tis 2009-10-27 klockan 13:24 -0500 skrev Dennis Gilmore:
On Tuesday 27 October 2009 01:16:46 pm Adam Jackson wrote:
On Tue, 2009-10-27 at 12:40 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
Id like to get some feedback on the patches that i'm proposing for F-13.
quite a few packages that need to deal with
On 27. okt. 2009 22:48, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 10:40:30PM +0100, Ola Thoresen wrote:
On 27. okt. 2009 21:10, Matthew Garrett wrote:
What hardware is this?
02:00.0 Network controller: Intel Corporation PRO/Wireless 3945ABG
[Golan] Network Connection (rev 02)
(And it
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 5:40 AM, Bojan Smojver bo...@rexursive.com wrote:
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 16:18 -0400, Warren Togami wrote:
5) How many untagged packages are there?
koji list-tagged --latest dist-f12-updates-candidate
I ran this today (just for kicks). It gives back 323 packages. Even
Just a quick question for those who know:
The shared libs from libgcc: /lib/libgcc*so* are not required by
anything:
[r...@localhost ~]# rpm -q --whatrequires libgcc-4.4.1-2.fc11.i586
no package requires libgcc-4.4.1-2.fc11.i586
I have a vague memory that libstdc++ uses this runtime for e.g.
2009/10/28 Linus Walleij linus.ml.wall...@gmail.com:
Just a quick question for those who know:
The shared libs from libgcc: /lib/libgcc*so* are not required by
anything:
[r...@localhost ~]# rpm -q --whatrequires libgcc-4.4.1-2.fc11.i586
no package requires libgcc-4.4.1-2.fc11.i586
Use this
On 10/22/2009 02:48 PM, Stephen Smalley wrote:
Hi,
/sbin/installkernel doesn't pass --dracut to /sbin/new-kernel-pkg, so a
make install from a kernel.org kernel tree tries to
invoke /sbin/mkinitrd rather than dracut. Is that intentional?
Also, any ideas on why a dracut-generated initramfs
Jud Craft wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
But this is about C++.
I don't mean to misunderstand, but if I recall from your very first
post in this thread...
Actually, the ABI issue is only if you use the C code generator, not the
native ones.
Hence I
Eric Springer wrote:
As for C++, I couldn't get some of my programs to compile as it seemed
to spew at some of the template usage. Anyway it looks very promising
and I look forward to using it in the future (especially with its
non-nonsense licensing).
So you don't consider it nonsense to
Rawhide Report wrote:
Removed package lam
Why was this package removed that late in F12's cycle, causing these broken
dependencies:
blacs-lam-1.1-33.fc12.i686 requires liblamf77mpi.so.0
blacs-lam-1.1-33.fc12.i686 requires liblam.so.0
orsa-lam-0.7.0-11.fc12.i686 requires lam
Haïkel Guémar wrote:
libmusicbrainz is an indirect dependence of listen (through
libtunepimp), if no one steps, i'll sure have to.
They need to upgrade to libmusicbrainz3. The libtunepimp/libmusicbrainz
protocol won't be supported server-side anymore very soon. :-(
There's also stuff in KDE
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 08:47:33AM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 5:40 AM, Bojan Smojver bo...@rexursive.com wrote:
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 16:18 -0400, Warren Togami wrote:
5) How many untagged packages are there?
koji list-tagged --latest dist-f12-updates-candidate
I
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 11:26:54AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Eric Springer wrote:
As for C++, I couldn't get some of my programs to compile as it seemed
to spew at some of the template usage. Anyway it looks very promising
and I look forward to using it in the future (especially with its
On 10/28/2009 06:24 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Jud Craft wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
But this is about C++.
I don't mean to misunderstand, but if I recall from your very first
post in this thread...
Actually, the ABI issue is only if you use the C code
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 09:43:17AM +0100, Ola Thoresen wrote:
On 27. okt. 2009 22:48, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 10:40:30PM +0100, Ola Thoresen wrote:
On 27. okt. 2009 21:10, Matthew Garrett wrote:
What hardware is this?
02:00.0 Network controller: Intel Corporation
Compose started at Wed Oct 28 06:15:09 UTC 2009
Broken deps for i386
--
banshee-1.5.1-0.3.git20090917.fc12.i686 requires mono(Mono.Zeroconf) =
0:2.0.0.76
galeon-2.0.7-16.fc12.i686 requires gecko-libs = 0:1.9.1.3
Broken
Are the nightly composes (such as this:
http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/nightly-composes/desktop/ ) a
build of what will become F12 or are they a build of rawhide?
Best regards
Andreas
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 12:12 PM, Andreas Tunek andreas.tu...@gmail.com wrote:
Are the nightly composes (such as this:
http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/nightly-composes/desktop/ ) a
build of what will become F12 or are they a build of rawhide?
I believe F-12 and rawhide are still one and
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 01:12:03PM +0100, Andreas Tunek wrote:
Are the nightly composes (such as this:
http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/nightly-composes/desktop/ ) a
build of what will become F12 or are they a build of rawhide?
Both. Rawhide _is_ what will become F12. At least until it's
Tue 20-Oct Mon 02-Nov Beta Testing
Fri 30-Oct Fri 30-Oct Blocker Bug Day (F12Blocker) #2
Mon 02-Nov Mon 02-Nov End of Beta Testing
Wed 04-Nov Wed 04-Nov Compose RC
Wed 04-Nov Wed 04-Nov Enable Fedora 12 Updates
Wed 04-Nov Wed 11-Nov Test RC
Mon 09-Nov Mon 09-Nov F12 Blocker Review
On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 10:41 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
2009/10/28 Linus Walleij linus.ml.wall...@gmail.com:
Just a quick question for those who know:
The shared libs from libgcc: /lib/libgcc*so* are not required by
anything:
[r...@localhost ~]# rpm -q --whatrequires
I've been trying to get axis2 built for F11. The newest version that meets all the dependencies is axis2 1.3 due to maven2 being only at 2.0.4. Axis2 1.3 nearly builds except for failing tests for the Scripting Module:---T E S T
* gr...@verizon.net gr...@verizon.net [2009-10-28 12:42]:
This appears to be related to this bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/
+source/openjdk-6/+bug/255149
What is the best way to workaround this rhino problem with openjdk6?
I recommend emailing fedora-devel-java-list.
Andrew
--
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 7:19 PM, Peter Jones pjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/27/2009 03:49 PM, Martin Dubuc wrote:
This is a very nice tool. Unfortunately, on my system running Fedora 11,
I
get the following erro:
Can't open RFKILL control device: No such file or directory
Using
On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 15:28 -0200, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
Yep, that feature isn't in kernels that old.
I have the same problem with a Philco 1001 notebok (intel atom) and
F11.
You mean a 2.6.30 kernel is too old?
Exactly. Fedora tends to run with a
On Wednesday 28 October 2009 01:41:34 am Alexander Boström wrote:
tis 2009-10-27 klockan 13:24 -0500 skrev Dennis Gilmore:
On Tuesday 27 October 2009 01:16:46 pm Adam Jackson wrote:
On Tue, 2009-10-27 at 12:40 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
Id like to get some feedback on the patches that
On 10/27/2009 05:06 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
SD == Steve Dickson ste...@redhat.com writes:
SD On the server (Which is suggested): Add the following entry to the
SD /etc/exports file:
SD / *(ro,fsid=0)
SD Note: 'fsid=0' is explained in the exports(5) man pages.
Could someone
It sounds like you are saying that there is no way to export the same
host filesystems with the same client-perceived names under v4 as was
being done before under v[23]. Is that really true?
My old /etc/exports is:
/mirror*(ro,insecure,sync,mp,all_squash)
So clients
On 28. okt. 2009 13:05, Ewan Mac Mahon wrote:
What make and model is the laptop?
It is a Compal HGL31
(Compal is selling their laptops under a lot of different brands)
Rgds.
Ola Thoresen
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
It has come to our attention the nightly cvs checkout tarballs stopped
working. A restorecon later and we're back in business. Just letting
everyone know.
http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/webfiles/
-Mike
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
Peter Robinson pbrobinson at gmail.com writes:
I thought dist-f12-updates-candidate were packages that had been build
for F-12 but had not yet been tagged. It doesn't necessarily mean they
are going to be pushed into F-12.
True, but there is no way to say right now which one would those be.
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 11:04:25 -0700,
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 15:28 -0200, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
Yep, that feature isn't in kernels that old.
I have the same problem with a Philco 1001 notebok (intel
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 09:06:02PM +, Bojan Smojver wrote:
Peter Robinson pbrobinson at gmail.com writes:
I thought dist-f12-updates-candidate were packages that had been build
for F-12 but had not yet been tagged. It doesn't necessarily mean they
are going to be pushed into F-12.
True,
Sorry to bug developers, but I didn't get any bites from PPC users on
fedora-list.
Does Fedora PPC work or install on oldworld PCI Macs, such as a beige
G3 desktop? My impression is that no one has tried it on an oldworld
Mac in the last few releases, and that getting it to boot at all would
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 06:17:31PM -0400, Tony Nelson wrote:
Sorry to bug developers, but I didn't get any bites from PPC users on
fedora-list.
Does Fedora PPC work or install on oldworld PCI Macs, such as a beige
G3 desktop? My impression is that no one has tried it on an oldworld
No, it
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 10:52:13PM +, Bojan Smojver wrote:
Josh Boyer jwboyer at gmail.com writes:
We had around 400 0-day stable updates for F11 if I'm remembering correctly.
Which makes me think - as many should be part of the release as possible,
right?
Yep. Which is why bodhi
The time is almost here to reap the harvest on which so many have toiled and
enjoy the bounty that is Fedora 12. With each new Fedora release comes some
Bugzilla housekeeping. This e-mail is designed to let you know about two things
happening around November 17, 2009 (Fedora 12 release day)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520051
Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520051
Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520051
Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531105
Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Author: pravins
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/samyak-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv19279
Modified Files:
samyak-fonts.spec
Added Files:
67-samyak-devanagari.conf 67-samyak-gujarati.conf
67-samyak-oriya.conf 67-samyak-tamil.conf
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517635
Bug 517635 depends on bug 520051, which changed state.
Bug 520051 Summary: [deva] Need fontconfig rules for Samyak Devanagari
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520051
Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528675
Akira TAGOH ta...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531431
--- Comment #2 from DmD Ljungmark spi...@takeit.se 2009-10-28 06:08:21 EDT
---
Created an attachment (id=366411)
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531431
--- Comment #1 from DmD Ljungmark spi...@takeit.se 2009-10-28 06:07:47 EDT
---
Created an attachment (id=366410)
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Font rendering is broken on Rawhide (radeon chipset)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531431
Summary: Font rendering is broken on Rawhide (radeon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531431
--- Comment #3 from DmD Ljungmark spi...@takeit.se 2009-10-28 06:55:27 EDT
---
Fixed with the latest kernel
Author: pravins
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lohit-gujarati-fonts/F-12
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv9962
Modified Files:
.cvsignore lohit-gujarati-fonts.spec sources
Log Message:
* Wed Oct 28 2009 Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com - 2.4.4-1
- upstream release wuth
Author: pravins
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lohit-gujarati-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv11062
Modified Files:
.cvsignore lohit-gujarati-fonts.spec sources
Log Message:
* Wed Oct 28 2009 Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com - 2.4.4-1
- upstream release wuth
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529637
Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520041
--- Comment #2 from Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com 2009-10-28 08:17:19
EDT ---
for this bug we need to first fix font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531431
--- Comment #4 from DmD Ljungmark spi...@takeit.se 2009-10-28 08:56:11 EDT
---
Scratch the Fixed and replace it with
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105631
--- Additional comments from naru...@openoffice.org Wed Oct 28 14:24:32
+ 2009 ---
We, OpenPrinting recommends all of applications (and all of distros) will
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522187
--- Comment #22 from Andrew Overholt overh...@redhat.com 2009-10-28 10:41:08
EDT ---
Jim Hayward reports on
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531431
Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522187
--- Comment #23 from Ben Konrath b...@bagu.org 2009-10-28 11:28:49 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #20)
Ben, do you have any
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531510
--- Comment #1 from Víctor Daniel bombayv...@yahoo.com.mx 2009-10-28
12:20:55 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=366463)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: [abrt] crash detected in fontforge-20090622-2.fc12
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531510
Summary: [abrt] crash detected in
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522187
--- Comment #24 from Andrew Overholt overh...@redhat.com 2009-10-28 14:30:30
EDT ---
I *finally* got rawhide x86_64
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522187
--- Comment #25 from Mat Booth fed...@matbooth.co.uk 2009-10-28 14:44:27 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #24)
I *finally*
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522187
--- Comment #26 from Ben Konrath b...@bagu.org 2009-10-28 14:55:08 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #24)
I *finally* got
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522187
--- Comment #27 from Andrew Overholt overh...@redhat.com 2009-10-28 14:58:38
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #26)
(In reply
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522187
Andrew Overholt overh...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522187
--- Comment #28 from Andrew Overholt overh...@redhat.com 2009-10-28 15:41:57
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #25)
(In reply
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531431
Jerome Glisse jgli...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132
--- Comment #200 from David E. Ross da...@rossde.com 2009-10-28 13:41:34 PDT
---
In which Gecko version has this been fixed?
--
Configure bugmail:
Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132
--- Comment #201 from Eric (Sheppy) Shepherd esheph...@mozilla.com
2009-10-28 13:48:17 PDT ---
@font-face is in Gecko 1.9.1. Were you asking about something more specific?
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528675
Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531105
Behdad Esfahbod besfa...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531105
--- Comment #6 from Behdad Esfahbod besfa...@redhat.com 2009-10-28 20:55:23
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #4)
(In reply to
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529594
Behdad Esfahbod besfa...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529594
--- Comment #26 from fujiwara tfuji...@redhat.com 2009-10-28 21:34:50 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #25)
I've said multiple
Hi,
Can someone please help me with this?
This person is looking for an PCI-based quad-port NIC which will work
on Fedora/CentOS.
Thanks.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Indranil Das Gupta indr...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 7:01 PM
Subject: Query on dual/quad port NIC
Dell sells one or more such cards.
--
Matt Domsch
Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO
linux.dell.com www.dell.com/linux
-Original Message-
From: fedora-infrastructure-list-boun...@redhat.com
[mailto:fedora-infrastructure-list-boun...@redhat.com] On Behalf Of susmit
Hi Matt,
Thanks for replying.
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 7:10 PM, matt_dom...@dell.com wrote:
Dell sells one or more such cards.
Can you _please_ point out one or two which works with Fedora? :)
Thanks.
--
Regards,
Susmit.
=
On 28/10/09 13:37, susmit shannigrahi wrote:
Hi,
Can someone please help me with this?
This person is looking for an PCI-based quad-port NIC which will work
on Fedora/CentOS.
Thanks.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Indranil Das Guptaindr...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at
Hi,
Zarafa is up at Publictest16.
Anyone want to test?
Please refer to last three comments of
https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1197
Thanks.
--
Regards,
Susmit.
=
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/user:susmit
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 11:59 PM, Tristan Santore
tristan.sant...@internexusconnect.net wrote:
On 28/10/09 13:37, susmit shannigrahi wrote:
Hi,
Can someone please help me with this?
This person is looking for an PCI-based quad-port NIC which will work
on Fedora/CentOS.
Thanks.
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009, susmit shannigrahi wrote:
Hi,
Zarafa is up at Publictest16.
Anyone want to test?
Please refer to last three comments of
https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1197
Can I get an account? How will we do FAS?
-Mike
Can I get an account? How will we do FAS?
You can use admin/admin.
The user is added the unix way, ($useradd way, though it has a
different command). So, if there is some application/script to sync
authentication that way, that should work.
Thanks.
--
Regards,
Susmit.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
susmit shannigrahi wrote:
Can I get an account? How will we do FAS?
You can use admin/admin.
The user is added the unix way, ($useradd way, though it has a
different command). So, if there is some application/script to sync
authentication that
Hi,
Depends on which PCI interface is meant.
PCI:
D-Link DFE-580TX uses sundance driver
PCI-X 133MHZ:
Intel PWLA8494GT Pro/1000GT uses e1000 driver
PCIe:
HP NC364T, 4x 1000Base-T, PCIe x4 (435508-B21)
Intel Gigabit ET Server Adapter, 4x 1000Base-T, PCIe x4, low profile
(E1G44ET)
Intel PRO/1000
hmm that would mean we would have to sync the FAS auth DB by the hour
or some fixed duration right?
Right.
But I think that this should not be much of a problem.
--
Regards,
Susmit.
=
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/user:susmit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
susmit shannigrahi wrote:
hmm that would mean we would have to sync the FAS auth DB by the
hour or some fixed duration right?
Right. But I think that this should not be much of a problem.
That shouldn't be a problem but is there an LDAP plugin
That shouldn't be a problem but is there an LDAP plugin that is
available? and if yes can we use it?
But we don't have a LDAP :)
--
Regards,
Susmit.
=
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/user:susmit
=
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
susmit shannigrahi wrote:
That shouldn't be a problem but is there an LDAP plugin that is
available? and if yes can we use it?
But we don't have a LDAP :)
yepp... sorry. i just got that cleared up
:)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 12:41 AM, Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote:
On Sunday 25 October 2009 06:26:49 pm Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
And koji.fedoraproject.org, no?
koji is a mod_python app. it doesnt run as a daemon at all.
but it it all python.
There are python daemons in the system
Outage Notification - 2009-10-29 21:00 UTC
There will be an outage starting at 2009-10-29 21:00 UTC, which will last
approximately 2 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2009-10-29 21:00 UTC'
Affected
Thanks Mike,
this time, I'm particularly interested in the infrastructure team.
However I might also contribute to the website team, but I feel more
interested in the infrastructure one.
Cheers!
Abiel
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 10:53 AM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 26 Oct
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009, Abiel Mogos wrote:
Thanks Mike,
this time, I'm particularly interested in the infrastructure team.
However I might also contribute to the website team, but I feel more
interested in the infrastructure one.
If you are able to make the meeting tomorrow that would be
Hi,
Thank you all for such prompt replies.
This was very helpful.
--
Regards,
Susmit.
=
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/user:susmit
=
Sent from Calcutta, WB, India
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 05:08:03PM -0400, Mike McLean wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 12:41 AM, Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote:
The daemon distinction might be wrong thing to fixate on here. There
is nothing in that distinction that should exclude python (or most any
language). I think
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 05:08:03PM -0400, Mike McLean wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 12:41 AM, Dennis Gilmore dennis-
omedqnbl...@public.gmane.org wrote:
The daemon distinction might be wrong thing to fixate on here.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Mike McLean wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 12:41 AM, Dennis Gilmore dennis-
omedqnbl...@public.gmane.org wrote:
On Sunday 25 October 2009 06:26:49 pm Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
And koji.fedoraproject.org, no?
koji is a mod_python app. it doesnt
Hi,
I'm running GNOME as desktop, and my ~/.thumbnails directory increased
to 40 Mbyte. Is there a utility to remove unused/unneeded entries?
Regards
Joachim Backes
--
Joachim Backes joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de
http://www.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 5:14 AM, Tony Nelson
tonynel...@georgeanelson.com wrote:
Does Fedora PPC work / install on oldworld PCI Macs, such as a beige G3
desktop? My impression is not.
How did you form this impression? Did you actually try to install the
PPC spin from:
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 08:46:05 +0100
Joachim Backes wrote:
Is there a utility to remove unused/unneeded entries?
I just remove all of the files under ~/.thumbnails as part of the script that
backs up my home directory every night (prior to the start of the actual
backup, of course).
They get
Has anyone had a total failure to run kmod-nvidia with an 8300 GS graphics
card in f11?
My system
(http://www.smolts.org/client/show/pub_0461ec99-2d05-44bf-ac48-1a0d78a17c52)
used to run with the kmod-nvidia-PAE installed from rpmfusion just fine in
f10 with no issues at all.
When I installed
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Phil Meyer pme...@themeyerfarm.com wrote:
On 10/27/2009 12:10 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Hello,
In fedora 11, it is still the version 2007 of tex-live which available.
When 2008 is going to be available ?
Can I just install it from the tex-live-2008.iso image
1 - 100 of 163 matches
Mail list logo
