I'm trying to construct koji-server on Fedora 10, but I got an error.
Kojira can't create repos. It is always failed when try to create repos.
2009-09-03 14:06:44,449 [INFO] koji.repo.manager: Created newRepo task 116 for
tag 2 (dist-foo-build)
2009-09-03 14:07:00,198 [INFO] koji.repo.manager:
I have already had this problem. Re-check the repo directory permission
(usually in /mnt/koji) and selinux linux permissions as well.
I have selinux disabled, to avoid problems.
I may find more usefull information in kojid.log.
Rodrigo Trujillo
From:
NGUYEN VAN TAN tan2...@yahoo.com
To:
On 09/02/2009 07:17 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Wed, 2009-09-02 at 10:26 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
As one of the persons involved in dracut and in integrating dracut into the
distribution I'm rather surprised to hear this.
Where has this been discussed ? Were are the bugs for the situations
On 09/02/2009 10:49 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
Also I've attached a patch which should update the Obsoletes handling
to correspond with what we determined in discussion earlier;
Versioned obsoletes is preferable.
Rahul
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
On 02/09/09 22:52, Philip Prindeville wrote:
Seems to be an rpm versioning issue:
[r...@builder SRPMS]# mock -r fedora-10-x86_64 --rebuild
perl-Net-Patricia-1.15_01-1.fc9.src.rpm
INFO: mock.py version 0.9.14 starting...
State Changed: init plugins
State Changed: start
INFO:
Compose started at Thu Sep 3 06:15:07 UTC 2009
Broken deps for i386
--
anerley-0.0.20-3.fc12.i686 requires libmissioncontrol-client.so.0
anerley-devel-0.0.20-3.fc12.i686 requires pkgconfig(libmissioncontrol)
2009/9/3 Rawhide Report rawh...@fedoraproject.org:
PackageKit-0.5.2-0.1.20090902git.fc12
-
* Wed Sep 02 2009 Richard Hughes rhug...@redhat.com - 0.5.2-0.1.20090902git
- Update to a newer git snapshot from the 0.5.x series.
- Should fix some issues with
Hi,
I'm claiming ownership over avrdude. There is a new upstream release
and I'm in progress of packaging software that depends on avrdude.
Any objections?
gr,
Bart
--
Bart Vanbrabant b...@vanbrabant.eu
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
Hans de Goede (j.w.r.dego...@hhs.nl) said:
The fact that it wasn't turned on at Alpha means it really shouldn't be
on now, not without FESCo approval.
That is interesting reasoning, first keep it out of Alpha even though it was
ready as you were afraid it would delay the Alpha further
Hey all,
I packaged up this app I stumbled upon called minitube
(http://flavio.tordini.org/minitube) but it seems a bit unstable and I
don't really want to toss it up to a package review until its stable
enough to be shipped but I wanted to mention it to see if anyone might
find a use for it,
On 09/02/2009 11:39 AM, Jerry James wrote:
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 9:35 AM, Warren Togamiwtog...@redhat.com wrote:
What is the correct behavior? Is this a bug that it changed?
Read up on the --follow-symlinks option to sed.
This is a new option it seems, meaning I can't rely on sed -i at
On 09/02/2009 07:19 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Matthias Clasenmcla...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2009-09-02 at 17:04 +, Colin Walters wrote:
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 4:38 PM, Matthias Clasenmcla...@redhat.com wrote:
After talking to the abrt guys, I've
On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 08:38:49AM -0500, Adam Miller wrote:
Hey all,
I packaged up this app I stumbled upon called minitube
(http://flavio.tordini.org/minitube) but it seems a bit unstable and I
don't really want to toss it up to a package review until its stable
enough to be shipped but
Hi,
On 09/03/2009 03:36 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Hans de Goede (j.w.r.dego...@hhs.nl) said:
The fact that it wasn't turned on at Alpha means it really shouldn't be
on now, not without FESCo approval.
That is interesting reasoning, first keep it out of Alpha even though it was
ready as you
On 09/03/2009 10:57 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
It really is like having to support gentoo, versus having to support a
distro using pre build packages. And I would really like to move to the
having to
support a pre-build package model for the initrd.
The problem is this:
The kernel binary RPM
On Mon, 2009-08-31 at 02:59 -0700, Alex Lancaster wrote:
CM == Caolán McNamara writes:
CM On Mon, 2009-08-31 at 01:53 -0700, Alex Lancaster wrote:
Rawhide Report writes:
Has something changed in the API/ABI?
CM The name of the .pc file itself, i.e. libnm-glib.pc - libnm_glib.pc, so
On 09/03/2009 11:35 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
The kernel binary RPM contains this pre-built initrd. The kernel source
RPM does not contain the sources necessary to make this pre-built initrd.
This makes me rather uncomfortable from a Licensing perspective.
True, but we do provide SRPMS with
Paul Howarth wrote:
On 02/09/09 22:52, Philip Prindeville wrote:
Seems to be an rpm versioning issue:
[r...@builder SRPMS]# mock -r fedora-10-x86_64 --rebuild
perl-Net-Patricia-1.15_01-1.fc9.src.rpm
INFO: mock.py version 0.9.14 starting...
State Changed: init plugins
State Changed:
On Wednesday 26 August 2009 Jindrich Novy wrote:
Hi,
first off, thanks many people who sent me RFE and bugfix
proposals. I've tried to fix most of them in the current package set
in the testing repository:
OK, I have finally installed texlive on F11. With this update all worked (with
the
Could the root cache be broken?
Incompatible changes in RPM between F9 and F10 ?
BTW, F9 was EOLed in July, so if it's broken now, I doubt it will be fixed.
--
Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Tom spot Callawaytcall...@redhat.com wrote:
On 09/03/2009 10:57 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
It really is like having to support gentoo, versus having to support a
distro using pre build packages. And I would really like to move to the
having to
support a
Paul Howarth wrote:
On 03/09/09 17:07, Philip Prindeville wrote:
Paul Howarth wrote:
On 02/09/09 22:52, Philip Prindeville wrote:
Seems to be an rpm versioning issue:
[r...@builder SRPMS]# mock -r fedora-10-x86_64 --rebuild
perl-Net-Patricia-1.15_01-1.fc9.src.rpm
INFO:
On 03/09/09 17:07, Philip Prindeville wrote:
Paul Howarth wrote:
On 02/09/09 22:52, Philip Prindeville wrote:
Seems to be an rpm versioning issue:
[r...@builder SRPMS]# mock -r fedora-10-x86_64 --rebuild
perl-Net-Patricia-1.15_01-1.fc9.src.rpm
INFO: mock.py version 0.9.14 starting...
State
Hans de Goede (j.w.r.dego...@hhs.nl) said:
It really is like having to support gentoo, versus having to support a
distro using pre build packages. And I would really like to move to the
having to
support a pre-build package model for the initrd.
The problem is this:
The kernel binary RPM
On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 18:37 +0200, drago01 wrote:
As long as we (fedora) ship the source code this shouldn't be an
issue, or am I missing something?
See the other messages. We have no facility to ensure that the binaries
used in generation of the initrd during kernel build have matching srpms
On Thursday 27 August 2009 Jindrich Novy wrote:
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 03:02:18PM +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote:
Hi,
first off, thanks many people who sent me RFE and bugfix
proposals. I've tried to fix most of them in the current package set
in the testing repository:
rpm -i
Hi,
On 09/03/2009 06:00 PM, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
On 09/03/2009 11:35 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
The kernel binary RPM contains this pre-built initrd. The kernel source
RPM does not contain the sources necessary to make this pre-built initrd.
This makes me rather uncomfortable from a
On Thu, 3 Sep 2009, Philip Prindeville wrote:
No joy:
[r...@builder SRPMS]# rm -rf /var/lib/mock/fedora-10-x86_64/root
[r...@builder SRPMS]# mock -r fedora-10-x86_64 --init --rebuild
perl-Net-Patricia-1.15_01-1.fc9.src.rpm
Don't run mock as root. That'll avoid the incompatible db
Hi,
On 09/03/2009 06:29 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Hans de Goede (j.w.r.dego...@hhs.nl) said:
It really is like having to support gentoo, versus having to support a
distro using pre build packages. And I would really like to move to the having
to
support a pre-build package model for the
The following is a list of topics to be discussed at tomorrow's FESCo
meeting, at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
243 New entry of 'Build packages for which Fedora is upstream for all
language translators' review correction' for F12 schedule
238 Can libvdpau go in Fedora?
On 09/03/2009 02:20 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
Regeneration is as easy with dracut as it is with mkinitrd, actually they
have the same cmdline syntax.
The only extra step required with dracut when using pre-generated images
is:
yum install dracut
Okay, so is there any reason why we don't
On 09/03/2009 02:25 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
Note that we have the same problem with any package which does static
linking against an lgpl library (such as glibc).
This is (one of the big reasons) why we only permit static linking with
explicit approval from FESCo.
I'm really very
On 09/02/2009 10:07 AM, Warren Togami wrote:
On 09/02/2009 11:39 AM, Jerry James wrote:
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 9:35 AM, Warren Togamiwtogami redhat com
wrote:
What is the correct behavior? Is this a bug that it changed?
Read up on the --follow-symlinks option to sed.
This is a new
On 09/03/2009 03:22 PM, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
On 09/03/2009 02:25 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
Note that we have the same problem with any package which does static
linking against an lgpl library (such as glibc).
This is (one of the big reasons) why we only permit static linking with
If we tracked the results of the build process independently of the RPM
itself, we could track much more complicated relationships between
packages (for example, the kernel borrowing bits of the output from the
last glibc build to make its initrd).
Koji's database has that information, sort
On 09/03/2009 04:59 PM, Roland McGrath wrote:
Koji's database has that information, sort of. It can tell you exactly
which other packages were installed in the buildroot, so that is the
superset of what-all bits could have been rolled into the output.
Yes, but I do not think we are in good
On Thu, 03 Sep 2009 10:53:54 -0600
Philip Prindeville philipp_s...@redfish-solutions.com wrote:
Paul Howarth wrote:
On 03/09/09 17:07, Philip Prindeville wrote:
Paul Howarth wrote:
On 02/09/09 22:52, Philip Prindeville wrote:
Seems to be an rpm versioning issue:
Over the past few months, Fedora Infrastructure has been discussing
having a consistent set of licenses for applications and scripts we
create for Fedora. The goals of doing this were to
* Be able to share code among the various programs that we write.
* Not have our libraries force a specific
Philip Prindeville wrote:
Panu Matilainen wrote:
On Thu, 3 Sep 2009, Philip Prindeville wrote:
No joy:
[r...@builder SRPMS]# rm -rf /var/lib/mock/fedora-10-x86_64/root
[r...@builder SRPMS]# mock -r fedora-10-x86_64 --init --rebuild
perl-Net-Patricia-1.15_01-1.fc9.src.rpm
So... run it as whom?
As your normal user. Just add it to the mock group:
# usermod -G mock your user
--
Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
On 09/03/2009 05:08 PM, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
On 09/03/2009 04:59 PM, Roland McGrath wrote:
Koji's database has that information, sort of. It can tell you exactly
which other packages were installed in the buildroot, so that is the
superset of what-all bits could have been rolled into the
Yes, but I do not think we are in good faith satisfying the requirement
to distribute the source for those binaries by pointing back to koji
pages and possibly forcing the user to dig into the lookaside cache.
The requirement is to provide a written offer to give someone the source
when
On 09/03/2009 05:46 PM, Roland McGrath wrote:
The requirement is to provide a written offer to give someone the source
when they ask.
Well, that's true for GPL. Can someone generate a list of the binaries
used in the generic initrd and the packages that they came from?
~spot
--
On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 14:46 -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
Yes, but I do not think we are in good faith satisfying the requirement
to distribute the source for those binaries by pointing back to koji
pages and possibly forcing the user to dig into the lookaside cache.
The requirement is
On 09/03/2009 06:14 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
We don't distribute under that clause of the GPL, because the 3 year
timeline on it is entirely too vague and we don't want to fall into that
trap.
Ugh. I had conveniently forgotten about that, thanks for the reminder.
~spot
--
fedora-devel-list
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 9:38 AM, Adam Millermaxamill...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey all,
I packaged up this app I stumbled upon called minitube
(http://flavio.tordini.org/minitube) but it seems a bit unstable and I
don't really want to toss it up to a package review until its stable
enough to be
On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 20:41 -0400, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
What would be the point of packaging something which can not operate
without codecs that fedora can not and should not ship?
I don't think that's a valid point here. For one, Fedora already has the
Totem YouTube plugin packaged, which
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 8:41 PM, Gregory Maxwellgmaxw...@gmail.com wrote:
What would be the point of packaging something which can not operate
without codecs that fedora can not and should not ship?
That was the rationale for vagalume ending up in rpmfusion-free: the
code itself is fully free,
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 11:37 PM, Mathieu Bridon
(bochecha)boche...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
# usermod -G mock your user
# usermod -a -G mock your user
would generally be better (won't blitz your existing group memberships)
--
Iain.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
On Mon, 2009-08-31 at 18:33 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 6:28 PM, Mani Aa.mani@gmail.com wrote:
http://puredata.info/
is not in the package database.
From the license POV, there are no problems.
I think this is the bug your after. A review is in progress
On Mon, 2009-08-31 at 18:56 -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Mani A wrote:
http://puredata.info/
is not in the package database.
From the license POV, there are no problems.
Best
A. Mani
Hi,
Fernando at planetccrma was working on packaging a
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507637
Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=45128
--- Additional comments from mey...@openoffice.org Thu Sep 3 15:32:07
+ 2009 ---
Have a look at the votes for 23402 (closed as a duplicate of this issue). (Why
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518887
--- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-09-03 12:11:07 EDT ---
Just an update here. I posted to the upstream
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466404
--- Comment #14 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-09-03 12:14:46 EDT ---
It doesn't look like this is going to be
the cvs version with
Version: 01:15 GMT 3-Sep-2009(20090903) and Library Version: 02:27 GMT
1-Sep-2009 and the TrueType font is generated successfully. So it is confirmed
that the issue is fixed in cvs. (So this bug will be closed?)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518887
--- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-09-03 16:02:46 EDT ---
Up to you. We can close it out now, or wait
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518887
zhoujingmil...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Author: aalam
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/saab-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv12394
Modified Files:
saab-fonts.spec
Added Files:
saab-fonts-fontconfig.conf
Log Message:
Updating spec file and add conf file
--- NEW FILE saab-fonts-fontconfig.conf
Author: aalam
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/saab-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv23340
Modified Files:
saab-fonts.spec
Log Message:
Change font pirority from 66 -67
Index: saab-fonts.spec
===
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503662
A S Alam aa...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Over the past few months, Fedora Infrastructure has been discussing
having a consistent set of licenses for applications and scripts we
create for Fedora. The goals of doing this were to
* Be able to share code among the various programs that we write.
* Not have our libraries force a specific
Em Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 11:48:42AM -0400, Aristeu Rozanski escreveu:
Hi,
does anyone know why CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE is enabled in fedora kernel?
I
thought that option was useful for embedded systems only.
IIRC because it makes the kernel faster :-)
- Arnaldo
On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 01:01:55PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 11:48:42AM -0400, Aristeu Rozanski escreveu:
Hi,
does anyone know why CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE is enabled in fedora
kernel? I
thought that option was useful for embedded systems
With Fedora 11 on IBM x3650 M2 (x86_64), I am having problems booting after
adding a second, add-in, SAS controller with 12 SAS disks in an external
enclosure. Without the add-in SAS controller, the system boots fine and
provides file sharing over samba, etc.
The main problem with this
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 10:56 PM, Kam Leokam@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 8:12 PM, Ed Greshkoed.gres...@greshko.com wrote:
Kevin Kempter wrote:
Hi all;
My son bought an hp Pavilion (HDX-16 1370us) laptop, with a 16 screen.
Upon trying to start the anaconda installer Fedora 10
Kam Leo wrote:
Anaconda did not find a suitable driver. It's happened before on other
systems. Do as Ed recommends and complete the text mode installation.
Before you go slogging through the log files do the following:
yum upgrade
yum install system-config-display
system-config-display
On 09/02/2009 01:38 PM, Randall J. Berry wrote:
So far F11 has been nothing short of a pain for me. I have had more
issues with this one release than I have for all of the preceding
releases combined.
Next comes the issues with streaming audio or video. Since the update
of Firefox 3.1 to
[Fixed typo in header line, etc.; added info at end.]
With Fedora 11 on IBM x3650 M2 (x86_64), I am having problems booting after
adding a second, add-in, SAS controller with 12 SAS disks in an external
enclosure. Without the add-in SAS controller, the system boots fine and
provides file
On 09/03/2009 02:25 PM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
Over the last 3 months, I noticed that I have posted and not gotten
any responses. Fair enough, maybe the posts aren't worth it.
But I just did a check of the archives and I don't see any of my
posts. Don't know if I am incorrectly posting or,
Does anyone know if there is a plan to release updated
xorg/mesa packages for F11 any time soon ?
The F11 ones are very broken, at least for ATI radeon based systems.
I have been using code from freedesktops git sources
(drm,mesa,xf86-video-ati) and this is now getting there, at least
blender
On Thursday 03 September 2009 12:41 AM, s wrote:
On 09/02/2009 01:38 PM, Randall J. Berry wrote:
So far F11 has been nothing short of a pain for me. I have had more
issues with this one release than I have for all of the preceding
releases combined.
Next comes the issues with streaming audio
Hi,
has anybody any idea how to use the ant-contrib.rpm?
It sits there in /usr/share/java but ant reports an error on:
taskdef resource=net/sf/antcontrib/antlib.xml/
Suggestions?
Thanks
Christoph
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
--
Are you really up-to-date with your Fedora 11 system? Firefox is now at
3.5.2 and you are talking about 3.1.1. You might want to look into that.
I'm using Firefox 3.5.2 on Fedora 11 x86_64 and have no problems with
YouTube. I watch YouTube and Vimeo videos just fine. If your system is
behind
2009/9/3 s skell...@swbell.net:
On 09/02/2009 01:38 PM, Randall J. Berry wrote:
So far F11 has been nothing short of a pain for me. I have had more issues
with this one release than I have for all of the preceding releases
combined.
Next comes the issues with streaming audio or video.
After reading the entire thread, and watching the video, here is what
I'd do.
Put the drive in a safe.
Go buy a new drive, and make use of it.
Drop the warranty claim even though it is valid. The company will save
money in the end.
In about 10 years, or whenever the corporate data on the
Hey i found that two files in /etc/yum.repos.d which are adobe-linux-i386.repo
and yum-iisc-f11.repo.
Also try looking in the directory
/etc/yum.repos.d/
Do you have the following two files there?
fedora.repo
fedora-updates.repo
What are their contents?
As the other responders said, you
I had a similar problem with my HP S3707c desktop (GeForce 9100M graphics).
Ended up booting into text mode with kernel parameter nouveau.modeset=0,
logged in as root (no password), ran Xorg -configure, edited the resulting file
to use the vesa driver and copied it to /etc/X11/xorg.conf, then
Gerhard Magnus
Wed, 02 Sep 2009 14:20:42 -0700
Does anyone know a program for FC11 that will convert Windows icon
files
(.ico) into a format accepted by gnome (.svg or .png)?
I asked nearly the same question recently on this list. I was suggested
to use mogrify. It's a part of
until this actual attempt to use it, i had assumed it was open source.
as its not, i dont expect i will use it; someone else had asked me to
try it.
i found most of my earlier issues were with install issues that weren't
immediately obvious,
now i seem to have sound via PA and i get no
Thanks for the suggestions.
Hey i found two files in /etc/yum.repos.d which are adobe-linux-i386.repo and
yum-iisc-f11.repo which has contents which iam attaching here.
In response to your suggestion, I tried copying even fedora.repo and
fedora-updates.repo also which iam attaching here.
I
On Tue, 2009-09-01 at 22:58 -0400, Kevin J. Cummings wrote:
On 09/01/2009 10:24 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Tue, 2009-09-01 at 21:16 -0400, Jim wrote:
...
That worked for me, but when I try to view video it claims that Flash is
not installed, which it is (64-bit Adobe version). There
Hi guys,
I recently tried KDE 4.3 and despite some gfx performance flaws this one got me
screaming:
I installed kdepim 4.3 and run kmail, setup my maildir as inbox and the first
thing I noticed: All mails were new, odd I thought and wanted to take a look
at my maildir via mutt. To my surprise:
Hi,
Is it safe to preupgrade a F7 32 bits to a F11 64 bits ?
BR
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Luc MAIGNAN wrote:
Hi,
Is it safe to preupgrade a F7 32 bits to a F11 64 bits ?
BR
All I know is I wouldn't do it
Not only is F7--F11 a big jump in and of itself...but trying to go from
32 ~ 64 bits would certainly add to the complexity to the point of
likely utter disaster
--
On 09/03/2009 06:10 PM, Luc MAIGNAN wrote:
Hi,
Is it safe to preupgrade a F7 32 bits to a F11 64 bits ?
No. Backup your data and do a fresh installation.
Rahul
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines:
Roger wrote:
On 09/03/2009 02:25 PM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
Over the last 3 months, I noticed that I have posted and not gotten
any responses. Fair enough, maybe the posts aren't worth it.
But I just did a check of the archives and I don't see any of my
posts. Don't know if I am
On 09/03/2009 01:34 PM, Terry Barnaby wrote:
Does anyone know if there is a plan to release updated
xorg/mesa packages for F11 any time soon ?
The F11 ones are very broken, at least for ATI radeon based systems.
I have been using code from freedesktops git sources
(drm,mesa,xf86-video-ati)
On 09/03/2009 08:56 AM, john wendel wrote:
I'm happily using LXDE on my F11 system, and I thought I'd remove Gnome,
using yum remove gnome\*.
Well, it was not to be. Yum decide to remove parts of LXDE, Firefox,
Thunderbird, Java, abiword, most of the system admin utilities, and
about 50
On Thu, 3 Sep 2009 17:11:14 +0530 (IST), SriLatha wrote:
Hey i found that two files in /etc/yum.repos.d which are
adobe-linux-i386.repo and yum-iisc-f11.repo.
Have you talked to the IISC guys yet?
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe:
On Wed, 2009-09-02 at 20:26 -0700, john wendel wrote:
I'm happily using LXDE on my F11 system, and I thought I'd remove Gnome,
using yum remove gnome\*.
Well, it was not to be. Yum decide to remove parts of LXDE, Firefox,
Thunderbird, Java, abiword, most of the system admin utilities, and
I'm contemplating a laptop purchase and my current top three
candidates are a MBP 17, Lenovo W500 (WUXGA/ATI Mobility FireGL V5700
(512MB)), and a Dell XPS 16 (1080p/ATI Mobility RADEON HD 4670 (1G)). I
get the impression -- were I to go with the Lenovo or Dell -- that I'm
pretty much stuck
On 09/02/2009 11:26 PM, john wendel wrote:
I'm happily using LXDE on my F11 system, and I thought I'd remove
Gnome, using yum remove gnome\*.
Well, it was not to be. Yum decide to remove parts of LXDE, Firefox,
Thunderbird, Java, abiword, most of the system admin utilities, and
about 50 other
sometimes volume is erratic in Rhythmbox, when I connect to a radio
stream slide goes to zero!!!
and sometimes it doesn't remember volume setting from a session to the next.
anyone experiencing same behaviour???
Latest packages are in use
--
Antonio Montagnani
Skype : antoniomontag
SIP:
If KDE 4 still feels strange to you, UserBase now has a treat in store. Hans
(aka Mogger, on IRC) has created a whole set of short looping screencasts that
show you exactly how to do all the common tasks associated with Plasma -
covering desktop and panel widgets, extenders and activities.
On Thursday 03 September 2009 13:39:36 Christoph Höger wrote:
Hi guys,
I recently tried KDE 4.3 and despite some gfx performance flaws this one
got me screaming: I installed kdepim 4.3 and run kmail, setup my maildir as
inbox and the first thing I noticed: All mails were new, odd I thought
Hello there,
after I upgraded from Fedora 10 to 11 using yum preupgrade (as proposed by the
daily process that checks for upgrades in GNOME), display in X.org doesn't
work anymore.
My guess is that it's a video/display issue, directly or indirectly, because
the system is responding, meaning I
On 09/03/2009 02:11 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 09/03/2009 01:34 PM, Terry Barnaby wrote:
Does anyone know if there is a plan to release updated
xorg/mesa packages for F11 any time soon ?
The F11 ones are very broken, at least for ATI radeon based systems.
I have been using code from
Am Donnerstag, den 03.09.2009, 14:47 +0100 schrieb Anne Wilson:
On Thursday 03 September 2009 13:39:36 Christoph Höger wrote:
Hi guys,
I recently tried KDE 4.3 and despite some gfx performance flaws this one
got me screaming: I installed kdepim 4.3 and run kmail, setup my maildir as
2009/9/3 Antonio M antonio.montagn...@gmail.com:
sometimes volume is erratic in Rhythmbox, when I connect to a radio
stream slide goes to zero!!!
and sometimes it doesn't remember volume setting from a session to the next.
anyone experiencing same behaviour???
Latest packages are in use
I
1 - 100 of 181 matches
Mail list logo
