* 1 Fedora Weekly News Issue 191
o 1.1 Announcements
+ 1.1.1 Fedora 12 (Constantine) Alpha Release
+ 1.1.2 Fedora 12 early branch now available
+ 1.1.3 Red Hat/Fedora/JBoss Developer conference in Brno, Czech Republic
+ 1.1.4 Upcoming Events
o 1.2 Marketing
+ 1.2.1 Marketing Meeting Log for
Rawhide Report writes:
[...]
A whole slew of broken deps caused by a new maven2 have been sitting
in rawhide for about the last week with no attempted rebuilds to fix
it. Anybody know what's going on?
Broken deps for i386
--
[...]
Rawhide Report writes:
[...]
A whole slew of broken deps caused by a new maven2 have been sitting
in rawhide for about the last week with no attempted rebuilds to fix
it. Anybody know what's going on?
We are working on update of maven2 to not so ancient version. Progress can be
tracked
Hi guys,
sorry, I recall this was discussed on the mailing list in the past, but
I can't find the thread anymore.
I need to resurrect rgmanager package in Fedora. fedora-cvs still has
the package so it's only a matter of re-importing it into the devel/
branch.
What are the right steps to take?
Rawhide Report writes:
[...]
A NetworkManger update has caused a number of new broken deps. Simple
rebuilds for some of these NetworkManager-based apps are failing:
Broken deps for i386
--
AK == Alexander Kurtakov writes:
Rawhide Report writes:
[...]
A whole slew of broken deps caused by a new maven2 have been sitting
in rawhide for about the last week with no attempted rebuilds to fix
it. Anybody know what's going on?
AK We are working on update of maven2 to not so
On Mon, 2009-08-31 at 01:53 -0700, Alex Lancaster wrote:
Rawhide Report writes:
Has something changed in the API/ABI?
The name of the .pc file itself, i.e. libnm-glib.pc - libnm_glib.pc, so
pkg-config --exists libnm-glib instead of pkg-config --exists libnm_glib
etc. No idea if this is an
On Sun, 30 Aug 2009 20:44:40 -0700, Elio wrote:
Problem should be fixed in nss-3.12.3.99.3-29.fc12. See
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=129934
and comments in Bug 520277.
Why do you add an explicit Requires: sqlite to package nss if
that one isn't even linked with
AK == Alexander Kurtakov writes:
Rawhide Report writes:
[...]
A whole slew of broken deps caused by a new maven2 have been sitting
in rawhide for about the last week with no attempted rebuilds to fix
it. Anybody know what's going on?
AK We are working on update of maven2 to
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 10:51 AM, Fabio M. Di Nittofdini...@redhat.com wrote:
What are the right steps to take?
I think:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/OrphanedPackages
covers them.
--
Gianluca Sforna
http://morefedora.blogspot.com
http://www.linkedin.com/in/gianlucasforna
CM == Caolán McNamara writes:
CM On Mon, 2009-08-31 at 01:53 -0700, Alex Lancaster wrote:
Rawhide Report writes:
Has something changed in the API/ABI?
CM The name of the .pc file itself, i.e. libnm-glib.pc - libnm_glib.pc, so
CM pkg-config --exists libnm-glib instead of pkg-config --exists
On Mon, 2009-08-31 at 11:48 +0200, Gianluca Sforna wrote:
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 10:51 AM, Fabio M. Di Nittofdini...@redhat.com
wrote:
What are the right steps to take?
I think:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/OrphanedPackages
covers them.
Looks like it.. thanks!
On Saturday 29 August 2009 22:43:46 Kevin Kofler wrote:
Matthias Clasen wrote:
Anyway, this all seems to be a somewhat moot discussion, trying to nail
us down on a 'promise to keep the old stuff around', when there already
is a patch that can solve the whole dilemma.
Looks like this is
Compose started at Mon Aug 31 06:15:05 UTC 2009
New package R-affy
Methods for Affymetrix Oligonucleotide Arrays
New package python-werkzeug
The Swiss Army knife of Python web development
Updated Packages:
NetworkManager-openconnect-0.7.996-1.git20090828.fc12
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 07:23:50PM -0400, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
Here's what happens when I try to install AucTeX for Emacs with texlive-2009:
$ sudo yum install emacs-auctex
Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit
Excluding Packages from RPM Fusion for Fedora 11 -
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 09:27:10AM +0200, Stefan Grosse wrote:
On Thu, 27 Aug 2009 18:16:33 +0200 Stefan Grosse
singularit...@gmx.net wrote:
SG dvipdfm-0.13.2d-40.fc11.i586 von installed hat
SG Abhängigkeitsauflöse-Probleme -- Fehlende Abhängigkeit:
SG libkpathsea.so.4 wird benötigt von
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 05:14:33PM +0200, Martin Sourada wrote:
Package texlive-dvips is obsoleted by texlive, trying to install
texlive-2009-0.3.20090827.fc11.i586 instead
This is obviously wrong obsolete, as dvips is actually provided by
texlive-dvips, but for some reason unless I tell yum
Hello,
I haven't followed closely the new packaging of texlive, so you should
take my comments with caution...
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 01:15:21PM +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote:
The new packages obsolete the ancient tetex stuff:
tetex-tex4ht
I think that the stand-alone tex4ht could be better
Stepan Kasal wrote:
Hello,
at certain periods of time, it was recommended to use #!/usr/bin/env .
Some people consider it ugly. (The humble opinion of the author of
this mail is the same.)
Currently there is popular mood to remove /usr/bin/env python, see
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 04:45:17PM +0300, Maz The Northener wrote:
I found out that after I updated my F11 a few days ago, fscanf started
missbehaving.
I filed a bug report in bugzilla. (bug 520414)
but since I have not heard anyone else yelling about this, I thought
that maybe this is my
Thanks for quick answer :) I was just puzzled because this seemed to
work without extra defines with older glibc.
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 5:10 PM, Jakub Jelinekja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 04:45:17PM +0300, Maz The Northener wrote:
I found out that after I updated my F11 a
Hello all.
In short: #!/usr/bin/env perl is OK in Fedora.
In my previous mail, I asked you to delete the (/usr)?/bin/env calls
from #! lines of Fedora scripts.
I would like to withdraw that request.
A discussion followed that post on fedora-perl-devel-list, which
actually proved that
And just a öast nail in coffin: I tried with -D_GNU_SOURCE and it
worked like you told.
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 5:26 PM, Maz The
Northenermazziesacco...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for quick answer :) I was just puzzled because this seemed to
work without extra defines with older glibc.
On Mon,
On Sat, 2009-08-29 at 19:06 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
AT == Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net writes:
AT I don't think apt traces whether a packages was a pulled in manually
AT or automatically, does it?
yum does keep track of many things in the yumdb and I think the reason
key
On 08/31/2009 07:26 AM, Maz The Northener wrote:
Thanks for quick answer :) I was just puzzled because this seemed to
work without extra defines with older glibc.
Only by accident. We had no C99-compatibility version of *scanf in
those older versions. We have now.
--
➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧
On Mon, 31 Aug 2009, James Antill wrote:
...you don't get rid of any extra stuff you got with blah, hopefully
yum history undo will solve that in a better way by recording what
happened at #1 and undoing it instead of trying to piece together what
might have happened at #1 after the fact.
On 08/30/2009 12:11 PM, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
2009/8/30 Christoph Höger choe...@cs.tu-berlin.de:
Hi,
is dma packaged by someone? That would be the first step and I would
happily test that thing (having postfix installed after Paul Frields
advice which works well).
I think I'll do
On Sat, 2009-08-29 at 20:51 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote:
Yes I know I should had done my research before buying, but wasn't sure
was gonna get it when I was at the store. Anyway, got this printer,
plugged it in, was detected but said no drivers for it. Any plans on
it, or way I can submit
2009/8/31 Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com:
Then installation of emacs-auctex runs without problems. So it seems
like yum has a hard time to resolve both installation of emacs-auctex and
obsoletion of dvipng in one transaction even though emacs-auctex
contains unversioned Requires: to dvipng and
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 6:28 PM, Mani Aa.mani@gmail.com wrote:
http://puredata.info/
is not in the package database.
From the license POV, there are no problems.
I think this is the bug your after. A review is in progress but
there's a few build issues.
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 10:42:12AM -0400, James Antill wrote:
On Sat, 2009-08-29 at 19:06 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
AT == Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net writes:
AT I don't think apt traces whether a packages was a pulled in manually
AT or automatically, does it?
yum does
Michel S. wrote:
Hi all,
With the recent discussion about removing sendmail from the base
install, has anyone taken a look at DMA? It appears to be designed with
exactly the same purpose in mind -- removing the dependency on a
desktop-oriented install on sendmail or postfix, while still
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Mani A wrote:
http://puredata.info/
is not in the package database.
From the license POV, there are no problems.
Best
A. Mani
Hi,
Fernando at planetccrma was working on packaging a recent version of
puredata. I don't know the current status. There
On Mon, 2009-08-31 at 13:01 +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote:
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 07:23:50PM -0400, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
Here's what happens when I try to install AucTeX for Emacs with
texlive-2009:
$ sudo yum install emacs-auctex
Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit
Name Start End
Alpha Testing Tue 2009-08-25 Tue
2009-09-29
Compose Snap #1Wed 2009-09-02 Wed
2009-09-02
Snapshot 1 Wed
why old linux system now available Fedora12 alpha version Download and try
it
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 10:08 AM, liuliu1103 liuliu1...@yeah.net wrote:
I want to buy fedora linux 7 system .But I can't bought is recently
Please tell me who have fedroa linux7 system,
I am from China
The packaging style in the nss-softokn package continues to bug me.
There are RPM triggers being used to install/remove a prelink config file
whenever the prelink package gets installed/removed. According to a comment
in the spec file, it is only done like that because the package doesn't
want
Author: sandeeps
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vemana2000-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv9976/devel
Modified Files:
.cvsignore sources
Added Files:
import.log vemana2000-fonts-fontconfig.conf
vemana2000-fonts.spec
Log Message:
--- NEW
Author: sandeeps
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vemana2000-fonts/F-11
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv15724
Modified Files:
sources
Added Files:
vemana2000-fonts-fontconfig.conf vemana2000-fonts.spec
Log Message:
--- NEW FILE vemana2000-fonts-fontconfig.conf
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507615
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org
2009-08-31 03:50:52 EDT ---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507615
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org
2009-08-31 03:50:46 EDT ---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520361
Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517789
--- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-08-31 04:05:47
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
If we're going
Author: pravins
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lohit-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6232
Modified Files:
.cvsignore lohit-fonts.spec sources
Log Message:
* Mon Aug 31 2009 Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com - 2.4.2-1
- upstream new release
- rh bugzilla bug
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518161
--- Comment #4 from Parag pnem...@redhat.com 2009-08-31 05:18:51 EDT ---
waiting for upstream release as well as Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518161
--- Comment #5 from Parag pnem...@redhat.com 2009-08-31 05:19:46 EDT ---
FYI, we have pushed fontconfig rules for
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468618
Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044
Bug 477044 depends on bug 477474, which changed state.
Bug 477474 Summary: [un-core-fonts] Please convert to new font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517635
Bug 517635 depends on bug 520039, which changed state.
Bug 520039 Summary: [gu_IN] Need fontconfig rules for Lohit Gujarati
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520045
Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517635
Bug 517635 depends on bug 520032, which changed state.
Bug 520032 Summary: [hi_IN] Need fontconfig rules for Lohit Hindi font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520042
Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520049
Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517635
Bug 517635 depends on bug 520033, which changed state.
Bug 520033 Summary: [mr_IN] Need fontconfig rules for Lohit Marathi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520043
Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520036
Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517635
Bug 517635 depends on bug 520038, which changed state.
Bug 520038 Summary: [bn_IN] ]Need fontconfig rules for Lohit Bengali
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520050
Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520037
Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520038
Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520361
Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517789
Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518161
--- Comment #6 from Behdad Esfahbod besfa...@redhat.com 2009-08-31 15:06:42
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #4)
waiting for
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520314
Behdad Esfahbod besfa...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519317
--- Comment #4 from Behdad Esfahbod besfa...@redhat.com 2009-08-31 17:28:40
EDT ---
Humm, I'd need access to such a
Author: behdad
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv23555
Modified Files:
.cvsignore fontconfig.spec sources
Log Message:
* Mon Aug 31 2009 Behdad Esfahbod besfa...@redhat.com - 2.7.2-1
- Update to 2.7.2
Index: .cvsignore
Author: behdad
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/F-11
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv24114
Modified Files:
fontconfig.spec sources
Log Message:
* Mon Aug 31 2009 Behdad Esfahbod besfa...@redhat.com - 2.7.2-1
- Update to 2.7.2
Index: fontconfig.spec
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518161
--- Comment #7 from Behdad Esfahbod besfa...@redhat.com 2009-08-31 17:58:09
EDT ---
Built for f11 and devel. Pushing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518161
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org
2009-08-31 17:59:10 EDT ---
fontconfig-2.7.2-1.fc11 has
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507615
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org
2009-08-31 19:35:05 EDT ---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507615
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507615
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org
2009-08-31 19:40:54 EDT ---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507615
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520037
Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Thank you for the responses.
I'll definitely take a look at the projects mentioned.
I am on #fedora-admin as cdelpino.
Thanks again!
Chris
On 08/27/2009 03:12 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On 08/26/2009 09:35 AM, Christian Del Pino wrote:
Hello everyone,
My name is Chris. I am looking to
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 12:12:11PM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On 08/26/2009 09:35 AM, Christian Del Pino wrote:
Hello everyone,
My name is Chris. I am looking to contribute my skills and time to the
Fedora Infrastructure group.
I started using Linux back in 1996 while in college.
Hello,
I assume it's the place to ask my question :
is there some known reason to not enable the module alsa snd-vxpocket,
for the digigram soundcard?
Otherwise, due to its audio quality, and despite of its long life, it
should be included in the fedora kernel...
Compilation of the module from
On Monday 31 August 2009, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Sun, 2009-08-30 at 21:33 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
Sorry Patrick, but our govco snoops have been bragging they have skype
decoded now for about 2 years.
If by decoded you mean payload encryption broken routinely without
the use of
On 08/31/2009 12:29 AM, Chris Thielen wrote:
I know it is possible to compile this for Fedora, but does anyone know
why this hasn't appeared either as a regularly maintained optional
package, or perhaps in consideration to replace the regular main menu by
default? Would it be correct to assume
b43 127352 0
ssb39572 1 b43
mac80211 199632 1 b43
cfg80211 37088 2 b43,mac80211
input_polldev 3952 2 b43,applesmc
what i don't see is the wl module loaded in your output... perhaps you
are using another driver
2009/8/31 Gene Heskett gene.hesk...@verizon.net:
Search on /. for skype spooks. Or if you are really confident, use it to
plan blowing something up on the 9/11/01 anniversary but plan to have your
plans interrupted.
Also, there is another attack that was discussed just in the last 36 hours
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 8:28 PM, paul s fedora-l...@queuemail.com wrote:
i work with a mbp4,1
http://www.smolts.org/client/show/pub_734339f1-74c4-4607-a763-2ef2378ab19e
which has a BCM4328 adapter...
b43 127352 0
ssb39572 1 b43
mac80211
On Monday 31 August 2009 00:02:26 Roberto Ragusa wrote:
People studied Skype:
http://www.recon.cx/en/f/vskype-part1.pdf
http://www.recon.cx/en/f/vskype-part2.pdf
and found that it contains tons and tons of cryptography,
obfuscation and countermeasures against debugging or reverse
On Sun, 30 Aug 2009 11:28:58 +0100
Marko Vojinovic vvma...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday 30 August 2009 09:20:59 Tim wrote:
On Sat, 2009-08-29 at 14:09 -0700, Joel Gomberg wrote:
I thought Skype was P2P application
Supposedly it is, but with closed source, you've no real idea what it's
Hi
when pressing CTRL-ALTF-F2 to switch to text console, the screen stay
in graphic mode, only the mouse cursor disappears.
I can blindly login, type some command; see the hard disk light blink
at each command, then go back using ALT-F1 and see I logged in on
tty2.
But switching between tty1 an
On Sun, 2009-08-30 at 10:42 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Not to defend Skype, but let's keep a sense of proportion. Is the
*phone system* open source?
That would depend on your level of electronics knowledge... But it
doesn't matter, how to use the phone, isn't a guarded secret. You can
On Sun, 2009-08-30 at 14:53 -0700, stan wrote:
Before you start trying fonts, write down the original font the xterm
is using. Then test away. At the end, if you don't find a better
font, set it back to the original value, and you are exactly where you
started.
Creating a new test user
On Mon, 2009-08-31 at 01:45 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
I think you should wait for GNOME Shell. It will be about the same.
I think there's something seriously wrong with the design of a menu that
takes up a third of the screen. It reminds me, far too much, of Windows
and KDE.
--
Alain Spineux wrote:
Hi
when pressing CTRL-ALTF-F2 to switch to text console, the screen stay
in graphic mode, only the mouse cursor disappears.
I can blindly login, type some command; see the hard disk light blink
at each command, then go back using ALT-F1 and see I logged in on
tty2.
But
john wendel wrote:
Is there a way to boot a real OS on a windows box (without using a VM)?
I'm looking for a way to boot Fedora on a hostile windows XP box. The
windows box is locked down with a BIOS password, won't boot a CD,
disabled usb ports, and no way for me to install any windows
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 16:13:39 -0400,
Ryan B. Lynch ryan.b.ly...@gmail.com wrote:
But either way, those call records could certainly be obtained via court
order, in a criminal investigation, or even just a civil lawsuit, if
they exist.
Not in the US. Some high level
On Monday 31 August 2009, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
On Monday 31 August 2009 00:02:26 Roberto Ragusa wrote:
People studied Skype:
http://www.recon.cx/en/f/vskype-part1.pdf
http://www.recon.cx/en/f/vskype-part2.pdf
and found that it contains tons and tons of cryptography,
obfuscation and
On Monday 31 August 2009, Alan Cox wrote:
On Sun, 30 Aug 2009 11:28:58 +0100
Marko Vojinovic vvma...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday 30 August 2009 09:20:59 Tim wrote:
On Sat, 2009-08-29 at 14:09 -0700, Joel Gomberg wrote:
I thought Skype was P2P application
Supposedly it is, but with closed
On Mon, 2009-08-31 at 02:04 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Monday 31 August 2009, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Sun, 2009-08-30 at 21:33 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
Sorry Patrick, but our govco snoops have been bragging they have skype
decoded now for about 2 years.
If by decoded you mean
Gene Heskett wrote:
Skype has a signup that vz doesn't block, or cannot block. I have attempted
to sign up for an account with ekiga on at least 4 occasions now, also
twinkle, and the confirming email which must be replied to never arrives for
any of those services, which prevents a vz
On Mon, 2009-08-31 at 21:54 +0930, Tim wrote:
On Sun, 2009-08-30 at 10:42 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Not to defend Skype, but let's keep a sense of proportion. Is the
*phone system* open source?
That would depend on your level of electronics knowledge... But it
doesn't matter, how
On Mon, 2009-08-31 at 12:05 +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
[...]
There are also some other awkward factors
- The person who completely reverse engineers skype probably destroys it.
If you can write a skype client than the spammers can write skype spam
tools as well.
- Skype appears to contain
On Monday 31 August 2009, Ed Greshko wrote:
Gene Heskett wrote:
Skype has a signup that vz doesn't block, or cannot block. I have
attempted to sign up for an account with ekiga on at least 4 occasions
now, also twinkle, and the confirming email which must be replied to
never arrives for any
On 08/31/2009 06:27 AM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
john wendel wrote:
Is there a way to boot a real OS on a windows box (without using a VM)?
I'm looking for a way to boot Fedora on a hostile windows XP box. The
windows box is locked down with a BIOS password, won't boot a CD,
disabled usb ports,
Hum...
As the subject says... I have been finding bad FF failures
on F11 - wonder if I should downgrade until a more stable
version comes out? This version is pretty, but has some
really nasty bugs, me thinks:
+ Bad rendering: simply said, I am seeing extra stuff that
shouldn't be there -
1 - 100 of 183 matches
Mail list logo
