Can anybody help me with this build issue? (related to pdflatex)

2009-07-20 Thread Hedayat Vatankhah
Hi all, Recently, one of my packages does not build against rawhide. Using pdflatex to generate documentation fails in rawhide. I don't know what's the problem specially that it seems that tex related packages have not bean changed since Fedora 11. (I can successfully build the package on an

Re: Are all your Fedora 12 Features Where They Should be?

2009-07-20 Thread Paul
Hi, Nine days remain before Fedora 12 Feature freeze. No more features can be added after 2009-07-28. I'm missing 2 features (still). No sound and no mounting of USB drives. I can get sound by a combination of su / chown -R paul:audio /dev/snd / exit / pulseaudio -k. USB I have to create a

Re: Are all your Fedora 12 Features Where They Should be?

2009-07-20 Thread Tomasz Torcz
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 07:21:17AM +0100, Paul wrote: Hi, Nine days remain before Fedora 12 Feature freeze. No more features can be added after 2009-07-28. I'm missing 2 features (still). No sound and no mounting of USB drives. I can get sound by a combination of su / chown -R

Chromium-3.0.195 fails to start

2009-07-20 Thread 梁穗隆
I download and install the latest rpm of chromium-3.0.195. But it fails to start. It shows us that things in gnome-terminal: [fed...@fedora-desktop disk]$ chromium-browser /usr/lib/chromium-browser/chromium-browser: Symbol `SSL_ImplementedCiphers' has different size in shared object, consider

Re: Chromium-3.0.195 fails to start

2009-07-20 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 07/20/2009 01:07 PM, 梁穗隆 wrote: I download and install the latest rpm of chromium-3.0.195. But it fails to start. Chromium is not in Fedora officially. You will have to contact the package maintainer directly. Rahul -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com

Re: Chromium-3.0.195 fails to start

2009-07-20 Thread Frank Murphy
On 20/07/09 08:37, 梁穗隆 wrote: I download and install the latest rpm of chromium-3.0.195. But it fails to start. snip I hope the bug will be fixed soon. Not a Fedora Package. Maybe contact Google? Regards, Frank -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com

Re: Chromium-3.0.195 fails to start

2009-07-20 Thread Aioanei Rares
On 07/20/2009 10:37 AM, 梁穗隆 wrote: I download and install the latest rpm of chromium-3.0.195. But it fails to start. It shows us that things in gnome-terminal: [fed...@fedora-desktop disk]$ chromium-browser /usr/lib/chromium-browser/chromium-browser: Symbol `SSL_ImplementedCiphers' has

Re: Chromium-3.0.195 fails to start

2009-07-20 Thread Thomas Janssen
2009/7/20 梁穗隆 liangsuil...@gmail.com: I download and install the latest rpm of chromium-3.0.195. But it fails to start. Looks like you want a chromium.repo [chromium] name=Chromium Test Packages baseurl=http://spot.fedorapeople.org/chromium/F$releasever/ enabled=1 gpgcheck=0 Another things,

Re: Are all your Fedora 12 Features Where They Should be?

2009-07-20 Thread Muayyad AlSadi
my feature is https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/MediaRepo and the feature works, the rest is to minor fixes, license issues, communication with upstream. I've just added https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:FeatureReadyForWrangler how much time do I have to make it 100% complete ?

Re: Broken dependencies in Fedora 11 - 2009-07-19

2009-07-20 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 04:49:51PM -, Michael Schwendt wrote: libguestfs We messed up the dependencies in this package when we introduced an epoch bump. Should be fixed by newer packages which are already in updates-testing. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Emerging Technologies, Red Hat

Re: Are all your Fedora 12 Features Where They Should be?

2009-07-20 Thread Richard Hughes
2009/7/20 Muayyad AlSadi als...@gmail.com: and the feature works, the rest is to minor fixes, license issues, communication with upstream. how much time do I have to make it 100% complete ? should it be 100% complete before You're going to have to sort out the licence issues and get it

Re: Are all your Fedora 12 Features Where They Should be?

2009-07-20 Thread Muayyad AlSadi
as I said in the IRC, I'm going to replace that file completely and things like that are the 50% I have not made yet, but should I do those now ? can't the feature be 50% complete to be Ready For Wrangler -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com

Re: Chromium-3.0.195 fails to start

2009-07-20 Thread Tom spot Callaway
On 07/20/2009 04:24 AM, Thomas Janssen wrote: You can workaround that multilib/dep issue by installing the nss-mdns.x86_64 package. And a dependency isn't a bug by the way. The nss-mdns is as well installed when you install the latest wine builds. No, that dependency actually is a bug because

Re: Are all your Fedora 12 Features Where They Should be?

2009-07-20 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 07/20/2009 08:46 AM, Muayyad AlSadi wrote: my feature is https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/MediaRepo Will this support usb key's as well ? JBG begin:vcard fn:Johann B. Gudmundsson n:Gudmundsson;Johann B. org:Reiknistofnun - University of Iceland;IT Management

Re: Are all your Fedora 12 Features Where They Should be?

2009-07-20 Thread Muayyad AlSadi
no, should it ? it currently check for optical media CD/DVD that matches the media.repo file like the DVD used for installation. please use the talk page to tell us why do you think it should check for all removable media not just CDs/DVDs -- fedora-devel-list mailing list

boost-1.39.0-3.fc12.src.rpm

2009-07-20 Thread Martin Dubuc
I would like to build boost 1.39 on RHEL 5.3. In the past, I have been successful building boost library found in rawhide for RHEL 5.x distributions. However, I have not been susccessful building boost 1.39 using boost-1.39.0-2.fc12.src.rpm. I saw a message earlier this month that stated that

Re: boost-1.39.0-3.fc12.src.rpm

2009-07-20 Thread Jon Ciesla
Martin Dubuc wrote: I would like to build boost 1.39 on RHEL 5.3. In the past, I have been successful building boost library found in rawhide for RHEL 5.x distributions. However, I have not been susccessful building boost 1.39 using boost-1.39.0-2.fc12.src.rpm. I saw a message earlier this

Re: F-11 updates seem hosed today

2009-07-20 Thread Jon Ciesla
Dodji Seketeli wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 13/07/2009 20:36, Tom Lane a écrit : (Not sure if this is the right list to complain on, but ...) Trying to do a routine yum update on an F-11 x86 machine is not working today. It successfully downloaded a bunch of

Re: boost-1.39.0-3.fc12.src.rpm

2009-07-20 Thread Petr Machata
20.07.2009 14:56, Martin Dubuc wrote: /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/boost-bitset.patch;4a646479: cpio: MD5 sum mismatch I am wondering if the source RPM is OK or not. Yes, the src rpm is OK, but on F11, rpm changed the digest algorithm to I think SHAsomething. If you have F11 handy, just install

Re: boost-1.39.0-3.fc12.src.rpm

2009-07-20 Thread Martin Dubuc
Thanks for the tip Jon. I was able to build boost RPM on RHEL 5.3. Martin On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 9:03 AM, Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net wrote: Martin Dubuc wrote: I would like to build boost 1.39 on RHEL 5.3. In the past, I have been successful building boost library found in rawhide for

Re: F-11 updates seem hosed today

2009-07-20 Thread Josh Boyer
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 08:21:47AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: Dodji Seketeli wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 13/07/2009 20:36, Tom Lane a écrit : (Not sure if this is the right list to complain on, but ...) Trying to do a routine yum update on an F-11 x86 machine

Re: F-11 updates seem hosed today

2009-07-20 Thread Jon Ciesla
Josh Boyer wrote: On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 08:21:47AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: Dodji Seketeli wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 13/07/2009 20:36, Tom Lane a écrit : (Not sure if this is the right list to complain on, but ...) Trying to do a routine yum

rawhide report: 20090720 changes

2009-07-20 Thread Rawhide Report
Compose started at Mon Jul 20 06:15:21 UTC 2009 New package lxrandr Simple monitor configuration tool Updated Packages: Miro-2.0.5-2.fc12 - * Sun Jul 19 2009 Alex Lancaster alexlan[AT]fedoraproject org - 2.0.5-2 - Rebuild against newer gecko Terminal-0.2.99.1-1.fc12

Re: Rawhide fonts problem report for 2009-07-20

2009-07-20 Thread Qianqian Fang
Behdad Esfahbod wrote: On 07/20/2009 10:03 AM, Qianqian Fang wrote: Nicolas Mailhot wrote: ☛ Mid-term, files in legacy PCF or Type1 formats need to be converted or removed. just curious, for PCF, what format you plan to convert to ? I had tried SFNT TTF/OTF, neither of them works with the

Re: Rawhide fonts problem report for 2009-07-20

2009-07-20 Thread Qianqian Fang
Behdad Esfahbod wrote: On 07/20/2009 10:32 AM, Qianqian Fang wrote: Behdad Esfahbod wrote: On 07/20/2009 10:03 AM, Qianqian Fang wrote: Nicolas Mailhot wrote: ☛ Mid-term, files in legacy PCF or Type1 formats need to be converted or removed. just curious, for PCF, what format you plan to

Re: Porting amarok-1.4 to F11

2009-07-20 Thread Chitlesh GOORAH
Ingvar Hagelund wrote: If anyone are interested in the packages, they are available from http://ingvar.blog.linpro.no/2009/06/11/amarok-14-for-fedora-11/ On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 12:05 AM, Greg Trounsonwrote: Thank you Ingvar.  After using Amarok 2 for a couple of months I'm convinced it has

Re: Porting amarok-1.4 to F11

2009-07-20 Thread Ben Boeckel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Chitlesh GOORAH wrote: Ingvar Hagelund wrote: If anyone are interested in the packages, they are available from http://ingvar.blog.linpro.no/2009/06/11/amarok-14-for- fedora-11/ On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 12:05 AM, Greg Trounsonwrote: Thank you

Re: Rawhide fonts problem report for 2009-07-20

2009-07-20 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Le lundi 20 juillet 2009 à 10:03 -0400, Qianqian Fang a écrit : Nicolas Mailhot wrote: ☛ Mid-term, files in legacy PCF or Type1 formats need to be converted or removed. just curious, for PCF, what format you plan to convert to ? Can I just dream bitmap fonts will go away ?

Re: Updates and delays in signing packages

2009-07-20 Thread Josh Boyer
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 11:56:02AM -0400, Bill McGonigle wrote: On 07/17/2009 07:57 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: It takes a push between 2 and 3 days to actually complete right now. We've had some significant delays due to a variety of factors over the past couple of weeks. I think we now have

Re: Chromium-3.0.195 fails to start

2009-07-20 Thread 梁穗隆
No, that dependency actually is a bug because I hardcoded the %{_isa} to force it to a specific architecture target: nss-mdns(x86-32). That's wrong, it shouldn't have the hardcoding. I'll fix it in the next build. Thank you, spot! ~spot -- urlhttp://liangsuilong.co.cc/url Fight for

Re: Are all your Fedora 12 Features Where They Should be?

2009-07-20 Thread John Poelstra
Muayyad AlSadi said the following on 07/20/2009 01:46 AM Pacific Time: my feature is https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/MediaRepo and the feature works, the rest is to minor fixes, license issues, communication with upstream. I've just added

Re: F-11 updates seem hosed today

2009-07-20 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 08:21:47 -0500, Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net wrote: Any word on this? I still don't seem to have anything on the mirror I sync from. . . See: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1531 Based on comments it looks like things should start

Re: Porting amarok-1.4 to F11

2009-07-20 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2009-07-20 at 12:05 -0400, Ben Boeckel wrote: Someone stated that 2.2 got the look-and-feel of 1.4 as an option. Maybe you'd like to try that? Currently would need build-from-source. He explained carefully that his problem with 2.x is the lack of features that worked well in 1.4;

Re: Rawhide fonts problem report for 2009-07-20

2009-07-20 Thread Qianqian Fang
Nicolas Mailhot wrote: Le lundi 20 juillet 2009 à 10:03 -0400, Qianqian Fang a écrit : Nicolas Mailhot wrote: ☛ Mid-term, files in legacy PCF or Type1 formats need to be converted or removed. just curious, for PCF, what format you plan to convert to ? Can I just

Re: Porting amarok-1.4 to F11

2009-07-20 Thread Ben Boeckel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Adam Williamson wrote: On Mon, 2009-07-20 at 12:05 -0400, Ben Boeckel wrote: Someone stated that 2.2 got the look-and-feel of 1.4 as an option. Maybe you'd like to try that? Currently would need build-from-source. He explained carefully that

Open Source Activity Map (for Red Hat marketing)

2009-07-20 Thread Valent Turkovic
http://www.redhat.com/about/where-is-open-source/activity/ The map that Red Hat produced is really nice, but it is a shame that www.openstreetmap.org maps aren't used and promoted. It is strange to see Red Hat promote Google maps when more open data is available but closed data is used. There is

Re: Open Source Activity Map (for Red Hat marketing)

2009-07-20 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 07/20/2009 11:38 PM, Valent Turkovic wrote: http://www.redhat.com/about/where-is-open-source/activity/ The map that Red Hat produced is really nice, but it is a shame that www.openstreetmap.org maps aren't used and promoted. It is strange to see Red Hat promote Google maps when more open

Re: Is BuildRoot still mandatory?

2009-07-20 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 07/21/2009 12:20 AM, Björn Persson wrote: So my question is: If there are no plans to build a package on any distribution release where a BuildRoot tag is needed, and it is known that the package won't build cleanly on such a release, is a BuildRoot tag still required for the package to

Re: Is BuildRoot still mandatory?

2009-07-20 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
BP == Björn Persson bj...@rombobjörn.se writes: BP So my question is: If there are no plans to build a package on any BP distribution release where a BuildRoot tag is needed, and it is BP known that the package won't build cleanly on such a release, is a BP BuildRoot tag still required for the

Release Engineering meeting summary for 2009-07-20

2009-07-20 Thread Jesse Keating
Minutes: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2009-07-20/fedora-meeting.2009-07-20-18.18.html Log: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2009-07-20/fedora-meeting.2009-07-20-18.18.log.html Meeting log --- * **Roll Call** (f13-18:18:42_) * **old business**

Mass rebuild for Fedora 12

2009-07-20 Thread Bill Nottingham
Fedora Release Enginerering is going to be starting a mass rebuild this Thursday, July 28th, for the following Fedora 12 features: - XZ RPM Payloads - x86 Architecture Support Just as in the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, if you'd like to opt out for your packages, check a file into your

Re: Are all your Fedora 12 Features Where They Should be?

2009-07-20 Thread Paul
Hi, Could you try running gparted as root after plugging USB drive? For me it triggers some kind of scan, after which proper HAL-based mount proccess works. Still says i'm not authorised to mount the drive... TTFN Paul -- Sie können mich aufreizen und wirklich heiß machen!

Re: Mass rebuild for Fedora 12

2009-07-20 Thread Bill Nottingham
Bill Nottingham (nott...@redhat.com) said: Fedora Release Enginerering is going to be starting a mass rebuild this Thursday, July 28th, for the following Fedora 12 features: That would be Thursday the 23rd, as per the web page. - XZ RPM Payloads - x86 Architecture Support Bill

Re: Purging the F12 orphans

2009-07-20 Thread Jesse Keating
On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 10:58 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: The first list was incomplete due to an API change. Here is the complete list: Here is an updated list. I'm still trying to work out some code to repoclose with each of these gone. Unblocked orphan apollon Unblocked orphan bes Unblocked

Re: Rawhide fonts problem report for 2009-07-20

2009-07-20 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Le lundi 20 juillet 2009 à 13:41 -0400, Qianqian Fang a écrit : Getting opentype bitmap/sfnt wrapper to work for bitmaps is definitely the way to go: it not only saves more than half of the space, but also makes rendering a lot faster. The only concern is the support to GTK1 applications

Re: Fit and Finish test day: batteries and suspend

2009-07-20 Thread Rodd Clarkson
I'd really like to join in with this having experienced issues with suspend/resume with: * Dell Inspiron 9300 (using nvidia driver as nouveau/nv don't support suspend/resume) * Dell Studion XPS 16 (using either radeon or radionhd as the catalyst driver won't compile on kernel 2.6.29) * EeePC 1000

Re: Purging the F12 orphans

2009-07-20 Thread Jesse Keating
On Mon, 2009-07-20 at 14:43 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: Here is an updated list. I'm still trying to work out some code to repoclose with each of these gone. Unblocked orphan apollon Unblocked orphan bes Unblocked orphan bytelist Unblocked orphan constantine Unblocked orphan cryptix

Re: Mass rebuild for Fedora 12

2009-07-20 Thread David
On 7/20/2009 4:14 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: Fedora Release Enginerering is going to be starting a mass rebuild this Thursday, July 28th, for the following Fedora 12 features: - XZ RPM Payloads - x86 Architecture Support Just as in the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, if you'd like to

Re: Mass rebuild for Fedora 12

2009-07-20 Thread Jon Stanley
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 11:18 PM, Daviddgbo...@comcast.net wrote: Continue to update Fedora 12/Rawhide during the rebuild? Or wait until the rebuild is completed? The rebuild will land all at once as the builds get moved from dist-f12-rebuild to dist-f12. So keep on updating, you'll have one

Re: Fit and Finish test day: batteries and suspend

2009-07-20 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 13:10 +1000, Rodd Clarkson wrote: It would be great if the test day (and others) could link to a iso for rawhide that fits on a CD to make this part of the process simple. hint, hint ;-] Yeah, I'm working on it. However, todays (and yesterdays) spins so far had the

Re: F-11 updates seem hosed today

2009-07-20 Thread Niels Haase
2009/7/20 Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to: On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 08:21:47 -0500,  Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net wrote: Any word on this?  I still don't seem to have anything on the mirror I sync from. . . See: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1531 Based on comments

Test the POSSE Education Fedora Remix today!

2009-07-20 Thread Sebastian Dziallas
=== Test the POSSE Education Fedora Remix today! === Have you ever wanted to contribute - or get others to contribute - to an open source education project, but never found the time to set up and get started? We've got a ready-to-go contributors' (not just code!) environment for you. The

[Bug 506262] X crash - FreeType: couldn't open face /usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/ukai.ttc: 1

2009-07-20 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506262 Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

Changes to multiple issues in qa

2009-07-20 Thread thorstenziehm
http://www.openoffice.org/servlets/ProjectIssues User thorstenziehm has changed several issues in qa project. Below is a list of the changed issues you are associated with: 82612 Font ecolier ec.ttf does not work anymore with OO. Changes:

[Bug 512867] New: please add DroidSansJapanese.ttf

2009-07-20 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: please add DroidSansJapanese.ttf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512867 Summary: please add DroidSansJapanese.ttf Product: Fedora

[Bug 503430] Incorrect Kerning in some applications

2009-07-20 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503430 --- Comment #27 from Caius 'kaio' Chance ccha...@redhat.com 2009-07-21 00:36:42 EDT --- Redone the conversion script:

[Bug 503430] Incorrect Kerning in some applications

2009-07-20 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503430 Caius 'kaio' Chance ccha...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 481068] bitmap-fonts needs updating to revised packaging guidelines

2009-07-20 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481068 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 503430] Incorrect Kerning in some applications

2009-07-20 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503430 --- Comment #28 from Fyva fyv...@ya.ru 2009-07-21 01:36:31 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=354434) --

Re: Rawhide fonts problem report for 2009-07-20

2009-07-20 Thread Qianqian Fang
Behdad Esfahbod wrote: On 07/20/2009 10:03 AM, Qianqian Fang wrote: Nicolas Mailhot wrote: ☛ Mid-term, files in legacy PCF or Type1 formats need to be converted or removed. just curious, for PCF, what format you plan to convert to ? I had tried SFNT TTF/OTF, neither of them works with the

Re: Rawhide fonts problem report for 2009-07-20

2009-07-20 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Le lundi 20 juillet 2009 à 10:03 -0400, Qianqian Fang a écrit : Nicolas Mailhot wrote: ☛ Mid-term, files in legacy PCF or Type1 formats need to be converted or removed. just curious, for PCF, what format you plan to convert to ? Can I just dream bitmap fonts will go away ?

Re: Rawhide fonts problem report for 2009-07-20

2009-07-20 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Le lundi 20 juillet 2009 à 13:41 -0400, Qianqian Fang a écrit : Getting opentype bitmap/sfnt wrapper to work for bitmaps is definitely the way to go: it not only saves more than half of the space, but also makes rendering a lot faster. The only concern is the support to GTK1 applications

Re: MirrorManager crawler patch

2009-07-20 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 01:27:11 -0400, Ricky Zhou ri...@fedoraproject.org wrote: 2) MirrorManager currently doesn't check timestamps, and the solution to this isn't trivial, especially since with FTP, which returns directory listing data as just the text of the output. This is

Re: MirrorManager crawler patch

2009-07-20 Thread Ricky Zhou
On 2009-07-20 09:34:47 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: 2) MirrorManager currently doesn't check timestamps, and the solution to this isn't trivial, especially since with FTP, which returns directory listing data as just the text of the output. This is almost impossible to parse

Re: [PATCH] build a 'full' package on i686

2009-07-20 Thread Bill Nottingham
Dave Jones (da...@redhat.com) said: +# We only build -PAE on 686. %ifarch i686 -%define with_up 0 %define with_pae 1 %else %define with_pae 0 The naming of 'with_up' is subtle here. With this change, we'll try building a '686' kernel as well as a '686-PAE'. That was

Re: [PATCH] build a 'full' package on i686

2009-07-20 Thread Dave Jones
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 10:12:06AM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: Dave Jones (da...@redhat.com) said: +# We only build -PAE on 686. %ifarch i686 -%define with_up 0 %define with_pae 1 %else %define with_pae 0 The naming of 'with_up' is subtle here. With

Re: [PATCH] build a 'full' package on i686

2009-07-20 Thread Bill Nottingham
Dave Jones (da...@redhat.com) said: Oh, I thought that proposal got shot down. The proposal to have the baseline be i686 + SSE2 was shot down; bare i686 was approved. Bill ___ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com

Re: [PATCH] build a 'full' package on i686

2009-07-20 Thread Quentin Armitage
Bill Nottingham notting redhat com wrote: The proposal to have the baseline be i686 + SSE2 was shot down; bare i686 was approved. Does this mean that an i686 kernel without PAE will still be built (my laptop processor does not have PAE so I am rather interested)? I note that the latest build on

RE: F11 and PulseAudio

2009-07-20 Thread Antonio Olivares
Before taking a shotgun and killing pulseaudio, try to stop it from running and see if the CPU goes back to normal? I saw on another list that killing pulseaudio and not removing it should help in some way? Hope you can see if that is true if you don't mind of course. Regards,

Re: Package kit notification of uprade available

2009-07-20 Thread Richard Hughes
2009/7/19 Claude Jones cjonesli...@tehogeeservices.com: I'm typing on my recently pre-upgraded F11 box. It's been working well. I have completed several rounds of updates since the upgrade. Yet, just now, having just run a bunch of updates which included the latest KDE packages and Wine and

Re: Package kit notification of uprade available

2009-07-20 Thread Claude Jones
On Mon July 20 2009, Richard Hughes wrote: 2009/7/19 Claude Jones cjonesli...@tehogeeservices.com: I'm typing on my recently pre-upgraded F11 box. It's been working well. I have completed several rounds of updates since the upgrade. Yet, just now, having just run a bunch of updates which

Re: Package kit notification of uprade available

2009-07-20 Thread Richard Hughes
2009/7/20 Claude Jones cjonesli...@tehogeeservices.com: Is there a disconnect there? It looks to me like the output of that first is in direct contradiction to the output of the second command, no? Yes. PackageKit uses: yumbase.conf.yumvar['releasever'] to get the current release version. If

fedora 11 bash maximum line length?

2009-07-20 Thread Frank Cox
What is the maximum length of a command line in bash on Fedora 11? [frank...@mutt ~]$ getconf ARG_MAX 2621440 Does this mean that I can enter over 2 million characters on a single bash command line? -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com -- fedora-list mailing

Re: Linux NULL pointer dereferece in the News...

2009-07-20 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 07/20/2009 03:14 AM, Gene Heskett wrote: On Sunday 19 July 2009, Rahul Sundaram wrote: On 07/19/2009 11:31 PM, Tom Horsley wrote: On Sun, 19 Jul 2009 23:11:52 +0530 Rahul Sundaram wrote: It is not so simple. This is not a compiler bug. I suggest you read through

Ultimate Linux Remote Control

2009-07-20 Thread Valent Turkovic
I have been building Linux media center and one thing that was missing was a great remote control. I was impressed with Fiire Chief remote, but it is too expensive and the Fiire company stopped making it ;( Then I found out that you can use Wiimote on Linux and that it costs 40$ on Ebay. This

Re: Ranter or evangelist?

2009-07-20 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Mon, 20 Jul 2009 13:24:27 +0530, Rahul wrote: There is no Pirut in Fedora 11. It's still provided as a virtual package by gnome-packagekit. That alone can be a source of confusion, particularly if old howtos/faqs continue to work. $ sudo yum install pirut [...]

Re: Yum: Cannot retrieve repository metadata for epel

2009-07-20 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Sun, 19 Jul 2009 15:09:58 -0600, Kevin wrote: rpm --erase epel-release and in case you don't have an epel-release package installed (it's included within Fedora 11 by accident), simply delete the epel.repo file. EPEL is a repository for RHEL and/or CentOS. Additionally,

Re: fedora 11 bash maximum line length?

2009-07-20 Thread Cameron Simpson
On 20Jul2009 01:50, Frank Cox thea...@sasktel.net wrote: | What is the maximum length of a command line in bash on Fedora 11? | | [frank...@mutt ~]$ getconf ARG_MAX | 2621440 | | Does this mean that I can enter over 2 million characters on a single bash | command line? Probably not - you can

Re: Ranter or evangelist?

2009-07-20 Thread Tim
Tim: The system can't really make magic decisions that a user is doing something dumb, e.g. wildcarding, in a too simplistic manner. Users need to learn not to do wildcarding without due care. Usually, they learn that through committing mistakes. *You* asked for it, you got it. It's not

Re: Ranter or evangelist?

2009-07-20 Thread Tim
On Mon, 2009-07-20 at 09:31 +0500, gil...@altern.org wrote: It's really weird. I already said that you have a gift for explaining, which means you're certainly not completely dumb. How come you can't understand the importance of market share for Linux? a. This is Linux, other than for the few

Re: amaya in repos?

2009-07-20 Thread Joel Rees
Okay, my report on trying to compile Amaya for ppc. On Jul 19, 2009, at 7:35 PM, Joel Rees wrote, Ed Greshko responded, Joel Rees wrote: Amaya shows to be orphaned, last entry is Fedora 9: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/amaya?

Re: Partitioning FC11 ??

2009-07-20 Thread Wolfgang S. Rupprecht
Gene Heskett gene.hesk...@verizon.net writes: Because I have lost entire installs when running lvm 3 damned times. Are you sure it was lvm3 instead of say screwed up disk I/O? My gripe with lvm3 is more philosophical -- it provides a silly service, namely allowing me to combine the failure

Re: Ranter or evangelist?

2009-07-20 Thread David
On 7/20/2009 5:36 AM, Tim wrote: On Mon, 2009-07-20 at 09:31 +0500, gil...@altern.org wrote: It's really weird. I already said that you have a gift for explaining, which means you're certainly not completely dumb. How come you can't understand the importance of market share for Linux? a.

Leonidas desktop slideshow

2009-07-20 Thread Ian Malone
Hi, The last few Fedora desktops (F8-F10) have had slide-show artwork for the desktop (actually, I liked infinity the best, but digressing), with Leonidas I notice that the main theme artwork (and also the Lion and Landscape backgrounds) are implemented as slideshows, but just seem to cycle

Re: how much junk should i have to install for a 32-bit toolchain?

2009-07-20 Thread Jonathan Underwood
2009/7/20 Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca: On Sun, 19 Jul 2009, Jonathan Underwood wrote: 2009/7/19 Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca: [snip] but i'm starting to wonder if this is worth the trouble, how much *more* i?86 content i'll have to dump on this machine and, most

Success - finally

2009-07-20 Thread Bradley
Well, I've been tinkering with installing an optimized kernel for years and finally I understand how to do it! This was such a big thing for me, since I run on an older, slower system, that I had to share it. I am now running Kernel 2.6.30.1 on my system and it runs so much nicer than

Re: Partitioning FC11 ??

2009-07-20 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Mon, 2009-07-20 at 03:08 -0700, Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote: Are you sure it was lvm3 instead of say screwed up disk I/O? I think he was saying lvm 3 damned times, but no matter. My gripe with lvm3 is more philosophical -- it provides a silly service, namely allowing me to combine the

Re: Partitioning FC11 ??

2009-07-20 Thread Albert Graham
On 07/19/2009 04:34 PM, Jim wrote: On 07/18/2009 11:12 PM, Albert Graham wrote: On 07/18/2009 02:15 AM, Jim wrote: My partition layout is sda1 ext3 /boot sda2 ext4 /home sda3 ext4 / sda4 Extended sda 5 Swap I want sda1 /boot to be my boot, why is it default selecting sda3 / ,

install F11 ON a USB-HDD

2009-07-20 Thread Daniel Kirsten
Hi, I installed F11 on a USB-HDD. I used a network-install-CD and allowed the installer to use the entire disk. I did not change the partition layout. I installed the bootloader to the same USB-drive. The installation seemed to be successful, but I cannot boot from this USB-HDD.WHen

Re: Partitioning FC11 ??

2009-07-20 Thread Don Quixote de la Mancha
A kernel developer, I think from Red Hat, said on a list that lvm is 2% slower than a physical partition. Considering the obsession some folks have with performance, that seems like an awful lot to give up for some flexibility which really may not be at all helpful to some users. The reason for

Re: Package kit notification of uprade available

2009-07-20 Thread Claude Jones
On 7/20/2009 3:32 AM, Richard Hughes wrote: Yes. PackageKit uses: yumbase.conf.yumvar['releasever'] to get the current release version. If this still happens after a reboot, please open a bug with the component yum, and state that releasever isn't being detected correct.ly. What is

Re: Wirelsess N Draft 2 Mini PCI Card

2009-07-20 Thread John W. Linville
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 04:15:39PM -0700, Markus Kesaromous wrote: This Mini PCI card has the Atheros 9k series chipset. Is it true that Fedora supports this card, as the vendor claims? If yes, what is the driver's name? Sparklan WMIA-199N 802.11n draft 2.0 2.4/5Ghz dual band Mini PCI

Re: Partitioning FC11 ??

2009-07-20 Thread Jim
On 07/20/2009 09:06 AM, Albert Graham wrote: boot=/dev/sda1 e rhgb quiet On the second kernel in your modification what is the e in boot=/dev/sda1 e rhgb quiet -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines:

Re: Package kit notification of uprade available

2009-07-20 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 07/20/2009 08:29 PM, Claude Jones wrote: On 7/20/2009 3:32 AM, Richard Hughes wrote: Yes. PackageKit uses: yumbase.conf.yumvar['releasever'] to get the current release version. If this still happens after a reboot, please open a bug with the component yum, and state that releasever

Upcoming IRC Classroom Sessions - 2009-07-20

2009-07-20 Thread Kevin Fenzi
Greetings. This is a regular posting I am going to try and make every monday, letting people know about the upcoming IRC classroom sessions that are scheduled. From the Classroom page at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Classroom we currently have the following Classes scheduled: 2009-07-21

RE: Wirelsess N Draft 2 Mini PCI Card

2009-07-20 Thread Markus Kesaromous
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 11:13:40 -0400 From: linvi...@redhat.com To: fedora-list@redhat.com Subject: Re: Wirelsess N Draft 2 Mini PCI Card On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 04:15:39PM -0700, Markus Kesaromous wrote: This Mini PCI card has the Atheros 9k

Re: Package kit notification of uprade available

2009-07-20 Thread suvayu ali
2009/7/20 Claude Jones cjonesli...@tehogeeservices.com: On 7/20/2009 3:32 AM, Richard Hughes wrote: Yes. PackageKit uses: yumbase.conf.yumvar['releasever'] to get the current release version. If this still happens after a reboot, please open a bug with the component yum, and state that

Missing dictionary for ispell and aspell

2009-07-20 Thread Aaron Konstam
When I try to use either ispell or aspell to check the spelling of words in a file I get the error message: Error: No word lists can be found for the language en_US That has never happened before. How do I get the proper dictionary? --

RE: Success - finally

2009-07-20 Thread Markus Kesaromous
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 07:46:12 -0700 From: freepales...@dslextreme.com To: fedora-list@redhat.com Subject: Re: Success - finally Bradley, On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 5:44 AM, Bradley wrote: Well, I've been tinkering with installing an optimized

F10 machine locking up several times a day

2009-07-20 Thread Kevin Kempter
Hi All; I'm running Fedora 10 on a Dell M6400 laptop. The past few days my machine has been locking up shutting off several times a day. I have a hunch its the KnetworkManager but I'm not certian. Below is a listing from my /var/log/messages (I did an egrep for fail, or error Can anyone

  1   2   >