On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 13:21 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
What is the policy regarding deletion of individual entries in the
middle of %changelog?
A developer added a %changelog entry to each of my cloud daemons'
packages, on the main fedora-cvs devel branch of each.
Then, a day or so
On 27/08/09 16:08, Peter Jones wrote:
On 08/27/2009 06:02 AM, Howard Wilkinson wrote:
I have had to patch the code for cpqarrayd to get it working under
Fedora 11. It was failing with a stack smashing exception. I have fixed
this by replacing stack structures with dynamic allocation. Where
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 22:54, Matthew
Woehlkemw_tr...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Dariusz J. Garbowski wrote:
Hi, something that bothers me a bit... More and more system restart
requests with each update (even if one doesn't use the package at the time).
This is a real shame. One of the
On Thursday 27 August 2009 18:34:38 Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Thu, 27 Aug 2009 12:14:43 -0400, Ben wrote:
[KDE X session file]
So your issue is that kdebase-workspace puts it there, but it's
not complete, so it shouldn't?
Well, in case installing ktorrent shall drag in the packages
for
On Thursday 27 August 2009 19:54:19 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote:
25.08.2009 02:07, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
A quick way to actually check for such dependencies is to switch to
another desktop environment, say Xfce, remove all the KDE packages and
install one
On Thursday 27 August 2009 18:45:44 Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 17:35 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
PolicyKit-KDE is now integral part of kdebase-workspace, it is a KDE
4.3 feature, we should disable it for now (untill we have new ported
version).
On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 23:06 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Maybe we just need an en_INTL locale which defaults to US English
translations, but ISO standards everywhere else (ISO -mm-dd dates, ISO
A4 paper, metric units etc.)? (Currency would be a problem though, default
to €? $? The generic
Hi all,
Currently, Fedora package management is one of the most annoying part of
Fedora experience for new desktop users (at least for those without
fast, always available internet connection). For such users, Fedora
package management Just Doesn't Work! I've almost never been able to
Matthias Clasen wrote:
I have been able to port some 10-12 PolicyKit users from 0.9 to 0.90 in
a matter of a few days. The KDE sig should really be able to get this
port done. We really don't want to ship multiple authorization
databases, that way lies confusion and madness.
The PolicyKitOne
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009, Hedayat Vatnakhah wrote:
Hi all,
Currently, Fedora package management is one of the most annoying part of
Fedora experience for new desktop users (at least for those without fast,
always available internet connection). For such users, Fedora package
management Just
On 08/28/2009 01:27 PM, Hedayat Vatnakhah wrote:
Hi all,
Currently, Fedora package management is one of the most annoying part
of Fedora experience for new desktop users (at least for those without
fast, always available internet connection). For such users, Fedora
package management Just
Oh, and speaking of anaconda, IMHO it should support DSL configuration
when using asknetwork. DSL is popular these days.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009, Aioanei Rares wrote:
Thanks anyway,
Hedayat
Since it's idea time, I think it would be good for the user that uses yum to
see in a listing (like yum search $whatever) to see the status of the
package, like installed, not installed, virtual package et al.
'yum list
On 08/28/2009 12:27 PM, Hedayat Vatnakhah wrote:
Now, some ideas:
3. AFAIK, currently yum's primary database file contains information
about packages, and all of the files in directories such as /usr/bin
and /usr/lib, so that it can resolve package and file level
dependencies. Isn't it
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009, Florian Festi wrote:
When we think of a Fedora that has grown another order of magnitude (may be
2015) it will become hard to argue against a more centralized solution. Right
now we are not at the point where the pain of the local repo db does out
weight the complexity
There was a thread more than a month ago about kdeinit4 failing to start
before one did as root a 'prelink -f /usr/bin/kdeinit4'. Well the
problem is still here. Anyone knows anything?
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
On 08/28/2009 02:47 PM, Seth Vidal wrote:
no - I think it'll be hard to argue why we need 20K pkgs in a single
repository. Or hell, why we need 20K pkgs AT ALL.
Dream on!
ls -1 /mnt/archive/fedora/development/x86_64/os/Packages/ | wc
18382 18382 708766
Not yet counting
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009, Florian Festi wrote:
May be we as upstream devs of the tool chain should just limit the number of
packages and packaged files by decree ;)=
this works for me.
When should we meet to decide how next to rule the world?
muahahahahahahaha
-sv
--
fedora-devel-list
Hello,
at certain periods of time, it was recommended to use #!/usr/bin/env .
Some people consider it ugly. (The humble opinion of the author of
this mail is the same.)
Currently there is popular mood to remove /usr/bin/env python, see
On Friday 28 August 2009 15:36:19 Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Fri, 2009-08-28 at 06:47 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
Matthias Clasen wrote:
I have been able to port some 10-12 PolicyKit users from 0.9 to 0.90 in
a matter of a few days. The KDE sig should really be able to get this
port done.
On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 12:45 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
I'd be willing to maintain PolicyKit 0.9 packages (as compatibility
packages
(though renaming should not be needed as they already have distinct names),
to be used by KDE) for F12. It is my understanding that those will not
On Friday 28 August 2009 16:23:07 David Zeuthen wrote:
On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 12:45 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
I'd be willing to maintain PolicyKit 0.9 packages (as compatibility
packages (though renaming should not be needed as they already have
distinct names), to be used by KDE) for
On 08/28/2009 09:09 AM, Rawhide Report wrote:
Broken deps for i386
--
paraview-3.6.1-4.fc12.i686 requires libssl.so.8
paraview-mpi-3.6.1-4.fc12.i686 requires libssl.so.8
3.6.1-5 is building now which should fix this.
--
On Friday 28 August 2009 16:14:51 Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
On Friday 28 August 2009 15:36:19 Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Fri, 2009-08-28 at 06:47 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
Matthias Clasen wrote:
I have been able to port some 10-12 PolicyKit users from 0.9 to 0.90
in a matter of a few
2009/8/27 Joshua C. joshua...@googlemail.com
2009/8/27 Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 01:44:13 +0200,
Joshua C. joshua...@googlemail.com wrote:
I'm trying to respin the f11.x86_64 install dvd in order to put the
new grub and anaconda packages, so that I can have
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 15:29:50 +0300,
Aioanei Rares scha...@gmail.com wrote:
Oh, and speaking of anaconda, IMHO it should support DSL configuration
when using asknetwork. DSL is popular these days.
If you actually file an RFE bug about this you'll need to be more specific.
There is
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 14:57:44 +0430,
Hedayat Vatnakhah heda...@grad.com wrote:
Now, some ideas:
3. AFAIK, currently yum's primary database file contains information
about packages, and all of the files in directories such as /usr/bin and
/usr/lib, so that it can resolve package and
Hi again,
On ۰۹/۰۸/۲۸ 04:50, Seth Vidal wrote:
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009, Hedayat Vatnakhah wrote:
Hi all,
Currently, Fedora package management is one of the most annoying part
of Fedora experience for new desktop users (at least for those
without fast, always available internet connection). For
Hi again!
/*Florian Festi ffe...@redhat.com*/ wrote on جمعه ۲۸ اوت ۰۹، ۱۷:۱۳:۱۰:
On 08/28/2009 12:27 PM, Hedayat Vatnakhah wrote:
Now, some ideas:
3. AFAIK, currently yum's primary database file contains information
about packages, and all of the files in directories such as /usr/bin
and
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009, Hedayat Vatnakhah wrote:
You don't need to know about all existing repositories, since you can still
resolve file level dependencies. In such
cases you'll be forced to download the other file I mentioned
(primary_file_deps.db).
I don't see why you'll need to recreate
.2009-08-28-17.01.log.html
---
17:01:14 jds2001 #startmeeting FESCo meeting 20090828
17:01:14 zodbot Meeting started Fri Aug 28 17:01:14 2009 UTC. The
chair is jds2001. Information about MeetBot at
http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
17:01:14 zodbot Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea
Hi.
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 11:43:00 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote
You might be referring to PPP which some (IMO only crappy ISPs do
this for DSL) DSL providers require you to use.
PPP is pretty much standard for broadband access because it allows
for some very useful tricks.
Please note that I
For those of you that wish to separate Fedora 12 stabalization work from
future development, we are now ready to process branch requests for
F-12.
If you branch your package early, builds from your new F-12 branch will
continue to go to the Fedora 12 targets. dist-f12 for now, and
eventually
On Fri, 2009-08-28 at 22:45 +0200, Björn Persson wrote:
Caolán McNamara wrote:
Well, FWIW there is the (rather weird) en_DK locale, which has
-MM-YY dates (I think its the only locale where this is the default)
Assuming you meant -MM-DD, sv_SE has that:
I'd guess Japan would too,
Working on something else I stumbled across this:
http://fpaste.org/jDwM/
that's a list of pkgs in rawhide which are obsoleted by something else in
rawhide.
seems a bit dodgy to me.
-sv
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
Hi internets,
I was looking at the current state of ABRT (I tested on F11). The
core capturing seems to work well. In brief, I propose to apply the
(attached) patch to comps-f12.xml.in.
For upgrades, we'll need to add a Conflicts: bug-buddy, correct?
ABRT is a big step forward from bug-buddy
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 5:16 PM, Milos Jakubicekxja...@fi.muni.cz wrote:
snip
I'm very very sorry for this as I'm sure that I've partially invalidated
my/your/both work, which is just bad:(
Could you try to merge my and your work somehow? I'd be glad if you would do
this and keep an eye of
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 11:31 PM, Colin Walterswalt...@verbum.org wrote:
Hi internets,
I was looking at the current state of ABRT (I tested on F11). The
core capturing seems to work well. In brief, I propose to apply the
(attached) patch to comps-f12.xml.in.
For upgrades, we'll need to
David Zeuthen wrote:
We announced that this would happen long ago. And, FWIW, it was approved
long ago by FESCO too.
You (well, whoever from your team was there to talk about the feature)
promised to FESCo that PolicyKit 0.9 and 1.0 can coexist and that 0.9 can
stay around if somebody signs
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 5:49 PM, drago01drag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 11:31 PM, Colin Walterswalt...@verbum.org wrote:
Hi internets,
I was looking at the current state of ABRT (I tested on F11). The
core capturing seems to work well. In brief, I propose to apply the
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 12:19 AM, Colin Walterswalt...@verbum.org wrote:
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 5:49 PM, drago01drag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 11:31 PM, Colin Walterswalt...@verbum.org wrote:
Hi internets,
I was looking at the current state of ABRT (I tested on F11). The
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 12:26 AM, drago01drag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 12:19 AM, Colin Walterswalt...@verbum.org wrote:
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 5:49 PM, drago01drag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 11:31 PM, Colin Walterswalt...@verbum.org wrote:
Hi internets,
I
1. Since Fedora 4, Fedora doesn't support installing software from DVD out
of the box. Fedora 8 is an exception here. Currently, it seems that the work
is almost done (99% completed as in [1]), and fixing the remaining 1% doesn't
seem to need much work but unfortunately it seems that it is
Message du 27/08/09 16:38
De : Jindrich Novy
A : fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
Copie à : fedora-fonts-l...@redhat.com, tcall...@redhat.com
Objet : Re: another spin of TeX Live 2009 packages
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 03:02:18PM +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote:
Hi,
first off, thanks many
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 27 Aug 2009, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
Dariusz J. Garbowski wrote:
Hi, something that bothers me a bit... More and more system restart
requests with each update (even if one doesn't use the package at the
time).
This is a real shame. One
Dne 28.8.2009 23:33, Adam Miller napsal(a):
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 5:16 PM, Milos Jakubicekxja...@fi.muni.cz wrote:
snip
I'm very very sorry for this as I'm sure that I've partially invalidated
my/your/both work, which is just bad:(
Could you try to merge my and your work somehow? I'd be
I'm reading APT and YUM source codes recently, and met the following
question:
for class apt.package.Package, there are a function isAutoRemovable,
which means:
http://apt.alioth.debian.org/python-apt-doc/apt/package.html?highlight=isautoremovable#apt.package.Package.isAutoRemovable
Return True
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517635
Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Author: whot
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/libfontenc/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv25120
Modified Files:
libfontenc-1.0.0-get-fontdir-from-pkgconfig.patch
libfontenc.spec
Log Message:
* Fri Aug 28 2009 Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@redhat.com 1.0.5-2
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520043
--- Comment #1 from Parag pnem...@redhat.com 2009-08-28 02:17:30 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=358995)
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520040
--- Comment #1 from Parag pnem...@redhat.com 2009-08-28 02:18:17 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=358998)
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520042
Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520032
Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520039
Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520043
Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520041
Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520038
Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520033
Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520037
Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518161
Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520035
Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520034
Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520036
Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520040
Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517635
Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520032
--- Comment #1 from Parag pnem...@redhat.com 2009-08-28 02:20:42 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=359006)
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520034
--- Comment #1 from Parag pnem...@redhat.com 2009-08-28 02:20:09 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=359004)
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520033
--- Comment #1 from Parag pnem...@redhat.com 2009-08-28 02:20:26 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=359005)
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520041
--- Comment #1 from Parag pnem...@redhat.com 2009-08-28 02:18:03 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=358997)
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520038
--- Comment #1 from Parag pnem...@redhat.com 2009-08-28 02:18:46 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=359000)
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520039
--- Comment #1 from Parag pnem...@redhat.com 2009-08-28 02:18:36 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=358999)
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520037
--- Comment #1 from Parag pnem...@redhat.com 2009-08-28 02:19:07 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=359001)
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520035
--- Comment #1 from Parag pnem...@redhat.com 2009-08-28 02:19:53 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=359003)
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520036
--- Comment #1 from Parag pnem...@redhat.com 2009-08-28 02:19:26 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=359002)
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: [ne_NP] Need fontconfig rules for Lohit Nepai font
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520046
Summary: [ne_NP] Need fontconfig rules for Lohit Nepai
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: [ta_IN] Need fontconfig rules for Lohit Tamil font
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520045
Summary: [ta_IN] Need fontconfig rules for Lohit Tamil
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: [kok_IN] Need fontconfig rules for Lohit Konkani font
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520050
Summary: [kok_IN] Need fontconfig rules for Lohit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520049
Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520046
Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520045
Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520051
Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517635
Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: [deva] Need fontconfig rules for Samyak Devanagari font
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520051
Summary: [deva] Need fontconfig rules for Samyak
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520050
Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518161
Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
From: Matt Domsch mdom...@puppet1.fedora.phx.redhat.com
---
configs/system/ip6tables-template.conf.erb | 40
1 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 configs/system/ip6tables-template.conf.erb
diff --git
From: Matt Domsch mdom...@puppet1.fedora.phx.redhat.com
---
configs/system/generic-network.conf.erb |4
manifests/filetypes/interfaces.pp |2 +-
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/configs/system/generic-network.conf.erb
From: Matt Domsch mdom...@puppet1.fedora.phx.redhat.com
---
modules/httpd/files/00-namevirtualhost.conf |4
modules/httpd/files/httpd.conf-rhel5p |1 +
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/modules/httpd/files/00-namevirtualhost.conf
This patch series enables IPv6 for several infrastructure services.
* ns2, so we start serving DNS by IPv6
* proxy4, so we can start serving fedoraproject.org and other sites by IPv6
* ip6tables for these servers
Comments welcome.
Thanks,
Matt
___
From: Matt Domsch mdom...@puppet1.fedora.phx.redhat.com
---
modules/bind/files/master/fedoraproject.org |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/modules/bind/files/master/fedoraproject.org
b/modules/bind/files/master/fedoraproject.org
index 43d6d18..2327080
From: Matt Domsch mdom...@puppet1.fedora.phx.redhat.com
---
modules/bind/files/master/fedoraproject.org |3 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/modules/bind/files/master/fedoraproject.org
b/modules/bind/files/master/fedoraproject.org
index cb9836f..43d6d18
From: Matt Domsch mdom...@puppet1.fedora.phx.redhat.com
---
modules/bind/files/named.conf | 12 +---
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/modules/bind/files/named.conf b/modules/bind/files/named.conf
index 6063696..29f0d63 100644
---
From: Matt Domsch mdom...@puppet1.fedora.phx.redhat.com
---
manifests/filetypes/standard.pp | 12
1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/manifests/filetypes/standard.pp b/manifests/filetypes/standard.pp
index d4ce26a..097b3df 100644
---
From: Matt Domsch mdom...@puppet1.fedora.phx.redhat.com
---
manifests/servergroups/dns.pp |9 +
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/manifests/servergroups/dns.pp b/manifests/servergroups/dns.pp
index 0b543b2..01b5a60 100644
---
From: Matt Domsch mdom...@puppet1.fedora.phx.redhat.com
---
manifests/servergroups/proxy.pp | 23 +++
1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/manifests/servergroups/proxy.pp b/manifests/servergroups/proxy.pp
index bfa0481..eeb9e19 100644
---
From: Matt Domsch mdom...@puppet1.fedora.phx.redhat.com
---
manifests/nodes/proxy4.fedoraproject.org.pp |7 +++
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/manifests/nodes/proxy4.fedoraproject.org.pp
b/manifests/nodes/proxy4.fedoraproject.org.pp
index 8926d94..fb31481
From: Matt Domsch mdom...@puppet1.fedora.phx.redhat.com
---
modules/bind/files/master/fedoraproject.org |3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/modules/bind/files/master/fedoraproject.org
b/modules/bind/files/master/fedoraproject.org
index 2327080..14eb8c3
From: Matt Domsch mdom...@puppet1.fedora.phx.redhat.com
---
modules/bind/files/master/fedoraproject.org |2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/modules/bind/files/master/fedoraproject.org
b/modules/bind/files/master/fedoraproject.org
index 14eb8c3..6f9286d
On 08/28/2009 05:11 PM, Matt Domsch wrote:
index 5c40c80..bd4480f 100644
--- a/modules/httpd/files/httpd.conf-rhel5p
+++ b/modules/httpd/files/httpd.conf-rhel5p
@@ -148,6 +148,7 @@ MaxRequestsPerChild1
#
Listen 0.0.0.0:80
Listen 0.0.0.0:443
+Listen [::]:80
Two comments:
-
Matt why are you spamming the list
- Original Message -
From: Matt Domsch matt_dom...@dell.com
To: fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
Sent: Friday, August 28, 2009 5:11 PM
Subject: [PATCH] add ip6tables on DNS servers
From: Matt Domsch mdom...@puppet1.fedora.phx.redhat.com
---
1 - 100 of 242 matches
Mail list logo