumeControlContinued
You can use gpart to make your USB pendrive as bootable then try to install
Fedora 11 using liveusb-creator procedure.
I never try with F11 but I installed F10 same way.
Or From windows you can make F11 installable USB Pen drive. Try below link
it is very easy way
Brian Mearns bmearns at ieee.org writes:
echo Creating block device nodes.
mkblkdevs
echo Creating character device nodes.
mkchardevs
echo Loading dm-crypt module
modprobe -q dm-crypt
echo Loading aes module
modprobe -q aes
echo Loading cbc module
modprobe -q cbc
echo
Konstantin Svist wrote:
Rahul Tidke wrote:
Hello,
I am configuring Fedora Core 6 and CentOS5.3 for automatic SSH
authentication, ssh version is OpenSSH_4.3p2, OpenSSL 0.9.8b, I have
executed following commands but still both systems prompt me for
passwords instead of using public
Konstantin Svist wrote:
Rahul Tidke wrote:
Hello,
I am configuring Fedora Core 6 and CentOS5.3 for automatic SSH
authentication, ssh version is OpenSSH_4.3p2, OpenSSL 0.9.8b, I
have executed following commands but still both systems prompt me for
passwords instead of using public keys.
Hi Ken,
Yes, OpenJDK uses the pisces rasterizer which is slower than the
ductus one, which is included in Sun's proprietary JRE.
Would be interesting if you could try the proprietary build against OpenJDK.
I already have some plans speeding up Pisces, I just need some time to
finally sit down ;)
is there any noticeable cost to defining new yum groups? and can
different groups have an overlap? i ask as a followup to an earlier
post when i asked about the minimal set of packages needed to do
docbook/xml/xslt processing.
right now, there's an Authoring and Publishing group that
On 06/26/2009 02:07 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
is there any noticeable cost to defining new yum groups? and can
different groups have an overlap? i ask as a followup to an earlier
post when i asked about the minimal set of packages needed to do
docbook/xml/xslt processing.
right
Hi the PHP (5.2.9) distributed with F11 does not appear to have the
imap_open function. Is this in a separate package that needs to be installed ?
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 3:48 PM, Bradleypursley...@comcast.net wrote:
On 06/25/2009 07:47 AM, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Thu, 25 Jun 2009 07:09:55 -0500
Bradley wrote:
- Upon installation, the system was unable to determine what type of
monitor was available and doesn't give me the option to
On 6/25/2009 8:47 AM, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Thu, 25 Jun 2009 07:09:55 -0500
Bradley wrote:
- Upon installation, the system was unable to determine what type of
monitor was available and doesn't give me the option to manually select
the monitor's type or capabilities.
You can do a yum
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
By the time I'm done, I expect 5 for 5 failures (so far, I'm 2 out of
2). Starting with F9, Anaconda reliably failed to install grub for me,
on every one of my machines, despite that they're all different.
I've hit this too. I've been meaning to open a bug report for
1 - 100 of 236 matches
Mail list logo
