Re: texlive-2009 tlmgr

2009-11-04 Thread Jindrich Novy
On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 02:00:19PM -0500, Neal Becker wrote: tlmgr Can't locate TeXLive/TLPOBJ.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /usr/share/texlive/tlpkg /usr/local/lib64/perl5/site_perl/5.10.0/x86_64- linux-thread-multi /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.10.0

Re: texlive-2009 man info

2009-11-04 Thread Jindrich Novy
On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 07:23:03AM -0500, Neal Becker wrote: I'm trying texlive-2009 packages for f11. I see man and info pages get installed (not in standard system locations, but into texlive tree), but man and info search paths don't seem to be setup to find them. Good point. The man

Re: texlive-2009 breakage?

2009-11-04 Thread Jindrich Novy
On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 11:19:56AM -0500, Neal Becker wrote: I had texlive* installed. After today's update, I no longer have any /usr/share/texlive directory! I'm guessing some install script removed it?? There was a mistake in the previous release. The %postun scriptlet tried to remove

Re: Mesa 7.6.0 bugs

2009-11-04 Thread Peter Robinson
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 1:04 AM, Bojan Smojver bo...@rexursive.com wrote: New mesa (7.6.0) is causing trouble for people using F-11/12 code (see bugs #524338 and #509528 for instance). I've seen a couple of bugs in the 3D stuff with Moblin/clutter as well. RHBZ #521714 and #529372 come to mind.

Re: texlive-2009 breakage?

2009-11-04 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
BTW Jindrich, I know you are very busy, and we never seem to be on irc at the same times, but how is progress on the texlive font packaging front? Font automation QA has progressed quite a bit since you started, you can self-check your progress with repo-font-audit now if you want:

conflict between seedit - selinux-policy and qstat - torque-client

2009-11-04 Thread Rudolf Kastl
Why do those packages have to conflict with each other? 1. seedit and selinux-policy-{targeted,mls} - i dont see a single file conflicting atleast with the targeted policy... 2. qstat and torque-client both provide a qstat binary... is there anything done to get that resolved upstream? or is it

Re: conflict between seedit - selinux-policy and qstat - torque-client

2009-11-04 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
RK == Rudolf Kastl che...@gmail.com writes: RK 2. qstat and torque-client both provide a qstat binary... is there RK anything done to get that resolved upstream? or is it a conflicts RK and forget scenario? This one, I think, should be easily resolvable with alternatives. Actually I think all

Re: A question about allow_unconfined_mmap_low in f11 amd selinux

2009-11-04 Thread Daniel J Walsh
On 11/03/2009 04:35 PM, Adam Jackson wrote: On Tue, 2009-11-03 at 21:31 +, Mike Cloaked wrote: For people running wine or Crossover and using MS Office 2003 and related codes it is necessary to do: # setsebool -P allow_unconfined_mmap_low 1 To prevent AVC denials. However there is

rawhide report: 20091104 changes

2009-11-04 Thread Rawhide Report
Compose started at Wed Nov 4 08:15:08 UTC 2009 Broken deps for ppc64 -- eclipse-photran-5.0.0-0.3.200910081739.fc12.noarch requires eclipse-cdt = 1:6.0 New package globus-gram-job-manager-callout-error Globus

Re: conflict between seedit - selinux-policy and qstat - torque-client

2009-11-04 Thread Daniel J Walsh
On 11/04/2009 08:14 AM, Rudolf Kastl wrote: Why do those packages have to conflict with each other? 1. seedit and selinux-policy-{targeted,mls} - i dont see a single file conflicting atleast with the targeted policy... 2. qstat and torque-client both provide a qstat binary... is there

CVS daily checkout seeds

2009-11-04 Thread Quentin Armitage
The CVS daily checkout seeds at http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/webfiles/ don't contain a checkout for F-12. Would it be possible for someone to add that? I have also noted that a checkout seed for F-9 is still included, which seems somewhat superfluous. Many thanks, Quentin -- fedora-devel-list

Re: conflict between seedit - selinux-policy and qstat - torque-client

2009-11-04 Thread Steve Traylen
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III ti...@math.uh.edu wrote: RK == Rudolf Kastl che...@gmail.com writes: RK 2. qstat and torque-client both provide a qstat binary... is there RK anything done to get that resolved upstream? or is it a conflicts RK and forget scenario? This

Re: conflict between seedit - selinux-policy and qstat - torque-client

2009-11-04 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
ST == Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch writes: ST Would be happy for an alternatives solution. I have yet another ST /usr/bin/qstat for a POSIX interface to batch on the way at some ST point. Turns out that the other queuing systems (torque and gridengine) have already renamed their qstat

Re: conflict between seedit - selinux-policy and qstat - torque-client

2009-11-04 Thread Rudolf Kastl
2009/11/4 Jason L Tibbitts III ti...@math.uh.edu: ST == Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch writes: ST Would be happy for an alternatives solution. I have yet another ST /usr/bin/qstat for a POSIX interface to batch on the way at some ST point. Turns out that the other queuing systems

Re: conflict between seedit - selinux-policy and qstat - torque-client

2009-11-04 Thread Steve Traylen
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Rudolf Kastl che...@gmail.com wrote: 2009/11/4 Jason L Tibbitts III ti...@math.uh.edu: ST == Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch writes: ST Would be happy for an alternatives solution. I have yet another ST /usr/bin/qstat for a POSIX interface to batch on the

Re: Re: A question about allow_unconfined_mmap_low in f11 amd selinux

2009-11-04 Thread mike cloaked
Daniel J Walsh dwalsh at redhat.com writes: You can run with SELinux in enforcement. mmap_low_allowed is the name of the boolean moving forward. By moving forward do you mean that one can, in f11, reset the original boolean and set boolean mmap_low_allowed instead, in a forthcoming policy

Re: conflict between seedit - selinux-policy and qstat - torque-client

2009-11-04 Thread Rudolf Kastl
2009/11/4 Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch: On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Rudolf Kastl che...@gmail.com wrote: 2009/11/4 Jason L Tibbitts III ti...@math.uh.edu: ST == Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch writes: ST Would be happy for an alternatives solution. I have yet another ST

Re: conflict between seedit - selinux-policy and qstat - torque-client

2009-11-04 Thread Steve Traylen
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Rudolf Kastl che...@gmail.com wrote: 2009/11/4 Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch: On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Rudolf Kastl che...@gmail.com wrote: 2009/11/4 Jason L Tibbitts III ti...@math.uh.edu: ST == Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch writes: ST

Re: conflict between seedit - selinux-policy and qstat - torque-client

2009-11-04 Thread Rudolf Kastl
2009/11/4 Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch: On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Rudolf Kastl che...@gmail.com wrote: 2009/11/4 Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch: On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Rudolf Kastl che...@gmail.com wrote: 2009/11/4 Jason L Tibbitts III ti...@math.uh.edu: ST == Steve

Re: conflict between seedit - selinux-policy and qstat - torque-client

2009-11-04 Thread Steve Traylen
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 4:43 PM, Rudolf Kastl che...@gmail.com wrote: 2009/11/4 Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch: On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Rudolf Kastl che...@gmail.com wrote: 2009/11/4 Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch: On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Rudolf Kastl che...@gmail.com

Re: A question about allow_unconfined_mmap_low in f11 amd selinux

2009-11-04 Thread Daniel J Walsh
On 11/04/2009 10:23 AM, mike cloaked wrote: Daniel J Walsh dwalsh at redhat.com writes: You can run with SELinux in enforcement. mmap_low_allowed is the name of the boolean moving forward. By moving forward do you mean that one can, in f11, reset the original boolean and set boolean

Re: A question about allow_unconfined_mmap_low in f11 amd selinux

2009-11-04 Thread Daniel J Walsh
On 11/04/2009 10:23 AM, mike cloaked wrote: Daniel J Walsh dwalsh at redhat.com writes: You can run with SELinux in enforcement. mmap_low_allowed is the name of the boolean moving forward. By moving forward do you mean that one can, in f11, reset the original boolean and set boolean

Re: rawhide report: 20091104 changes - excluding noarch packages

2009-11-04 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 11/04/2009 07:47 AM, Rawhide Report wrote: Compose started at Wed Nov 4 08:15:08 UTC 2009 Broken deps for ppc64 -- eclipse-photran-5.0.0-0.3.200910081739.fc12.noarch requires eclipse-cdt= 1:6.0 Is there any way to exclude a

Re: rawhide report: 20091104 changes - excluding noarch packages

2009-11-04 Thread Andrew Overholt
* Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com [2009-11-04 10:58]: On 11/04/2009 07:47 AM, Rawhide Report wrote: Compose started at Wed Nov 4 08:15:08 UTC 2009 Broken deps for ppc64 -- eclipse-photran-5.0.0-0.3.200910081739.fc12.noarch

Re: rawhide report: 20091104 changes - excluding noarch packages

2009-11-04 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 11/04/2009 09:04 AM, Andrew Overholt wrote: * Orion Poplawskior...@cora.nwra.com [2009-11-04 10:58]: On 11/04/2009 07:47 AM, Rawhide Report wrote: Compose started at Wed Nov 4 08:15:08 UTC 2009 Broken deps for ppc64 --

Re: rawhide report: 20091104 changes - excluding noarch packages

2009-11-04 Thread Steve Traylen
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Andrew Overholt overh...@redhat.com wrote: * Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com [2009-11-04 10:58]: On 11/04/2009 07:47 AM, Rawhide Report wrote: Compose started at Wed Nov  4 08:15:08 UTC 2009 Broken deps for ppc64

Re: rawhide report: 20091104 changes - excluding noarch packages

2009-11-04 Thread Andrew Overholt
* Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch [2009-11-04 11:18]: On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Andrew Overholt overh...@redhat.com wrote: * Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com [2009-11-04 10:58]: On 11/04/2009 07:47 AM, Rawhide Report wrote: Compose started at Wed Nov  4 08:15:08 UTC 2009

Re: rawhide report: 20091104 changes - excluding noarch packages

2009-11-04 Thread Mat Booth
2009/11/4 Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch: On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Andrew Overholt overh...@redhat.com wrote: * Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com [2009-11-04 10:58]: On 11/04/2009 07:47 AM, Rawhide Report wrote: Compose started at Wed Nov  4 08:15:08 UTC 2009 Broken deps for

Re: rawhide report: 20091104 changes - excluding noarch packages

2009-11-04 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 09:06:34 -0700, Orion wrote: On 11/04/2009 09:04 AM, Andrew Overholt wrote: * Orion Poplawskior...@cora.nwra.com [2009-11-04 10:58]: On 11/04/2009 07:47 AM, Rawhide Report wrote: Compose started at Wed Nov 4 08:15:08 UTC 2009 Broken deps for ppc64

rfkill

2009-11-04 Thread Martin Dubuc
Addition of a working version of rfkill in Fedora 12 has been really welcomed. In my application, I would like to monitor the RF kill switch to detect when user enables/disables Wi-Fi on the system. I thought I could use the rfkill executable to do this, using rfkill event, piping the output using

Re: A question about allow_unconfined_mmap_low in f11 amd selinux

2009-11-04 Thread John Reiser
mmap_low_allowed is the name of the boolean moving forward. This access has proven to be a critical security feature, and several kernel/root vulnerabilities will be prevented by turning this boolean off, with the only down side, preventing old windows applications from running by default in

Re: rfkill

2009-11-04 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Wed, 2009-11-04 at 11:35 -0500, Martin Dubuc wrote: Addition of a working version of rfkill in Fedora 12 has been really welcomed. In my application, I would like to monitor the RF kill switch to detect when user enables/disables Wi-Fi on the system. I thought I could use the rfkill

Ubuntu shows updates / security updates on shell logins

2009-11-04 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
Newly installed Ubuntu 9.10, when you log in over ssh you may see: 34 packages can be updated. 10 updates are security updates. I think this is a nice feature, because many administrators will log in to servers remotely over ssh and never see the graphical indications from packagekit et al.

Re: A question about allow_unconfined_mmap_low in f11 amd selinux

2009-11-04 Thread Eric Paris
On Wed, 2009-11-04 at 08:38 -0800, John Reiser wrote: The kernel could remove 99.9% of the vulnerability, with no dynamic cost to processes that don't use page 0, by: 1. Reduce STACK_TOP by one page, and reserve the corresponding virtual page frame. 2. If a process does

Re: rawhide report: 20091104 changes - excluding noarch packages

2009-11-04 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 09:06:34AM -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote: I did ExcludeArch: ppc64 and submitted a build, but it attempted to build it on a ppc64 machine: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1787949 Should I just keep retrying until I get another arch? Koji / RPM

Re: rawhide report: 20091104 changes - excluding noarch packages

2009-11-04 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 05:18:00PM +0100, Steve Traylen wrote: Maybe I am missing something here but if the architecture matters it's not a a noarch package by definition. No. noarch describes the contents of the final RPM. But it doesn't take into account that arch-specific stuff might be

Re: Ubuntu shows updates / security updates on shell logins

2009-11-04 Thread Seth Vidal
On Wed, 4 Nov 2009, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: Newly installed Ubuntu 9.10, when you log in over ssh you may see: 34 packages can be updated. 10 updates are security updates. I think this is a nice feature, because many administrators will log in to servers remotely over ssh and never see

Re: Ubuntu shows updates / security updates on shell logins

2009-11-04 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
RWMJ == Richard W M Jones rjo...@redhat.com writes: RWMJ Newly installed Ubuntu 9.10, when you log in over ssh you may see: RWMJ 34 packages can be updated. 10 updates are security updates. What a terrible idea. My users, who are welcome to ssh into a number of machines at my site, have no

Re: Ubuntu shows updates / security updates on shell logins

2009-11-04 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 11:57:29AM -0500, Seth Vidal wrote: On Wed, 4 Nov 2009, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: Newly installed Ubuntu 9.10, when you log in over ssh you may see: 34 packages can be updated. 10 updates are security updates. I think this is a nice feature, because many

Re: rawhide report: 20091104 changes - excluding noarch packages

2009-11-04 Thread Peter Lemenkov
2009/11/4 Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com: Is there any way to exclude a noarch package from certain arches? If it does depends on arch, then it isn't a noarch. -- With best regards, Peter Lemenkov. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com

Re: Ubuntu shows updates / security updates on shell logins

2009-11-04 Thread Richard June
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III ti...@math.uh.edu wrote: RWMJ == Richard W M Jones rjo...@redhat.com writes: RWMJ Newly installed Ubuntu 9.10, when you log in over ssh you may see: RWMJ 34 packages can be updated. 10 updates are security updates. What a terrible idea.  

Re: conflict between seedit - selinux-policy and qstat - torque-client

2009-11-04 Thread Rudolf Kastl
bug against qstat filed: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533016 as for seedit: i am going to investigate it further. kind regards, Rudolf Kastl -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

Re: rawhide report: 20091104 changes - excluding noarch packages

2009-11-04 Thread Paul Howarth
On 04/11/09 17:09, Peter Lemenkov wrote: 2009/11/4 Orion Poplawskior...@cora.nwra.com: Is there any way to exclude a noarch package from certain arches? If it does depends on arch, then it isn't a noarch. So a noarch script package that depends on its arch script interpreter (e.g. all

Re: rawhide report: 20091104 changes - excluding noarch packages

2009-11-04 Thread Jesse Keating
On Wed, 2009-11-04 at 17:20 +, Paul Howarth wrote: So a noarch script package that depends on its arch script interpreter (e.g. all python and perl packages) should be arch packages? And bash for that matter. This is a known problem with rpm/koji. The distinction between noarch and

Re: rawhide report: 20091104 changes

2009-11-04 Thread Kevin Kofler
Rawhide Report wrote: Broken deps for ppc64 -- eclipse-photran-5.0.0-0.3.200910081739.fc12.noarch requires eclipse-cdt = 1:6.0 [snip] eclipse-photran-5.0.0-0.3.200910081739.fc12 --- * Tue Nov 03

Re: Kernel using LZMA compression

2009-11-04 Thread Ikem Krueger
The executive summary is: Xen does not let a kernel boot itself, because mimicking bare hardware is too tedious (and pointless.) Instead, Xen instantiates an instance of a kernel into the Xen environment. To do this instantiation, Xen does its own decompression, so Xen must know everything

Re: Kernel using LZMA compression

2009-11-04 Thread Bryn M. Reeves
On 11/04/2009 06:18 PM, Ikem Krueger wrote: The executive summary is: Xen does not let a kernel boot itself, because mimicking bare hardware is too tedious (and pointless.) Instead, Xen instantiates an instance of a kernel into the Xen environment. To do this instantiation, Xen does its own

Re: rawhide report: 20091104 changes - excluding noarch packages

2009-11-04 Thread Björn Persson
Jesse Keating wrote: On Wed, 2009-11-04 at 17:20 +, Paul Howarth wrote: So a noarch script package that depends on its arch script interpreter (e.g. all python and perl packages) should be arch packages? And bash for that matter. Unless the interpreter is available on all of the

Re: Kernel using LZMA compression

2009-11-04 Thread Ikem Krueger
I am reading between the lines here (I have never looked at this stuff in Xen) but I would assume it's for the reason given above. The kernel's own decompression routines must run very early on in the boot process - well before the first line of C code runs and while the CPU (on x86) is

Re: conflict between seedit - selinux-policy and qstat - torque-client

2009-11-04 Thread Bill Nottingham
Because seedit getting installed causes selinux-policy-targeted and friends to get screwed up. That sounds like a reason to not ship seedit. Am I missing something? Bill -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

Re: Ubuntu shows updates / security updates on shell logins

2009-11-04 Thread Kevin Kofler
Richard June wrote: It's a good idea for one off jobs where the primary user is also the admin, but not so good for shared systems. Personally I think a better plan would be to display that information *only* if the user is flagged as an administrator, group root, wheel, etc. It's actually a

Re: Ubuntu shows updates / security updates on shell logins

2009-11-04 Thread Juan Rodriguez
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.atwrote: It's actually a security risk to display this to non-admin users. It's like putting a sticker on your door saying This door is not locked because my keyhole is not working. By that logic, Packagekit displaying that to

Re: rawhide report: 20091104 changes - excluding noarch packages

2009-11-04 Thread Jesse Keating
On Wed, 2009-11-04 at 19:31 +0100, Björn Persson wrote: Unless the interpreter is available on all of the architectures that Fedora supports, which Python, Perl and Bash are as far as I can see. Until we add a new arch. But that still leaves things like java, mono, ruby, etc as problem

Re: A question about allow_unconfined_mmap_low in f11 amd selinux

2009-11-04 Thread Adam Jackson
On Wed, 2009-11-04 at 08:38 -0800, John Reiser wrote: I have three applications that fundamentally fail to work if mmap(0,PAGE_SIZE,,MAP_FIXED,,) is disallowed. Addressing memory at address 0 is fundamental to the way that they work. Using any other page would totally prevent two of the apps

Re: conflict between seedit - selinux-policy and qstat - torque-client

2009-11-04 Thread Rudolf Kastl
2009/11/4 Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com: Because seedit getting installed causes selinux-policy-targeted and friends to get screwed up. That sounds like a reason to not ship seedit. Am I missing something? on first start of the seedit-gui there is a popup: you have to initialize before

Re: rawhide report: 20091104 changes - excluding noarch packages

2009-11-04 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 11/04/2009 10:39 AM, Jesse Keating wrote: On Wed, 2009-11-04 at 17:20 +, Paul Howarth wrote: So a noarch script package that depends on its arch script interpreter (e.g. all python and perl packages) should be arch packages? And bash for that matter. This is a known problem with

Re: rawhide report: 20091104 changes - excluding noarch packages

2009-11-04 Thread Jerry James
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 11:50 AM, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote: Until we add a new arch.  But that still leaves things like java, mono, ruby, etc as problem areas where noarch may not actually be noarch. We seem to be using noarch in two different senses: 1. Contains no machine code,

Re: Ubuntu shows updates / security updates on shell logins

2009-11-04 Thread Richard June
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote: Richard June wrote: It's a good idea for one off jobs where the primary user is also the admin, but not so good for shared systems. Personally I think a better plan would be to display that information *only* if the

Re: A question about allow_unconfined_mmap_low in f11 amd selinux

2009-11-04 Thread John Reiser
You're saying you have apps that rely on being able to dereference the zero page, and _not_ because the processor mode requires it? I thought the vax died long ago. The apps were written intentionally to exploit being able to use page 0. It's significantly faster (a factor of 10 or more) and

Re: Ubuntu shows updates / security updates on shell logins

2009-11-04 Thread Seth Vidal
On Wed, 4 Nov 2009, Kevin Kofler wrote: Richard June wrote: It's a good idea for one off jobs where the primary user is also the admin, but not so good for shared systems. Personally I think a better plan would be to display that information *only* if the user is flagged as an administrator,

Re: Kernel using LZMA compression

2009-11-04 Thread Bryn M. Reeves
On 11/04/2009 06:37 PM, Ikem Krueger wrote: I am reading between the lines here (I have never looked at this stuff in Xen) but I would assume it's for the reason given above. The kernel's own decompression routines must run very early on in the boot process - well before the first line of C code

Re: Ubuntu shows updates / security updates on shell logins

2009-11-04 Thread Konstantin Ryabitsev
2009/11/4 Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at: Richard June wrote: It's a good idea for one off jobs where the primary user is also the admin, but not so good for shared systems. Personally I think a better plan would be to display that information *only* if the user is flagged as an

Re: rfkill

2009-11-04 Thread Dan Williams
On Wed, 2009-11-04 at 16:48 +, Bastien Nocera wrote: On Wed, 2009-11-04 at 11:35 -0500, Martin Dubuc wrote: Addition of a working version of rfkill in Fedora 12 has been really welcomed. In my application, I would like to monitor the RF kill switch to detect when user enables/disables

Boot from CD, safe changes to USB-Stick

2009-11-04 Thread Ikem Krueger
You don't wanna change something on the harddisks, but wanna safe the changes. So you boot from Live-CD and the changes are redirected to the USB-Stick. Puppy Linux does it that way*. I wanna see it in Fedora. :D *http://puppylinux.com/development/howpuppyworks.html

Re: Ubuntu shows updates / security updates on shell logins

2009-11-04 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Seth Vidal skvi...@fedoraproject.org said: i don't think it is a security risk. Or rather - if it is then the rpmdb should not be readable by non-root users. If knowing installed versions are a security risk, then so is uname -r and almost any command that takes -v to display

Re: Ubuntu shows updates / security updates on shell logins

2009-11-04 Thread Seth Vidal
On Wed, 4 Nov 2009, Chris Adams wrote: Once upon a time, Seth Vidal skvi...@fedoraproject.org said: i don't think it is a security risk. Or rather - if it is then the rpmdb should not be readable by non-root users. If knowing installed versions are a security risk, then so is uname -r and

Re: Boot from CD, safe changes to USB-Stick

2009-11-04 Thread Michael Cronenworth
Duane Smith on 11/04/2009 02:13 PM wrote: You don't wanna change something on the harddisks, but wanna safe the changes. So you boot from Live-CD and the changes are redirected to the USB-Stick. Puppy Linux does it that way*. I wanna see it in Fedora. :D Already possible I believe. I think

Re: Boot from CD, safe changes to USB-Stick

2009-11-04 Thread Ikem Krueger
Already possible I believe. I think there's a persistent overlay kernel command argument that you can point to use a file on your USB drive if you're booting from CD. I may be wrong on this though. I research for that.. It's easier just to boot from USB though. Faster all the way around.

Re: rawhide report: 20091104 changes - excluding noarch packages

2009-11-04 Thread Jesse Keating
On Wed, 2009-11-04 at 11:53 -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote: If that gets tagged, it will get excluded from the ppc64 repo? Yes -- Jesse Keating RHCE (http://jkeating.livejournal.com) Fedora Project (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JesseKeating) GPG Public Key

Re: rawhide report: 20091104 changes - excluding noarch packages

2009-11-04 Thread Jesse Keating
On Wed, 2009-11-04 at 12:00 -0700, Jerry James wrote: Those aren't the same. Since the addition of a new arch can break #2, how can packagers mean anything other than #1 by noarch? They can't, but it was a historical assumption that if you indicate #1, you're implicitly indicating #2. This

Re: help debugging segfault with alienarena 7.32

2009-11-04 Thread Tom spot Callaway
On 11/03/2009 03:23 PM, Tom spot Callaway wrote: On 11/03/2009 02:16 PM, Jerry James wrote: My guess (and it is just a guess) is that this is triggering multiple initializations of portaudio. Try this patch: Well, it turned out to be a lot more complicated than that. Alienarena uses

Re: CVS daily checkout seeds

2009-11-04 Thread Till Maas
On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 02:51:27PM +, Quentin Armitage wrote: The CVS daily checkout seeds at http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/webfiles/ don't contain a checkout for F-12. Would it be possible for someone to add that? I have also noted that a checkout seed for F-9 is still included, which

Re: Boot from CD, safe changes to USB-Stick

2009-11-04 Thread Joshua C.
2009/11/4 Ikem Krueger ikem.krue...@googlemail.com: Already possible I believe. I think there's a persistent overlay kernel command argument that you can point to use a file on your USB drive if you're booting from CD. I may be wrong on this though. I research for that.. It's easier just

Re: Boot from CD, safe changes to USB-Stick

2009-11-04 Thread Joshua C.
2009/11/4 Ikem Krueger ikem.krue...@googlemail.com: Already possible I believe. I think there's a persistent overlay kernel command argument that you can point to use a file on your USB drive if you're booting from CD. I may be wrong on this though. I research for that.. It's easier just

Re: help debugging segfault with alienarena 7.32

2009-11-04 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 16:12:40 -0500, Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com wrote: On 11/03/2009 03:23 PM, Tom spot Callaway wrote: Well, it turned out to be a lot more complicated than that. Alienarena uses OpenAL-soft, which dlopens portaudio if it is present. Portaudio is Are you able

Addition to the Policy for non responsive maintainers

2009-11-04 Thread Kevin Fenzi
Greetings. FESCo has made an additional 'fast track' process for non responsive maintainers available for some rare cases. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers#Fast_Track_procedure for more details. See https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/251 for

Outage Notification - 2009-11-05 13:00 UTC

2009-11-04 Thread Mike McGrath
There will be an outage starting at 2009-11-05 13:00 UTC, which will last approximately 1 hour. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2009-11-05 13:00 UTC' Affected Services: Buildsystem DNS Torrent Translation

Re: help debugging segfault with alienarena 7.32

2009-11-04 Thread Tom spot Callaway
On 11/04/2009 05:26 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 16:12:40 -0500, Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com wrote: On 11/03/2009 03:23 PM, Tom spot Callaway wrote: Well, it turned out to be a lot more complicated than that. Alienarena uses OpenAL-soft, which dlopens

Re: Boot from CD, safe changes to USB-Stick

2009-11-04 Thread Ikem Krueger
Already possible I believe. I think there's a persistent overlay kernel command argument that you can point to use a file on your USB drive if you're booting from CD. I may be wrong on this though. I research for that.. I looked for kernel command. The only sources I found where this* and

Re: Boot from CD, safe changes to USB-Stick

2009-11-04 Thread Ikem Krueger
Look here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_and_use_Live_USB and scroll down to data persistence The primary usage of this feature is booting a USB stick with your live image as well as the persistent changes. Sorry. But that's not what I meant. -- fedora-devel-list mailing

Re: Pyhton image

2009-11-04 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
JM == Jonathan MERCIER bioinfornat...@gmail.com writes: JM Dear sir, I have open a bug: JM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532248 JM But i have any answer! What can i do? Somehow acquire patience? Work on debugging the problem yourself? You haven't given much time at all for the

source file audit - 2009-11-01

2009-11-04 Thread Kevin Fenzi
Here's attached another run of my sources/patches url checker. - There are 932 lines in this run. Down from 1060 last run. 700 sourcecheck-20070826.txt 620 sourcecheck-20070917.txt 561 sourcecheck-20071017.txt 775 sourcecheck-20080206.txt 685 sourcecheck-20080214.txt 674

Re: source file audit - 2009-11-01

2009-11-04 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 11/05/2009 05:48 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: sundaram:BADSOURCE:cryptopp560.zip:cryptopp Upstream source modified to remove patent encumbered portions. Rahul -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

Re: Web page for distro life cycle stage

2009-11-04 Thread John Poelstra
Shakthi Kannan said the following on 11/03/2009 08:51 AM Pacific Time: Hi, Is there a web-page or is it possible to have one that shows the Fedora distro release and its stage in the release cycle? Would this page help? If so, setting a page watch might be helpful.

Upcoming schedule tasks

2009-11-04 Thread John Poelstra
Start End Name Wed 04-Nov Wed 04-Nov Compose RC Wed 04-Nov Wed 04-Nov Enable Fedora 12 Updates Wed 04-Nov Wed 11-Nov Test RC Fri 06-Nov Fri 06-Nov Blocker Bug Day (F12Blocker) #3 Mon 09-Nov Mon 09-Nov F12 Blocker Review (go/no go) 1 PM EST Wed 11-Nov Wed 11-Nov F12

Re: help debugging segfault with alienarena 7.32

2009-11-04 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 18:12:42 -0500, Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com wrote: Looks like alienarena defaults to ALSA. When I tell it to tell OpenAL-soft to use PulseAudio Software, it doesn't actually make any sound at all, even though PulseAudio sees the application trying to do so.

Re: source file audit - 2009-11-01

2009-11-04 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 17:18:16 -0700, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: Here's attached another run of my sources/patches url checker. bruno:BADURL:glest_data_3.2.1.zip:glest-data I took over glest recently and hadn't had to worry about where the sources had come from yet. The next time

[Bug 530880] Review Request: ns-tiza-fonts - A Slab-Serif Font

2009-11-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530880 TK009 john.brown...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 530880] Review Request: ns-tiza-fonts - A Slab-Serif Font

2009-11-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530880 Paul Flo Williams p...@frixxon.co.uk changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 530880] Review Request: ns-tiza-fonts - A Slab-Serif Font

2009-11-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530880 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-11-04 04:13:00 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) 1. I

[Bug 225617] Merge Review: bitmap-fonts

2009-11-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617 --- Comment #30 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-11-04 04:16:57 EDT --- I didn't find anything else

[Bug 530880] Review Request: ns-tiza-fonts - A Slab-Serif Font

2009-11-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530880 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-11-04 04:20:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) (In

[Bug 532237] gedit defaults to bitmap fonts with kanji

2009-11-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532237 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-11-04 04:28:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) Hmm,

[Bug 501847] [ml_IN][GSUB] U+0D21 U+0D4D U+0D30 U+0D48 U+0D35 U+0D4D delete key can't delete the whole char

2009-11-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501847 Ani Peter ape...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 501849] [ml_IN][GSUB] U+0D21 U+0D4D U+0D30 U+0D48 U+0D35 U+0D4D move to the right of the font need pressing right arrow key many times

2009-11-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501849 Ani Peter ape...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 501852] [ml_IN] need extra backspace press to delete this string of characters

2009-11-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501852 Ani Peter ape...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 530857] Review Request: drehatlas-xaporho-fonts - latin typeface inspired by a hobby rock band logo

2009-11-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530857 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-11-04 07:01:04 EDT ---

[Bug 477436] [padauk-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-11-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477436 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-11-04 07:09:47 EDT ---

[Bug 477436] [padauk-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-11-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477436 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 514911] Review Request: sil-padauk-fonts - Padauk font for Burmese and the Myanmar script

2009-11-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514911 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added

  1   2   3   >