I have the impression that since about 2 days ago the font rendering
in Fedora rawhide is less good than before. Fonts appear fuzzier, and
in particular Luxi Mono looks more deformed. There hasn't been a
freetype update, thus some GNOME package might be responsible.
I have noticed this effect on 2
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 09:49:13AM +0100, Christoph Frieben wrote:
I have the impression that since about 2 days ago the font rendering
in Fedora rawhide is less good than before. Fonts appear fuzzier, and
in particular Luxi Mono looks more deformed. There hasn't been a
freetype update, thus
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 11:59:30AM -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
Jindrich Novy wrote:
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 03:05:34PM -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
I wonder if texlive should include a /etc/profile.d package to set
TEXMFCNF,
so that other packages, such as xdvipdfmx will work? Or, should
Compose started at Thu Oct 29 06:15:07 UTC 2009
Broken deps for i386
--
banshee-1.5.1-3.fc12.i686 requires mono(Mono.Zeroconf) = 0:4.0.0.90
blam-1.8.5-18.fc12.i686 requires gecko-libs = 0:1.9.1.3
Hi,
[from last week's announcement]
system-config-cluster is currently dead as an upstream project. If
someone wants to take over the fedora package, then they will first have
to take over the upstream side of things too.
Here then, for the second time of asking, is a request to see if
Hi,
since a year or so the AMD K10 thermal sensors module (k10temp) seems to
be floating around the web. I would appreciate some kernel packager
integrating it into the fedora 11 stock kernel - since without it I can
not build (and trust!) a silent cooling system.
Any plans on this issue?
On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 22:25 -0400, Tony Nelson wrote:
On 09-10-28 18:24:49, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 06:17:31PM -0400, Tony Nelson wrote:
Sorry to bug developers, but I didn't get any bites from PPC
users on fedora-list.
Does Fedora PPC work or install on oldworld PCI
On 29/10/09 11:29, Clodoaldo Neto wrote:
I've been using Fedora 10 and while trying F12 beta I noticed a
problem in the httpd run directory permission. Then I tried F11 and
the same problem happens:
[Wed Oct 28 12:05:02 2009] [notice] Apache/2.2.13 (Unix) DAV/2
PHP/5.2.9 mod_python/3.3.1
To Adam Williamson
I have upgraded the latest packages from Rawhide, including xorg-x11-drv-ati
and some components of X. It looks quite good. Glxgears performance grows
from about 640 fps to more than 1000 fps. Gnome-terminal is more smooth but
not perfect.
I found other problems in Fedora 12.
2009/10/29 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org:
On 29/10/09 11:29, Clodoaldo Neto wrote:
I've been using Fedora 10 and while trying F12 beta I noticed a
problem in the httpd run directory permission. Then I tried F11 and
the same problem happens:
[Wed Oct 28 12:05:02 2009] [notice] Apache/2.2.13
2009/10/29 Tomasz Torcz:
There was a change to font properties which changed Best shapes
to turn on slight hinting.
Good point, but I wonder why this change has been made. It suffices to
look at two attachments to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=198082
namely
Here a short report from the Power Management Fedora Test day on
10/22/09 [1]. First of all many thanks to all the people who
participated in it and who reported their findings. In order to make
things easier for testers and to make sure we get a lot more stable and
comparable results Marcela
Phil Knirsch wrote:
All in all the whole test day was a real success. Especially the great
idea of Marcela, Jan and Petr to make a rpm for the testday which
automated a lot of the work that needed to be done.
For the next testday we already plan to expand that idea and include the
Dne 29.10.2009 12:38, Christoph Höger napsal(a):
since a year or so the AMD K10 thermal sensors module (k10temp) seems to
be floating around the web. I would appreciate some kernel packager
integrating it into the fedora 11 stock kernel - since without it I can
not build (and trust!) a silent
Am Donnerstag, den 29.10.2009, 14:51 +0100 schrieb Michal Schmidt:
Dne 29.10.2009 12:38, Christoph Höger napsal(a):
since a year or so the AMD K10 thermal sensors module (k10temp) seems to
be floating around the web. I would appreciate some kernel packager
integrating it into the fedora 11
When: Friday, 2009-10-30 @ 16:00-20:00 UTC (1200-1600 hours EDT)
Where: #fedora-qa on irc.freenode.net
F-12 Blocker Meeting may still be in session (more than likely) in
#fedora-bugzappers, so we will be gathering in #fedora-qa.
The Bug Zappers will be holding a bug triage event this Friday
On 10/29/2009 02:48 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Phil Knirsch wrote:
All in all the whole test day was a real success. Especially the great
idea of Marcela, Jan and Petr to make a rpm for the testday which
automated a lot of the work that needed to be done.
For the next testday we
Hi
I've got a wireless CDMA modem that works perfectly using the option usb
serial driver, but is not currently listed as one of the supported devices.
I've been manually adding its ID to option.c and recompiling the driver
since F8. This however means that each time I perform a kernel upgrade I
Marcela Mašláňová on 10/29/2045 08:17 AM wrote:
We were thinking about some image, but for measurement we
needed installed system. Anyway requirements for tests were huge
e.g. openoffice, kernel-debuginfo.
When you use a USB drive you can install any number of packages. Just
set your
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Dululu Ululu dul...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I've got a wireless CDMA modem that works perfectly using the option usb
serial driver, but is not currently listed as one of the supported devices.
I've been manually adding its ID to option.c and recompiling the
brain lock on my annnouncement email. wrong list.
TK009
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Le Jeu 29 octobre 2009 14:30, Christoph Frieben a écrit :
2009/10/29 Tomasz Torcz:
There was a change to font properties which changed Best shapes
to turn on slight hinting.
Good point, but I wonder why this change has been made. It suffices to
look at two attachments to
Jindrich Novy wrote:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 11:59:30AM -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
Jindrich Novy wrote:
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 03:05:34PM -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
I wonder if texlive should include a /etc/profile.d package to set
TEXMFCNF,
so that other packages, such as xdvipdfmx
On 10/28/2009 03:05 PM, Roland McGrath wrote:
It sounds like you are saying that there is no way to export the same
host filesystems with the same client-perceived names under v4 as was
being done before under v[23]. Is that really true?
With Pre-F12 servers... Yeah...
The V4 protocol
On 10/29/2009 11:17 AM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Steve Dickson ste...@redhat.com wrote:
On a pre F-12 Server:
2) Added the '/ *(ro,fsid=0)' entry to the /etc/exportsfile and
reset the exports with 'exportfs -arv' (see exports(5) for details).
to, 2009-10-29 kello 09:29 -0200, Clodoaldo Neto kirjoitti:
I've been using Fedora 10 and while trying F12 beta I noticed a
problem in the httpd run directory permission. Then I tried F11 and
the same problem happens:
I've opened a bug about this a while ago -
2009/10/29 Nicolas Mailhot:
It is well known that some old fonts like Microsoft core fonts have bad/buggy
hinting (MS hides the problem by adding font-specific workarounds in its text
stack). They should certainly never be used to evaluate if a general default
is good or not.
The empirical
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Christoph Frieben
christoph.frie...@googlemail.com wrote:
2009/10/29 Nicolas Mailhot:
The empirical result remains, however, and it is consistent with that
of any other
font that I have looked at.
Luxi Mono is not the Red Hat/Fedora monospaced font and is
Le Jeu 29 octobre 2009 17:21, Christoph Frieben a écrit :
The empirical result remains, however, and it is consistent with that
of any other font that I have looked at.
It is consistent for you. You'd need a massive test campaign to prove this is
not subjective, not limited to a specific set
2009/10/29 Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com:
Currently I'm trying to not to replace any package that has a separate
upstream and is already packaged separatelly in Fedora.
IMO I think we'd be better off adopting the texlive versions of the
packages, rather than doing a half-and-half job on this
On Thursday 29 October 2009 17:26:25 Jonathan Underwood wrote:
IMO I think we'd be better off adopting the texlive versions of the
packages, rather than doing a half-and-half job on this by packaging
individual upstreams. The reason being that Fedora then benefits from
the integration and
2009/10/29 José Matos jama...@fc.up.pt:
On Thursday 29 October 2009 17:26:25 Jonathan Underwood wrote:
IMO I think we'd be better off adopting the texlive versions of the
packages, rather than doing a half-and-half job on this by packaging
individual upstreams. The reason being that Fedora
2009/10/29 Nicolas Mailhot:
You may comment on it, but do not expect Fedora to care overmuch about a
component that was removed in Fedora 9 (4 release cycles ago, for legal
reasons so it has 0 chance to get back in). For RHEL please go through RHEL
channels.
--
Nicolas Mailhot
I had
Rawhide Report wrote:
banshee-1.5.1-3.fc12.i686 requires mono(Mono.Zeroconf) = 0:4.0.0.90
mono-zeroconf somehow got backwards! Can the current version please go back
in?
blam-1.8.5-18.fc12.i686 requires gecko-libs = 0:1.9.1.3
galeon-2.0.7-16.fc12.i686 requires gecko-libs = 0:1.9.1.3
These
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 10:20 +0100, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 09:49:13AM +0100, Christoph Frieben wrote:
I have the impression that since about 2 days ago the font rendering
in Fedora rawhide is less good than before. Fonts appear fuzzier, and
in particular Luxi Mono looks
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 21:09 +0800, Liang Suilong wrote:
I found other problems in Fedora 12. I do not know whether they are
related to ATi KMS and opensource dirvers or not.
First Problem:
Adobe flash player seems to take up too much cpu usage. It makes
machine run slow. If I open
I wrote:
Rawhide Report wrote:
banshee-1.5.1-3.fc12.i686 requires mono(Mono.Zeroconf) = 0:4.0.0.90
mono-zeroconf somehow got backwards! Can the current version please go
back in?
blam-1.8.5-18.fc12.i686 requires gecko-libs = 0:1.9.1.3
galeon-2.0.7-16.fc12.i686 requires gecko-libs =
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 14:40 +0100, Phil Knirsch wrote:
Here a short report from the Power Management Fedora Test day on
10/22/09 [1]. First of all many thanks to all the people who
participated in it and who reported their findings.
For the next testday we already plan to expand that idea
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 09:24 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Marcela Mašláňová on 10/29/2045 08:17 AM wrote:
We were thinking about some image, but for measurement we
needed installed system. Anyway requirements for tests were huge
e.g. openoffice, kernel-debuginfo.
When you use a
Adam Williamson on 10/29/2009 01:13 PM wrote:
Not exactly, you need enough spare memory and/or swap space, because
they get installed into 'memory'.
Not when you use persistent storage... I have an updated F11 USB stick
that would like to meet you. :)
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 18:47 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Rawhide Report wrote:
banshee-1.5.1-3.fc12.i686 requires mono(Mono.Zeroconf) = 0:4.0.0.90
mono-zeroconf somehow got backwards! Can the current version please go back
in?
Dennis is looking at this. Seems something went awry when he
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 17:59 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le Jeu 29 octobre 2009 17:21, Christoph Frieben a écrit :
The empirical result remains, however, and it is consistent with that
of any other font that I have looked at.
It is consistent for you. You'd need a massive test
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 11:07 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
Second Problem:
I try to hibernate my desktop. Later I wake them up. The brightness of
LCD screen is not normal. It is too low. I nearly can not see what is
it in the screen. I switch to tty console. It is the same with GUI
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 13:15 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Adam Williamson on 10/29/2009 01:13 PM wrote:
Not exactly, you need enough spare memory and/or swap space, because
they get installed into 'memory'.
Not when you use persistent storage... I have an updated F11 USB stick
that
Le Jeu 29 octobre 2009 18:44, Christoph Frieben a écrit :
2009/10/29 Nicolas Mailhot:
You may comment on it, but do not expect Fedora to care overmuch about a
component that was removed in Fedora 9 (4 release cycles ago, for legal
reasons so it has 0 chance to get back in). For RHEL please
I wrote:
Rawhide Report wrote:
1:nant-0.85-30.fc12.i686 requires mono(NDoc.Core) = 0:1.3.3498.0
Not sure what went wrong here.
I figured it out. mono-ndoc very cleverly encodes the date it was built
into Mono's equivalent of a soname! So a simple rebuild at a later date,
even with nothing
On Thursday 29 October 2009 07:08:44 am Christoph Höger wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 29.10.2009, 14:51 +0100 schrieb Michal Schmidt:
Dne 29.10.2009 12:38, Christoph Höger napsal(a):
since a year or so the AMD K10 thermal sensors module (k10temp) seems
to be floating around the web. I would
I wrote:
I wrote:
Rawhide Report wrote:
1:nant-0.85-30.fc12.i686 requires mono(NDoc.Core) = 0:1.3.3498.0
Not sure what went wrong here.
I figured it out. mono-ndoc very cleverly encodes the date it was built
into Mono's equivalent of a soname! So a simple rebuild at a later date,
On 10/29/2009 09:09 AM, Liang Suilong wrote:
And then, Tom 'spot' Callaway has not pushed a new upgrade for chromium
browser. But I do not want to disturbing him. I just wait for him
silently. Haha!
There is a reason for the delay:
http://spot.livejournal.com/311443.html
The good news is
Neal Becker wrote:
Jindrich Novy wrote:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 11:59:30AM -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
Jindrich Novy wrote:
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 03:05:34PM -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
I wonder if texlive should include a /etc/profile.d package to set
TEXMFCNF,
so that other
On 10/29/2009 01:17 PM, Martin Dubuc wrote:
How is it possible to figure out what driver is associated with which
interface. We used to have some of this information available in
/sys/config/hwconf. I am especially interested to know details of Wi-Fi
interfaces (for instance ath5k or iwlagn).
On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 14:35 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Joost van der Sluis on 10/26/2009 01:42 PM wrote:
Those files are not architecture independent. They are somewhat similar
to .o files. They contain the run time library for the language,
compiled to native windows object
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 7:18 AM, David Woodhouse dw...@infradead.orgwrote:
On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 22:25 -0400, Tony Nelson wrote:
On 09-10-28 18:24:49, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 06:17:31PM -0400, Tony Nelson wrote:
Sorry to bug developers, but I didn't get any bites from
hello,
I tried to make an rpm package for xul sqlite-manager
it's a xul app and a firefox plugin (forget about the plugin)
http://code.google.com/p/sqlite-manager/downloads/list
http://sqlite-manager.googlecode.com/files/SQLiteManager_XR_0.5.6.zip
there was a problem, and it's solved now
Jon Stanley wrote:
If you would like to add something to this agenda, you can reply to
this e-mail, file a new ticket at https://fedorahosted.org/fesco,
e-mail me directly, or bring it up at the end of the meeting, during
the open floor.
I just filed:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/265
On 09-10-29 08:18:30, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 22:25 -0400, Tony Nelson wrote:
On 09-10-28 18:24:49, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 06:17:31PM -0400, Tony Nelson wrote:
Sorry to bug developers, but I didn't get any bites from PPC
users on fedora-list.
On 09-10-29 16:41:57, King InuYasha wrote:
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 7:18 AM, David Woodhouse
dw...@infradead.orgwrote:
On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 22:25 -0400, Tony Nelson wrote:
On 09-10-28 18:24:49, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 06:17:31PM -0400, Tony Nelson wrote:
Sorry to
Author: tagoh
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/knm-new-fixed-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv25094/devel
Modified Files:
.cvsignore sources
Added Files:
import.log knm-new-fixed-fonts-fontconfig.conf
knm-new-fixed-fonts.spec
Log Message:
Author: tagoh
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/knm-new-fixed-fonts/F-12
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv16040/F-12
Modified Files:
.cvsignore sources
Added Files:
import.log knm-new-fixed-fonts-fontconfig.conf
knm-new-fixed-fonts.spec
Log Message:
initial
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523454
--- Comment #24 from Ani Peter ape...@redhat.com 2009-10-29 02:43:03 EDT ---
Tested latest rawhide (smc-fonts-04.2-2.fc12)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523454
--- Comment #25 from Ani Peter ape...@redhat.com 2009-10-29 02:45:23 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=366559)
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523454
--- Comment #26 from Ani Peter ape...@redhat.com 2009-10-29 02:46:19 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=366560)
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523454
--- Comment #28 from Ani Peter ape...@redhat.com 2009-10-29 02:48:49 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=366562)
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523454
--- Comment #27 from Ani Peter ape...@redhat.com 2009-10-29 02:47:55 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=366561)
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523454
Ani Peter ape...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Author: tagoh
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/knm-new-fixed-fonts/F-11
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv2720/F-11
Modified Files:
.cvsignore sources
Added Files:
import.log knm-new-fixed-fonts-fontconfig.conf
knm-new-fixed-fonts.spec
Log Message:
initial
Author: tagoh
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/knm-new-fixed-fonts/F-10
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv7007/F-10
Modified Files:
.cvsignore sources
Added Files:
import.log knm-new-fixed-fonts-fontconfig.conf
knm-new-fixed-fonts.spec
Log Message:
initial
Author: tagoh
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/knm-new-fixed-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv8591
Modified Files:
knm-new-fixed-fonts.spec
Log Message:
* Thu Oct 29 2009 Akira TAGOH ta...@redhat.com - 1.1-9
- change the priority to 65 to make this the less
Author: tagoh
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/knm_new-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv14190
Removed Files:
Makefile sources
Log Message:
dead package
--- Makefile DELETED ---
--- sources DELETED ---
___
Author: tagoh
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/knm_new-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv14668
Added Files:
dead.package
Log Message:
dead package
--- NEW FILE dead.package ---
This package has been renamed to knm-new-fixed-fonts.
Author: tagoh
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/knm-new-fixed-fonts/F-12
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv14959
Modified Files:
knm-new-fixed-fonts.spec
Log Message:
* Thu Oct 29 2009 Akira TAGOH ta...@redhat.com - 1.1-9
- change the priority to 65 to make this the less
Author: tagoh
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/knm_new-fonts/F-12
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv21194
Added Files:
dead.package
Removed Files:
Makefile branch knm_new-fonts.spec sources
Log Message:
dead package
--- NEW FILE dead.package ---
This package has
Author: tagoh
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/knm-new-fixed-fonts/F-11
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv24865
Modified Files:
knm-new-fixed-fonts.spec
Log Message:
* Thu Oct 29 2009 Akira TAGOH ta...@redhat.com - 1.1-9
- change the priority to 65 to make this the less
Author: tagoh
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/knm-new-fixed-fonts/F-10
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv28603
Modified Files:
knm-new-fixed-fonts.spec
Log Message:
* Thu Oct 29 2009 Akira TAGOH ta...@redhat.com - 1.1-9
- change the priority to 65 to make this the less
Author: tagoh
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/knm_new-fonts/F-11
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv28981
Added Files:
dead.package
Removed Files:
Makefile branch knm_new-fonts.spec sources
Log Message:
dead package
--- NEW FILE dead.package ---
This package has
Author: tagoh
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/knm_new-fonts/F-10
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv4803
Removed Files:
Makefile branch knm_new-fonts.spec sources
Log Message:
dead package
--- Makefile DELETED ---
--- branch DELETED ---
--- knm_new-fonts.spec DELETED
Package knm_new-fonts in Fedora devel has been retired by tagoh
To make changes to this package see:
/pkgdb/packages/name/knm_new-fonts
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
Package knm_new-fonts in Fedora 10 was orphaned by tagoh
To make changes to this package see:
/pkgdb/packages/name/knm_new-fonts
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
Package knm_new-fonts in Fedora 10 has been retired by tagoh
To make changes to this package see:
/pkgdb/packages/name/knm_new-fonts
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
Package knm_new-fonts in Fedora 11 was orphaned by tagoh
To make changes to this package see:
/pkgdb/packages/name/knm_new-fonts
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
Package knm_new-fonts in Fedora 11 has been retired by tagoh
To make changes to this package see:
/pkgdb/packages/name/knm_new-fonts
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531105
Richard Hughes rhug...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Author: nim
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv357/devel
Modified Files:
.cvsignore fontpackages.spec import.log sources
Log Message:
1.30
Index: .cvsignore
Author: nim
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/F-12
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv910/F-12
Modified Files:
.cvsignore fontpackages.spec import.log sources
Log Message:
1.30
Index: .cvsignore
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530857
Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530857
Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Dear packager,
At 20091029T192211Z, while scanning the rawhide repository located at:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-rawhide-current/x86_64/
I have identified the following problems in your adf-accanthis-fonts package:
SRPM RPM17 19
Dear packager,
At 20091029T192211Z, while scanning the rawhide repository located at:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-rawhide-current/x86_64/
I have identified the following problems in your abyssinica-fonts package:
SRPM RPM 17 18
abyssinica-fonts
Dear packager,
At 20091029T192211Z, while scanning the rawhide repository located at:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-rawhide-current/x86_64/
I have identified the following problems in your asana-math-fonts package:
SRPM RPM 17 18 19
asana-math-fonts
Dear packager,
At 20091029T192211Z, while scanning the rawhide repository located at:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-rawhide-current/x86_64/
I have identified the following problems in your apanov-heuristica-fonts
package:
SRPM RPM 17
Dear packager,
At 20091029T192211Z, while scanning the rawhide repository located at:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-rawhide-current/x86_64/
I have identified the following problems in your apanov-edrip-fonts package:
SRPMRPM 17
apanov-edrip-fonts
Dear packager,
At 20091029T192211Z, while scanning the rawhide repository located at:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-rawhide-current/x86_64/
I have identified the following problems in your artwiz-aleczapka-fonts package:
SRPMRPM 4 7 11
Dear packager,
At 20091029T192211Z, while scanning the rawhide repository located at:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-rawhide-current/x86_64/
I have identified the following problems in your bpg-fonts package:
SRPM RPM 6 17
bpg-fonts
Dear packager,
At 20091029T192211Z, while scanning the rawhide repository located at:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-rawhide-current/x86_64/
I have identified the following problems in your bitmap-fonts package:
SRPM RPM 7 9 11 17 19
bitmap-fonts
Dear packager,
At 20091029T192211Z, while scanning the rawhide repository located at:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-rawhide-current/x86_64/
I have identified the following problems in your beteckna-fonts package:
SRPMRPM17 19
beteckna-fonts
Dear packager,
At 20091029T192211Z, while scanning the rawhide repository located at:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-rawhide-current/x86_64/
I have identified the following problems in your chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts
package:
SRPMRPM
Dear packager,
At 20091029T192211Z, while scanning the rawhide repository located at:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-rawhide-current/x86_64/
I have identified the following problems in your baekmuk-ttf-fonts package:
SRPM RPM 17 18 19
Dear packager,
At 20091029T192211Z, while scanning the rawhide repository located at:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-rawhide-current/x86_64/
I have identified the following problems in your cf-bonveno-fonts package:
SRPM RPM 17
cf-bonveno-fonts
Dear packager,
At 20091029T192211Z, while scanning the rawhide repository located at:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-rawhide-current/x86_64/
I have identified the following problems in your bitstream-vera-fonts package:
SRPM RPM 8 9
Dear packager,
At 20091029T192211Z, while scanning the rawhide repository located at:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-rawhide-current/x86_64/
I have identified the following problems in your brettfont-fonts package:
SRPM RPM 17
brettfont-fonts
1 - 100 of 263 matches
Mail list logo
