-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm proud to announce the release of Fedora 12, the latest innovative
Linux distribution from the Fedora Project, a global, collaborative
partnership of free software community members sponsored by Red Hat.
If you can't wait to get the distribution,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The RPM Fusion team is proud to announce the public availability of our
''free'' and ''nonfree'' package repositories for Fedora 12 (Constantine). The
repositories contain multimedia applications, kernel drivers, games and other
software the Fedora
Hello there,
On behalf of Fedora Electronic Lab team, I have the pleasure to
announce the fifth consecutive release of the Fedora Electronic Lab 12
Livedvd.
This Livedvd is available for download at
http://spins.fedoraproject.org/fel#downloads
This release highlights Fedora's commitment in
hello, fedora-buildsys-list:
when I requset a build task for pakcage anaconda to koji,
one errie error come out.
It detailed as follow:
pg.DatabaseError: error ' ERROR: new row for relation task violates
check constraint task_weight_check '
in ' UPDATE task SET weight=-0.9838856091396
On 11/17/2009 09:08 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
Henrique Junior wrote on 16.11.2009 23:57:
I have a question that may sound a little stupid, but that came as I
write a short article about some Fedora's curiosities.
Why are our packages still using the tag f*c*X, f*c*Y, f*c*W since
Fedora does
On Tuesday 17 November 2009 02:27:08 Matthew Saltzman wrote:
Latest F11 texlive-2009 update complains about dependencies of the new
packages (which have .fc12 version suffixes!) on
libpoppler.so.5()(64bit).
The same complain happens on F12 (on a x86_64 no less). :-)
--
José Abílio
--
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 09:27:08PM -0500, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
Latest F11 texlive-2009 update complains about dependencies of the new
packages (which have .fc12 version suffixes!) on
libpoppler.so.5()(64bit).
It is now fixed.
Jindrich
--
Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 08:47:16AM +, José Matos wrote:
On Tuesday 17 November 2009 02:27:08 Matthew Saltzman wrote:
Latest F11 texlive-2009 update complains about dependencies of the new
packages (which have .fc12 version suffixes!) on
libpoppler.so.5()(64bit).
The same complain
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 07:37:54PM -0500, Neal Becker wrote:
-- Processing Dependency: texlive-Asana-Math = 2009 for package: texlive-
collection-fontsextra-2009-2.13989.fc12.noarch
--- Package texlive-asana-math-fedora-fonts.noarch
0:2009-2.0.926.15878.fc12 set to be updated
-- Finished
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 07:23:10PM -0500, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
From today's F11 texlive-2009 update:
Setting up Update Process
Resolving Dependencies
-- Running transaction check
-- Processing Dependency: libkpathsea.so.4()(64bit) for
I just went to rawhide over the last day and am not able to boot into
kernel 2.6.32-0.48.rc7.git1.fc13 unless selinux is disabled. (permissive
isn't good enough). I can boot into my old kernel 2.6.31.5-127.fc12 which
had a dracut generated image from before the upgrade. The error occurs
when udev
2009/11/16 Rahul Sundaram sunda...@fedoraproject.org
On 11/17/2009 04:27 AM, Henrique Junior wrote:
Hello, *
I have a question that may sound a little stupid, but that came as I
write a short article about some Fedora's curiosities.
Why are our packages still using the tag f*c*X,
Maybe it should be reported in bugzilla:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/
This might be useful too:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Bugs
2009. 11. 16, hétfő keltezéssel 11.12-kor Tamas Hoppar ezt írta:
Hi everybody,
I get a dbus error after blanking a dvd+rw and start to write an ISO,
using
Hello,
I can't find po2sgml installed in the latest translate-toolkit package.
Has it been removed ? Is there any other package that provides it ?
Regards,
Amit.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 19:55 -0500, Chris Ball wrote:
Hi,
I've written up a draft of an F13 filesystem rollback feature using
Btrfs snapshots that are automatically created by yum:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SystemRollbackWithBtrfs
It'd be great to get feedback on whether
Hi,
I just wanted to report an evolution crash report with abrt. All I get
(besides a stacktrace) is libcurl failed HTTP Post.
Since I suspect that libcurl generally can handle HTTP posts, I wonder
if this is some general bug in abrt?
Did anybody submit bugs successfully using this tool?
Am Dienstag, den 17.11.2009, 11:33 +0100 schrieb Christoph Höger:
Since I suspect that libcurl generally can handle HTTP posts, I wonder
if this is some general bug in abrt?
It's a problem with libcurl's resolver.
Did anybody submit bugs successfully using this tool?
Yes I did. However I had
Lots of errors like these:
Error: Missing Dependency: libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.11)(64bit) is needed by package
texlive-luatex-bin-2009-2.15878.fc12.x86_64 (texlive)
Error: Missing Dependency: libpoppler.so.5()(64bit) is needed by package
texlive-jadetex-bin-2009-2.15878.fc12.x86_64 (texlive)
--
On 11/17/2009 04:12 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
I just went to rawhide over the last day and am not able to boot into
kernel 2.6.32-0.48.rc7.git1.fc13 unless selinux is disabled. (permissive
isn't good enough). I can boot into my old kernel 2.6.31.5-127.fc12 which
had a dracut generated image
Jindrich Novy wrote:
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 07:37:54PM -0500, Neal Becker wrote:
-- Processing Dependency: texlive-Asana-Math = 2009 for package:
texlive- collection-fontsextra-2009-2.13989.fc12.noarch
--- Package texlive-asana-math-fedora-fonts.noarch
0:2009-2.0.926.15878.fc12 set to be
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 2:48 AM, Jeff Garzik jgar...@pobox.com wrote:
On 11/17/2009 02:43 AM, nodata wrote:
Am 2009-11-17 01:55, schrieb Chris Ball:
Hi,
I've written up a draft of an F13 filesystem rollback feature using
Btrfs snapshots that are automatically created by yum:
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 7:22 PM, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
Many of you received emails over the weekend and this morning regarding
broken deps in rawhide. If these emails mentioned that the deps were
broken on ppc or ppc64 they can be ignored. We are no longer producing
On 11/16/2009 08:22 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
Many of you received emails over the weekend and this morning regarding
broken deps in rawhide. If these emails mentioned that the deps were
broken on ppc or ppc64 they can be ignored. We are no longer producing
ppc/ppc64 as a primary arch, however
On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 08:10 -0500, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 2:48 AM, Jeff Garzik jgar...@pobox.com wrote:
As the URL notes under Detailed Description, that is not handled at all.
It wraps all file I/O, yum or not, into the snapshot.
Yeah but you can't roll back userland
On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 11:22 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
Many of you received emails over the weekend and this morning regarding
broken deps in rawhide. If these emails mentioned that the deps were
broken on ppc or ppc64 they can be ignored. We are no longer producing
ppc/ppc64 as a primary
Hi all,
It'd be great to get feedback on whether this is the right idea,
and how exactly the UI interaction should work, before submitting
this formally.
Some off-list feedback so far:
* People want independent active snapshots per filesystem (i.e. btrfs
/home is the live
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 08:09:38AM -0500, Neal Becker wrote:
Jindrich Novy wrote:
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 07:37:54PM -0500, Neal Becker wrote:
-- Processing Dependency: texlive-Asana-Math = 2009 for package:
texlive- collection-fontsextra-2009-2.13989.fc12.noarch
--- Package
On Tue, 17 Nov 2009, James Antill wrote:
On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 08:10 -0500, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 2:48 AM, Jeff Garzik jgar...@pobox.com wrote:
As the URL notes under Detailed Description, that is not handled at all.
It wraps all file I/O, yum or not, into the
Hi,
This implies that all you have is a hammer but you can already run
yum history undo.
which works up to a point. If the older pkgs you had prior to an
update are not available anywhere history undo isn't going to be able
to 'undo' but so much.
And of course, it's not
On 11/17/2009 02:48 AM, Jeff Garzik wrote:
On 11/17/2009 02:43 AM, nodata wrote:
Am 2009-11-17 01:55, schrieb Chris Ball:
Hi,
I've written up a draft of an F13 filesystem rollback feature using
Btrfs snapshots that are automatically created by yum:
Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com writes:
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 06:53:25AM -0500, Neal Becker wrote:
Lots of errors like these:
Error: Missing Dependency: libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.11)(64bit) is needed by package
texlive-luatex-bin-2009-2.15878.fc12.x86_64 (texlive)
Error: Missing Dependency:
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 10:36 AM, David Zeuthen da...@fubar.dk wrote:
(I'm not subscribed to fedora-devel-list so if you expect an answer
please Cc me)
On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 09:52 -0500, Chris Ball wrote:
* Ray says not to invent a new system-config-blah, and instead to talk
with davidz
Peter Jones pjo...@redhat.com writes:
Do they support rollbacks after commit? If they don't, they're not
really as useful for this as they could be.
Rollback *after* commit? This must be some other usage of the term
commit than is standard to database people.
regards,
Contrary to what the man page says, wodim doesn't automatically format
DVD+RWs, so you have to fully format the disc in advance before using
wodim to write it.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519465
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
fedora-devel-list mailing
On 11/12/2009 12:06 AM, Ding Yi Chen wrote:
Hi,
I've tried to build e-17 by hand.
When I try to build from eina from e-17,
however, I found that the package name, eina, is already been taken by eina,
the media player.
How should I do with them?
Off the top of my head, I'd suggest
On 11/12/2009 01:39 PM, Adrian Reber wrote:
There is ubuntu bug report against id3lib libid3 crashes (stack
smashing) when reading VBR MP3 file[1]. I am able to reproduce this on
ubuntu but not on Fedora and I do not understand why. The patch[2] looks
like it is doing the right thing but there
On 11/14/2009 05:59 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
Hi folks,
After getting okays from a few folks I decided to fix the long
standing libsndfile bugs.
One of these was a request [1] to split the utilities that come with
libsndfile into a utils subpackage. I did this only for F-13.
Since
On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 11:48 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Peter Jones pjo...@redhat.com writes:
Do they support rollbacks after commit? If they don't, they're not
really as useful for this as they could be.
Rollback *after* commit? This must be some other usage of the term
commit than is
tis 2009-11-17 klockan 02:48 -0500 skrev Jeff Garzik:
A bloody awful solution, especially when you consider that btrfs'
maintainer Chris Mason is adding support for real userland transactions
(via some additional ioctls).
Yes.
But the draft proposal is presented as tools for experienced
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 05:37:32PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com writes:
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 06:53:25AM -0500, Neal Becker wrote:
Lots of errors like these:
Error: Missing Dependency: libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.11)(64bit) is needed by
package
On 11/17/2009 11:48 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Peter Jones pjo...@redhat.com writes:
Do they support rollbacks after commit? If they don't, they're not
really as useful for this as they could be.
Rollback *after* commit? This must be some other usage of the term
commit than is standard to
Jindrich Novy wrote:
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 06:53:25AM -0500, Neal Becker wrote:
Lots of errors like these:
Error: Missing Dependency: libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.11)(64bit) is needed by
package texlive-luatex-bin-2009-2.15878.fc12.x86_64 (texlive)
Error: Missing Dependency:
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 1:33 PM, James Antill ja...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 11:48 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Peter Jones pjo...@redhat.com writes:
Do they support rollbacks after commit? If they don't, they're not
really as useful for this as they could be.
Rollback
On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 14:05 -0500, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 1:33 PM, James Antill ja...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 11:48 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Peter Jones pjo...@redhat.com writes:
Do they support rollbacks after commit? If they don't, they're not
On 11/17/2009 11:48 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Peter Jones pjo...@redhat.com writes:
Do they support rollbacks after commit? If they don't, they're not
really as useful for this as they could be.
Rollback *after* commit? This must be some other usage of the term
commit than is standard to
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Peter Jones pjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On 11/17/2009 11:48 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Peter Jones pjo...@redhat.com writes:
Do they support rollbacks after commit? If they don't, they're not
really as useful for this as they could be.
Rollback *after* commit? This
On 11/17/2009 02:15 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Peter Jones pjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On 11/17/2009 11:48 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Peter Jones pjo...@redhat.com writes:
Do they support rollbacks after commit? If they don't, they're not
really as useful for this as they
On 11/17/2009 12:05 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
Sure, this isn't a perfect solution, it's just a nice to have feature
if you care for it. It's nice to take a complete snapshot of your
system right before you update just in case something goes horribly
wrong and you lose say configuration files or
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Orcan Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
After getting okays from a few folks I decided to fix the long
standing libsndfile bugs.
One of these was a request [1] to split the utilities that come with
libsndfile into a utils subpackage. I did this
On 17.11.2009 07:54, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote on 11.11.2009 22:30:
As you may have heard already, several seats of the Fedora Board,
FESCo, and FAMSCO are up for election soon(¹). Right now we are in
the nomination period, which will be followed by a Candidate
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
Hi folks,
After getting okays from a few folks I decided to fix the long
standing libsndfile bugs.
One of these was a request [1] to split the utilities that come with
libsndfile
On 11/17/2009 02:07 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
It also works well for people who have things like homedir backup going
nightly, but not full system backup. Restore to the way it was before
the last yum update, recover important things from backup. It's an oh
shit handle that has saved my
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 8:15 PM, Orcan Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
Hi folks,
After getting okays from a few folks I decided to fix the long
standing libsndfile bugs.
One of
Hi Everyone,
Sorry for the cross-list posting, but the matter is of interest to both
lists afaict, as I have seen messages related to maven on both.
As some of you might know, we intend to put maven 2.2.1 in rawhide. The
new maven will be a completely re-written rpm, one that should be a lot
Hi,
I'm not sure how much of this can/should be automated.
Sorry, not quite following -- what is the caution around automatically
creating a new snapshot before each yum transaction? Why shouldn't it
be automated?
This also keeps us out of the dangerous territory that comes with
On 11/17/2009 03:56 PM, Chris Ball wrote:
Hi,
I'm not sure how much of this can/should be automated.
Sorry, not quite following -- what is the caution around automatically
creating a new snapshot before each yum transaction? Why shouldn't it
be automated?
I somewhat read the
On 2009/11/16 10:56 AM, Peter Jones wrote:
On 11/11/2009 01:30 AM, Stewart Adam wrote:
On 2009/11/10 5:41 PM, Peter Jones wrote:
On 11/10/2009 05:37 PM, Caryl Bigenho wrote:
Hi,
My MacBook is a 4,1. Will it work on my machine?
A 64-bit EFI image should work on a MacBook4,1 . A 32-bit EFI
Hi,
We've now created a useless and slightly dangerous object
though. Regardless of the competence of the user who's problem
that is, better to avoid it if we can.
Okay. Perhaps the automated snapshot creation algorithm should be
amended to something like:
check /proc/mounts for at
Hi,
I somewhat read the initial suggestion as trying to implement
transactional behavior via snapshot. Just creating one shouldn't
hurt.
Ah. Yeah, not at all.
I fail to understand how a snapshot would differentiate between
yum related changes and other changes that occur by
Am 2009-11-17 19:33, schrieb Alexander Boström:
tis 2009-11-17 klockan 02:48 -0500 skrev Jeff Garzik:
A bloody awful solution, especially when you consider that btrfs'
maintainer Chris Mason is adding support for real userland transactions
(via some additional ioctls).
Yes.
But the draft
On 11/17/2009 04:17 PM, Stewart Adam wrote:
On 2009/11/16 10:56 AM, Peter Jones wrote:
On 11/11/2009 01:30 AM, Stewart Adam wrote:
On 2009/11/10 5:41 PM, Peter Jones wrote:
On 11/10/2009 05:37 PM, Caryl Bigenho wrote:
Hi,
My MacBook is a 4,1. Will it work on my machine?
A 64-bit EFI
Contrary to what the man page says, wodim doesn't automatically format
DVD+RWs, so you have to fully format the disc in advance before using
wodim to write it.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519465
Thanks. :)
As I know that's not the only thing that's not fixed in Wodim and
On Tuesday 17 November 2009 06:50:58 am Jesse Keating wrote:
On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 11:22 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
Many of you received emails over the weekend and this morning regarding
broken deps in rawhide. If these emails mentioned that the deps were
broken on ppc or ppc64 they can
On Nov 17, 2009, at 14:47, Conrad Meyer ceme...@u.washington.edu
wrote:
On Tuesday 17 November 2009 06:50:58 am Jesse Keating wrote:
On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 11:22 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
Many of you received emails over the weekend and this morning
regarding
broken deps in rawhide.
On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 22:44 +, Ikem Krueger wrote:
Some news? Planned for Fedora 13?
The X level support is already in F12 - see
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/XI2 . Application level support
will come later
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk:
Am 2009-11-18 00:19, schrieb Adam Williamson:
On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 22:44 +, Ikem Krueger wrote:
Some news? Planned for Fedora 13?
The X level support is already in F12 - see
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/XI2 . Application level support
will come later
Is multi-touch the same
On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 16:10 -0700, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
Hello,
I just posted my first review request a few days ago. I think someone
has been trying to help me through that process. Up to now I've felt
like I've been following instructions. Could someone please review the
On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 21:45 -0200, Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote:
Can you post this info in the bug report ?
I was just about to at your request (I think one of the two places is
enough ;-) but noticed that Nathan was faster in applying relevant
changes. Note that I haven't done a throughout check,
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 12:36:02 -0600,
Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
We currently have a 3d chess game packaged as chess. I want to ask for
fedora hosted space for it sop that we can be upstream for some modernization
(with regard to ogre and gcc) changes. However it strikes me that
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 04:10:48PM -0700, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
Hello,
I just posted my first review request a few days ago. I think someone
has been trying to help me through that process. Up to now I've felt
like I've been following instructions. Could someone please review the
Hi,
Multitouch means, several mousepointers and you can move them all
seperately.
No, that's what multi-pointer means. Multi-Pointer X is already in
F12.
Gesture support is, you make a certain sign with a mousepointer,
and a certain action is triggered.
Would be cool
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 10:58:24AM -0500, Peter Jones wrote:
Really, temporarily removing this is more desirable than merely passing
maintainership of kudzu around. Kudzu needs to actually go away.
Yay!
--
Matthew Miller mat...@mattdm.org
Senior Systems Architect
Cyberinfrastructure Labs /
Hi David, thanks for the reply.
Yep, we're planning to add support to DeviceKit-disks for
exposing the (privileged) operations that btrfs may expose
(locked down by polkit, etc etc). There are also plans to expose
these operations in the UI in Palimpsest and/or Nautilus. I don't
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 17:11 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
Actually not if done in conjunction with a release bump, such as we do
with a mass rebuild.
Only if we make a promise to never use the same base n-v-r across the
releases
2009/11/17, Itamar Reis Peixoto ita...@ispbrasil.com.br:
because renaming it will cause problems, for example.
foo-1.0.fc10
foo-1.0.fc11
foo-1.0.fc11 foo-1.0.fc10
foo-1.0.fc10
foo-1.0.f11
foo-1.0.f11 foo-1.0.fc10
rpmdev-vercmp foo-1.0.f11 foo-1.0.fc10
0:foo-1.0.fc10 is newer
On Nov 17, 2009, at 21:21, Josephine Tannhäuser josephine.tannhau...@googlemail.co
m wrote:
2009/11/17, Itamar Reis Peixoto ita...@ispbrasil.com.br:
because renaming it will cause problems, for example.
foo-1.0.fc10
foo-1.0.fc11
foo-1.0.fc11 foo-1.0.fc10
foo-1.0.fc10
foo-1.0.f11
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 12:08:15AM -0500, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 17:11 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
Actually not if done in conjunction with a release bump, such as we do
with a mass rebuild.
Only if we
I noticed that http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora appears to be
strongly promoting i386 Fedora over x86_64. Is this intentional or an
oversight?
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
On 11/18/2009 01:32 AM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
I noticed that http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora appears to be
strongly promoting i386 Fedora over x86_64. Is this intentional or an
oversight?
I agree, that was my first impression as well.
However, if you just want a single download now
I think this is a script which reads your currently used architecture
and provide a dl link. please insert a x86_64 livecd and try it again!
2009/11/18, Gregory Maxwell gmaxw...@gmail.com:
I noticed that http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora appears to be
strongly promoting i386 Fedora over
On Tuesday 17 November 2009 10:55:22 pm Josephine Tannhäuser wrote:
I think this is a script which reads your currently used architecture
and provide a dl link. please insert a x86_64 livecd and try it again!
That doesn't appear to be true. I double checked that the user agent string
Firefox
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105084
User tl changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
oflb-prociono-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree:
On ppc:
oflb-prociono-fonts-20090715-2.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh
oflb-prociono-fonts-20090715-2.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh
On ppc64:
oflb-prociono-fonts-20090715-2.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh
serafettin-cartoon-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree:
On ppc:
serafettin-cartoon-fonts-0.5.1-3.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh
serafettin-cartoon-fonts-0.5.1-3.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh
On ppc64:
serafettin-cartoon-fonts-0.5.1-3.fc12.noarch requires
lcdf-typetools has broken dependencies in the development tree:
On ppc:
lcdf-typetools-2.79-2.fc12.ppc requires libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.1)
lcdf-typetools-2.79-2.fc12.ppc requires libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)
lcdf-typetools-2.79-2.fc12.ppc requires libc.so.6
gdouros-aegean-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree:
On ppc:
gdouros-aegean-fonts-3.01-2.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh
gdouros-aegean-fonts-3.01-2.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh
On ppc64:
gdouros-aegean-fonts-3.01-2.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh
cjkuni-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree:
On ppc:
cjkuni-fonts-ghostscript-0.2.20080216.1-31.fc13.noarch requires
ghostscript = 0:8.63-4
On ppc64:
cjkuni-fonts-ghostscript-0.2.20080216.1-31.fc13.noarch requires
ghostscript = 0:8.63-4
Please resolve this as
apanov-heuristica-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree:
On ppc:
1:apanov-heuristica-fonts-0.2-4.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh
1:apanov-heuristica-fonts-0.2-4.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh
On ppc64:
1:apanov-heuristica-fonts-0.2-4.fc13.noarch requires
fonts-ISO8859-2 has broken dependencies in the development tree:
On ppc:
fonts-ISO8859-2-75dpi-1.0-22.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh
fonts-ISO8859-2-75dpi-1.0-22.fc12.noarch requires mkfontdir
On ppc64:
fonts-ISO8859-2-75dpi-1.0-22.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh
vollkorn-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree:
On ppc:
vollkorn-fonts-1.008-4.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh
vollkorn-fonts-1.008-4.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh
On ppc64:
vollkorn-fonts-1.008-4.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh
ns-tiza-chalk-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree:
On ppc:
ns-tiza-chalk-fonts-20080210-2.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh
ns-tiza-chalk-fonts-20080210-2.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh
On ppc64:
ns-tiza-chalk-fonts-20080210-2.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh
lohit-gujarati-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree:
On ppc:
lohit-gujarati-fonts-2.4.4-1.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh
lohit-gujarati-fonts-2.4.4-1.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh
On ppc64:
lohit-gujarati-fonts-2.4.4-1.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh
bpg-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree:
On ppc:
bpg-nino-medium-fonts-4.005-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh
bpg-nino-medium-fonts-4.005-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh
On ppc64:
bpg-nino-medium-fonts-4.005-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh
lohit-kannada-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree:
On ppc:
lohit-kannada-fonts-2.4.4-2.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh
lohit-kannada-fonts-2.4.4-2.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh
On ppc64:
lohit-kannada-fonts-2.4.4-2.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh
sj-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree:
On ppc:
sj-delphine-fonts-2.0.2-5.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh
sj-delphine-fonts-2.0.2-5.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh
On ppc64:
sj-delphine-fonts-2.0.2-5.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh
smc-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree:
On ppc:
smc-meera-fonts-04.2-2.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh
smc-meera-fonts-04.2-2.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh
On ppc64:
smc-meera-fonts-04.2-2.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh
sazanami-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree:
On ppc:
sazanami-mincho-fonts-0.20040629-9.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh
sazanami-mincho-fonts-0.20040629-9.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh
On ppc64:
sazanami-mincho-fonts-0.20040629-9.fc13.noarch requires
lohit-bengali-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree:
On ppc:
lohit-bengali-fonts-2.4.3-3.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh
lohit-bengali-fonts-2.4.3-3.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh
On ppc64:
lohit-bengali-fonts-2.4.3-3.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh
lohit-maithili-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree:
On ppc:
lohit-maithili-fonts-2.4.3-2.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh
lohit-maithili-fonts-2.4.3-2.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh
On ppc64:
lohit-maithili-fonts-2.4.3-2.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh
silkscreen-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree:
On ppc:
silkscreen-expanded-fonts-1.0-4.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh
silkscreen-expanded-fonts-1.0-4.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh
On ppc64:
silkscreen-expanded-fonts-1.0-4.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh
1 - 100 of 1419 matches
Mail list logo
