Re: RFE: FireKit

2009-07-24 Thread Aioanei Rares
On 07/24/2009 01:01 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: Ahmed Kamal on 07/23/2009 04:54 PM wrote: Exactly the point, the user shares his desktop, or starts some service using the services GUI, and FireKit should offer to help. Moreover, this actually would improve desktop security, since without

Re: Purging the F12 orphans

2009-07-24 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
On 07/23/2009 06:43 PM, Braden McDaniel wrote: On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 13:35 -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote: On 07/21/2009 12:06 PM, Braden McDaniel wrote: On Mon, 2009-07-20 at 20:11 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: [snip] Orphan: pcmanx-gtk2 gnash-plugin requires /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins

Re: [pkgdb] libatomic_ops: sharkcz has requested approveacls

2009-07-24 Thread Nicolas Chauvet
This package was orphaned because libatomic_ops is going to be merged with gc. Do we have a particular rationale about why to continue to maintain it over splitting libatomic_ops-static from the current gc 7.1 where libatomic_ops snapshot is newer ? (despite versioned as 1.2) Nicolas (kwizart)

Re: [pkgdb] libatomic_ops: sharkcz has requested approveacls

2009-07-24 Thread Dan Horák
Nicolas Chauvet píše v Pá 24. 07. 2009 v 10:06 +0200: This package was orphaned because libatomic_ops is going to be merged with gc. Do we have a particular rationale about why to continue to maintain it over splitting libatomic_ops-static from the current gc 7.1 where libatomic_ops snapshot

Re: Purging the F12 orphans

2009-07-24 Thread Braden McDaniel
On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 23:26 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: On 07/23/2009 06:43 PM, Braden McDaniel wrote: On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 13:35 -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote: On 07/21/2009 12:06 PM, Braden McDaniel wrote: On Mon, 2009-07-20 at 20:11 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: [snip] Orphan:

Re: More changes to syncmail in CVS

2009-07-24 Thread Itamar Reis Peixoto
sound's good. I will try today. On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 7:28 PM, Jesse Keatingjkeat...@redhat.com wrote: Today we discovered that CVS commits were still often having a 30 second delay that was unnecessary.  Ricky discovered that we could pass an option to cvs in syncmail that would prevent

Re: [pkgdb] libatomic_ops: sharkcz has requested approveacls

2009-07-24 Thread Nicolas Chauvet
2009/7/24 Dan Horák d...@danny.cz: Nicolas Chauvet píše v Pá 24. 07. 2009 v 10:06 +0200: This package was orphaned because libatomic_ops is going to be merged with gc. Do we have a particular rationale about why to continue to maintain it over splitting libatomic_ops-static from the current

Re: RFE: FireKit

2009-07-24 Thread Stephen Gallagher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/23/2009 05:54 PM, Ahmed Kamal wrote: To me it seems like a great idea, but your usual computer user does not really know about Apache and ports, IP's and the like. Exactly the point, the user shares his desktop, or starts some

Re: [pkgdb] libatomic_ops: sharkcz has requested approveacls

2009-07-24 Thread Rex Dieter
Nicolas Chauvet wrote: 2009/7/24 Dan Horák d...@danny.cz: Nicolas Chauvet píše v Pá 24. 07. 2009 v 10:06 +0200: This package was orphaned because libatomic_ops is going to be merged with gc. Do we have a particular rationale about why to continue to maintain it over splitting

Re: Updated Fedora 12 Schedule (take 2)

2009-07-24 Thread Mark McLoughlin
Hi John, (Cc-ing fedora-devel-list, surprised to see the schedule hasn't been posted there) On Mon, 2009-07-13 at 21:09 -0700, John Poelstra wrote: http://poelstra.fedorapeople.org/schedules/f-12/f-12-releng-tasks.html http://poelstra.fedorapeople.org/schedules/f-12/f-12-releng.ics In the

Re: Updated Fedora 12 Schedule (take 2)

2009-07-24 Thread Bill Nottingham
Mark McLoughlin (mar...@redhat.com) said: http://poelstra.fedorapeople.org/schedules/f-12/f-12-releng-tasks.html http://poelstra.fedorapeople.org/schedules/f-12/f-12-releng.ics In the F-11 schedule, we had 85 days between Feature Freeze and GA. And then GA slipped by two weeks. In the

Re: Updated Fedora 12 Schedule (take 2)

2009-07-24 Thread Mark McLoughlin
On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 10:13 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: Mark McLoughlin (mar...@redhat.com) said: http://poelstra.fedorapeople.org/schedules/f-12/f-12-releng-tasks.html http://poelstra.fedorapeople.org/schedules/f-12/f-12-releng.ics In the F-11 schedule, we had 85 days between

openssh-blacklist - careless waste of space.

2009-07-24 Thread Yanko Kaneti
So openssh-blacklist-0.7-1.fc11.src.rpm - size 1072930614 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=1372950 openssh-blacklist-0.7-1.fc10.src.rpm - size 1072930519 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=1372948 openssh-blacklist-0.7-1.fc12.src.rpm - size 1072930637

Fedora 12 Mass Rebuild has begun

2009-07-24 Thread Jesse Keating
This morning I have started the mass rebuild. The buildsystem will soon be filling up with background build tasks. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating signature.asc Description: This is a

Re: Plan for tomorrow's (20090724) FESCo meeting

2009-07-24 Thread Phil Knirsch
On 07/24/2009 02:34 AM, Jon Stanley wrote: I profusely apologize, time slipped away from me today and I didn't get an agenda put together until now. Following are the topics to be discussed at tomorrow's FESCo meeting, at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net 211 mikeb as a

Re: RFE: FireKit

2009-07-24 Thread Ahmed Kamal
If I might suggest, you probably want to use a compiled language like C. The GLib C framework is probably a good approach, especially with its excellent glib-dbus integration. I agree a long running daemon would best be written in C, perhaps pyGtk would be good enough for only the GUI config

Re: openssh-blacklist - careless waste of space.

2009-07-24 Thread Guido Grazioli
2009/7/24 Yanko Kaneti yan...@declera.com So openssh-blacklist-0.7-1.fc11.src.rpm - size 1072930614 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=1372950 openssh-blacklist-0.7-1.fc10.src.rpmhttp://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=1372950%0Aopenssh-blacklist-0.7-1.fc10.src.rpm-

Re: openssh-blacklist - careless waste of space.

2009-07-24 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
YK == Yanko Kaneti yan...@declera.com writes: YK Seriously wtf!? Can't answer that. YK And where is the frikken package review for it? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509990 Unfortunately neither the reviewer nor the packager updated the ticket title with the changed name of the

Re: Announcing 11 packages as orphaned

2009-07-24 Thread Kevin Kofler
Tom spot Callaway wrote: On 07/23/2009 07:07 PM, Michał Bentkowski wrote: kooldock -- Cool dock for KDE with great visual effects and enhancements Please note this package is dead due to legal reasons. Please leave it that way. Plus, it's based on KDE 3 technologies and integrates very

Re: RFE: FireKit

2009-07-24 Thread Colin Walters
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Ahmed Kamalemail.ahmedka...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi, Here's a RFE for FireKit, a firewall desktop kit. The firewall is a longstanding messy problem, and I'm glad you're interested in tackling it. User Experience: === 1- Joe wants some help from his

Re: RFE: FireKit

2009-07-24 Thread Adam Miller
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 10:34 AM, Colin Walterswalt...@verbum.org wrote: SNIP Backing up a minute, in discussions among the desktop team and other people about this, one thing that came up as a specific problem with having no firewall at all was the public WiFi hotspot case.  If for example I

Re: RFE: FireKit

2009-07-24 Thread Michael Cronenworth
Ahmed Kamal on 07/24/2009 10:12 AM wrote: I agree a long running daemon would best be written in C, perhaps pyGtk would be good enough for only the GUI config dialogs. I will start a request for a fedorahosted project, then I'll work on recruiting developers yes. GUI? What GUI? You don't

Re: RFE: FireKit

2009-07-24 Thread Colin Walters
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Adam Millermaxamill...@gmail.com wrote: Might we want to look at having firewall profiles such that different sets of rules can be applied based on environment? I'm uncomfortable to tying the solution for desktop sharing button doesn't actually work unless you

Re: RFE: FireKit

2009-07-24 Thread Matthew Woehlke
Adam Williamson wrote: On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 17:17 -0500, Matthew Woehlke wrote: I have to ask... when are we going to see Linux allow network access based on the checksum of the process that wants to use it? After all, 'doze has had this ability for years. (Maybe SELinux can provide this

Re: openssh-blacklist - careless waste of space.

2009-07-24 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 05:30:27PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote: So openssh-blacklist-0.7-1.fc11.src.rpm - size 1072930614 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=1372950 openssh-blacklist-0.7-1.fc10.src.rpm - size 1072930519 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=1372948

Re: RFE: FireKit

2009-07-24 Thread Stephen Gallagher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/24/2009 12:03 PM, Matthew Woehlke wrote: Stephen Gallagher wrote: Python does not make for a particularly efficient long-running daemon. And if your plan is to monitor for port openings in order to prompt, it's going to need to be a

Re: RFE: FireKit

2009-07-24 Thread Björn Persson
Colin Walters wrote: If for example I enable desktop sharing before leaving work, then head to the airport, and log on there to WiFi, you really don't want the desktop sharing still enabled. Nor likely do you want sshd. – Internal tech support, Randy Hacker speaking. – Hi Randy, Joe

Re: RFE: FireKit

2009-07-24 Thread Dan Winship
On 07/24/2009 11:34 AM, Colin Walters wrote: Backing up a minute, in discussions among the desktop team and other people about this, one thing that came up as a specific problem with having no firewall at all was the public WiFi hotspot case. If for example I enable desktop sharing before

Re: RFE: FireKit

2009-07-24 Thread Colin Walters
2009/7/24 Björn Persson bj...@xn--rombobjrn-67a.se: Colin Walters wrote: If for example I enable desktop sharing before leaving work, then head to the airport, and log on there to WiFi, you really don't want the desktop sharing still enabled.  Nor likely do you want sshd.  – Internal tech

Re: RFE: FireKit

2009-07-24 Thread Matthew Woehlke
Björn Persson wrote: Matthew Woehlke wrote: an iptables rule that allows stuff if there is a socket that will receive it, otherwise can drop Where's the point in that? Stealth? You might as well ask what is the point of using DROP (instead of REJECT) at all. Obviously there is a reason or

Re: RFE: FireKit

2009-07-24 Thread Colin Walters
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Colin Walterswalt...@verbum.org wrote: Joe might have file sharing enabled to share his documents with his colleagues in his own company, but just because Joe wants to let people see the presentation, that doesn't mean he wants anyone who might be connected

Re: RFE: FireKit

2009-07-24 Thread Matthew Woehlke
Stephen Gallagher wrote: On 07/24/2009 12:03 PM, Matthew Woehlke wrote: Stephen Gallagher wrote: Python does not make for a particularly efficient long-running daemon. And if your plan is to monitor for port openings in order to prompt, it's going to need to be a long-running daemon (also

Re: RFE: FireKit

2009-07-24 Thread Björn Persson
Colin Walters wrote: 2009/7/24 Björn Persson bj...@xn--rombobjrn-67a.se: Colin Walters wrote: If for example I enable desktop sharing before leaving work, then head to the airport, and log on there to WiFi, you really don't want the desktop sharing still enabled. Nor likely do you want

Re: RFE: FireKit

2009-07-24 Thread Björn Persson
Colin Walters wrote: Ok, how about this - gnome-user-share and vino are by default tied to networks, rather than global. So instead of one global GConf key, they have per-network state stored either in /system/networking or based of some key in their own config. When the network changes,

Re: RFE: FireKit

2009-07-24 Thread Björn Persson
Matthew Woehlke wrote: Björn Persson wrote: Matthew Woehlke wrote: an iptables rule that allows stuff if there is a socket that will receive it, otherwise can drop Where's the point in that? Stealth? You might as well ask what is the point of using DROP (instead of REJECT) at all.

Re: RFE: FireKit

2009-07-24 Thread Casey Dahlin
On 07/24/2009 02:09 AM, Aioanei Rares wrote: I tend to agree here. Maybe C++ would be a far better option (biased, of course :) Ugh. I think C will do just fine. Its perfectly adequate without growing any tumorous appendages. /me waits patiently for Objective C on linux to be worth a damn.

Re: RFE: FireKit

2009-07-24 Thread Matthew Woehlke
Björn Persson wrote: Matthew Woehlke wrote: Björn Persson wrote: Matthew Woehlke wrote: an iptables rule that allows stuff if there is a socket that will receive it, otherwise can drop Where's the point in that? Stealth? You might as well ask what is the point of using DROP (instead of

Re: RFE: FireKit

2009-07-24 Thread Matthew Woehlke
Casey Dahlin wrote: On 07/24/2009 02:09 AM, Aioanei Rares wrote: I tend to agree here. Maybe C++ would be a far better option (biased, of course :) Ugh. I think C will do just fine. Its perfectly adequate without growing any tumorous appendages. C is just fine for device drivers, just

Re: RFE: FireKit

2009-07-24 Thread Bill McGonigle
On 07/23/2009 06:17 PM, Matthew Woehlke wrote: I have to ask... when are we going to see Linux allow network access based on the checksum of the process that wants to use it? After all, 'doze has had this ability for years. (Maybe SELinux can provide this already?) Is this a checksum of the

Re: Firewall rules using SELinux context (Was Re: RFE: FireKit)

2009-07-24 Thread Casey Dahlin
On 07/24/2009 03:53 PM, Stephen Smalley wrote: On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 15:47 -0400, Casey Dahlin wrote: A couple of mentions of SELinux have cropped up in the FireKit thread, which got me thinking about the Firewall and SELinux and ways in which they are similar. I had the following thought:

Re: RFE: FireKit

2009-07-24 Thread Bill McGonigle
On 07/24/2009 03:21 PM, Matthew Woehlke wrote: Why is it people seem to have a problem with obscurity *on top of* security? What's wrong with making it as hard as possible for the bad guys? It's well known that security through obscurity is an insufficient defense. Only fools would rely on

Re: RFE: FireKit

2009-07-24 Thread Matthew Woehlke
Bill McGonigle wrote: On 07/23/2009 06:17 PM, Matthew Woehlke wrote: I have to ask... when are we going to see Linux allow network access based on the checksum of the process that wants to use it? After all, 'doze has had this ability for years. (Maybe SELinux can provide this already?) Is

F12 Alpha Blocker Bug review meeting recap 2009-07-24

2009-07-24 Thread James Laska
Greetings folks, A quick recap of today's blocker bug review meeting for Fedora 12 Alpha. Full irc transcript available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2009-07-24/fedora-bugzappers.2009-07-24-15.03.html. = Attendees = adamw, jlaska, f13, notting, bugbot (can't forget him),

Re: Firewall rules using SELinux context (Was Re: RFE: FireKit)

2009-07-24 Thread Matthew Woehlke
'Content-Type: format=flowed' would be really nice, as opposed to the 'one line per paragraph' you sent... Casey Dahlin wrote: A couple of mentions of SELinux have cropped up in the FireKit thread, which got me thinking about the Firewall and SELinux and ways in which they are similar. I had

Re: Firewall rules using SELinux context (Was Re: RFE: FireKit)

2009-07-24 Thread Roland McGrath
It sounds like something that looks at an SELinux policy's rules for SECMARK and generates corresponding iptables rules would amount to the same thing you have in mind. Since you load new SELinux policy in a big static-switch sort of way, it doesn't seem much different in a way you could discern

Re: Firewall rules using SELinux context (Was Re: RFE: FireKit)

2009-07-24 Thread Casey Dahlin
On 07/24/2009 04:44 PM, Steve Grubb wrote: On Friday 24 July 2009 03:47:51 pm Casey Dahlin wrote: A couple of mentions of SELinux have cropped up in the FireKit thread, which got me thinking about the Firewall and SELinux and ways in which they are similar. I had the following thought:

Re: RFE: FireKit

2009-07-24 Thread Steve Grubb
On Thursday 23 July 2009 02:16:10 pm Ahmed Kamal wrote: Here's a RFE for FireKit, a firewall desktop kit. What this does is: 1- Exposes a dbus interface for applications to programatically open/close ports I don't exactly like this. If one application gets compromised, it can now open other

Re: Firewall rules using SELinux context (Was Re: RFE: FireKit)

2009-07-24 Thread Steve Grubb
On Friday 24 July 2009 04:56:51 pm Casey Dahlin wrote: Just because selinux has policy doesn't mean the app is installed. If the app is not installed nothing is running in its context, so none of the rules will ever trigger. If the attacker can work out the chain of allowed transitions, they

Re: Firewall rules using SELinux context (Was Re: RFE: FireKit)

2009-07-24 Thread Roland McGrath
I don't think I explained it well. I was thinking what if you had this rule: -A INPUT -Z cups_t -j ACCEPT and then cups was compromised and started listening on port 80. Since the above rule has no port restrictions and cups is allowed to accept connections, would cups now be able to

Re: Firewall rules using SELinux context (Was Re: RFE: FireKit)

2009-07-24 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 16:55:23 -0400, Steve Grubb sgr...@redhat.com wrote: I don't think I explained it well. I was thinking what if you had this rule: -A INPUT -Z cups_t -j ACCEPT and then cups was compromised and started listening on port 80. Since the above rule has no port

Re: Firewall rules using SELinux context (Was Re: RFE: FireKit)

2009-07-24 Thread Simo Sorce
On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 14:00 -0700, Roland McGrath wrote: I don't think I explained it well. I was thinking what if you had this rule: -A INPUT -Z cups_t -j ACCEPT and then cups was compromised and started listening on port 80. Since the above rule has no port restrictions and cups

Re: Firewall rules using SELinux context (Was Re: RFE: FireKit)

2009-07-24 Thread Simo Sorce
On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 16:21 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: I thought the idea was to label packets based on source and destination (including ports) not application. Applications would get access to the packets based on their context and the context (labels) of the packets. I may have

Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-07-24

2009-07-24 Thread Till Maas
On Fri July 24 2009, Jon Stanley wrote: Log: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2009-07-24/fedora-meeting.2 009-07-24-16.59.log.html 17:01:18 jds2001 #topic No frozen rawhide proposal 17:01:22 jds2001 .fesco 224 17:01:25 * jwb is here 17:01:41 * nirik goes to look over the page

Re: Firewall rules using SELinux context (Was Re: RFE: FireKit)

2009-07-24 Thread Roland McGrath
So I think most of us in this discussion probably don't actually understand SECMARK. I sure didn't. I think I might now, sort of. The SELinux policy just says contexts, and it doesn't say anything about the port numbers. The point of SECMARK is that you write port-matching rules that are what

Re: Firewall rules using SELinux context (Was Re: RFE: FireKit)

2009-07-24 Thread Simo Sorce
On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 17:44 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote: On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 16:21 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: I thought the idea was to label packets based on source and destination (including ports) not application. Applications would get access to the packets based on their context

Re: RFE: FireKit

2009-07-24 Thread Jesse Keating
On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 14:24 -0500, Matthew Woehlke wrote: Ugh. I think C will do just fine. Its perfectly adequate without growing any tumorous appendages. C is just fine for device drivers, just don't make me write a GUI using only C ;-). (Tumorous appendage? I object to that...) Get

Re: Firewall rules using SELinux context (Was Re: RFE: FireKit)

2009-07-24 Thread Gregory Maxwell
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 5:49 PM, Roland McGrathrol...@redhat.com wrote: So I think most of us in this discussion probably don't actually understand SECMARK.  I sure didn't.  I think I might now, sort of.  The SELinux policy just says contexts, and it doesn't say anything about the port numbers.

Re: RFE: FireKit

2009-07-24 Thread Björn Persson
Matthew Woehlke wrote: Björn Persson wrote: That's obscurity, not security. Why is it people seem to have a problem with obscurity *on top of* security? What's wrong with making it as hard as possible for the bad guys? It could be because you're not actually making it any harder for the

Re: RFE: FireKit

2009-07-24 Thread Matthew Woehlke
Björn Persson wrote: Your address will go on the try other exploits list anyway, *If* they scan a port that is not DROP'd. You're also assuming that the attacker doesn't already own any of the other machines in the local network, or café, or airport, or wherever you are at the moment. If he

Re: Firewall rules using SELinux context (Was Re: RFE: FireKit)

2009-07-24 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 18:08:55 -0400, Simo Sorce sso...@redhat.com wrote: On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 17:44 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote: now if you allow to apply application labels to packets then you could say that packets directed to 8080 are labeled squid_t and not apache_t and that would

Re: Fedora 12 Mass Rebuild has begun

2009-07-24 Thread पराग़
Hi, On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 8:25 PM, Jesse Keatingjkeat...@redhat.com wrote: This morning I have started the mass rebuild.  The buildsystem will soon be filling up with background build tasks. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild I think its good to disable cvs commit mails

Re: Fedora 12 Mass Rebuild has begun

2009-07-24 Thread Jesse Keating
On Sat, 2009-07-25 at 09:23 +0530, Parag N(पराग़) wrote: I think its good to disable cvs commit mails when we do mass rebuilds. That would mean shutting down CVS to all other contributors. That is not something we want to do. People are allowed to do their own builds now, and newer builds

[Bug 513582] segfault in FTC_CMapCache_Lookup()

2009-07-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513582 Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 483391] [te_IN] New Telugu codepoints/glyphs in Unicode 5.1

2009-07-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483391 sandeep shedmake sshed...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

rpms/abyssinica-fonts/devel abyssinica-fonts.spec,1.4,1.5

2009-07-24 Thread Jesse Keating
Author: jkeating Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/abyssinica-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv22194 Modified Files: abyssinica-fonts.spec Log Message: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild Index: abyssinica-fonts.spec

rpms/adf-accanthis-fonts/devel adf-accanthis-fonts.spec,1.1,1.2

2009-07-24 Thread Jesse Keating
Author: jkeating Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/adf-accanthis-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv24593 Modified Files: adf-accanthis-fonts.spec Log Message: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild Index: adf-accanthis-fonts.spec

rpms/apanov-edrip-fonts/devel apanov-edrip-fonts.spec,1.7,1.8

2009-07-24 Thread Jesse Keating
Author: jkeating Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/apanov-edrip-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv7187 Modified Files: apanov-edrip-fonts.spec Log Message: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild Index: apanov-edrip-fonts.spec

rpms/asana-math-fonts/devel asana-math-fonts.spec,1.7,1.8

2009-07-24 Thread Jesse Keating
Author: jkeating Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/asana-math-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv16409 Modified Files: asana-math-fonts.spec Log Message: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild Index: asana-math-fonts.spec

rpms/baekmuk-ttf-fonts/devel baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec,1.18,1.19

2009-07-24 Thread Jesse Keating
Author: jkeating Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/baekmuk-ttf-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv10024 Modified Files: baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec Log Message: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild Index: baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec

rpms/bitmap-fonts/devel bitmap-fonts.spec,1.19,1.20

2009-07-24 Thread Jesse Keating
Author: jkeating Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/bitmap-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv26953 Modified Files: bitmap-fonts.spec Log Message: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild Index: bitmap-fonts.spec

rpms/bitstream-vera-fonts/devel bitstream-vera-fonts.spec, 1.16, 1.17

2009-07-24 Thread Jesse Keating
Author: jkeating Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/bitstream-vera-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv27135 Modified Files: bitstream-vera-fonts.spec Log Message: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild Index: bitstream-vera-fonts.spec

rpms/bpg-fonts/devel bpg-fonts.spec,1.1,1.2

2009-07-24 Thread Jesse Keating
Author: jkeating Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/bpg-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv7795 Modified Files: bpg-fonts.spec Log Message: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild Index: bpg-fonts.spec

rpms/brettfont-fonts/devel brettfont-fonts.spec,1.6,1.7

2009-07-24 Thread Jesse Keating
Author: jkeating Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/brettfont-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv8750 Modified Files: brettfont-fonts.spec Log Message: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild Index: brettfont-fonts.spec

rpms/cf-bonveno-fonts/devel cf-bonveno-fonts.spec,1.5,1.6

2009-07-24 Thread Jesse Keating
Author: jkeating Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cf-bonveno-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv27078 Modified Files: cf-bonveno-fonts.spec Log Message: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild Index: cf-bonveno-fonts.spec

rpms/chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts/devel chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts.spec, 1.1, 1.2

2009-07-24 Thread Jesse Keating
Author: jkeating Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv30668 Modified Files: chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts.spec Log Message: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild Index:

rpms/chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts/devel chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts.spec, 1.4, 1.5

2009-07-24 Thread Jesse Keating
Author: jkeating Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv30942 Modified Files: chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts.spec Log Message: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild Index:

rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel cjkuni-fonts.spec,1.11,1.12

2009-07-24 Thread Jesse Keating
Author: jkeating Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv1798 Modified Files: cjkuni-fonts.spec Log Message: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild Index: cjkuni-fonts.spec

rpms/conakry-fonts/devel conakry-fonts.spec,1.1,1.2

2009-07-24 Thread Jesse Keating
Author: jkeating Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/conakry-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20748 Modified Files: conakry-fonts.spec Log Message: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild Index: conakry-fonts.spec

rpms/fontconfig/devel fontconfig.spec,1.135,1.136

2009-07-24 Thread Jesse Keating
Author: jkeating Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv25069 Modified Files: fontconfig.spec Log Message: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild Index: fontconfig.spec

rpms/fontforge/devel fontforge.spec,1.46,1.47

2009-07-24 Thread Jesse Keating
Author: jkeating Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontforge/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv25278 Modified Files: fontforge.spec Log Message: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild Index: fontforge.spec

rpms/fonts-ISO8859-2/devel fonts-ISO8859-2.spec,1.17,1.18

2009-07-24 Thread Jesse Keating
Author: jkeating Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fonts-ISO8859-2/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv25863 Modified Files: fonts-ISO8859-2.spec Log Message: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild Index: fonts-ISO8859-2.spec

rpms/fonts-KOI8-R/devel fonts-KOI8-R.spec,1.13,1.14

2009-07-24 Thread Jesse Keating
Author: jkeating Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fonts-KOI8-R/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv26090 Modified Files: fonts-KOI8-R.spec Log Message: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild Index: fonts-KOI8-R.spec

rpms/fonts-hebrew-fancy/devel fonts-hebrew-fancy.spec,1.7,1.8

2009-07-24 Thread Jesse Keating
Author: jkeating Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fonts-hebrew-fancy/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv26277 Modified Files: fonts-hebrew-fancy.spec Log Message: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild Index: fonts-hebrew-fancy.spec

rpms/fonttools/devel fonttools.spec,1.17,1.18

2009-07-24 Thread Jesse Keating
Author: jkeating Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fonttools/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv26485 Modified Files: fonttools.spec Log Message: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild Index: fonttools.spec

rpms/fontypython/devel fontypython.spec,1.7,1.8

2009-07-24 Thread Jesse Keating
Author: jkeating Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontypython/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv26649 Modified Files: fontypython.spec Log Message: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild Index: fontypython.spec

rpms/freetype/devel freetype.spec,1.73,1.74

2009-07-24 Thread Jesse Keating
Author: jkeating Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/freetype/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv1300 Modified Files: freetype.spec Log Message: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild Index: freetype.spec

rpms/gfs-ambrosia-fonts/devel gfs-ambrosia-fonts.spec,1.5,1.6

2009-07-24 Thread Jesse Keating
Author: jkeating Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/gfs-ambrosia-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv32480 Modified Files: gfs-ambrosia-fonts.spec Log Message: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild Index: gfs-ambrosia-fonts.spec

rpms/gfs-artemisia-fonts/devel gfs-artemisia-fonts.spec,1.11,1.12

2009-07-24 Thread Jesse Keating
Author: jkeating Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/gfs-artemisia-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv32616 Modified Files: gfs-artemisia-fonts.spec Log Message: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild Index: gfs-artemisia-fonts.spec

rpms/gfs-baskerville-fonts/devel gfs-baskerville-fonts.spec, 1.11, 1.12

2009-07-24 Thread Jesse Keating
Author: jkeating Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/gfs-baskerville-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv304 Modified Files: gfs-baskerville-fonts.spec Log Message: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild Index: gfs-baskerville-fonts.spec

rpms/gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts/devel gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts.spec, 1.10, 1.11

2009-07-24 Thread Jesse Keating
Author: jkeating Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv456 Modified Files: gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts.spec Log Message: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild Index:

rpms/gfs-bodoni-fonts/devel gfs-bodoni-fonts.spec,1.10,1.11

2009-07-24 Thread Jesse Keating
Author: jkeating Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/gfs-bodoni-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv620 Modified Files: gfs-bodoni-fonts.spec Log Message: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild Index: gfs-bodoni-fonts.spec

rpms/gfs-complutum-fonts/devel gfs-complutum-fonts.spec,1.9,1.10

2009-07-24 Thread Jesse Keating
Author: jkeating Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/gfs-complutum-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv768 Modified Files: gfs-complutum-fonts.spec Log Message: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild Index: gfs-complutum-fonts.spec

rpms/gfs-decker-fonts/devel gfs-decker-fonts.spec,1.1,1.2

2009-07-24 Thread Jesse Keating
Author: jkeating Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/gfs-decker-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv922 Modified Files: gfs-decker-fonts.spec Log Message: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild Index: gfs-decker-fonts.spec

rpms/gfs-didot-fonts/devel gfs-didot-fonts.spec,1.9,1.10

2009-07-24 Thread Jesse Keating
Author: jkeating Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/gfs-didot-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv1214 Modified Files: gfs-didot-fonts.spec Log Message: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild Index: gfs-didot-fonts.spec

rpms/gfs-eustace-fonts/devel gfs-eustace-fonts.spec,1.5,1.6

2009-07-24 Thread Jesse Keating
Author: jkeating Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/gfs-eustace-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv1381 Modified Files: gfs-eustace-fonts.spec Log Message: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild Index: gfs-eustace-fonts.spec

rpms/gfs-fleischman-fonts/devel gfs-fleischman-fonts.spec,1.5,1.6

2009-07-24 Thread Jesse Keating
Author: jkeating Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/gfs-fleischman-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv1549 Modified Files: gfs-fleischman-fonts.spec Log Message: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild Index: gfs-fleischman-fonts.spec

rpms/gfs-garaldus-fonts/devel gfs-garaldus-fonts.spec,1.5,1.6

2009-07-24 Thread Jesse Keating
Author: jkeating Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/gfs-garaldus-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv1726 Modified Files: gfs-garaldus-fonts.spec Log Message: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild Index: gfs-garaldus-fonts.spec

rpms/gfs-gazis-fonts/devel gfs-gazis-fonts.spec,1.10,1.11

2009-07-24 Thread Jesse Keating
Author: jkeating Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/gfs-gazis-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv1868 Modified Files: gfs-gazis-fonts.spec Log Message: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild Index: gfs-gazis-fonts.spec

rpms/gfs-jackson-fonts/devel gfs-jackson-fonts.spec,1.5,1.6

2009-07-24 Thread Jesse Keating
Author: jkeating Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/gfs-jackson-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv2027 Modified Files: gfs-jackson-fonts.spec Log Message: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild Index: gfs-jackson-fonts.spec

rpms/gfs-neohellenic-fonts/devel gfs-neohellenic-fonts.spec, 1.10, 1.11

2009-07-24 Thread Jesse Keating
Author: jkeating Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/gfs-neohellenic-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv2173 Modified Files: gfs-neohellenic-fonts.spec Log Message: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild Index: gfs-neohellenic-fonts.spec

  1   2   3   4   >