-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear FUDCon attendees,
We've added an extra hotel field to the FUDCon wiki pre-registration
table, on the far right.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FUDCon:Toronto_2009#Pre-registration
If you *have already booked at the hotel*, please visit the
Hi All,
I presume that the reason that tagging requests aren't being done is
due to the upcoming beta but is there a reason that non core or
critical path packages can't be tagged in. I have a number of Moblin
packages that fix various issues, in particular a rebuild of
network-manager-netbook to
On Thursday 15 October 2009 12:51:28 am Peter Robinson wrote:
Hi All,
I presume that the reason that tagging requests aren't being done is
due to the upcoming beta but is there a reason that non core or
critical path packages can't be tagged in. I have a number of Moblin
packages that fix
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 8:55 AM, Conrad Meyer ceme...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Thursday 15 October 2009 12:51:28 am Peter Robinson wrote:
Hi All,
I presume that the reason that tagging requests aren't being done is
due to the upcoming beta but is there a reason that non core or
critical
Hi Peter,
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 08:51 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
Hi All,
I presume that the reason that tagging requests aren't being done is
due to the upcoming beta but is there a reason that non core or
critical path packages can't be tagged in. I have a number of Moblin
packages that
On 10/10/2009 10:43 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote:
Am Samstag, den 10.10.2009, 21:41 +0200 schrieb Chitlesh GOORAH:
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 9:34 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote:
I am starting the AWOL procedure [1] for Claudio Tomasoni, because he
didn't respond to a bug I opened 5 months ago [2].
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 13:26:53 -0700, Adam wrote:
(push some Xorg changes we'd never be happy about putting
in stable into it).
If you know that you would _never_ be happy with a test-update becoming
a stable update, then either don't push such a test-update or unpush
it (manually or by relying
Jesse Keating jkeat...@j2solutions.net writes:
And that's a people problem more than a process problem. If nobody
tests it in updates-testing, then how is the maintainer to know that it
is problematic? Certainly not solvable with even more repos for testing
content...
I ran updates-testing
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 08:59:13AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 8:55 AM, Conrad Meyer ceme...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Thursday 15 October 2009 12:51:28 am Peter Robinson wrote:
Hi All,
I presume that the reason that tagging requests aren't being done is
due to the
Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to writes:
Postgres isn't even updatable. You need to do dumps before doing the upgrade.
So downgrades aren't too much worse than upgrades. (Though the new dumps
might use new features that will need to get modified to make them readable
by old versions.)
Note
Can someone shed light on the status of geronimo in Fedora? Seems like
it hasn't managed to build since F11 - and the F11 build was never
pushed. There is a geronimo-spec 1.2 in CVS that doesn't compile
(missing dependencies among other things). Apache's site has version
2.1.4.
Mind
Compose started at Thu Oct 15 06:15:06 UTC 2009
Broken deps for i386
--
sugar-toolkit-0.86.0-1.fc12.i686 requires python-json
Broken deps for x86_64
--
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 08:59:13AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 8:55 AM, Conrad Meyer ceme...@u.washington.edu
wrote:
If they're not on any of the official spins, what benefit does tagging them
into dist-f12 provide over having them as updates? (Pushing updates is
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 08:59:13AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 8:55 AM, Conrad Meyer ceme...@u.washington.edu
wrote:
If they're not on any of the official spins, what benefit does tagging them
Michael Schwendt wrote:
If you know that you would _never_ be happy with a test-update becoming
a stable update, then either don't push such a test-update or unpush
it (manually or by relying on karma automatism).
That was my point!
However, it could be that you would need to offer a
Charles Dostale wrote:
MySQL and PostgreSQL come to mind.
/etc/yum.conf might have nodowngrade=mysql-server postgresql-
server in the default file.
Seth Vidal wrote:
I have no idea what that would do? just tell the user tough noogies?
packagename can't be downgraded because of file
Milos Jakubicek wrote:
I should discourage anybody from taking over octaviz, the package fails
to build from source as it is not compatible with vtk 5.0 [1], I spent
with it several hours when it failed during our F11 mass rebuild in
February, without any significant success.
IMO it should
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 08:59 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
Because it allows me to test them as part of what will become the F-12
Moblin remix spin
You can add custom repositories to spin config files, so you could get
the updated packages in that way. Not ideal, but it ought to work.
As Conrad
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
Postgres isn't even updatable. You need to do dumps before doing
the upgrade.
OK, maybe that isn't a good example then.
However, using your comment, and turning my idea around, if
PostgreSQL isn't upgradable, according to my idea it should be
excluded by default
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 08:59 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
Because it allows me to test them as part of what will become the F-12
Moblin remix spin
You can add custom repositories to spin config files, so you could get
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 16:53 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
Not according to Jesse, even in this thread there seems to be mixed
communications. My understanding was from the last FUDCon would be
that it would be complete lock down for core stuff with more
flexibility for the stuff that obviously
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 5:03 PM, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 16:53 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
Not according to Jesse, even in this thread there seems to be mixed
communications. My understanding was from the last FUDCon would be
that it would be complete
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 16:53 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 08:59 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
Because it allows me to test them as part of what will become the F-12
Moblin remix spin
You can
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 17:06 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
Thats true for most of the freeze, but when we hit release candidate
stage we change absolutely nothing. The problem right now is that there
is only one repo to publish things into, rawhide, but we have multiple
things we'd like to
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 16:53 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 08:59 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
Because it allows me to
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 17:44 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
I would be nice to have a tomorrow's rawhide will be the last
opportunity to get things tagged into the beta email. If there was
one I missed it and the amount of extra work it has cost me due to
having to spin up repos and answer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 15.10.2009 17:51, schrieb chasd:
Postgres isn't even updatable. You need to do dumps before doing
the upgrade.
Yes, but you should make the dump with the dump utility of the new
release to which you want to update.
Best Regards:
Jochen
Dne 15.10.2009 17:21, Kevin Kofler napsal(a):
Matěj Cepl wrote:
This is actually your personal opinion AFAIK, right?
No, it's what updates-testing is for.
Yes, that's your personal opinion about what updates-testing is for.
Who gives a darn? If nobody complains about any issues, just push
Dne 14.10.2009 22:26, Adam Williamson napsal(a):
I agree with this, but by the same token, the use suggested by Matej
seems against the purpose of updates-testing, as does the original idea
in this thread (push some Xorg changes we'd never be happy about putting
in stable into it). I also
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 20:26 +0200, Matěj Cepl wrote:
Dne 14.10.2009 22:26, Adam Williamson napsal(a):
I agree with this, but by the same token, the use suggested by Matej
seems against the purpose of updates-testing, as does the original idea
in this thread (push some Xorg changes we'd
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 17:27 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Michael Schwendt wrote:
If you know that you would _never_ be happy with a test-update becoming
a stable update, then either don't push such a test-update or unpush
it (manually or by relying on karma automatism).
That was my point!
When trying to install via rawhide the last few days, or at least within
last week or so, the network wouldn't come up, whether via thru
askmethod or normal defaults. It doesn't matter whether dhcp or static
IP, still doesn't start and you get infinite circle of retry menus after
each attempt.
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 16:20 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote:
Anyone else running into this problem?
No, in fact I performed many network installs over the past few days, on
i386, x86_64, and ppc, and virt. A variety of hardware, a variety of
network devices.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Dave Airlie airl...@redhat.com wrote:
2 months is too long for user apps maybe, for X.org or Mesa from what I
can see for ever probably isn't long enough
My guess is that it's relatively easy for a semi-technical person to
be able to map back from a visible
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 14:29 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 16:20 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote:
Anyone else running into this problem?
No, in fact I performed many network installs over the past few days, on
i386, x86_64, and ppc, and virt. A variety of hardware, a variety
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 17:37 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote:
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 14:29 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 16:20 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote:
Anyone else running into this problem?
No, in fact I performed many network installs over the past few days, on
i386,
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009, Mike Chambers wrote:
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 14:29 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 16:20 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote:
Anyone else running into this problem?
No, in fact I performed many network installs over the past few days, on
i386, x86_64, and
Theodore Papadopoulo wrote:
I would like to understand why the file macros.cmake as distributed in
fedora-10 defines:
%_cmake_skip_rpath -DCMAKE_SKIP_RPATH:BOOL=ON
Because otherwise installed binaries would end up with rpaths, even for
standard library paths. (Probably a bug, I wonder if that
Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Please do not ever push untested work to stable just because no one
complained. If you want testing on older releases you can push it to
testing but please don't ever promote it.
Sorry, letting updates sit in testing forever is just not an option.
People who bother to
Matěj Cepl wrote:
Yes, I know, that's opinion of people around KDE that they don't
distinguish between Rawhide and updates-testing
That's not true. In KDE SIG:
* we do not push KDE prereleases to updates-testing (nor to the stable
updates, of course),
* we rarely push application prereleases
Adam Williamson wrote:
I should've clarified that as far as new packages go, I don't see a
problem with just pushing them to stable after a few days in -testing as
long as no-one complains. It's quite hard for a new package to *break*
something on a currently-working system without explicit
Till Maas wrote:
IMHO having both in RPMFusion with a proper dependency is the easiest
way to install it. Having some package with a missing kernel module
dependency in Fedora would only make it more complicated for other
repositories that provide the kernel module and can therefore provide a
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 09:03 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 16:53 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
Not according to Jesse, even in this thread there seems to be mixed
communications. My understanding was from the last FUDCon would be
that it would be complete lock down for
On Fri, 2009-10-16 at 01:27 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
FWIW, network-manager-netbook is a release blocker for the moblin spin.
Given how much time we spent with Dan Williams porting
network-manager-netbook to NM 0.8, it would be a great shame if the
moblin spin couldn't get a beta from
I recently installed gestikk. And to my horror one of the dialogs said.
(Check Box) F*** off
No lie,
So how does one recommend that this be removed.
Steven
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
On 10/16/2009 05:14 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Orion Poplawski wrote:
Can someone shed light on the status of geronimo in Fedora? Seems like
it hasn't managed to build since F11 - and the F11 build was never
pushed. There is a geronimo-spec 1.2 in CVS that doesn't compile
(missing dependencies
Le 16/10/2009 06:58, Steven James Drinnan a écrit :
I recently installed gestikk. And to my horror one of the dialogs said.
(Check Box) F*** off
No lie,
So how does one recommend that this be removed.
Steven
File a ticket upstream.
The string itself is in the .glade file, since
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528496
Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=96826
User hdu changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=96826
User nmailhot changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=96826
User hdu changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529196
Robin Sonefors ozam...@flukkost.nu changed:
What|Removed |Added
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=96826
--- Additional comments from nmail...@openoffice.org Thu Oct 15 13:10:21
+ 2009 ---
IIRC (I may be wrong) part of the decision for GNOME apps happens at
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=96826
--- Additional comments from h...@openoffice.org Thu Oct 15 13:42:04 +
2009 ---
Ok, doing it as a last level resort for glyph fallback looks like a reasonable
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=96826
--- Additional comments from c...@openoffice.org Thu Oct 15 13:50:25 +
2009 ---
a) resulting in gazillions of weird codepoints., yup. get it with accidental
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=96826
--- Additional comments from h...@openoffice.org Thu Oct 15 14:07:00 +
2009 ---
I'd hoped to pick up this myself by F-12, I might try again to do this myself
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528345
Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528345
--- Comment #7 from Sara L. Uckelman li...@ellipsis.cx 2009-10-15 12:38:16
EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=364963)
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528345
--- Comment #8 from Sara L. Uckelman li...@ellipsis.cx 2009-10-15 12:38:48
EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=364964)
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528345
--- Comment #9 from Sara L. Uckelman li...@ellipsis.cx 2009-10-15 12:39:09
EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=364965)
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528345
Sara L. Uckelman li...@ellipsis.cx changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527406
Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528220
Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528272
Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Author: nim
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-ignacio-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv13983/devel
Modified Files:
.cvsignore sources
Added Files:
gfs-ignacio-fonts-fontconfig.conf gfs-ignacio-fonts.spec
import.log
Log Message:
initial
Author: nim
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-ignacio-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv14478/devel
Modified Files:
import.log
Log Message:
initial import
Index: import.log
===
RCS file:
Author: nim
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-ignacio-fonts/F-11
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv17041/F-11
Modified Files:
.cvsignore sources
Added Files:
gfs-ignacio-fonts.spec import.log
Log Message:
initial import
--- NEW FILE gfs-ignacio-fonts.spec ---
Author: nim
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-ignacio-fonts/F-12
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv17207/F-12
Modified Files:
.cvsignore sources
Added Files:
gfs-ignacio-fonts-fontconfig.conf gfs-ignacio-fonts.spec
import.log
Log Message:
initial import
Author: nim
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/adf-tribun-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv18113/devel
Modified Files:
.cvsignore sources
Added Files:
adf-tribun-fonts-fontconfig.conf adf-tribun-fonts.spec
import.log
Log Message:
initial import
Author: nim
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/adf-tribun-fonts/F-12
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv21909/F-12
Modified Files:
.cvsignore sources
Added Files:
adf-tribun-fonts-fontconfig.conf adf-tribun-fonts.spec
import.log
Log Message:
initial import
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528220
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org
2009-10-15 17:25:41 EDT ---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528272
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org
2009-10-15 17:34:41 EDT ---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528949
Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528949
--- Comment #9 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-10-15
18:21:56 EDT ---
This one is good technically
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477436
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514911
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528496
Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Hi
After reading Mairin's Unpackaged Font of the Week post yesterday, I
decided to try packaging it.
The result is a review request at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529196
I've never done RPM packages before, so realistically there should be
some mistakes. I'd be thankful for
Le Jeu 15 octobre 2009 15:21, Robin Sonefors a écrit :
After reading Mairin's Unpackaged Font of the Week post yesterday, I
decided to try packaging it.
Great decision! Welcome!
The result is a review request at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529196
I've never done RPM
20:06 mmcgrath #startmeeting
20:06 zodbot Meeting started Thu Oct 15 20:06:16 2009 UTC. The chair is
mmcgrath. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
20:06 zodbot Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic.
20:06 mmcgrath Who's here?
20:06 * a-k is
---
modules/lftp/manifests/init.pp |5 +
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 modules/lftp/manifests/init.pp
diff --git a/modules/lftp/manifests/init.pp b/modules/lftp/manifests/init.pp
new file mode 100644
index 000..abd88b8
--- /dev/null
+++
---
manifests/servergroups/compose.pp |2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/manifests/servergroups/compose.pp
b/manifests/servergroups/compose.pp
index b2cb3ab..49c78f4 100644
--- a/manifests/servergroups/compose.pp
+++ b/manifests/servergroups/compose.pp
@@
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 22:48 +, Jesse Keating wrote:
+++ b/modules/lftp/manifests/init.pp
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+class sigul {
+
+package { lftp:
+ensure = installed,
+}
--
Mike pointed out that this is wrong. It now reads:
class lftp::package {
package { lftp:
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 22:48 +, Jesse Keating wrote:
+++ b/modules/lftp/manifests/init.pp
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+class sigul {
+
+package { lftp:
+ensure = installed,
+}
--
Mike pointed out that this is wrong. It now
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009, Jesse Keating wrote:
---
manifests/servergroups/compose.pp |2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/manifests/servergroups/compose.pp
b/manifests/servergroups/compose.pp
index b2cb3ab..49c78f4 100644
---
On Thursday 15 October 2009 05:59:47 pm Mike McGrath wrote:
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 22:48 +, Jesse Keating wrote:
+++ b/modules/lftp/manifests/init.pp
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+class sigul {
+
+package { lftp:
+ensure = installed,
On Thursday 15 October 2009 06:00:07 pm Mike McGrath wrote:
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009, Jesse Keating wrote:
---
manifests/servergroups/compose.pp |2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/manifests/servergroups/compose.pp
b/manifests/servergroups/compose.pp
I'm following this web page to install Fedora 11 x86_64 on an
Acer Aspire 6930 laptop:
http://www.sixtyfourbit.org/LinuxEM64T-2.htm
I did the install on sda5, with a swap on sda6. I did not resize
the Windows partition and left sda1, 2 and 3 alone. GRUB was
installed on sda5. After the
charles zeitler writes:
when trying to copy a certain file, i get the message:
cp: reading 'file' : Input/output error
i took the volume it was on offline, did a forced
e2fsck. same thing.
smartctl -H tells me the drive 'passes' .
i can change the name with mv, no problem there.
are
Il giorno gio, 15/10/2009 alle 06.42 -0400, lanas ha scritto:
I did the install on sda5, with a swap on sda6. I did not resize
the Windows partition and left sda1, 2 and 3 alone. GRUB was
installed on sda5. After the Fedora 11 install, the GRUB menu
shows and I can start Fedora. That's
Il giorno gio, 15/10/2009 alle 00.29 -0500, charles zeitler ha scritto:
when trying to copy a certain file, i get the message:
cp: reading 'file' : Input/output error
How many files you can't copy?
i took the volume it was on offline, did a forced
e2fsck. same thing.
Did you made the
On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 21:04:05 -0700
stan gr...@q.com wrote:
I got a lot farther with your instructions than I did before. I think
I am at the ISO creation stage, and it is choking because I didn't do
something that it wants. I'm not sure what the purpose of treeinfo
is. I'll keep plugging
Hi all,
I have successfully updated a HP Compaq 6730s laptop (FreeDOS) from
fedora 10 to fedora 11 (Using DVD and yum update), after gdm login
(about 3mn after login), Fedora freezes and i get kernel panic with
Plymouth splash screen (Fedora logo) raised, i think that intel drm
driver is buggy
On 09-10-15 01:29:22, charles zeitler wrote:
when trying to copy a certain file, i get the message:
cp: reading 'file' : Input/output error
i took the volume it was on offline, did a forced
e2fsck. same thing.
smartctl -H tells me the drive 'passes' .
i can change the name with mv,
I have used Fedora before on a comcast network with a small router and it
worked fine.
DHCP seemed to setup everything correctly.
Now I have DSL with two other Windows XP computers as well as Wi-Fi for two
laptops.
The Windows XP systems as well as the Fedora system are plugged into the
Hello My friends,
I'm currently heaving some doubts about an update that i need to do.
Here it goes.
I have to install Fedora 11 with Samba and Sybase Adaptive Server
Anywhere, to work with a program manufactured by a third party.
Currently there is a server running Red Hat 5.0 with and old
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 09:35:14PM +0100, Paul Smith wrote:
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 9:44 PM, Suvayu Ali fatkasuvayu+li...@gmail.com
wrote:
It is similar to Gnome. If notification area is already on your panel, then
right click that and see whether the Network Manager applet is hidden. The
Tait Clarridge wrote:
On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 13:10 -0600, Linuxguy123 wrote:
On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 21:02 +0200, Andras Simon wrote:
On 10/14/09, Linuxguy123 linuxguy...@gmail.com wrote:
How is it working for you ?
If, by 'any other mini', you mean 'any netbook', then
Tait Clarridge wrote:
On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 14:42 -0600, Linuxguy123 wrote:
On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 15:34 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Linuxguy123 linuxguy...@gmail.com wrote:
How is it working for you ?
Thanks
Do the netbooks (Atoms,
I have googled for setup advice on NFSv4 specifically for F11 - but I have
not yet found a good reference including pitfall lists and itemised steps...
does anyone know of a good (step by step) reference for setting up both
NFSv4 server and client in F11?
--
View this message in context:
1 - 100 of 143 matches
Mail list logo
