Re: Policy on removing %changelog entries?

2009-08-28 Thread Tomas Mraz
On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 13:21 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: What is the policy regarding deletion of individual entries in the middle of %changelog? A developer added a %changelog entry to each of my cloud daemons' packages, on the main fedora-cvs devel branch of each. Then, a day or so

Re: cpqarrayd for fedora 11 and 12

2009-08-28 Thread Howard Wilkinson
On 27/08/09 16:08, Peter Jones wrote: On 08/27/2009 06:02 AM, Howard Wilkinson wrote: I have had to patch the code for cpqarrayd to get it working under Fedora 11. It was failing with a stack smashing exception. I have fixed this by replacing stack structures with dynamic allocation. Where

Re: dhclient and dhcp update require restart?

2009-08-28 Thread Christof Damian
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 22:54, Matthew Woehlkemw_tr...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: Dariusz J. Garbowski wrote: Hi, something that bothers me a bit... More and more system restart requests with each update (even if one doesn't use the package at the time). This is a real shame. One of the

Re: ktorrent adds kdm - Re: Orphaning packages

2009-08-28 Thread Jaroslav Reznik
On Thursday 27 August 2009 18:34:38 Michael Schwendt wrote: On Thu, 27 Aug 2009 12:14:43 -0400, Ben wrote: [KDE X session file] So your issue is that kdebase-workspace puts it there, but it's not complete, so it shouldn't? Well, in case installing ktorrent shall drag in the packages for

Re: gwenview - Re: Orphaning packages

2009-08-28 Thread Jaroslav Reznik
On Thursday 27 August 2009 19:54:19 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote: 25.08.2009 02:07, Kevin Kofler wrote: Rahul Sundaram wrote: A quick way to actually check for such dependencies is to switch to another desktop environment, say Xfce, remove all the KDE packages and install one

Re: PolicyKit 0.9 is going away

2009-08-28 Thread Jaroslav Reznik
On Thursday 27 August 2009 18:45:44 Matthias Clasen wrote: On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 17:35 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: Jaroslav Reznik wrote: PolicyKit-KDE is now integral part of kdebase-workspace, it is a KDE 4.3 feature, we should disable it for now (untill we have new ported version).

Re: Page size pain / localisation / possible F13 feature

2009-08-28 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 23:06 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: Maybe we just need an en_INTL locale which defaults to US English translations, but ISO standards everywhere else (ISO -mm-dd dates, ISO A4 paper, metric units etc.)? (Currency would be a problem though, default to €? $? The generic

Some ideas/questions about yum

2009-08-28 Thread Hedayat Vatnakhah
Hi all, Currently, Fedora package management is one of the most annoying part of Fedora experience for new desktop users (at least for those without fast, always available internet connection). For such users, Fedora package management Just Doesn't Work! I've almost never been able to

Re: PolicyKit 0.9 is going away

2009-08-28 Thread Rex Dieter
Matthias Clasen wrote: I have been able to port some 10-12 PolicyKit users from 0.9 to 0.90 in a matter of a few days. The KDE sig should really be able to get this port done. We really don't want to ship multiple authorization databases, that way lies confusion and madness. The PolicyKitOne

Re: Some ideas/questions about yum

2009-08-28 Thread Seth Vidal
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009, Hedayat Vatnakhah wrote: Hi all, Currently, Fedora package management is one of the most annoying part of Fedora experience for new desktop users (at least for those without fast, always available internet connection). For such users, Fedora package management Just

Re: Some ideas/questions about yum

2009-08-28 Thread Aioanei Rares
On 08/28/2009 01:27 PM, Hedayat Vatnakhah wrote: Hi all, Currently, Fedora package management is one of the most annoying part of Fedora experience for new desktop users (at least for those without fast, always available internet connection). For such users, Fedora package management Just

Re: Some ideas/questions about yum

2009-08-28 Thread Aioanei Rares
Oh, and speaking of anaconda, IMHO it should support DSL configuration when using asknetwork. DSL is popular these days. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

Re: Some ideas/questions about yum

2009-08-28 Thread Seth Vidal
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009, Aioanei Rares wrote: Thanks anyway, Hedayat Since it's idea time, I think it would be good for the user that uses yum to see in a listing (like yum search $whatever) to see the status of the package, like installed, not installed, virtual package et al. 'yum list

Re: Some ideas/questions about yum

2009-08-28 Thread Florian Festi
On 08/28/2009 12:27 PM, Hedayat Vatnakhah wrote: Now, some ideas: 3. AFAIK, currently yum's primary database file contains information about packages, and all of the files in directories such as /usr/bin and /usr/lib, so that it can resolve package and file level dependencies. Isn't it

Re: Some ideas/questions about yum

2009-08-28 Thread Seth Vidal
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009, Florian Festi wrote: When we think of a Fedora that has grown another order of magnitude (may be 2015) it will become hard to argue against a more centralized solution. Right now we are not at the point where the pain of the local repo db does out weight the complexity

Prelink and kdeinit4 problems persist(Rawhide)

2009-08-28 Thread Aioanei Rares
There was a thread more than a month ago about kdeinit4 failing to start before one did as root a 'prelink -f /usr/bin/kdeinit4'. Well the problem is still here. Anyone knows anything? -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com

Re: Some ideas/questions about yum

2009-08-28 Thread Florian Festi
On 08/28/2009 02:47 PM, Seth Vidal wrote: no - I think it'll be hard to argue why we need 20K pkgs in a single repository. Or hell, why we need 20K pkgs AT ALL. Dream on! ls -1 /mnt/archive/fedora/development/x86_64/os/Packages/ | wc 18382 18382 708766 Not yet counting

Re: Some ideas/questions about yum

2009-08-28 Thread Seth Vidal
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009, Florian Festi wrote: May be we as upstream devs of the tool chain should just limit the number of packages and packaged files by decree ;)= this works for me. When should we meet to decide how next to rule the world? muahahahahahahaha -sv -- fedora-devel-list

#! /usr/bin/perl preferred

2009-08-28 Thread Stepan Kasal
Hello, at certain periods of time, it was recommended to use #!/usr/bin/env . Some people consider it ugly. (The humble opinion of the author of this mail is the same.) Currently there is popular mood to remove /usr/bin/env python, see

Re: PolicyKit 0.9 is going away

2009-08-28 Thread Jaroslav Reznik
On Friday 28 August 2009 15:36:19 Matthias Clasen wrote: On Fri, 2009-08-28 at 06:47 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: Matthias Clasen wrote: I have been able to port some 10-12 PolicyKit users from 0.9 to 0.90 in a matter of a few days. The KDE sig should really be able to get this port done.

Re: PolicyKit 0.9 is going away

2009-08-28 Thread David Zeuthen
On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 12:45 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: I'd be willing to maintain PolicyKit 0.9 packages (as compatibility packages (though renaming should not be needed as they already have distinct names), to be used by KDE) for F12. It is my understanding that those will not

Re: PolicyKit 0.9 is going away

2009-08-28 Thread Jaroslav Reznik
On Friday 28 August 2009 16:23:07 David Zeuthen wrote: On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 12:45 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: I'd be willing to maintain PolicyKit 0.9 packages (as compatibility packages (though renaming should not be needed as they already have distinct names), to be used by KDE) for

Re: rawhide report: 20090828 changes

2009-08-28 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 08/28/2009 09:09 AM, Rawhide Report wrote: Broken deps for i386 -- paraview-3.6.1-4.fc12.i686 requires libssl.so.8 paraview-mpi-3.6.1-4.fc12.i686 requires libssl.so.8 3.6.1-5 is building now which should fix this. --

Re: PolicyKit 0.9 is going away

2009-08-28 Thread Jaroslav Reznik
On Friday 28 August 2009 16:14:51 Jaroslav Reznik wrote: On Friday 28 August 2009 15:36:19 Matthias Clasen wrote: On Fri, 2009-08-28 at 06:47 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: Matthias Clasen wrote: I have been able to port some 10-12 PolicyKit users from 0.9 to 0.90 in a matter of a few

Re: How to respin F11-install-dvd with GRUB on ext4?

2009-08-28 Thread Joshua C.
2009/8/27 Joshua C. joshua...@googlemail.com 2009/8/27 Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 01:44:13 +0200, Joshua C. joshua...@googlemail.com wrote: I'm trying to respin the f11.x86_64 install dvd in order to put the new grub and anaconda packages, so that I can have

Re: Some ideas/questions about yum

2009-08-28 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 15:29:50 +0300, Aioanei Rares scha...@gmail.com wrote: Oh, and speaking of anaconda, IMHO it should support DSL configuration when using asknetwork. DSL is popular these days. If you actually file an RFE bug about this you'll need to be more specific. There is

Re: Some ideas/questions about yum

2009-08-28 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 14:57:44 +0430, Hedayat Vatnakhah heda...@grad.com wrote: Now, some ideas: 3. AFAIK, currently yum's primary database file contains information about packages, and all of the files in directories such as /usr/bin and /usr/lib, so that it can resolve package and

Re: Some ideas/questions about yum

2009-08-28 Thread Hedayat Vatnakhah
Hi again, On ۰۹/۰۸/۲۸ 04:50, Seth Vidal wrote: On Fri, 28 Aug 2009, Hedayat Vatnakhah wrote: Hi all, Currently, Fedora package management is one of the most annoying part of Fedora experience for new desktop users (at least for those without fast, always available internet connection). For

Re: Some ideas/questions about yum

2009-08-28 Thread Hedayat Vatnakhah
Hi again! /*Florian Festi ffe...@redhat.com*/ wrote on ‫جمعه ۲۸ اوت ۰۹، ۱۷:۱۳:۱۰‬: On 08/28/2009 12:27 PM, Hedayat Vatnakhah wrote: Now, some ideas: 3. AFAIK, currently yum's primary database file contains information about packages, and all of the files in directories such as /usr/bin and

Re: Some ideas/questions about yum

2009-08-28 Thread Seth Vidal
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009, Hedayat Vatnakhah wrote: You don't need to know about all existing repositories, since you can still resolve file level dependencies. In such cases you'll be forced to download the other file I mentioned (primary_file_deps.db). I don't see why you'll need to recreate

FESCo meeting summary for 2009-08-28

2009-08-28 Thread Jon Stanley
.2009-08-28-17.01.log.html --- 17:01:14 jds2001 #startmeeting FESCo meeting 20090828 17:01:14 zodbot Meeting started Fri Aug 28 17:01:14 2009 UTC. The chair is jds2001. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 17:01:14 zodbot Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea

Re: Some ideas/questions about yum

2009-08-28 Thread Ralf Ertzinger
Hi. On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 11:43:00 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote You might be referring to PPP which some (IMO only crappy ISPs do this for DSL) DSL providers require you to use. PPP is pretty much standard for broadband access because it allows for some very useful tricks. Please note that I

Fedora 12 early branch now available.

2009-08-28 Thread Jesse Keating
For those of you that wish to separate Fedora 12 stabalization work from future development, we are now ready to process branch requests for F-12. If you branch your package early, builds from your new F-12 branch will continue to go to the Fedora 12 targets. dist-f12 for now, and eventually

Re: Page size pain / localisation / possible F13 feature

2009-08-28 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2009-08-28 at 22:45 +0200, Björn Persson wrote: Caolán McNamara wrote: Well, FWIW there is the (rather weird) en_DK locale, which has -MM-YY dates (I think its the only locale where this is the default) Assuming you meant -MM-DD, sv_SE has that: I'd guess Japan would too,

pkgs in rawhide which are obsoleted by something in rawhide

2009-08-28 Thread Seth Vidal
Working on something else I stumbled across this: http://fpaste.org/jDwM/ that's a list of pkgs in rawhide which are obsoleted by something else in rawhide. seems a bit dodgy to me. -sv -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com

ABRT for f12 status

2009-08-28 Thread Colin Walters
Hi internets, I was looking at the current state of ABRT (I tested on F11). The core capturing seems to work well. In brief, I propose to apply the (attached) patch to comps-f12.xml.in. For upgrades, we'll need to add a Conflicts: bug-buddy, correct? ABRT is a big step forward from bug-buddy

Re: Firefox addon for Fedora-pkgdb search

2009-08-28 Thread Adam Miller
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 5:16 PM, Milos Jakubicekxja...@fi.muni.cz wrote: snip I'm very very sorry for this as I'm sure that I've partially invalidated my/your/both work, which is just bad:( Could you try to merge my and your work somehow? I'd be glad if you would do this and keep an eye of

Re: ABRT for f12 status

2009-08-28 Thread drago01
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 11:31 PM, Colin Walterswalt...@verbum.org wrote: Hi internets, I was looking at the current state of ABRT (I tested on F11).  The core capturing seems to work well.  In brief, I propose to apply the (attached) patch to comps-f12.xml.in. For upgrades, we'll need to

Re: PolicyKit 0.9 is going away

2009-08-28 Thread Kevin Kofler
David Zeuthen wrote: We announced that this would happen long ago. And, FWIW, it was approved long ago by FESCO too. You (well, whoever from your team was there to talk about the feature) promised to FESCo that PolicyKit 0.9 and 1.0 can coexist and that 0.9 can stay around if somebody signs

Re: ABRT for f12 status

2009-08-28 Thread Colin Walters
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 5:49 PM, drago01drag...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 11:31 PM, Colin Walterswalt...@verbum.org wrote: Hi internets, I was looking at the current state of ABRT (I tested on F11).  The core capturing seems to work well.  In brief, I propose to apply the

Re: ABRT for f12 status

2009-08-28 Thread drago01
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 12:19 AM, Colin Walterswalt...@verbum.org wrote: On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 5:49 PM, drago01drag...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 11:31 PM, Colin Walterswalt...@verbum.org wrote: Hi internets, I was looking at the current state of ABRT (I tested on F11).  The

Re: ABRT for f12 status

2009-08-28 Thread drago01
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 12:26 AM, drago01drag...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 12:19 AM, Colin Walterswalt...@verbum.org wrote: On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 5:49 PM, drago01drag...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 11:31 PM, Colin Walterswalt...@verbum.org wrote: Hi internets, I

Re: Some ideas/questions about yum

2009-08-28 Thread Muayyad AlSadi
1. Since Fedora 4, Fedora doesn't support installing software from DVD out of the box. Fedora 8 is an exception here. Currently, it seems that the work is almost done (99% completed as in [1]), and fixing the remaining 1% doesn't seem to need much work but unfortunately it seems that it is

Re: another spin of TeX Live 2009 packages

2009-08-28 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Message du 27/08/09 16:38 De : Jindrich Novy A : fedora-devel-list@redhat.com Copie à : fedora-fonts-l...@redhat.com, tcall...@redhat.com Objet : Re: another spin of TeX Live 2009 packages On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 03:02:18PM +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote: Hi, first off, thanks many

Re: dhclient and dhcp update require restart?

2009-08-28 Thread David Cantrell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 27 Aug 2009, Matthew Woehlke wrote: Dariusz J. Garbowski wrote: Hi, something that bothers me a bit... More and more system restart requests with each update (even if one doesn't use the package at the time). This is a real shame. One

Re: Firefox addon for Fedora-pkgdb search

2009-08-28 Thread Milos Jakubicek
Dne 28.8.2009 23:33, Adam Miller napsal(a): On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 5:16 PM, Milos Jakubicekxja...@fi.muni.cz wrote: snip I'm very very sorry for this as I'm sure that I've partially invalidated my/your/both work, which is just bad:( Could you try to merge my and your work somehow? I'd be

how to determain those no longer required packages

2009-08-28 Thread Ray Chen
I'm reading APT and YUM source codes recently, and met the following question: for class apt.package.Package, there are a function isAutoRemovable, which means: http://apt.alioth.debian.org/python-apt-doc/apt/package.html?highlight=isautoremovable#apt.package.Package.isAutoRemovable Return True

[Bug 517635] [indic] fc-match output is not matching to current locale

2009-08-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517635 Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

rpms/libfontenc/devel libfontenc-1.0.0-get-fontdir-from-pkgconfig.patch, 1.1, 1.2 libfontenc.spec, 1.29, 1.30

2009-08-28 Thread Peter Hutterer
Author: whot Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/libfontenc/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv25120 Modified Files: libfontenc-1.0.0-get-fontdir-from-pkgconfig.patch libfontenc.spec Log Message: * Fri Aug 28 2009 Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@redhat.com 1.0.5-2 -

[Bug 520043] [pa_IN] Need fontconfig rules for Lohit Punjabi font

2009-08-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520043 --- Comment #1 from Parag pnem...@redhat.com 2009-08-28 02:17:30 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=358995) --

[Bug 520040] [kn_IN] Need fontconfig rules for Lohit Kannada font

2009-08-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520040 --- Comment #1 from Parag pnem...@redhat.com 2009-08-28 02:18:17 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=358998) --

[Bug 520042] [or_IN] Need fontconfig rules for Lohit Oriya font

2009-08-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520042 Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 520032] [hi_IN] Need fontconfig rules for Lohit Hindi font

2009-08-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520032 Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 520039] [gu_IN] Need fontconfig rules for Lohit Gujarati font

2009-08-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520039 Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 520043] [pa_IN] Need fontconfig rules for Lohit Punjabi font

2009-08-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520043 Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 520041] [ml_IN] Need fontconfig rules for Lohit Malayalam font

2009-08-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520041 Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 520038] [bn_IN] ]Need fontconfig rules for Lohit Bengali font

2009-08-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520038 Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 520033] [mr_IN] Need fontconfig rules for Lohit Marathi font

2009-08-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520033 Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 520037] [sd...@devanagari] ]Need fontconfig rules for Lohit Sindhi font

2009-08-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520037 Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 518161] contains expression seems not working on the fontconfig rule

2009-08-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518161 Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 520035] [as_IN] Need fontconfig rules for Lohit Assamese font

2009-08-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520035 Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 520034] [mai_IN] Need fontconfig rules for Lohit Maithili font

2009-08-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520034 Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 520036] [ks...@devanagari] Need fontconfig rules for Lohit Kashmiri font

2009-08-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520036 Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 520040] [kn_IN] Need fontconfig rules for Lohit Kannada font

2009-08-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520040 Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 517635] [indic] fc-match output is not matching to current locale

2009-08-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517635 Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 520032] [hi_IN] Need fontconfig rules for Lohit Hindi font

2009-08-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520032 --- Comment #1 from Parag pnem...@redhat.com 2009-08-28 02:20:42 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=359006) --

[Bug 520034] [mai_IN] Need fontconfig rules for Lohit Maithili font

2009-08-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520034 --- Comment #1 from Parag pnem...@redhat.com 2009-08-28 02:20:09 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=359004) --

[Bug 520033] [mr_IN] Need fontconfig rules for Lohit Marathi font

2009-08-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520033 --- Comment #1 from Parag pnem...@redhat.com 2009-08-28 02:20:26 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=359005) --

[Bug 520041] [ml_IN] Need fontconfig rules for Lohit Malayalam font

2009-08-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520041 --- Comment #1 from Parag pnem...@redhat.com 2009-08-28 02:18:03 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=358997) --

[Bug 520038] [bn_IN] ]Need fontconfig rules for Lohit Bengali font

2009-08-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520038 --- Comment #1 from Parag pnem...@redhat.com 2009-08-28 02:18:46 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=359000) --

[Bug 520039] [gu_IN] Need fontconfig rules for Lohit Gujarati font

2009-08-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520039 --- Comment #1 from Parag pnem...@redhat.com 2009-08-28 02:18:36 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=358999) --

[Bug 520037] [sd...@devanagari] ]Need fontconfig rules for Lohit Sindhi font

2009-08-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520037 --- Comment #1 from Parag pnem...@redhat.com 2009-08-28 02:19:07 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=359001) --

[Bug 520035] [as_IN] Need fontconfig rules for Lohit Assamese font

2009-08-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520035 --- Comment #1 from Parag pnem...@redhat.com 2009-08-28 02:19:53 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=359003) --

[Bug 520036] [ks...@devanagari] Need fontconfig rules for Lohit Kashmiri font

2009-08-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520036 --- Comment #1 from Parag pnem...@redhat.com 2009-08-28 02:19:26 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=359002) --

[Bug 520046] New: [ne_NP] Need fontconfig rules for Lohit Nepai font

2009-08-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [ne_NP] Need fontconfig rules for Lohit Nepai font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520046 Summary: [ne_NP] Need fontconfig rules for Lohit Nepai

[Bug 520045] New: [ta_IN] Need fontconfig rules for Lohit Tamil font

2009-08-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [ta_IN] Need fontconfig rules for Lohit Tamil font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520045 Summary: [ta_IN] Need fontconfig rules for Lohit Tamil

[Bug 520050] New: [kok_IN] Need fontconfig rules for Lohit Konkani font

2009-08-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [kok_IN] Need fontconfig rules for Lohit Konkani font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520050 Summary: [kok_IN] Need fontconfig rules for Lohit

[Bug 520049] [te_IN] Need fontconfig rules for Lohit Telugu font

2009-08-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520049 Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 520046] [ne_NP] Need fontconfig rules for Lohit Nepai font

2009-08-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520046 Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 520045] [ta_IN] Need fontconfig rules for Lohit Tamil font

2009-08-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520045 Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 520051] [deva] Need fontconfig rules for Samyak Devanagari font

2009-08-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520051 Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 517635] [indic] fc-match output is not matching to current locale

2009-08-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517635 Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 520051] New: [deva] Need fontconfig rules for Samyak Devanagari font

2009-08-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [deva] Need fontconfig rules for Samyak Devanagari font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520051 Summary: [deva] Need fontconfig rules for Samyak

[Bug 520050] [kok_IN] Need fontconfig rules for Lohit Konkani font

2009-08-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520050 Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 518161] contains expression seems not working on the fontconfig rule

2009-08-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518161 Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[PATCH] ip6tables template for RHEL5

2009-08-28 Thread Matt Domsch
From: Matt Domsch mdom...@puppet1.fedora.phx.redhat.com --- configs/system/ip6tables-template.conf.erb | 40 1 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 configs/system/ip6tables-template.conf.erb diff --git

[PATCH] extend eth{} to optionally take a list of IPv6 addresses

2009-08-28 Thread Matt Domsch
From: Matt Domsch mdom...@puppet1.fedora.phx.redhat.com --- configs/system/generic-network.conf.erb |4 manifests/filetypes/interfaces.pp |2 +- 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/configs/system/generic-network.conf.erb

[PATCH] add apache IPv6 config options

2009-08-28 Thread Matt Domsch
From: Matt Domsch mdom...@puppet1.fedora.phx.redhat.com --- modules/httpd/files/00-namevirtualhost.conf |4 modules/httpd/files/httpd.conf-rhel5p |1 + 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/modules/httpd/files/00-namevirtualhost.conf

IPv6 enablement patches

2009-08-28 Thread Matt Domsch
This patch series enables IPv6 for several infrastructure services. * ns2, so we start serving DNS by IPv6 * proxy4, so we can start serving fedoraproject.org and other sites by IPv6 * ip6tables for these servers Comments welcome. Thanks, Matt ___

[PATCH] add ibiblio1 AAAA

2009-08-28 Thread Matt Domsch
From: Matt Domsch mdom...@puppet1.fedora.phx.redhat.com --- modules/bind/files/master/fedoraproject.org |1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/modules/bind/files/master/fedoraproject.org b/modules/bind/files/master/fedoraproject.org index 43d6d18..2327080

[PATCH] add AAAA records for ns2, proxy4, and torrent1

2009-08-28 Thread Matt Domsch
From: Matt Domsch mdom...@puppet1.fedora.phx.redhat.com --- modules/bind/files/master/fedoraproject.org |3 +++ 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/modules/bind/files/master/fedoraproject.org b/modules/bind/files/master/fedoraproject.org index cb9836f..43d6d18

[PATCH] enable IPv6 in named.conf

2009-08-28 Thread Matt Domsch
From: Matt Domsch mdom...@puppet1.fedora.phx.redhat.com --- modules/bind/files/named.conf | 12 +--- 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/modules/bind/files/named.conf b/modules/bind/files/named.conf index 6063696..29f0d63 100644 ---

[PATCH] create ip6tables definition

2009-08-28 Thread Matt Domsch
From: Matt Domsch mdom...@puppet1.fedora.phx.redhat.com --- manifests/filetypes/standard.pp | 12 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/manifests/filetypes/standard.pp b/manifests/filetypes/standard.pp index d4ce26a..097b3df 100644 ---

[PATCH] add ip6tables on DNS servers

2009-08-28 Thread Matt Domsch
From: Matt Domsch mdom...@puppet1.fedora.phx.redhat.com --- manifests/servergroups/dns.pp |9 + 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/manifests/servergroups/dns.pp b/manifests/servergroups/dns.pp index 0b543b2..01b5a60 100644 ---

[PATCH] add IPv6 addresses for apache VirtualHost stanzas

2009-08-28 Thread Matt Domsch
From: Matt Domsch mdom...@puppet1.fedora.phx.redhat.com --- manifests/servergroups/proxy.pp | 23 +++ 1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/manifests/servergroups/proxy.pp b/manifests/servergroups/proxy.pp index bfa0481..eeb9e19 100644 ---

[PATCH] assign IPv6 addresses to proxy4

2009-08-28 Thread Matt Domsch
From: Matt Domsch mdom...@puppet1.fedora.phx.redhat.com --- manifests/nodes/proxy4.fedoraproject.org.pp |7 +++ 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/manifests/nodes/proxy4.fedoraproject.org.pp b/manifests/nodes/proxy4.fedoraproject.org.pp index 8926d94..fb31481

[PATCH] change proxy4 IPv6 addresses to static scheme

2009-08-28 Thread Matt Domsch
From: Matt Domsch mdom...@puppet1.fedora.phx.redhat.com --- modules/bind/files/master/fedoraproject.org |3 ++- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/modules/bind/files/master/fedoraproject.org b/modules/bind/files/master/fedoraproject.org index 2327080..14eb8c3

[PATCH] add proxy4 IPv6 addresses into zone file

2009-08-28 Thread Matt Domsch
From: Matt Domsch mdom...@puppet1.fedora.phx.redhat.com --- modules/bind/files/master/fedoraproject.org |2 ++ 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/modules/bind/files/master/fedoraproject.org b/modules/bind/files/master/fedoraproject.org index 14eb8c3..6f9286d

Re: [PATCH] add apache IPv6 config options

2009-08-28 Thread Jeff Garzik
On 08/28/2009 05:11 PM, Matt Domsch wrote: index 5c40c80..bd4480f 100644 --- a/modules/httpd/files/httpd.conf-rhel5p +++ b/modules/httpd/files/httpd.conf-rhel5p @@ -148,6 +148,7 @@ MaxRequestsPerChild1 # Listen 0.0.0.0:80 Listen 0.0.0.0:443 +Listen [::]:80 Two comments: -

Re: [PATCH] add ip6tables on DNS servers

2009-08-28 Thread Jerald Darow
Matt why are you spamming the list - Original Message - From: Matt Domsch matt_dom...@dell.com To: fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com Sent: Friday, August 28, 2009 5:11 PM Subject: [PATCH] add ip6tables on DNS servers From: Matt Domsch mdom...@puppet1.fedora.phx.redhat.com ---

  1   2   3   >