BO == Bryan O'Sullivan writes:
BO On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 11:41 PM, Alex Lancaster al...@users.sourceforge.net
wrote:
Similarly with ghc based packages, there appears to be no movement to
fix these broken deps:
BO We were told there would be a massrebuild that would magically hit all of
BO
On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 09:35:28PM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
This will function much like the 'update' target, it will prompt you to
edit a file to fill in the target and a description of your change. It
will use a cli tool (fedora-hosted) to file a ticket in the rel-eng trac
for you, and
2009/8/5 Alex Lancaster al...@users.sourceforge.net:
BO == Bryan O'Sullivan writes:
BO On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 11:41 PM, Alex Lancaster
al...@users.sourceforge.net
wrote:
Similarly with ghc based packages, there appears to be no movement to
fix these broken deps:
BO We were told there
Dear sir,
I have an old bug : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482757
This person want a review someone can review this software please.
Thanks
kind regards
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Hello All!
2009/8/5 Jonathan MERCIER bioinfornat...@gmail.com:
Dear sir,
I have an old bug : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482757
This person want a review someone can review this software please.
Thanks
kind regards
Jonathan, you may review this srpm by yourself. Don't be
On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 23:00 -0400, TK009 wrote:
On 08/04/2009 10:21 PM, Mike Chambers wrote:
Does anyone else see the fonts and/or window panes or preview panes
showing the email fonts or whatever in a larger size than in previous
versions? In other words, if you highlight a folder on left
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 12:34 +0400, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
Hello All!
2009/8/5 Jonathan MERCIER bioinfornat...@gmail.com:
Dear sir,
I have an old bug : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482757
This person want a review someone can review this software please.
Thanks
kind
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 10:58 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
could you add a bug report to https://bugzilla.redhat.com and attach
screenshot of that you described above, please? I do not remember any
such issue seeing myself, and I cannot even imagine what you mean.
Here ya go..
2009/8/5 Christopher Stone chris.st...@gmail.com:
I'm glad you are going through with it. Awesome support from the KDE SIG!
Kudos!
+1
Thanks from all us F10 users who don't want or cant upgrade to F11 for
various reasons.
--
LG Thomas
Dubium sapientiae initium
--
fedora-devel-list
Hi all.
KDE 4.3 will come to F11 and F10. It's a cool thing.
There aren't updates like this for Gnome. Why not?
F10 with Gnome 2.26 sounds fine to me.
--
Josephine Fine Tannhäuser
2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
2009/8/5 Josephine Tannhäuser josephine.tannhau...@googlemail.com:
KDE 4.3 will come to F11 and F10. It's a cool thing.
There aren't updates like this for Gnome. Why not?
F10 with Gnome 2.26 sounds fine to me.
Because I don't want to _support_ the latest and greatest GNOME on old
versions. A
04 2009 Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk - 1.2-2
- New upstream release
- Fix operation with more recent rpm config
skkdic-20090805-1.T0306.fc12
* Wed Aug 05 2009 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp - 20090805-1.T0306
- Update for F12Alpha
- A bit clean up for spec
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 9:49 AM, Josephine
Tannhäuserjosephine.tannhau...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi all.
KDE 4.3 will come to F11 and F10. It's a cool thing.
There aren't updates like this for Gnome. Why not?
F10 with Gnome 2.26 sounds fine to me.
Because a lot of GNOME works directly with
On 05.08.2009 12:02, Richard Hughes wrote:
2009/8/5 Josephine Tannhäuser josephine.tannhau...@googlemail.com:
KDE 4.3 will come to F11 and F10. It's a cool thing.
There aren't updates like this for Gnome. Why not?
F10 with Gnome 2.26 sounds fine to me.
Because I don't want to _support_ the
On Wednesday 05 August 2009 12:04:21 Till Maas wrote:
On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 01:55:11PM -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
The KDE SIG is now working on KDE-4.3.0-related builds for Fedora 10 and
11 candidate updates. As this requires some buildroot overrides, if your
package uses KDE libraries, it
On Wednesday 05 August 2009 13:08:28 Colin Walters wrote:
Because a lot of GNOME works directly with (and depends on) the core
OS., and we want a stable system.
Does this mean, that every time I've installed my system and left
GNOME out, I made a broken system?
Is there a list of those
2009/8/5 Alex Lancaster al...@users.sourceforge.net:
There was a mass rebuild, but unfortunately they failed because of
some (presumably) transient problem with the build system, because the
rebuild now.
However once the deps failed there should have been regular nagmail
from the rawhide
On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 12:23:12PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
On 05.08.2009 12:02, Richard Hughes wrote:
2009/8/5 Josephine Tannhäuser josephine.tannhau...@googlemail.com:
KDE 4.3 will come to F11 and F10. It's a cool thing.
There aren't updates like this for Gnome. Why not?
F10 with
On 31/07/09 01:09, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
Bill McGonigle wrote:
What's it going to take to make most
people who shut off SELinux stop doing that?
...being able to install bleeding-edge devel KDE to
/usr/local/my-kde-install and be able to use that as my primary desktop.
I guess that would -
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 11:49 +0200, Josephine Tannhäuser wrote:
Hi all.
KDE 4.3 will come to F11 and F10. It's a cool thing.
There aren't updates like this for Gnome. Why not?
F10 with Gnome 2.26 sounds fine to me.
GNOME has stable bugfix updates, and we do bring all of those into
released
On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 21:51 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote:
2 - My mouse was not detected at all during install. Or at least, I
never saw the mouse arrow during it. Had to use keyboard the whole
time.
Pretty sure this is an anaconda glitch. X doesn't show a cursor until
you define one. I'll
Josephine Tannhäuser wrote:
KDE 4.3 will come to F11 and F10. It's a cool thing.
There aren't updates like this for Gnome. Why not?
For the most part, those are hard decisions best left to the discretion of
the maintainers in question.
-- Rex
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
Recently, you've added the following groups to comps:
it-security-code-analysis
it-security-forensics
it-security-intrusion-detection
it-security-reconnaissance
it-security-wireless
it-security-password-recovery
You've also added a new toplevel category. This means this new nebulous
'IT Securty'
On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 10:00:24AM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Recently, you've added the following groups to comps:
it-security-code-analysis
it-security-forensics
it-security-intrusion-detection
it-security-reconnaissance
it-security-wireless
it-security-password-recovery
You've
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Thorsten Leemhuisfed...@leemhuis.info wrote:
Further: The behavior changes to much IMHO -- one reason why I use
Fedora at home and work and suggested it to others were the major new
kernel versions that got delivered as regular update. But that doesn't
really
Ahmed Kamal wrote:
Hi,
I'm probably hitting some bug in F11. I've created the lcktest
directory, and date lcktest/date-file to create a simple file
inside. Repeated this on a ext3 and a ext4 file-system. Now, this works
fine on ext3, but fails on ext4. I tried the same setup on another F11
Hi,
There was a recent xulrunner/Firefox security update and all the
packages depending on the unstable xulrunner interface were rebuilt. For
some reason the Firefox extension I maintain, mozvoikko, can't be built
against xulrunner 1.9.1.2-1.fc12. The build has succeeded with all
previous
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 10:06 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
+# Description of your tag request\n\
+notes=Here is where you give a description of what you want to change,\n\
+rational for why the change is important enough to break the freeze,\n\
+impact of not accepting the change, and what
Ville-Pekka Vainio wrote:
results in
`nsISupports::COMTypeInfoint::kIID' referenced in section `.data.rel.ro'
of
/usr/lib64/xulrunner-sdk-1.9.1/lib/libxpcomglue_s.a(nsGenericFactory.o):
defined in discarded section
JL == Jussi Lehtola jussileht...@fedoraproject.org writes:
JL (I'm not very sure, however, about the current policy of wanting
JL sponsors to review first packages. IMHO anyone should be able to
JL review them, just as long as a sponsor goes through them and some
JL inofficial reviews by the
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 12:17 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
JL == Jussi Lehtola jussileht...@fedoraproject.org writes:
JL (I'm not very sure, however, about the current policy of wanting
JL sponsors to review first packages. IMHO anyone should be able to
JL review them, just as long as a
JL == Jussi Lehtola jussileht...@fedoraproject.org writes:
JL That's what I think, too, but
JL http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Get_Sponsored
JL thinks otherwise:
Actually it just says what I said more succinctly. An informal review
can be done by anyone. The actual full
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 00:15 -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
I should probably talk to Spot about that.
So, the rule here is that we don't take outside linking into effect when
marking the package's licensing. We go by what the source in the tarball
tells us. Otherwise, it would become
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 11:33 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 00:15 -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
I should probably talk to Spot about that.
So, the rule here is that we don't take outside linking into effect when
marking the package's licensing. We go by what the
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 08:01 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
I don't want to get between the lines here (there are good arguments and
against updating Gnome and KDE for older releases) and I hate buzz-words
like Corporate identity, but I find it more and more odd that one
doesn't know what to expect
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Adam Williamsonawill...@redhat.com wrote:
snip
We've had this discussion before, but to re-state my opinion: the only
sane way to handle this is multiple, discretionary update repositories.
A repository for security and stable bugfix updates, and a repository
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 2:49 PM, Adam Millermaxamill...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Adam Williamsonawill...@redhat.com wrote:
snip
We've had this discussion before, but to re-state my opinion: the only
sane way to handle this is multiple, discretionary update repositories.
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 17:21 +0300, Juha Tuomala wrote:
On Wednesday 05 August 2009 14:06:43 Jussi Lehtola wrote:
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 13:46 +0300, Juha Tuomala wrote:
On Wednesday 05 August 2009 13:08:28 Colin Walters wrote:
Because a lot of GNOME works directly with (and depends on)
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 1:51 PM, Mark
Bidewellmark.bidew...@alumni.clemson.edu wrote:
snip
+1
snip
Would we want to consider putting together a proposal for something
that is OpenSuSE Buildservice styled in order to satisfy this?
-Adam
--
http://maxamillion.googlepages.com
On 08/05/2009 11:47 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
And maintainers can choose whether or not they
want to take on the work of shipping updates in the adventurous
repository.
How does this work? It would seem that the adventurous repository would
be mandatory as something that changes ABI would
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 13:58 -0500, Adam Miller wrote:
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 1:51 PM, Mark
Bidewellmark.bidew...@alumni.clemson.edu wrote:
snip
+1
snip
Would we want to consider putting together a proposal for something
that is OpenSuSE Buildservice styled in order to satisfy this?
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 11:58 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On 08/05/2009 11:47 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
And maintainers can choose whether or not they
want to take on the work of shipping updates in the adventurous
repository.
How does this work? It would seem that the adventurous
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 15:03 -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
On 08/05/2009 02:38 PM, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
Apropos, what's the license in case a GPL package links against OpenSSL?
GPL with exceptions or what? Or is it even allowed?
So, in this specific case, I'm still arguing with Red Hat
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 15:28 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
Care to write up a proposal on how this work-flow would look like? Without
some of the details, I'm confused how one would avoid all kinds of weirdness
from repo conflicts if you have multiple of these repos enabled. That, and
the
fact
On 08/05/2009 12:11 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 11:58 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
Also, having the expectation that the other repository is for security
updates doesn't address the problem of a security release breaking ABI.
That's rather unlikely (well, except in
On 08/05/2009 03:41 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
The missing bit of the argument from before is whether we actually want
to care about people who only want 'stable' updates, and that tracks
back to the question of what Fedora actually is, which I don't believe
the Board has settled yet. If we
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 12:44 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
Sure, this is comparable to the present situation. But it doesn't seem
like it makes things much better.
* It doesn't solve the original poster's issue (that the GNOME stack
isn't going to be updated for F10 since the maintainers
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 12:58 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
It also would require multiple CVS branches, one for security, one for
adventurous, as well as different buildroots to go along with those,
since you wouldn't be able to build a security update for a gnome
package against the newer
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 12:44 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
Sure, this is comparable to the present situation. But it doesn't seem
like it makes things much better.
* It doesn't solve the original poster's issue (that the GNOME stack
isn't going to be updated for F10 since the maintainers
Till Maas (opensou...@till.name) said:
You've also added a new toplevel category. This means this new nebulous
'IT Securty' item is pushed at the toplevel, much as 'Desktops' or
'Language Support'. That seems misplaced to me.
How can I bundle the groups, if not with a category? Or can
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 13:04 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
An alternative would be to tag updates within a single repo in a way
that yum and PackageKit understand and have appropriate configuration
options to enable certain types of update, which would really be much
the same situation, just
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 15:49 -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
On 08/05/2009 03:41 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
The missing bit of the argument from before is whether we actually want
to care about people who only want 'stable' updates, and that tracks
back to the question of what Fedora
On 08/05/2009 04:11 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
The question is whether Fedora intends to be a distribution suitable for
day-to-day general purpose use by people who are not necessarily that
interested in Fedora per se - whether it's got an aim to be a
general-purpose operating system like other
On 08/05/2009 01:04 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 12:44 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
Sure, this is comparable to the present situation. But it doesn't seem
like it makes things much better.
* It doesn't solve the original poster's issue (that the GNOME stack
isn't
On 08/05/2009 09:26 AM, Ville-Pekka Vainio wrote:
Hi,
There was a recent xulrunner/Firefox security update and all the
packages depending on the unstable xulrunner interface were rebuilt. For
some reason the Firefox extension I maintain, mozvoikko, can't be built
against xulrunner
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 16:18 -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
Maintainers are pushing updates because they
feel there is a reason, a bug fixed, a security hole closed, a
significant feature enhancement that users want (or that they think
users want).
A bug filed by FEVEr or it's replacement
* Jesse Keating [05/08/2009 22:38] :
A bug filed by FEVEr or it's replacement saying there is a bigger number
released somewhere.
Do maintainers really push out updates for this? I've always considered
a reason to push out a build for rawhide but not to issue updates for
the stable releases.
On Wed, August 5, 2009 2:33 pm, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 16:18 -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
Maintainers are pushing updates because they
feel there is a reason, a bug fixed, a security hole closed, a
significant feature enhancement that users want (or that they think
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 22:49 +0200, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
Do maintainers really push out updates for this? I've always considered
a reason to push out a build for rawhide but not to issue updates for
the stable releases.
It's really hard to tell when so many updates pushers put 0 information
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 13:14 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 13:04 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
An alternative would be to tag updates within a single repo in a way
that yum and PackageKit understand and have appropriate configuration
options to enable certain types of
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 13:25 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
Either way it's going to be some level of extra work for someone
somewhere, I haven't denied that. Was just discussing the parameters of
addressing (or not addressing) this issue. It's not possible to make all
parties happy in the
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 13:03 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 12:58 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
It also would require multiple CVS branches, one for security, one for
adventurous, as well as different buildroots to go along with those,
since you wouldn't be able to build a
Ok, in F11 it had /etc/anacrontab file that I could edit to get my
cron.daily time to be set. But I don't see that file and can't find
where the time is set that I want it ran from. I believe it was 4am
this morning when it ran but I don't know where that time to run came
from?
Any
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 14:26 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
Well, I think it's really the same issue. The problem is one of
expectation: we have two similar components, GNOME and KDE, in the same
distribution, following different update polices - GNOME favours stable,
KDE favours adventurous.
On 2009-08-05 04:32:57 PM, Mike Chambers wrote:
Ok, in F11 it had /etc/anacrontab file that I could edit to get my
cron.daily time to be set. But I don't see that file and can't find
where the time is set that I want it ran from. I believe it was 4am
this morning when it ran but I don't know
- Original Message -
From: Ricky Zhou ri...@fedoraproject.org
To: fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 5:42 PM
Subject: Re: crontab configuration
these anacron/crontab changes should hopefully be
mentioned the release notes somehow
I have a bug on release
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 10:18 PM, Tom spot Callawaytcall...@redhat.com wrote:
On 08/05/2009 04:11 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
The question is whether Fedora intends to be a distribution suitable for
day-to-day general purpose use by people who are not necessarily that
interested in Fedora per
On 08/05/2009 08:02 AM, Paul Howarth wrote:
http://danwalsh.livejournal.com/27571.html
This is really nice.
To partially answer my own question, Dan keeps coming up with great
stuff that seems essential for average admins to maintain an SELinux box.
-Bill
--
Bill McGonigle, Owner
Hi FESCo,
After requesting status updates, including direct email to the feature
owners, the following feature pages do not have a current status or
their ability to tested during the Alpha is unclear based on the lack of
information provided or percentage of completion.
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 6:32 PM, Chris Adamscmad...@hiwaay.net wrote:
Once upon a time, Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com said:
On 08/05/2009 02:38 PM, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
Apropos, what's the license in case a GPL package links against OpenSSL?
GPL with exceptions or what? Or is it even
Tasks Beginning or Ending in the Next Two Weeks
Name Start End
Test 'Test Compose' (boot media testing) Wed 2009-07-29 Wed
2009-08-05
Compose Alpha CandidateThu 2009-08-06 Thu
2009-08-06
Test
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 15:15 -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
Hi FESCo,
After requesting status updates, including direct email to the feature
owners, the following feature pages do not have a current status or
their ability to tested during the Alpha is unclear based on the lack of
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 14:36 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 14:26 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
Well, I think it's really the same issue. The problem is one of
expectation: we have two similar components, GNOME and KDE, in the same
distribution, following different
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 14:34 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 14:24 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
That was the problem I initially thought of with this method, but then
I
thought - there's no actual reason we can't have different trains of
updates in a single
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Adam Williamsonawill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 14:36 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 14:26 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
Well, I think it's really the same issue. The problem is one of
expectation: we have two similar
On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 00:56 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
I'll make sure one of the Desktop-y guys updates this (presumably
Matthias).
I've updated it recently and bumped it to 75%. It would seem
disingenuous to bump it to 100% when GNOME 2.28 has not been released
yet.
It is fine for the
On 08/05/2009 02:26 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 13:25 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
Sure. I'm just pointing out that you're trying to solve a different
problem than either the original poster or Thorsten. (And now that I
understand your problem better, perhaps yours is
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 17:23 -0700, Christopher Stone wrote:
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Adam Williamsonawill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 14:36 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 14:26 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
Well, I think it's really the same
On 08/05/2009 10:51 AM, Mike Chambers wrote:
2 - My mouse was not detected at all during install. Or at least, I
never saw the mouse arrow during it. Had to use keyboard the whole
time.
someone has filed a bug against this.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513879
3 - I used the
2009/8/6 Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 17:23 -0700, Christopher Stone wrote:
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Adam Williamsonawill...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 14:36 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 14:26 -0700, Adam Williamson
Adam Williamson wrote:
Mandriva has a /testing repository for /updates, but not for /backports,
on the basis that /backports is fundamentally unstable so you may as
well just do your testing in the repo. This works fine, so far.
That's not going to work for KDE SIG. Updates like KDE 4.3.0
Adam Williamson wrote:
I probably couldn't do much justice to a comprehensive plan as I have
insufficient knowledge of how the buildsystem works. I was acting at a
higher level - just trying to point out that it's essentially doomed to
try and please everyone with a single update repository,
Adam Williamson wrote:
If we are - or _want to be_ - that kind of a distribution, we have to
provide a stable update set so we can stop telling people who just want
a distro to run Aunt Flo's desktop or their webserver or whatever on to
run CentOS or Ubuntu instead. If, however, we really
Matthias Clasen wrote:
- It would pull along a good-sized portion of the 'plumbing' layer: new
udev, kernel, pulseaudio, X...
Hmmm, that's interesting. KDE seems to be a lot more flexible there, you
sure don't need to run the latest kernel to use the latest KDE.
That said, some stuff like the
I know this is a staging and thus experimental driver.
I only wanted to point out that if you compile the kernl
without SMP support, then this driver module will have these
undefined symbols:
spin_lock_bh
_per_cpu_offset
synchronize_irq
spin_unlock_irqrestore
del_timer_sync
spin_lock_irqsave
I
On Mon, 2009-08-03 at 15:08 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
A few days back I ran into
http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/2009-July/001293.html
I am wondering, since we are already using KMS in most places in Fedora,
how far are we from achieving this by default in a Fedora release?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dave Airlie wrote:
On Mon, 2009-08-03 at 15:08 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
A few days back I ran into
http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/2009-July/001293.html
I am wondering, since we are already using KMS in most places
in
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from h...@openoffice.org Wed Aug 5 09:20:48 +
2009 ---
*** Issue 104011 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505911
John W. Linville linvi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505911
Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
If you have any questions why you received this email, please see the text at
the end of this email. Replies to this email are NOT read, please see the text
at the end of this email. You can add comments to this bug at:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=587506
pango | general | Ver:
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from hussn...@openoffice.org Wed Aug 5 23:43:30
+ 2009 ---
regaring issue nr. 104011 i have exported the file with OO DEV300m53 (Build
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from hussn...@openoffice.org Thu Aug 6 00:29:12
+ 2009 ---
Created an attachment (id=63976)
issue 104011: document of oo 2.1.0
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from hussn...@openoffice.org Thu Aug 6 00:31:17
+ 2009 ---
Created an attachment (id=63977)
issue 104011: document of oo 2.1.0 (correct
Ticket filed at: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1580
==Project Sponsor==
Name: Komaragiri Satya
Fedora Account Name: satyak
Group: Google Summer of Code 2008
Infrastructure Sponsor: None yet.
==Secondary Contact info==
Name: Yaakov Nemoy
Fedora Account Name: ynemoy
Group:
On Mon, 3 Aug 2009 11:45:08 -0400
Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote:
Jon Stanley (jonstan...@gmail.com) said:
I'd like some mailman experts (if we have any) to take a look at
this procedure to migrate lists from redhat.com to lists.fp.o and
let me know if there's something
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Kevin Fenzike...@tummy.com wrote:
Are we doing a mass migration? Or just migrating lists some at a time
as time permits? I can see advantages/disadvantages to both ways, just
wondering which we are planning.
I was planning on starting small, and adding from
On Tue, 4 Aug 2009, John Palmieri wrote:
Hey everyone. I put up a proposal[1] that describes a publish/subscribe
setup for the infrastructure wide notification system. I haven't quite
gotten to the publish side of things because the QMF docs get a little hazy
there but the meat of the
On 08/04/2009 09:03 PM, Les wrote:
...
I was going to write a C example, but I am just too rusty in Algol to
be sure I coded it correctly. However, the Thunk method as shown using
PASCAL is one method of implementing pass by value.
If you want to run ALGOL programs, I'll suggest the
On 08/05/2009 10:54 AM, rajpal songara wrote:
hi everyone,
i'm using bsnl dial-up phone for browsing internet having model
cdma2000wll
but, i'm still not succeed to conect with internet
so, plz guide me how to configure all such things
thanks
Please fine tune your question means which
1 - 100 of 202 matches
Mail list logo
