Hi Jim,
On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 23:49 +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 12:50 +0200, Ondřej Vašík wrote:
Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 09:02 +0200, Ondřej Vašík wrote:
Owen Taylor wrote:
I was rather surprised to see:
On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 00:38 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Run make V=1 if you want the verbose output you're used to.
This will be REQUIRED in Fedora for packages using this feature
Yes, it's a good idea for packages to do this, as it makes the koji logs
much more useful. We do this for qemu
Mark McLoughlin wrote:
...
The issue here is weighing up the benefit of a 1.11 update to developers
using F-9 and F-10 versus the risk of breaking existing working builds.
It sounds automake has improved its level of compatibility between
releases, so the risk is relatively low. Even still,
On 30/06/09 01:39, Bill Nottingham wrote:
That's a really crappy place for that message, though. What's the user
supposed to do there... reboot and then go download another 700MB - 4GB?
Yes it's a crappy place. I knew that when I suggested it. I just couldn't
think of a Javascript hack which
Hi All,
I've having some issues with a PPC64 build and was wondering if
someone a bit more ppc savy could have a poke. It builds fine on x86
and ppc32. git head also has the same issue as the current stable
release so unfortunately that doesn't help much.
PPC64 build
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 6:29 AM, Peter Robinsonpbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I've having some issues with a PPC64 build and was wondering if
someone a bit more ppc savy could have a poke.
A backtrace would be really useful here (remember to build with -ggdb
-O0 for extra usefulness).
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Colin Walterswalt...@verbum.org wrote:
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 6:29 AM, Peter Robinsonpbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I've having some issues with a PPC64 build and was wondering if
someone a bit more ppc savy could have a poke.
A backtrace would be
Here it is, dracut-0.3!
Featuring booting from all kind of block devices, NFS, iSCSI and NBD.
Dracut is a new initramfs infrastructure. It should replace nash/mkinitrd.
Dracut is a feauture for Fedora 12 http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Dracut
How to get started, if you want to test.
#
Hi Harald,
On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 12:59 +0200, Harald Hoyer wrote:
Here it is, dracut-0.3!
Thanks for your efforts, this is excellent.
We've started using it for OLPC's F11 spin, including our own modules to
implement OLPC features. So much nicer than what we had before!
However, the spec file
On 07/02/2009 01:09 PM, Daniel Drake wrote:
Hi Harald,
On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 12:59 +0200, Harald Hoyer wrote:
Here it is, dracut-0.3!
Thanks for your efforts, this is excellent.
We've started using it for OLPC's F11 spin, including our own modules to
implement OLPC features. So much nicer
Jim Meyering wrote:
I try to accommodate progressiveness, when the benefit appears to
outweigh the risk.
ACK. The risk of an automake-1.10-automake-1.11 upgrade on Fedora is
close to zero and outweigh the effects of bug fixes having gone into
automake-1.11.
So far, I know of no
On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 13:14 +0200, Harald Hoyer wrote:
The idea is to pregenerate a generic initrd and package it in an rpm and
deliver
it together with the kernel. There should be no need to generate the initrd
on
an X0-1 itsself.
Is it going to work like this in standard Fedora too?
Or
- 1.1.1-16
- Update tuning files to 20090702.
- Drop no longer needed workaround for #483644.
dvdauthor-0.6.14-9.fc12
---
* Tue Jun 30 2009 Rex Dieter rdie...@fedoraproject.org - 0.6.14-9
- rebuild (GraphicsMagick)
eclipse-gef-3.5.0-1.fc12
* Wed Jul 01
On 07/02/2009 01:25 PM, Daniel Drake wrote:
On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 13:14 +0200, Harald Hoyer wrote:
The idea is to pregenerate a generic initrd and package it in an rpm and deliver
it together with the kernel. There should be no need to generate the initrd on
an X0-1 itsself.
Is it going to
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 10:45:19AM +0100, Andrew Haley wrote:
Matthias Clasen wrote:
we'd like to announce the 'Fit and Finish' initiative for Fedora,
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fit_and_Finish
with the goal to improve the user experience of the Fedora desktop. We
want to
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Rawhide Reportrawh...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Compose started at Thu Jul 2 06:15:05 UTC 2009
...
New package ldd-pdf
Linux Device Drivers, Third Edition Book in PDF format
We ship books as packages?
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 9:27 PM, Matthias Clasenmcla...@redhat.com wrote:
To achieve this, we will hold regular test days, each of which will
focus on use cases in a certain area. A few ideas for test day topics
Overall, an excellent idea and plan. We had some very good results
with an OLPC
On 07/02/2009 06:03 PM, drago01 wrote:
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Rawhide Reportrawh...@fedoraproject.org
wrote:
Compose started at Thu Jul 2 06:15:05 UTC 2009
...
New package ldd-pdf
Linux Device Drivers, Third Edition Book in PDF format
We ship books as packages?
Yes and
On 02/07/09 13:41, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
snip
We ship books as packages?
Yes and this is not even the first time. Dive Into Python has been in
the repo for ages already.
Rahul
Is there a book group?
or what search parameter?
Tried yum info Dive Into Python
Error: No matching
On 07/02/2009 06:15 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
Is there a book group?
or what search parameter?
Tried yum info Dive Into Python
# yum info diveintopython
Since we have more than one book, I guess a new group could be defined
as well. If there is consensus on the name, I can add it. Should we
On 02/07/09 13:47, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 07/02/2009 06:15 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
Is there a book group?
or what search parameter?
Tried yum info Dive Into Python
# yum info diveintopython
Since we have more than one book, I guess a new group could be defined
as well. If there is
On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 13:45 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote:
On 02/07/09 13:41, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
snip
We ship books as packages?
Yes and this is not even the first time. Dive Into Python has been in
the repo for ages already.
Rahul
Is there a book group?
or what search
2009/7/2 Rahul Sundaram sunda...@fedoraproject.org:
On 07/02/2009 06:15 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
Is there a book group?
or what search parameter?
Tried yum info Dive Into Python
# yum info diveintopython
Since we have more than one book, I guess a new group could be defined
as well. If
On 07/02/2009 12:59 PM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
Here it is, dracut-0.3!
Featuring booting from all kind of block devices, NFS, iSCSI and NBD.
Dracut is a new initramfs infrastructure. It should replace nash/mkinitrd.
Dracut is a feauture for Fedora 12
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Dracut
Am Donnerstag, den 02.07.2009, 14:02 +0200 schrieb Till Maas:
On Thu July 2 2009, Christoph Höger wrote:
I had to create a new .fedora.cert this morning, because make
new-sources told me mine was out of date.
So I did but now make build runs into
Error: [('SSL routines',
Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 10:45:19AM +0100, Andrew Haley wrote:
In Ubuntu there's a Help button on the top menu bar that leads to a
nice help application, yelp. We have that app too, but it doesn't
seem to have the same contents, which are:
New to Ubuntu?
Adding and
Hi Harald,
On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 12:59 +0200, Harald Hoyer wrote:
Here it is, dracut-0.3!
Thanks for your efforts, this is excellent.
We've started using it for OLPC's F11 spin, including our own modules to
implement OLPC features. So much nicer than what we had before!
However, the
+1 on the Books idea but I feel obligated to do something along the lines of:
Insert snide remark about code vs. content here
But I shall refrain.
-Adam
--
http://maxamillion.googlepages.com
-
() ascii ribbon campaign - against html
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 9:20 AM, Peter Robinsonpbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
Interestingly with -ggdb it builds fine with out without -O0.
That makes it a lot more likely to be a compiler flaw (though not guaranteed).
Does 'make check' pass in the source tree you built with -O0?
A backtrace
On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 02:52:59PM +0200, Thomas Janssen wrote:
2009/7/2 Rahul Sundaram sunda...@fedoraproject.org:
On 07/02/2009 06:15 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
Is there a book group?
or what search parameter?
Tried yum info Dive Into Python
# yum info diveintopython
Since we
On 07/02/2009 03:07 PM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
On 07/02/2009 12:59 PM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
Here it is, dracut-0.3!
Featuring booting from all kind of block devices, NFS, iSCSI and NBD.
Dracut is a new initramfs infrastructure. It should replace
nash/mkinitrd.
Dracut is a feauture for Fedora 12
On 07/02/2009 03:26 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
Hi Harald,
On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 12:59 +0200, Harald Hoyer wrote:
Here it is, dracut-0.3!
Thanks for your efforts, this is excellent.
We've started using it for OLPC's F11 spin, including our own modules to
implement OLPC features. So much nicer
On 07/02/2009 06:58 PM, Adam Miller wrote:
+1 on the Books idea
Does this look ok?
--- comps-f12.xml.in.orig 2009-07-02 15:39:02.0 +0530
+++ comps-f12.xml.in2009-07-02 19:49:32.108616562 +0530
@@ -520,6 +520,17 @@
/packagelist
/group
group
+idbooks/id
+
Interestingly with -ggdb it builds fine with out without -O0.
That makes it a lot more likely to be a compiler flaw (though not guaranteed).
Does 'make check' pass in the source tree you built with -O0?
A backtrace would still be great though. Try setting DEBUG=fcatch in
the environment.
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 12:16 PM, Glen Turnerg...@gdt.id.au wrote:
On 30/06/09 01:39, Bill Nottingham wrote:
That's a really crappy place for that message, though. What's the user
supposed to do there... reboot and then go download another 700MB - 4GB?
Yes it's a crappy place. I knew that
Peter Robinson wrote:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1449113
Unrelated to this issue, but please use make V=1 so we see the actual
build command lines in the build.log (see the thread about the new
automake).
Kevin Kofler
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Yes and this is not even the first time. Dive Into Python has been in
the repo for ages already.
That doesn't mean it's compliant with our guidelines on shipping content. I
really don't see what benefit it gives us to have a package dumping some
book into /usr/share. Can't
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Kevin Koflerkevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Yes and this is not even the first time. Dive Into Python has been in
the repo for ages already.
That doesn't mean it's compliant with our guidelines on shipping content. I
really don't see what
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 4:22 PM, Rahul
Sundaramsunda...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On 07/02/2009 06:58 PM, Adam Miller wrote:
+1 on the Books idea
Does this look ok?
--- comps-f12.xml.in.orig 2009-07-02 15:39:02.0 +0530
+++ comps-f12.xml.in 2009-07-02 19:49:32.108616562 +0530
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 10:14 AM, drago01drag...@gmail.com wrote:
If the content enhances the OS user experience, then the content is
OK to be packaged in Fedora. This means, for example, that things
like: fonts, themes, clipart, and wallpaper are OK.
So does a programming book enhance the OS
On 07/02/2009 08:45 PM, drago01 wrote:
If we want to go this route, why limit it to technical books?
That's what is currently available. The description can be changed if
policy is.
Rahul
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 10:41 PM, Rahul
Sundaramsunda...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On 07/02/2009 06:03 PM, drago01 wrote:
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Rawhide Reportrawh...@fedoraproject.org
wrote:
Compose started at Thu Jul 2 06:15:05 UTC 2009
...
New package ldd-pdf
Linux Device
On 07/02/2009 08:51 PM, David wrote:
I disagree that Fedora should be packaging books, both of these can
easily be downloaded via web.
Why package something that has no dependencies?
We package hundreds of things that have no dependencies and can be
downloaded easily via web including fonts.
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1449113
Unrelated to this issue, but please use make V=1 so we see the actual
build command lines in the build.log (see the thread about the new
automake).
With V=1
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1450335name=build.log
Rahul Sundaram pisze:
On 07/02/2009 08:51 PM, David wrote:
I disagree that Fedora should be packaging books, both of these can
easily be downloaded via web.
Why package something that has no dependencies?
We package hundreds of things that have no dependencies and can be
downloaded
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Kevin Koflerkevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Xavier Toth wrote:
So I do a yum update, pickup a yum that isn't compatible with the
original anaconda and then can no longer make installable DVD's. This
is busted! If anaconda is dependent on a specific version of yum
On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 08:53:52PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 07/02/2009 08:51 PM, David wrote:
I disagree that Fedora should be packaging books, both of these can
easily be downloaded via web.
Why package something that has no dependencies?
We package hundreds of things that have
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 1:23 AM, Rahul
Sundaramsunda...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On 07/02/2009 08:51 PM, David wrote:
I disagree that Fedora should be packaging books, both of these can
easily be downloaded via web.
Why package something that has no dependencies?
We package hundreds of
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Davidbouncingc...@gmail.com wrote:
OK, but if the package payload doesn't interoperate with another
package, I can't see the point. Fonts, artwork, sure, they are a
system resource for other software.
By that logic a book distributed in PDF is a system resource
Glen Turner (g...@gdt.id.au) said:
That's a really crappy place for that message, though. What's the user
supposed to do there... reboot and then go download another 700MB - 4GB?
Yes it's a crappy place. I knew that when I suggested it. I just couldn't
think of a Javascript hack which would
On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 16:28 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1449113
Unrelated to this issue, but please use make V=1 so we see the actual
build command lines in the build.log (see the thread about the new
automake).
With V=1
Peter Robinson wrote:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1449113
Unrelated to this issue, but please use make V=1 so we see the actual
build command lines in the build.log (see the thread about the new
automake).
With V=1
On 07/02/2009 08:37 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Yes and this is not even the first time. Dive Into Python has been in
the repo for ages already.
That doesn't mean it's compliant with our guidelines on shipping content. I
really don't see what benefit it gives us to have a
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1449113
Unrelated to this issue, but please use make V=1 so we see the actual
build command lines in the build.log (see the thread about the new
automake).
With V=1
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1450335name=build.log
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1449113
Unrelated to this issue, but please use make V=1 so we see the actual
build command lines in the build.log (see the thread about the new
automake).
With V=1
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 5:19 PM, Adam Millermaxamill...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 10:14 AM, drago01drag...@gmail.com wrote:
If the content enhances the OS user experience, then the content is
OK to be packaged in Fedora. This means, for example, that things
like: fonts, themes,
Does this look ok?
--- comps-f12.xml.in.orig 2009-07-02 15:39:02.0 +0530
+++ comps-f12.xml.in 2009-07-02 19:49:32.108616562 +0530
@@ -520,6 +520,17 @@
/packagelist
/group
group
+ idbooks/id
+ _nameTechnical Books/_name
+ _description/
+
On Thu July 2 2009, Kevin Kofler wrote:
It's also a hard decision where to draw the line: will you accept a PDF of
Jules Verne's Around the World in 80 Days (which is in the public domain)
as well? What exact criteria make Dive into Python OK and Around the World
in 80 Days not?
Dive into
Peter Robinson wrote:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1449113
Unrelated to this issue, but please use make V=1 so we see the actual
build command lines in the build.log (see the thread about the new
automake).
With V=1
Kevin Kofler, Thu, 02 Jul 2009 17:07:39 +0200:
It's also a hard decision where to draw the line: will you accept a PDF
of Jules Verne's Around the World in 80 Days (which is in the public
domain) as well? What exact criteria make Dive into Python OK and Around
the World in 80 Days not?
And
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 5:43 PM, Bill Nottinghamnott...@redhat.com wrote:
Glen Turner (g...@gdt.id.au) said:
That's a really crappy place for that message, though. What's the user
supposed to do there... reboot and then go download another 700MB - 4GB?
Yes it's a crappy place. I knew that when
2009/7/2 Paul W. Frields sticks...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 02:52:59PM +0200, Thomas Janssen wrote:
2009/7/2 Rahul Sundaram sunda...@fedoraproject.org:
On 07/02/2009 06:15 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
Is there a book group?
Since we have more than one book, I guess a new group
Hi All,
I'm working to get the core moblin packages into Fedora with the plan
of having at least experimental support in time for F-12. If you've
got a few spare cycles and have some time to review a package there's
a list against the tracker bug here.
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 5:43 PM, Bill Nottinghamnott...@redhat.com wrote:
Of course, I suspect we'll now have someone claiming that the camel
book is actually a religous text.
For the love of Larry, have you no respect?
--
Mat Booth
www.matbooth.co.uk
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 06:30:50PM +0200, Till Maas wrote:
On Thu July 2 2009, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 04:51:50PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
No I didn't. Are the details published anywhere of how to request access?
I'm working on it. Basically, email dwmw2 or me an ssh
Bill Nottingham, Thu, 02 Jul 2009 12:43:10 -0400:
I'm not sure how distributable the KJV is or isnt', but it's explicitly
forbidden by the guidelines.
Of course, I suspect we'll now have someone claiming that the camel book
is actually a religous text.
Of course, and GNU Manifesto!
But, no
On 07/02/2009 10:45 PM, Petr Machata wrote:
Hi,
recently we've (that's we as in me and Benjamin Kosnik, not a royal
we) broken up boost to sub-packages in Fedora Rawhide, but we forgot
to drop a filelist at the main boost package, intended as an umbrella
over all the sub-packages. So in
MC == Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com writes:
MC So, how should I propose to FESCO exclusion of DiveIntoPython
MC (BTW, wonderful book), Jules Verne and anything else we find?
Open a ticket on their trac (https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/).
The issue here is that the guidelines explicitly permit
On Tue, 2009-06-30 at 13:55 -0400, Christopher Beland wrote:
On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 15:27 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
If you have ideas for
other areas that could benefit from this kind of attention, please let
us know.
I can think of a number of different cross-component tests...
On 07/02/2009 09:33 PM, Thomas Janssen wrote:
2009/7/2 Paul W. Frields sticks...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 02:52:59PM +0200, Thomas Janssen wrote:
2009/7/2 Rahul Sundaram sunda...@fedoraproject.org:
On 07/02/2009 06:15 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
Is there a book group?
Since we have
Due to the US holiday, FESCo will not hold it's regularly scheduled
meeting tomorrow. All business will be postponed until next week.
Have a great 4th if you're in the US, and if you're anywhere else,
have a great 4th anyway! :)
-Jon
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 12:43 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
I'm not sure how distributable the KJV is or isnt'
It's been out of copyright for some little time, now. Probably.(*)
* Of course, one could potentially make some quite interesting legal
arguments about the author credit, and whether
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 12:32 PM, Ville Skyttäville.sky...@iki.fi wrote:
IMO the latter is clearly preferable, and would be even a good default. But
then again, it might be too late to change the default as it could break stuff
(even if the xdg-open man page doesn't document async/sync
On 07/02/2009 02:10 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 12:43 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
I'm not sure how distributable the KJV is or isnt'
It's been out of copyright for some little time, now. Probably.(*)
* Of course, one could potentially make some quite interesting
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 9:43 AM, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote:
Of course, I suspect we'll now have someone claiming that the camel
book is actually a religous text.
So say we all!
:)
-Chris
--
Chris Weyl
Ex astris, scientia
--
fedora-devel-list mailing
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 2:30 PM, Jerry Jamesloganje...@gmail.com wrote:
I am more and more of the opinion that xdg-open is simply the wrong
tool for viewing/editing temporary files. It wasn't built for that
use case, and the tools it invokes were not either.
I think the easiest fix here is
Hi,
For a few days now updating rawhide doesn't work, because it misses a
dependency:
kdebase-workspace-4.2.95-3.fc12.i586 from rawhide has depsolving problems
-- Missing Dependency: libxklavier.so.12 is needed by package
kdebase-workspace-4.2.95-3.fc12.i586 (rawhide)
Error: Missing
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Colin Walterswalt...@verbum.org wrote:
I think the easiest fix here is for the app not to delete the
temporary file immediately after the helper exits. Just write it in
$TMPDIR and let tempreaper come along and eat it later.
I am an XEmacs developer, and I
Op woensdag 01-07-2009 om 21:02 uur [tijdzone +0300], schreef Ville
Skyttä:
Hello,
I noticed a bunch of mingw32*-debuginfo packages that contain only *.debug
(no
sources, no build id) appeared in Rawhide. Is this how mingw32 debuginfo
packages are supposed to look like, or is the
On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 15:02 -0400, Clemens Eisserer wrote:
Hi,
For a few days now updating rawhide doesn't work, because it misses a
dependency:
kdebase-workspace-4.2.95-3.fc12.i586 from rawhide has depsolving problems
-- Missing Dependency: libxklavier.so.12 is needed by package
On Saturday 27 June 2009 13:41:42 Jindrich Novy wrote:
Good news everyone!
I've invented a device that installs TeX Live 2008 on your Fedora!
/futurama
TeX Live 2008 is now packaged and available for testing. It is not in
Fedora yet because it requires reviews of couple of packages. But you
I just submitted this update:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/edit/xemacs-21.5.29-1.fc11,
which is supposed to close two bugs. When I submitted it, I got this:
500 Internal error
The server encountered an unexpected condition which prevented it from
fulfilling the request.
I checked My
On Thursday 02 July 2009, Xia Shing Zee wrote:
I'm a new package maintainer, but I'll try dumpasn1 and id3v2
Thanks (ditto to the others who grabbed the rest of the packages). Please go
ahead and take ownership of these in pkgdb, they have been orphaned already.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing
On Thursday 02 July 2009, Erik van Pienbroek wrote:
The implementation of mingw32 debuginfo packages has recently been
discussed on the Fedora-MinGW mailing list:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/fedora-mingw/2009-June/001613.html
[...]
I think it's best to continue this discussion on
Op vrijdag 03-07-2009 om 00:49 uur [tijdzone +0300], schreef Ville
Skyttä:
On Thursday 02 July 2009, Erik van Pienbroek wrote:
The implementation of mingw32 debuginfo packages has recently been
discussed on the Fedora-MinGW mailing list:
Jason L Tibbitts III, Thu, 02 Jul 2009 12:32:48 -0500:
Open a ticket on their trac (https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/).
Hmm, it *is* complicated.
The issue here is that the guidelines explicitly permit documentation
and help files; diveintopython is obviously documenting Python, and if
it was
Am Donnerstag, den 02.07.2009, 09:48 -0400 schrieb Paul W. Frields:
On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 02:52:59PM +0200, Thomas Janssen wrote:
2009/7/2 Rahul Sundaram sunda...@fedoraproject.org:
On 07/02/2009 06:15 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
Is there a book group?
or what search parameter?
The Dracut wiki page has now been moved from my drafts to it's permanent
location.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Dracut
Debugging can be found here
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Dracut/Debugging
Note i'm not sure if the
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Dracut#Getting_the_Source containst
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Christoph Wickert
christoph.wick...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 02.07.2009, 23:10 +0530 schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
On 07/02/2009 09:33 PM, Thomas Janssen wrote:
...
Books and Guides even better.
Committed for Fedora 12.
Correct me if I'm
MC == Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com writes:
MC Well, I always understood, that documentation which is part of
MC normal package is OK, but source package which contains nothing
MC else than documentation isn't.
If that was the case, then I see 17 -docs packages that build
completely separately
On 07/03/2009 04:56 AM, Christoph Wickert wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 02.07.2009, 23:10 +0530 schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
On 07/02/2009 09:33 PM, Thomas Janssen wrote:
...
Books and Guides even better.
Committed for Fedora 12.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but new groups in comps are expected to be
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79878
--- Additional comments from o...@openoffice.org Thu Jul 2 08:16:08 +
2009 ---
*** Issue 82986 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507637
--- Comment #11 from Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com 2009-07-02 15:20:26
EDT ---
In reply to comment #8, I manually
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503430
--- Comment #6 from Caius 'kaio' Chance ccha...@redhat.com 2009-07-02
19:47:56 EDT ---
Thanks for info. I am redoing the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487581
--- Comment #5 from Caius 'kaio' Chance ccha...@redhat.com 2009-07-03
01:09:05 EDT ---
I zapped this to draw attention of
How often is bugzilla.redhat.com updated with changes in Fedora pkgdb?
It has yet to sync the audacious* ownership changes from June 29th.
Perhaps it's broken?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/describecomponents.cgi?product=Fedora
___
On 07/02/2009 08:53 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
Hi, I've had a chance to talk to spot and I've drafted the following
policy about licensing the things that we write in Fedora Infrastructure:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure_Licensing
Do people like it? Is a GPL family
On 07/02/2009 07:03 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 07/02/2009 08:53 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
Hi, I've had a chance to talk to spot and I've drafted the following
policy about licensing the things that we write in Fedora Infrastructure:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure_Licensing
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 8:07 AM, Michael Schwendtbugs.mich...@gmx.net wrote:
How often is bugzilla.redhat.com updated with changes in Fedora pkgdb?
It has yet to sync the audacious* ownership changes from June 29th.
Perhaps it's broken?
It is. Toshio has a change that should be live in the
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 07/02/2009 08:53 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
Hi, I've had a chance to talk to spot and I've drafted the following
policy about licensing the things that we write in Fedora Infrastructure:
1 - 100 of 191 matches
Mail list logo
