- John5342 john5...@googlemail.com wrote:
Firstly, not all people turn the automatic upgrade on.
Secondly, there are folks use rpm -hiv or build from srpm.
In that case, they are more likely to spot the bugs.
I am not talking about upgrades. I am talking about updates. Most
people
- John5342 john5...@googlemail.com wrote:
2009/7/8 Ding Yi Chen dc...@redhat.com:
I don't think this has anything to do with motivation. You have an
idea and on the face of it it sounds great but even the greatest
ideas
can be doomed by the details. If you don't believe me (or Kevin)
I'd like another pair of eyes as what I see in a backtrace looks strange.
The full backtrace is attached, two excerpts inline below.
With Fedora 11 (and never before) I see deadlocks in Audacious
occasionally. It's not too easy to reproduce, but starting something
resource-hungry while playing
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Indeed. Here's an idea -- why don't you mass mail the maintainers of all
the autotools-using projects you can find on Sourceforge, and be sure to
tell them how much autotools suck, and how better CMake is. I'm sure they
will appreciate your helpful suggestions.
Hahaha…
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Wrong, as usual.
That's an ad hominem argument.
Since each autoconf macro typically expands out to hundreds lines of
shellcode,
But those hundreds of lines of shellcode *CHANGE* with the autoconf and/or
aclocal version! Even if upstream changes *nothing* in
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
That's definitely a useful tip -- always ignore warnings. They are
always completely meaningless.
You don't need to worry about them.
Quit the sarcasm. The thing is: this is how things work in the real world,
whether it's a good idea or not. The autotools spit out
Ding Yi Chen wrote:
If X-1.3 does not specify Y-1.3 as dependency, I don't think
yum update X will pull Y-1.3, even with the current version.
Selective updates are not really tested in practice and tend not to work.
You're expected to get ALL stable updates, not just one. The old RHL
Ding Yi Chen wrote:
Tell Denture your constraint and
it will build packages if it can; or reasons why it cannot build.
The word build there is another big fail. Users DO NOT WANT to build their
packages from source. If they did, they'd all be using Gentoo!
Kevin Kofler
--
On Mon, 06.07.09 09:54, darrell pfeifer (darrel...@gmail.com) wrote:
Using rawhide and gdm-2.26.1-13.fc12.i586 when I do a ck-list-sessions I see
Session4:
unix-user = '500'
realname = 'darrell pfeifer'
seat = 'Seat5'
session-type = ''
active = FALSE
x11-display = ':0'
x11-display-device
Ding Yi Chen wrote:
- John5342 john5...@googlemail.com wrote:
I am not talking about upgrades. I am talking about updates. Most
people just run updates when packagekit (or similar) tells them to.
In
a proper release updates are released together. In Denture they will
be updated out of
On Wednesday, 08 July 2009 at 11:00, Michael Schwendt wrote:
I'd like another pair of eyes as what I see in a backtrace looks strange.
The full backtrace is attached, two excerpts inline below.
With Fedora 11 (and never before) I see deadlocks in Audacious
occasionally. It's not too easy to
On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 06:05:47PM -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
If someone thinks that by patching configure.ac, instead of configure,
one achieves tremendous savings in the frequency of needing to rebase
one's patches, they're in a desperate need for a reality check.
No, you are. Please
Kevin Kofler writes:
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Indeed. Here's an idea -- why don't you mass mail the maintainers of all
the autotools-using projects you can find on Sourceforge, and be sure to
tell them how much autotools suck, and how better CMake is. I'm sure they
will appreciate your helpful
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 12:28:55 +0200, Dominik wrote:
On Wednesday, 08 July 2009 at 11:00, Michael Schwendt wrote:
I'd like another pair of eyes as what I see in a backtrace looks strange.
The full backtrace is attached, two excerpts inline below.
With Fedora 11 (and never before) I see
Kevin Kofler writes:
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Wrong, as usual.
That's an ad hominem argument.
Since each autoconf macro typically expands out to hundreds lines of
shellcode,
But those hundreds of lines of shellcode *CHANGE* with the autoconf and/or
aclocal version!
You're changing the
Richard W.M. Jones writes:
On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 06:05:47PM -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
If someone thinks that by patching configure.ac, instead of configure,
one achieves tremendous savings in the frequency of needing to rebase
one's patches, they're in a desperate need for a reality
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 13:16:56 +0200, me wrote:
Actually, I see that on Fedora 10, too.
Do you remember when you ran into it for the first time?
alsa-lib was upgraded for F10 at beginning of May, for example. [Perhaps
I need to diff in that area.]
Hmmm, the alsa-lib diff between 1.0.19 and
On Wednesday, 08 July 2009 at 13:16, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 12:28:55 +0200, Dominik wrote:
On Wednesday, 08 July 2009 at 11:00, Michael Schwendt wrote:
I'd like another pair of eyes as what I see in a backtrace looks strange.
The full backtrace is attached, two
on., 17.06.2009 kl. 11.44 -0700, skrev Ray Van Dolson:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 08:06:36AM -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 7:25 AM, Ray Van Dolsonra...@bludgeon.org wrote:
Hmm, I just always figured I was supposed to add myself to the audio
group. So these files are
Christoph Höger on 07/08/2009 09:21 AM wrote:
how do I do that?
Since you have not submitted it for stable I do not see any problem.
Don't do anything. :)
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
On Wednesday 08 July 2009 08:59:43 am Rick L. Vinyard, Jr. wrote:
What is the effect on non-Fedora and older distributions (pre F10) if I
mark a subpackage (such as documentation) with BuildArch: noarch?
the package will attempt to build as noarch only. you cant to it for F-9 and
since F-9 is
On Wednesday 08 July 2009 16:30:56 Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Christoph Höger on 07/08/2009 09:21 AM wrote:
how do I do that?
I guess you can use Delete/Unpush/Revoke request or something like that in
bodhi web interface.
Since you have not submitted it for stable I do not see any problem.
On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 09:30 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Christoph Höger on 07/08/2009 09:21 AM wrote:
how do I do that?
Since you have not submitted it for stable I do not see any problem.
Don't do anything. :)
You might want to disable the automatic push to stable, though, in
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 07:59:43 -0600, Jr. wrote:
What is the effect on non-Fedora and older distributions (pre F10) if I
mark a subpackage (such as documentation) with BuildArch: noarch?
You can evaluate the %fedora variable to use this new feature only
for Fedora = 10:
%if 0%{?fedora} 9
Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 07:59:43 -0600, Jr. wrote:
What is the effect on non-Fedora and older distributions (pre F10) if I
mark a subpackage (such as documentation) with BuildArch: noarch?
You can evaluate the %fedora variable to use this new feature only
for Fedora = 10:
also renamed file /etc/pulse/default.pa.rpmnew to /etc/pulse/default.pa
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 8:22 AM, Sachin asci...@gmail.com wrote:
i added myself to the pulse-access and audio group ..
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 7:43 AM, Kjartan Maraas kmar...@broadpark.nowrote:
on., 17.06.2009 kl. 11.44
Am Mittwoch, den 08.07.2009, 17:41 +0300 schrieb Jussi Lehtola:
On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 09:30 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Christoph Höger on 07/08/2009 09:21 AM wrote:
how do I do that?
Since you have not submitted it for stable I do not see any problem.
Don't do anything.
Over the last few months I've had problems with the gnome
authorization dialog failing, sometimes intermittently and sometimes
consistently for long periods of time. The dialog I'm referring to is
the one that pops up when root access is needed to run an application
or control panel. Examples are
On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 08:30 -0700, darrell pfeifer wrote:
The bottom line: with policykit being used more heavily in rawhide, if
you're getting strange intermittent permissions failures, try the
workaround.
When you run out of inotify watches, many things will fail, not just
PolicyKit.
Rick L. Vinyard, Jr. wrote:
Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 07:59:43 -0600, Jr. wrote:
What is the effect on non-Fedora and older distributions (pre F10) if I
mark a subpackage (such as documentation) with BuildArch: noarch?
You can evaluate the %fedora variable to use this new
On 2009-07-08 12:30:30 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
Is he not responding at axel.th...@atrpms.net?
That's his bugzilla email addess, so that seems to be the case :-(
Thanks,
Ricky
pgpYpzXyQeI8L.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
Ricky Zhou wrote:
On 2009-07-08 12:30:30 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
Is he not responding at axel.th...@atrpms.net?
That's his bugzilla email addess, so that seems to be the case :-(
Thanks,
Ricky
What about i...@fedoraproject.org?
--
in your fear, speak only peace
in your fear, seek
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 07:17:38PM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
But, once I do that, you'll abandon this reasoning too, once you realize
that it's a non-starter, and change the topic to something else. It'll
probably be line number changes.
Nonsense. I'm not being intentionally dishonest, please
Sven Lankes wrote:
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 12:41:56PM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
Is he not responding at axel.th...@atrpms.net?
That's his bugzilla email addess, so that seems to be the case :-(
What about i...@fedoraproject.org?
That is Andreas Thienemann -
Jon Ciesla (l...@jcomserv.net) said:
Is he not responding at axel.th...@atrpms.net?
That's his bugzilla email addess, so that seems to be the case :-(
What about i...@fedoraproject.org?
i...@fp.o is not Axel. ath...@fp.o just goes to the ATrpms.net e-mail address.
Bill
--
there are alot of bug report's and patch's waiting for Axel.Thimm
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 2:51 PM, Bill Nottinghamnott...@redhat.com wrote:
Jon Ciesla (l...@jcomserv.net) said:
Is he not responding at axel.th...@atrpms.net?
That's his bugzilla email addess, so that seems to be the case :-(
On 08/07/09 18:51, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Jon Ciesla (l...@jcomserv.net) said:
Is he not responding at axel.th...@atrpms.net?
That's his bugzilla email addess, so that seems to be the case :-(
What about i...@fedoraproject.org?
i...@fp.o is not Axel. ath...@fp.o just goes to the
On 07/08/2009 01:44 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 07:17:38PM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
But, once I do that, you'll abandon this reasoning too, once you realize
that it's a non-starter, and change the topic to something else. It'll
probably be line number changes.
Nonsense.
It's been released here:
http://projects.gnome.org/dia/
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
# rpm -ql fluxbox-pulseaudio
/etc/fluxbox-pulseaudio
# ls -la /etc/fluxbox-pulseaudio
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 2008-09-17 19:29 /etc/fluxbox-pulseaudio
# rpm -q --qf %{ARCH}\n fluxbox-pulseaudio
x86_64
... it means the package contains one empty file. Is it really normal
that we
On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 20:44 +0200, Andreas Bierfert wrote:
It is not only an empty file. It requires the necessary PA packages
and triggers
automatic PA loading on session starts.
Please see [1] and [2] for some more background information.
That subpackage should likely be noarch.
--
On Wed, 08 Jul 2009 11:50:18 -0700
Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 20:44 +0200, Andreas Bierfert wrote:
It is not only an empty file. It requires the necessary PA packages
and triggers
automatic PA loading on session starts.
Please see [1] and [2] for
On Wed July 8 2009, Christoph Höger wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 08.07.2009, 17:41 +0300 schrieb Jussi Lehtola:
On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 09:30 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Christoph Höger on 07/08/2009 09:21 AM wrote:
how do I do that?
Since you have not submitted it for stable I do
We've had the first 'Fit and Finish' test day on display configuration
yesterday. I'd like to thank everybody who came by on irc and tested
something, or filed a bug. If you could not make it, our test cases are
still available here:
Thanks. Did it.
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Kevin Kofler writes:
What he was talking about is that rediffing patches, i.e. making patches
apply to a new upstream version (that's what rediffing means for us Fedora
packagers), is more likely to break for configure.ac than for configure.
And that's exactly what I said. Thank you for
On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 11:36 -0700, Conrad Meyer wrote:
File a bug.
Found one already filed here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502870
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
snip
Frankly, all of this would scare me away from the autotools. If
all that can happen from patching a small file rather than a
monster file...
Forcing version x.y of some tool and then shipping the results of
using said
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Kevin Kofler writes:
What he was talking about is that rediffing patches, i.e. making patches
apply to a new upstream version (that's what rediffing means for us
Fedora packagers), is more likely to break for configure.ac than for
configure.
And that's exactly what
On Fri, 2009-07-03 at 12:27 +0200, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
devtodo-0.1.20-3.fc12
I maintain this package in Fedora. Just wrote the author asking for a
clarification on licensing.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/
--
Kevin Kofler writes:
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Kevin Kofler writes:
What he was talking about is that rediffing patches, i.e. making patches
apply to a new upstream version (that's what rediffing means for us
Fedora packagers), is more likely to break for configure.ac than for
configure.
And
On 07/07/2009 07:42 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
RAND does not necessarily mean royalty-free
Oh, I agree. The trick is nobody knows what those RAND terms are.
Free, not free, something-we-never-dreamed-of, etc. Various folks (e.g.
OSNews) have been attempting to get Microsoft to present them with a
於 三，2009-07-08 於 11:37 +0200，Kevin Kofler 提到：
Ding Yi Chen wrote:
Tell Denture your constraint and
it will build packages if it can; or reasons why it cannot build.
The word build there is another big fail. Users DO NOT WANT to build their
packages from source. If they did, they'd all
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
In my last message, rather than speculate I posted logs from a randomly
chosen project, openldap, that showed that to be not the case.
That's one project. It doesn't prove any sort of a general trend.
I invite you to find a counterexample, but I regret to inform you,
Frank Murphy wrote:
On 08/07/09 18:51, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Jon Ciesla (l...@jcomserv.net) said:
Is he not responding at axel.th...@atrpms.net?
That's his bugzilla email addess, so that seems to be the case :-(
What about i...@fedoraproject.org?
i...@fp.o is not Axel. ath...@fp.o just
On 07/08/2009 08:58 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Case closed.
No, your argumentation is based on false premises.
Perhaps I wasn't clear in my last post. You two need to take this
offlist, or simply let this thread stop by agreeing to disagree. This is
the last friendly
I have a 500G Sata Drive that I have F11 installed on half of it, using
3 primary partitions (/boot, / and swap).
Now, I want to run rawhide on the other half, via F11 and update to
rawhide (which I understand is not exactly running smoothly), or install
rawhide itself. But the problem I run
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yes, i am doing it.
Bernie Innocenti wrote:
It's been released here:
http://projects.gnome.org/dia/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
Kevin Kofler writes:
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
In my last message, rather than speculate I posted logs from a randomly
chosen project, openldap, that showed that to be not the case.
That's one project. It doesn't prove any sort of a general trend.
That's one more project's worth of data that
since now the people is able to build EPEL packages, why not ask to
the people when it's request cvs branch's to maintain EPEL packages
too ?
--
Itamar Reis Peixoto
e-mail/msn: ita...@ispbrasil.com.br
sip: ita...@ispbrasil.com.br
skype: itamarjp
icq: 81053601
+55 11 4063 5033
+55
On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 02:15:54 -0300, Itamar wrote:
since now the people is able to build EPEL packages,
since now? The people have been able to build EPEL packages for
a much longer time. The only thing that's new is that koji+bodhi
can be used.
why not ask to
the people when it's request cvs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503430
--- Comment #18 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-07-08
03:47:52 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #17)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510
Hin-Tak Leung ht...@users.sourceforge.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=69129
User kstribley changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477421
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org
2009-07-08 07:20:49 EDT ---
madan-fonts-1.0-9.fc11 has
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477405
Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
There's a minor issue with the supybot-based config of MeetBot. Until
it can be resolved, it's important that zodbot be started with it's
cwd in /srv/web/meetbot. Weird, yes. But effective at making it work
:)
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 01:06:19PM -0400, Jon Stanley wrote:
There's a minor issue with the supybot-based config of MeetBot. Until
it can be resolved, it's important that zodbot be started with it's
cwd in /srv/web/meetbot. Weird, yes. But effective at making it work
:)
I'd add that to
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 13:06:19 -0400
Jon Stanley jonstan...@gmail.com wrote:
There's a minor issue with the supybot-based config of MeetBot. Until
it can be resolved, it's important that zodbot be started with it's
cwd in /srv/web/meetbot. Weird, yes. But effective at making it work
:)
I
Found out that majority of space being used was /var/log/httpd and
most were in the /admin.fedoraproject.org-access.log.* ones. Checked
with mmcgrath about removing old ones and got ok. Confirmed on log1
that the logs were copied over and removed
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009, D. Hugh Redelmeier wrote:
| From: Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca
| i ask since a problem i was having with the radeon driver during the
| test phase -- screen suddenly going dark, literally right in the
| middle of keystrokes -- is coming back and seems to be
On Wednesday 08 July 2009, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009, D. Hugh Redelmeier wrote:
| From: Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca
|
| i ask since a problem i was having with the radeon driver during the
| test phase -- screen suddenly going dark, literally right in the
|
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Wednesday 08 July 2009, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009, D. Hugh Redelmeier wrote:
| From: Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca
|
| i ask since a problem i was having with the radeon driver during the
| test phase -- screen
Rex,
thanks for this!
Rex Dieter wrote:
Rex Dieter wrote:
Howard Wilkinson wrote:
I am building a version of Asterisk for use on Fedora 9 derived systems.
The environment is patched up to the latest updates. The Asterisk
Voicemail does not work unless linked against the static
Mikkel,
Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
Howard Wilkinson wrote:
I have 4 Powervault 220s devices which need the firmware on the embedded
controller cards upgraded. I have download the dell Linux utilities and
tried to do the upgrade. However, this is failing - seemingly because I
have mirrored
On Wednesday 08 July 2009, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Wednesday 08 July 2009, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009, D. Hugh Redelmeier wrote:
| From: Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca
|
| i ask since a problem i was having with the
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Roberto Ragusa wrote:
The decision to not save buffers and cached is debatable. Even if
it is memory which can be read again from the disk, it is MUCH
faster to read from the swap image in a contiguous fashion, than
to seek everywhere for minutes after a suspend.
That
On 08/07/09 10:59, James Allsopp wrote:
Hi,
I've checked this out and that was happening, but I've just had this
reported by rkhunter;
snip
Warning: Package manager verification has failed:
File: /sbin/chkconfig
Try running the command 'prelink /sbin/chkconfig' to
El mié, 08-07-2009 a las 10:59 +0100, James Allsopp escribió:
Hi,
I've checked this out and that was happening, but I've just had this
reported by rkhunter;
Warning: Package manager verification has failed:
File: /bin/rpm
Try running the command 'prelink /bin/rpm' to
Hi,
I've checked all the files you asked me to. The following is the files
from the yum whatprovides followed by that grepped on /var/log/
chkconfig-1.3.38-1.i386
Mar 26 00:53:01 Updated: chkconfig-1.3.38-1.i386
rpm-4.6.1-1.fc10.i386
Jun 10 08:34:24 Updated: rpm-4.6.1-1.fc10.i386
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 8:08 AM, James Allsopp
jamesaalls...@googlemail.comwrote:
Hi,
I've checked all the files you asked me to.
This is also good reading...
Intrusion Detection in Linux
http://www.nic.com/~dave/SecurityAdminGuide/SecurityAdminGuide-7.html
FC
--
fedora-list mailing list
Hi,
I have used evolution, and i have two queries;
1. maximum size of stored data (pst file size in evolution)
2. How I join/manage multiple PST's in evolution.
can anyone help me out.
Thanks Regards
Adeel Akbar
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe:
On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 12:08 +0100, James Allsopp wrote:
Hi,
I've checked all the files you asked me to. The following is the files
from the yum whatprovides followed by that grepped on /var/log/
chkconfig-1.3.38-1.i386
Mar 26 00:53:01 Updated: chkconfig-1.3.38-1.i386
rpm-4.6.1-1.fc10.i386
On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 18:25 +0600, Adeel Akbar wrote:
Hi,
I have used evolution, and i have two queries;
1. maximum size of stored data (pst file size in evolution)
2. How I join/manage multiple PST's in evolution.
can anyone help me out.
Evolution doesn't use .pst files. It's not
Chris Thielen wrote,
On Tue, 2009-07-07 at 20:18 +1000, alan duval wrote:
How does one access a parallel connected printer from WIN XP as a
virtual machine?
If you're using (forgive me, I forget the exact name)
proper (Bridged)
networking, e.g. where the virtual machine has a real IP on
El jue, 09-07-2009 a las 09:07 +1000, alan duval escribió:
I am using a desktop computer at home and don't have a network. I have
installed VirtualBox so that I can run WIN XP occasionally.
As WIN XP is a virtual machine can it be regarded as on a network?
I have no experience of setting up a
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 9:38 AM, Richard Shawhobbes1...@gmail.com wrote:
I wanted to see if anyone else was affected by this. I just updated my
Fedora 10 Myth box (x86_64) and my lirc got updated to 0.8.5 and now my
remote doesn't work. This configuration has worked flawlessly since Fedora
8.
On Mon, 06 Jul 2009 12:15:58 -0400
Rich Mahn r...@lat.com wrote:
I did a clean install of F11 x86_64 on a system that also has F10
i686, F8, and others for a multi-boot situation. F11 is working
fairly well except for one problem. I can't mount one of my disks.
snip
Does anybody
Robert P. J. Day-2 wrote:
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009, Mike Cloaked wrote:
Does anyone know if the following two printers work well (and
preferably without the need for additional drivers) in F10 and F11?
Samsung CLP 310N
and
SCX-4500W
i've yet to get my samsung scx-4826fn running under
Am Mittwoch, den 08.07.2009, 18:25 +0600 schrieb Adeel Akbar:
Hi,
I have used evolution, and i have two queries;
1. maximum size of stored data (pst file size in evolution)
2. How I join/manage multiple PST's in evolution.
can anyone help me out.
PST file types are Outlook's.
On Mon, 06 Jul 2009 12:15:58 -0400
Rich Mahn r...@lat.com wrote:
I did a clean install of F11 x86_64 on a system that also has F10
i686, F8, and others for a multi-boot situation. F11 is working
fairly well except for one problem. I can't mount one of my disks.
snip
VirtualBox has an internal network option that will create a private
network containing your computer (host) and the Windows XP virtual
machine (guest), avoiding the need for any real network.
If you can print from GNOME or KDE, your printer is already set up with
cups most likely. Samba is
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:55 AM, Andy Wangdope...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I posted this on fedoraforum.org when I was testing the preview F11
and just did again to see if anyone using F11 release has any ideas,
but I thought I'd try the mailing list as well:
*** post from fedora forum ***
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Marc Fergusonmarcfergu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 4:19 PM, Jim Kinney jim.kin...@gmail.com wrote:
The 32/64 bit dual lib shuffle. I have found that most closed-source,
commercial products are barely usable on 64-bit Linux because of the
hard
Dear All, I've an old server running FC6. Is there a neat way to
upgrade (Not clean install) from FC6 to FC11 without messing up things and
keeping my settings and data?
Thanks.
--
Peter Excalibur
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe:
Hello.
I'm trying to compile fedora 11's latest dovecot package on Centos 5.3
and I get cpio md5 sum mismatch. However running rpm -K goes fine.
Here's what I ran:
[buil...@testing SRPMS]$ wget -q
http://mirror.anl.gov/pub/fedora/linux/updates/11/SRPMS/dovecot-1.2-0.rc6.1.fc11.src.rpm
On Wed, 08 Jul 2009 13:13:58 -0300
Ezequiel Alfíe wrote:
I'm trying to compile fedora 11's latest dovecot package on Centos 5.3
and I get cpio md5 sum mismatch. However running rpm -K goes fine.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/StrongerHashes
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~
On 07/08/2009 09:43 PM, Ezequiel Alfíe wrote:
Hello.
I'm trying to compile fedora 11's latest dovecot package on Centos 5.3
and I get cpio md5 sum mismatch. However running rpm -K goes fine.
You need to switch the hash.
http://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.6.0#Strongfilechecksums
SHA256 is used
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Frank Coxthea...@sasktel.net wrote:
On Wed, 08 Jul 2009 13:13:58 -0300
Ezequiel Alfíe wrote:
I'm trying to compile fedora 11's latest dovecot package on Centos 5.3
and I get cpio md5 sum mismatch. However running rpm -K goes fine.
On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 12:11 -0400, Excalibur Xcalibur wrote:
Dear All,
I've an old server running FC6. Is there a neat way to
upgrade (Not clean install) from FC6 to FC11 without messing up things
and keeping my settings and data?
make a very good back up of the settings and
1 - 100 of 163 matches
Mail list logo
