On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 01:09:14PM -0500, Mike McLean wrote:
Perhaps since RHEL5 is something of an important platform for mock we
should consider making this codepath conditional, or otherwise fix this
without forking.
Hello Mike,
thanks for getting the new release of mock out, also for
I wonder how the priority on tag-inheritance works. whether the priority
number which is large has priority, or not?
In other words, the larger the priority number is ,the priorer . is it like
this?
--
Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list
Fedora-buildsys-list@redhat.com
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 1:35 AM, Jonathan Dieter jdie...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, 2009-11-22 at 00:52 -0500, Bill McGonigle wrote:
On 11/21/2009 03:52 AM, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
FWIW, there is a syslinux module named ifcpu64 that will load different
kernels/initrds based on whether the
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 10:51 AM, drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Sir Gallantmon ngomp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 1:35 AM, Jonathan Dieter jdie...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, 2009-11-22 at 00:52 -0500, Bill McGonigle wrote:
On 11/21/2009 03:52
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:05:12 -0600
Matt Domsch matt_dom...@dell.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 09:20:54PM +0100, Robert Scheck wrote:
Hello Matt,
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009, Matt Domsch wrote:
mksh-39-1.fc12 (build/make) robert
I tried to reproduce your build failure from your mass
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 09:39:49 +0100
Gianluca Sforna gia...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 10:05 PM, Matt Domsch matt_dom...@dell.com
wrote:
it's not SELinux (that is Disabled on my builders). I believe it
is: Bug 510183 - mock mounts /dev/pts in chroot with wrong options
Compose started at Sun Nov 22 08:15:10 UTC 2009
New package microba
Set of JFC (Swing) components
Updated Packages:
Coin2-2.5.0-8.fc13
--
* Sun Nov 22 2009 Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org - 2.5.0-8
- Eliminate /usr/share/Coin.
- Rename mans into *coin2.
- Fix
On Sunday, 22 November 2009 at 01:34, Jon Stanley wrote:
[...]
Please let me know if you have any questions, comments, or room for
improvement!
It'll provide means for maintainers to verify their changes, and that's
always a good thing. Thanks!
Regards,
R.
--
Fedora
to, 2009-11-19 kello 14:30 -0800, Christopher Aillon kirjoitti:
Perhaps we should continue to provide -unstable, though. Things that
still need the unstable libs can continue Require -unstable which will
make it a heck of a lot easier to figure out what to rebuild...
+1. I'd like to see a
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 11:07 AM, Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org wrote:
Looks like it. Does a koji scratch build succeed?
Yes:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1822361
If so, should I just close the bug?
I'd wait until Matt's builders are fixed or you might just end up
Jon Stanley wrote:
The message will contain the name of the file, the package
concerned, the md5sum, and the user that uploaded it. An example is
below:
File upload.cgi for package sportrop-fonts has been uploaded to the
lookaside cache with md5sum 26489f9e92601f0f84cfbb278c2b98e1 by
Jon Stanley wrote:
The message will contain the
name of the file, the package
concerned, the md5sum, and the
user that uploaded it. An example is
below:
File upload.cgi for package sportrop-fonts has
been uploaded to the
lookaside cache with md5sum
26489f9e92601f0f84cfbb278c2b98e1 by
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 3:16 PM, Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net wrote:
Does anyone know why I'm getting tons of notifications concerning packages
for which I am not maintainer, co-maintainer?
No clue - are you on fedora-extras-commits maybe? You'd get them all
in that case.
--
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 7:21 PM, Martin Sourada
martin.sour...@gmail.com wrote:
So,
since I've already received 3 separate bug reports caused by BadIDChoice
X Error in subtitleeditor [1][2][3] (haven't had enough time to debug
and try to fix it yet though) by abrt, I wonder if there is any
2009/10/30 Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com:
I'm presenting a complete list of packages shipped in TeX Live to
discuss another possible obsoletions:
dvipdfm
dvipdfmx
I think the latest TeXLive doesn't include dvipdfm as its
functionality is now covered by dvipdfmx. Anyway, In both cases I am
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009, Matthew Garrett wrote:
worked without a password or login or anything. For the envisioned
'desktop' model is there a reason to have multiple users for the
default? Is there a reason to have anything but root?
Yes. There's a range of acts that root is able to perform
James Morris wrote:
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, Matthew Garrett wrote:
I don't think I'd agree with that. The common case for F10 and F11 will
be for people to have installed a package once with the root password
and then ticked the Remember authentication box. At that point, we
have the same
Mike McGrath wrote:
Epochs are nasty. Can anyone think of any other mechanism they could use
with rpm?
Ubuntu's really hack?
E.g. this version was used for Jaunty's K3b:
1.0.5+kde4svn935857+really1.0.5-3ubuntu5
Kevin Kofler
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
While working on Flash development in Windows XP TabletPC, I noticed the
right-click is done by pressing the stylus for few second and icon will
display the right-click mouse delay. I wonder if the new
xorg-x11-drv-wacom can do similar action for
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 03:25:27PM -0800, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
While working on Flash development in Windows XP TabletPC, I noticed the
right-click is done by pressing the stylus for few second and icon will
display the right-click mouse delay. I wonder if the new
xorg-x11-drv-wacom can
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 12:03 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 11:31:27 -0500, Tony wrote:
On 09-11-21 06:40:45, drago01 wrote:
...
You misunderstood me, I was not suggesting adding another epoch but
simply bump the %{epoch} for every release.
If this were really
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/22/2009 05:09 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 03:25:27PM -0800, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
I am not sure if the current linuxwacom can do similar action. If so,
how can it be done?
the principle would be similar to the
On Sat, 2009-11-21 at 08:16 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
it has the problem that we'd have to do something horrible one time to
switch to that system, of course, but that seems the 'cleanest' way to
do it. I'm still not sure it's necessary. I think as Jesse does - any
time this is broken
Author: nim
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/apanov-heuristica-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv7763/devel
Modified Files:
apanov-heuristica-fonts.spec import.log
Log Message:
remove evil duplicate ttf files
Index: apanov-heuristica-fonts.spec
File fontpackages-1.34.tar.xz for package fontpackages has been uploaded to the
lookaside cache with md5sum e2addbc31d1cfdba3f457b40a44faa95 by nim
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
Author: nim
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv29971/devel
Modified Files:
.cvsignore fontpackages.spec import.log sources
Log Message:
1.34
Index: .cvsignore
Dear packager,
At 20091122T202901Z, your “saab-fonts” package failed one or more of the tests
I was performing on the “fedora-devel” repository located at:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-f13-build-current/x86_64/
There are three different reasons that may cause this message:
1.
Dear packager,
At 20091122T202901Z, your “drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts” package failed
one or more of the tests
I was performing on the “fedora-devel” repository located at:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-f13-build-current/x86_64/
There are three different reasons that
Dear packager,
At 20091122T202901Z, your “drehatlas-xaporho-fonts” package failed one or more
of the tests
I was performing on the “fedora-devel” repository located at:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-f13-build-current/x86_64/
There are three different reasons that may cause
Dear packager,
At 20091122T202901Z, your “drehatlas-widelands-fonts” package failed one or
more of the tests
I was performing on the “fedora-devel” repository located at:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-f13-build-current/x86_64/
There are three different reasons that may cause
Dear packager,
At 20091122T202901Z, your “beteckna-fonts” package failed one or more of the
tests
I was performing on the “fedora-devel” repository located at:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-f13-build-current/x86_64/
There are three different reasons that may cause this
Dear packager,
At 20091122T202901Z, your “chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts” package failed one
or more of the tests
I was performing on the “fedora-devel” repository located at:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-f13-build-current/x86_64/
There are three different reasons that may
Dear packager,
At 20091122T202901Z, your “cf-bonveno-fonts” package failed one or more of the
tests
I was performing on the “fedora-devel” repository located at:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-f13-build-current/x86_64/
There are three different reasons that may cause this
Dear packager,
At 20091122T202901Z, your “gargi-fonts” package failed one or more of the tests
I was performing on the “fedora-devel” repository located at:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-f13-build-current/x86_64/
There are three different reasons that may cause this message:
1.
Dear packager,
At 20091122T202901Z, your “conakry-fonts” package failed one or more of the
tests
I was performing on the “fedora-devel” repository located at:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-f13-build-current/x86_64/
There are three different reasons that may cause this message:
Dear packager,
At 20091122T202901Z, your “oflb-notcouriersans-fonts” package failed one or
more of the tests
I was performing on the “fedora-devel” repository located at:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-f13-build-current/x86_64/
There are three different reasons that may cause
Dear packager,
At 20091122T202901Z, your “oflb-prociono-fonts” package failed one or more of
the tests
I was performing on the “fedora-devel” repository located at:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-f13-build-current/x86_64/
There are three different reasons that may cause this
Dear packager,
At 20091122T202901Z, your “oldstandard-sfd-fonts” package failed one or more of
the tests
I was performing on the “fedora-devel” repository located at:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-f13-build-current/x86_64/
There are three different reasons that may cause this
Dear packager,
At 20091122T202901Z, your “pango” package failed one or more of the tests
I was performing on the “fedora-devel” repository located at:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-f13-build-current/x86_64/
There are three different reasons that may cause this message:
1. your
Dear packager,
At 20091122T202901Z, your “abyssinica-fonts” package failed one or more of the
tests
I was performing on the “fedora-devel” repository located at:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-f13-build-current/x86_64/
There are three different reasons that may cause this
Dear packager,
At 20091122T202901Z, your “nafees-web-naskh-fonts” package failed one or more
of the tests
I was performing on the “fedora-devel” repository located at:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-f13-build-current/x86_64/
There are three different reasons that may cause this
Dear packager,
At 20091122T202901Z, your “baekmuk-bdf-fonts” package failed one or more of the
tests
I was performing on the “fedora-devel” repository located at:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-f13-build-current/x86_64/
There are three different reasons that may cause this
Dear packager,
At 20091122T202901Z, your “cjkuni-fonts” package failed one or more of the tests
I was performing on the “fedora-devel” repository located at:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-f13-build-current/x86_64/
There are three different reasons that may cause this message:
Dear packager,
At 20091122T202901Z, your “taipeifonts” package failed one or more of the tests
I was performing on the “fedora-devel” repository located at:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-f13-build-current/x86_64/
There are three different reasons that may cause this message:
1.
Dear packager,
At 20091122T202901Z, your “liberation-fonts” package failed one or more of the
tests
I was performing on the “fedora-devel” repository located at:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-f13-build-current/x86_64/
There are three different reasons that may cause this
Dear packager,
At 20091122T202901Z, your “fonts-hebrew-fancy” package failed one or more of
the tests
I was performing on the “fedora-devel” repository located at:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-f13-build-current/x86_64/
There are three different reasons that may cause this
Dear packager,
At 20091122T202901Z, your “wqy-unibit-fonts” package failed one or more of the
tests
I was performing on the “fedora-devel” repository located at:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-f13-build-current/x86_64/
There are three different reasons that may cause this
Dear packager,
At 20091122T202901Z, your “wqy-bitmap-fonts” package failed one or more of the
tests
I was performing on the “fedora-devel” repository located at:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-f13-build-current/x86_64/
There are three different reasons that may cause this
Dear packager,
At 20091122T202901Z, your “linux-libertine-fonts” package failed one or more of
the tests
I was performing on the “fedora-devel” repository located at:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-f13-build-current/x86_64/
There are three different reasons that may cause this
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526204
Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
In an effort to work on the cvs side of
https://fedorahosted.org/packagedb/ticket/165 I'd like to have an
offsite copy of cvs1:/cvs/pkgs to test on. Being that this is in
violation of our security policy
Hi John,
I had an up to date fedora 11 install that was working fine. I followed the
instructions on the wiki for doing a yum upgrade and everything seemed to go
very well until I rebooted and things hung as the graphical interface (I use
KDE) was to boot. I am able to boot into single user
*Google Chrome OS Download*
Filename: Google-Chrome-OS-Build-enming.teo-22Nov2009-0704hrs.vmdk
Filesize: 697.38MB
Type: VMware VMDK image file
MD5 Checksum: 1aec57157dd2083b166e493c0e831a
67
Download link: http://www.zshare.net/download/68819648ff817281/
--
Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bonjour,
Is there a tutorial to configure a sound card under fedora 10?
My sound card (Realtek ALC 882 integrated on Asus P5WD2 mobo) is working
but the sound is not clear: a lot of interferences (b, criccroc...),
so, in piano passages of
On Sat, 2009-11-21 at 21:18 -0700, Reg Clemens wrote:
I use XV for everyting, and it worked fine till I went to 64bit Fc11
Is there an rpm out there with a good 64bit xv in it?
Currently the 32bit version cant find a needed library, even tho
its in /usr/lib64
--
Hello @all,
after upgrading to Fedora 12 I get some problems with NetworkManager for
example Wireless Networks were disabled and you couldn't avtivate this.
Some entries in /var/log/messages shows me an assertion in
NetworkManager. I will post these line and I hope that somebody can help
me.
Dell Inspiron 531S:
Installed 64-bit, everything I've tested works perfectly.
Dell Latitude E6400:
Installed 64-bit, everything I've tested works perfectly.
Dell Inspiron 546:
+Airlink 101 wireless PCI card
Installed 64-bit, everything I've tested works perfectly.
(Side
On 11/19/2009 10:51 AM, Oliver Ruebenacker wrote:
I just preupgraded from F10 to F12, and booting goes as far as the
Fedora logo (circle with lower tip) filling up with white, then
flashing briefly. Then the screen goes and stays blank afterwards,
except for a cursor, and it displays if I
Hi,
I have a Huawei E220 mobile broadband dongle on 3UK. In Fedora 10 this
worked beautifully. However, having upgraded to F12, I get the
following in the log when I try to connect:
Nov 22 10:45:57 Sonozaki NetworkManager: info Activation (ttyUSB0)
starting connection '3 Internet'
Nov 22
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 05:20:29 -0500, Orcan wrote:
My tests, with a few mpc files that I have, gave positive results on
F-12 x86_64. No issues.
Thanks for the test. Basically, the worst that could have happened
is that the plugin failed to play anything on x86_64 _actually_ while it
simply
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:18:49 -0700, Reg wrote:
I use XV for everyting, and it worked fine till I went to 64bit Fc11
Is there an rpm out there with a good 64bit xv in it?
Currently the 32bit version cant find a needed library, even tho
its in /usr/lib64
The 32-bit build won't search in
Hi
I am wonder how far from the arrival of evolution 2.28.1 in F12. One
of main reasons to upgrade to F12, for me, is that F12 shipped with
evo 2.28. People from Unbuntu use evo-2.28 (in fact evo 2.28.1) and
evo-mapi to connect to exchange 2007. Unfortunately, current evo
2.28.0 can't connect
Hello,
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 5:38 AM, Gordon Messmer yiny...@eburg.com wrote:
On 11/19/2009 10:51 AM, Oliver Ruebenacker wrote:
I just preupgraded from F10 to F12, and booting goes as far as the
Fedora logo (circle with lower tip) filling up with white, then
flashing briefly. Then
Am Sonntag, den 22.11.2009, 23:10 +1100 schrieb L:
Hi
I am wonder how far from the arrival of evolution 2.28.1 in F12. One
of main reasons to upgrade to F12, for me, is that F12 shipped with
evo 2.28. People from Unbuntu use evo-2.28 (in fact evo 2.28.1) and
evo-mapi to connect to
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 20:15:01 -0800, Greg Maruszeczka wrote:
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 03:05:43 + (UTC) Amadeus W.M.
amadeu...@verizon.net wrote:
I have been happily using 64 bit flash player on a 64 bit F11 and
suddenly, after today's updates it simply disappeared. Firefox doesn't
think it
I just updated f11-f12. After, I followed instructions to convert root
partition from ext3-ext4. I used superrescuecd to do it, so filesystem was
not mounted.
Rebooted into f12 and everything seemed fine. I also was trying out nouveau
instead of nvidia, which was OK until I tried to play an
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009, Amadeus W.M. wrote:
... but that seems to point to a 32-bit flash version. Where can I
find an up- to-date download page for the 64-bit flash plugin?
http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/flashplayer10/64bit.html
rday
--
these days, what's the most up-to-date set of packages that supports
rendering docbook into as many formats as possible -- html, xhtml,
pdf, ps, dvi, txt, and so on.
specifically, i have no interest in packages related to SGML or
DSSSL or, if possible, jade. if one could guarantee that one
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:34:11 +0100, ELMORABITY Mohamed wrote:
Le samedi 21 novembre 2009 à 16:25 -0600, Chris a écrit :
So it seems. Agreed as to boost. I read somewhere that an app called
Clamz might be worth considering. Perhaps sometime soon I shall.
Clamz seems to be a good alternative,
Got everything re-installed from scratch (I like to take
the opportunity to clean stuff up every 6 months rather than
trying to upgrade :-). My first backup successfully rsynced
my new installation to a USB drive in cron last night,
I can VPN to work with pptp and run NX sessions,
so things seem
On Sun, 2009-11-22 at 05:00 +, Andreas M. Kirchwitz wrote:
It looks like a lot of people were complaining about such reports
and asked to turn it off.
I'd be surprised if those sort of people even read the root mail, so I
wouldn't expect them to see, or even know about, a logwatch report.
Timothy Murphy wrote:
However, I find that when I add my old grub.conf entries for Fedora-11
to my new grub.conf , I am unable to boot Fedora-11 .
(I'm also unable to boot it if I run grub interactively.)
The error I get is:
fsck.ext4: unable to resolve UUID=66c3...699e .
I cannot work
Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote:
Woudld it be possible to do the signature using SHA256 also? On one
of the iso's I recently burned did have a checksum file with a gpg
SHA256 signature hash. That was enough to remind me that I should
be using the SHA256 for checksumming the iso.
Yes, that is
Is there a problem with autofs/automount under Fedora-12?
I have exactly the same settings that I had in Fedora-11,
but the mount command is not being completed at boot-time,
although I have no problem giving it later by hand.
--
Timothy Murphy
e-mail: gayleard /at/ eircom.net
tel:
Timothy Murphy wrote:
Is there a problem with autofs/automount under Fedora-12?
I have exactly the same settings that I had in Fedora-11,
but the mount command is not being completed at boot-time,
although I have no problem giving it later by hand.
I'm a bit confused about what command
Reg Clemens wrote:
I use XV for everyting, and it worked fine till I went to 64bit Fc11
Is there an rpm out there with a good 64bit xv in it?
Currently the 32bit version cant find a needed library, even tho
its in /usr/lib64
Did you try the 64bit version from rpmfusion-nonfree? I know the
I'm currently using KVM and trying to figure out how to reload/edit the
default KVM iptable rules. I understand that I can save them
(iptables-save) in the /etc/sysconfig/iptables and simply reload it
rather than having to reboot each time. Where/How can I modify the
default kvm/libvirt rules?
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 11:12:24 -0500
Nabeel wrote:
I'm currently using KVM and trying to figure out how to reload/edit the
default KVM iptable rules.
Good luck with that :-). I don't know how to modify them, but I
can completely eradicate them via:
virsh net-destroy default
virsh net-undefine
I recently installed F12 and after decided to resetup BackupPC instead
of just restoring my settings from F11 (in case any important changes
were made). After fixing some selinux issues I was able to login to
the cgi interface but I could only get the summary page, not the admin
options. After
Hi,
I try to compile latest nvidia drivers for a GEFORCE 8600 GTS under F12,
but it doesn't work and the log isn't very verbose.
Has anyone succeed to do this ?
BR
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 11:07:57 +0100
François Patte francois.pa...@mi.parisdescartes.fr wrote:
Is there a tutorial to configure a sound card under fedora 10?
I'm not aware of one, though that doesn't mean there isn't one.
My sound card (Realtek ALC 882 integrated on Asus P5WD2 mobo) is
On 11/22/2009 10:12 AM, Nabeel wrote:
Where/How can I modify the
default kvm/libvirt rules?
These rules are created by libvirtd when it sets up its virtual
network(s). If you want to use libvirt-managed networks, I think you're
stuck with this behavior. You do have the option, however of
On Sun, 2009-11-22 at 17:43 +0100, Luc MAIGNAN wrote:
Hi,
I try to compile latest nvidia drivers for a GEFORCE 8600 GTS under F12,
but it doesn't work and the log isn't very verbose.
Has anyone succeed to do this ?
Have you tried the ones on RPMfusion's updates-testing repo?
BR
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 03:36:25 -0200, Germán Racca wrote:
[]
I did the following. Before starting with preupgrade, I removed all but
the last F11 kernel (this to save space on /boot). But nevertheless,
after reboot it said that it needed 0MB of space. Here I did what
someone said in
Hi,
I have been using Ubuntu for several years, but I've just installed
F12 for a specific use. While using it, I have encountered an odd
problem in changing the default SSH port number other than 22.
In Ubuntu (like other Unix-like systems), it was very straight forward
to change the default
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 22/11/2009 17:49, stan a écrit :
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 11:07:57 +0100
François Patte francois.pa...@mi.parisdescartes.fr wrote:
Is there a tutorial to configure a sound card under fedora 10?
I'm not aware of one, though that doesn't mean
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 6:58 PM, Soo-Hyun Choi s.c...@hackers.org.uk wrote:
Hi,
I have been using Ubuntu for several years, but I've just installed
F12 for a specific use. While using it, I have encountered an odd
problem in changing the default SSH port number other than 22.
In Ubuntu
I have F12 i686, i found this in sshd_config at line 13 (just
un-comment and change port number)
#Port 22
Yes, what I am saying is it didn't work what it supposed to do by
simply changing this value. That is if I change this value to an
arbitrary high number (e.g., 10100), the ssh connection
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 1:15 PM, Soo-Hyun Choi s.c...@hackers.org.uk wrote:
Yes, what I am saying is it didn't work what it supposed to do by
simply changing this value. That is if I change this value to an
arbitrary high number (e.g., 10100), the ssh connection is not being
made. (Yes, I did
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 7:15 PM, Soo-Hyun Choi s.c...@hackers.org.uk wrote:
I have F12 i686, i found this in sshd_config at line 13 (just
un-comment and change port number)
#Port 22
Yes, what I am saying is it didn't work what it supposed to do by
simply changing this value. That is if I
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 17:58:17 +
Soo-Hyun Choi s.c...@hackers.org.uk wrote:
Hi,
I have been using Ubuntu for several years, but I've just installed
F12 for a specific use. While using it, I have encountered an odd
problem in changing the default SSH port number other than 22.
In Ubuntu
i have changed that line to ;
# nmap localhost
Starting Nmap 5.00 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2009-11-22 19:10 CET
Interesting ports on localhost.localdomain (127.0.0.1):
Not shown: 993 closed ports
PORT STATE SERVICE
25/tcp open smtp
80/tcp open http
111/tcp open rpcbind
On Sunday 22 November 2009 13:15:44 Soo-Hyun Choi wrote:
[...@foo ~] $ ssh -p 10100 mymachine
ssh: connect to host mymachine port 10100: No route to host
Any idea?
That error indicates you cannot get packets to the host. The sshd is
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 18:15:44 +
Soo-Hyun Choi s.c...@hackers.org.uk wrote:
I have F12 i686, i found this in sshd_config at line 13 (just
un-comment and change port number)
#Port 22
Yes, what I am saying is it didn't work what it supposed to do by
simply changing this value. That is
2009/11/22 Soo-Hyun Choi s.c...@hackers.org.uk
I have been using Ubuntu for several years, but I've just installed
F12 for a specific use. While using it, I have encountered an odd
problem in changing the default SSH port number other than 22.
In Ubuntu (like other Unix-like systems), it
I think you will need to adjust selinux settings to allow sshd works
in another port.
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Alessandro Boggiano boggi...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/11/22 Soo-Hyun Choi s.c...@hackers.org.uk
I have been using Ubuntu for several years, but I've just installed
F12 for a
On 21/11/09 02:20, Oliver Ruebenacker wrote:
Hello,
Now I have almost the same problem on another computer. Except that
I did not use preupgrate but upgrade via netinstal. The only thing I
know the computers have in common is that they are both Dell and have
flat screns. One is a
Thanks for the quick response I'll probably end up doing the same thing
you did.
Tom Horsley wrote:
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 11:12:24 -0500
Nabeel wrote:
I'm currently using KVM and trying to figure out how to reload/edit the
default KVM iptable rules.
Good luck with that :-). I don't
Subject says it all. Tell us about your experience.
Just installed Fedora 12 on Fujitsu-Siemens Esprimo U9200 laptop (2GB RAM).
Clean install from x86-64 KDE Live CD, immediately followed by a yum update.
In short, everything works flawlessly! Many thanks to all Fedora devs!! :-)
Specifics:
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 11:46 AM, n2xssvv.g02gfr12930
n2xssvv.g02gfr12...@ntlworld.com wrote:
I found earlier threads describing a similar problem with F12 alpha
and beta, but found no solution.
Any advice?
If you have an NVidia graphics card, then wait. It's not ready for
prime time
1 - 100 of 166 matches
Mail list logo
