On 11/24/2009 01:19 AM, peng chen wrote:
hello, fedora-buildsys-list:
I encounter with several strange build tasks, which build state is
building,but task state is failed.
resultly, these build tasks are always in the building state. I run command
koji cancel ,but failed to
cancel it ,it's
I'm having a problem building the current zsh srpm
(zsh-4.3.10-4.fc13.src.rpm) on my local builder, which runs F11-x86_64
and has mock-0.9.18-1.fc11.noarch. On IRC, a user reported the same
problem, only his builder runs CentOS 5.4 and has
mock-0.9.14-2.el5.noarch. Surprisingly, the same srpm
That is job control weirdness. Something about the state of tty magic is
different in the two different contexts where you run the test. The things
to look at are whether the tests are using a temporary pty and what 'ps j'
says about all the processes involved in the build/test (including mock
RM == Roland McGrath rol...@redhat.com writes:
RM That is job control weirdness. Something about the state of tty
RM magic is different in the two different contexts where you run the
RM test.
Unfortunately that level of magic is mostly beyond me.
RM The things to look at are whether the
Unfortunately that level of magic is mostly beyond me.
That's OK. We can translate for you.
RM The things to look at are whether the tests are using a
RM temporary pty
I do not really know how to determine that.
The TTY column in ps is a start.
However, it simplifies things to know
Hi all,
some Fedora users just pointed me out that the x86 DVD image names
are not accurate. The install DVD is called Fedora-12-i386-DVD.iso
while the live DVD is called Fedora-12-i686-Live.iso. Please note the
i386 text in the install DVD file name. This is creating some
confusion among
2009/11/23 Otto Haliburton ottohalibur...@tx.rr.com:
- Original Message - From: Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
Sent: Monday, November 23, 2009 3:03 PM
Subject: Re: Kernel-2.6.31.6-134 seems to have a bug
Am 23.11.2009 22:50, schrieb Adam Williamson:
He already said that he had talked to his upstreams and they had said
they would not adjust their code. In that case, he really has done
everything he possibly can in his position as maintainer, and sending
him further nag emails is achieving nothing
Compose started at Tue Nov 24 08:15:09 UTC 2009
New package erlang-erlsom
Support for XML Schema in Erlang
New package libcue
Cue sheet parser library
New package libunistring
GNU Unicode string library
New package pidgin-sipe
Pidgin plugin for connecting to MS
Hi,
this is a short announce that there is a new db4 in rawhide for a while
now. Please modify your package accordingly and consider rebuild.
Older db-4.7.25 is now moved to compat-db so no broken dependencies
should occur. If your package uses the /usr/bin/db* utilities please
consider immediate
I have a couple of imaging-related packages, I'm happy to swap reviews
for them:
jai-imageio-core - Core Java Advanced Imaging Image I/O Tools API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536944
This is a plugin for Java that enables support for BMP, GIF, PCX, PNM,
Raw (not digital camera
Le Mar 24 novembre 2009 14:17, Felix Kaechele a écrit :
Am 23.11.2009 22:50, schrieb Adam Williamson:
He already said that he had talked to his upstreams and they had said
they would not adjust their code. In that case, he really has done
everything he possibly can in his position as
On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 19:01 -0500, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 6:43 PM, Jesse Keating jkeat...@j2solutions.net
wrote:
This is precisely the dialog that has been removed from F12 and is not
planned to be returned.
My understanding was that this was removed because
Once upon a time, Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net said:
To repeat myself once again, core fonts are not free, they have a maintenance
cost,
What is the real maintenance cost?
You have said that core fonts are not going away, so the maintenance
cost will not go away. How is
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 11/24/2009 02:21 AM, Ben Williams wrote:
If release engineering would like to release liveusb.iso for people to
use to install or just to look at the new features, that is fine But
from the #fedora channel the # of people installing off of the livecd
images are very
On 11/24/2009 08:35 PM, Simon Andrews wrote:
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 11/24/2009 02:21 AM, Ben Williams wrote:
If release engineering would like to release liveusb.iso for people to
use to install or just to look at the new features, that is fine But
from the #fedora channel the # of people
On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 22:32 +, Colin Walters wrote:
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 10:02 PM, James Morris jmor...@namei.org wrote:
Possibly (it could simply be that an updated policy is weaker for some
reason) -- but it doesn't matter, there should be no way to change MAC
policy without
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009, James Antill wrote:
On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 22:32 +, Colin Walters wrote:
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 10:02 PM, James Morris jmor...@namei.org wrote:
Possibly (it could simply be that an updated policy is weaker for some
reason) -- but it doesn't matter, there should be
On Tuesday, 24 November 2009 at 16:24, James Antill wrote:
On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 22:32 +, Colin Walters wrote:
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 10:02 PM, James Morris jmor...@namei.org wrote:
Possibly (it could simply be that an updated policy is weaker for some
reason) -- but it doesn't
Thanks, everyone.
I update to kernel-2.6.31.6-148, compiz and gnome-shell return to normal.
I think that I should write a post after searching the FP wiki for radeon
and KMS,
Liang
--
urlhttp://www.liangsuilong.info/url
Fight for freedom(3F）
Ask not what your Linux distro can do for you!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 24.11.2009 16:00, schrieb Chris Adams:
What is the real maintenance cost?
You have said that core fonts are not going away, so the maintenance
cost will not go away. How is badgering other maintainers a good thing?
If you don't want to
Le Mar 24 novembre 2009 16:00, Chris Adams a écrit :
Once upon a time, Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net said:
To repeat myself once again, core fonts are not free, they have a
maintenance
cost,
What is the real maintenance cost?
You have said that core fonts are not going
Once upon a time, Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net said:
Le Mar 24 novembre 2009 16:00, Chris Adams a écrit :
Once upon a time, Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net said:
To repeat myself once again, core fonts are not free, they have a
maintenance
cost,
What is the
Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
The costs could go down to nothing if there was no core font user left in
Fedora
Surely some are required for external legacy applications (including free
software and propitiatory applications)?
Even logging into a remote old linux system will require the old font
On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 16:59 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le Mar 24 novembre 2009 16:00, Chris Adams a écrit :
What is the real maintenance cost?
You have said that core fonts are not going away, so the maintenance
cost will not go away.
The costs could go down to nothing if there
On 11/20/2009 01:06 PM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
snip
1-4 are more RFEs for bugzilla, but I'll try to elaborate here and
start some discussion:
1. Can Fedora enable anonymous/unauthenticated bug submission.
We're thinking about this, but it can be flood the BZ, so the solution
might be, that
Hi,
I had the crazy idea to try F12 again on an IBM system (SurePOS 565,
specific Point-of-Sale hardware, with 82915G/GV/910GL), on which RHEL4
was the last RHEL/Fedora version I could install without problems
(see also https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=339361 for some
comments about
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 06:10:59PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 19:38 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
How that translates in packages and defaults is not really the most
important part, but the plan is to have strict package defaults + a
policy package that makes
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 10:38:49 +0100
Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
some Fedora users just pointed me out that the x86 DVD image names
are not accurate. The install DVD is called Fedora-12-i386-DVD.iso
while the live DVD is called Fedora-12-i686-Live.iso. Please note the
On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 10:38 +0100, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
Hi all,
some Fedora users just pointed me out that the x86 DVD image names
are not accurate. The install DVD is called Fedora-12-i386-DVD.iso
while the live DVD is called Fedora-12-i686-Live.iso. Please note the
i386 text in the
One of the important features of sudo is its ability to log elevated-access
actions to syslog.
Userhelper similarly logs actions, like so: userhelper[26491]: running
'/usr/share/system-config-users/system-config-users ' with root privileges
on behalf of 'mattdm'.
PolicyKit serves a similar
Le Mar 24 novembre 2009 17:01, Chris Adams a écrit :
That's not an answer. What is the real maintenance cost?
I already explained yesterday : there are rotting Fedora Core packages to
merge review, packaging guidelines to write to define how they are supposed to
be cleaned up, a huge pile of
On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 11:26 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
One of the important features of sudo is its ability to log elevated-access
actions to syslog.
Userhelper similarly logs actions, like so: userhelper[26491]: running
'/usr/share/system-config-users/system-config-users ' with root
Le Mar 24 novembre 2009 17:06, Jeremy Sanders a écrit :
Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
The costs could go down to nothing if there was no core font user left in
Fedora
Surely some are required for external legacy applications (including free
software and propitiatory applications)?
If no one
Le Mar 24 novembre 2009 17:09, Jussi Lehtola a écrit :
uestions on the internet.
Instead of ranting about legacy fonts that have been used for decades,
you can direct your energy towards something useful: making sure that
new fonts that are compatible with modern font handling systems are
This is a report of the weekly KDE-SIG-Meeting with a summary of the
topics that were discussed. If you want to add a comment please reply
to this email or add it to the related meeting page.
--
= Weekly KDE
Once upon a time, Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net said:
Le Mar 24 novembre 2009 17:01, Chris Adams a écrit :
That's not an answer. What is the real maintenance cost?
I already explained yesterday : there are rotting Fedora Core packages to
merge review, packaging guidelines to
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009, Matthew Miller wrote:
One of the important features of sudo is its ability to log elevated-access
actions to syslog.
Userhelper similarly logs actions, like so: userhelper[26491]: running
'/usr/share/system-config-users/system-config-users ' with root privileges
on
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 11:26 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
One of the important features of sudo is its ability to log elevated-access
actions to syslog.
Userhelper similarly logs actions, like so: userhelper[26491]: running
On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 11:48 -0500, Seth Vidal wrote:
when the policies are updated it is policy kit that has to be involved.
polkitd is running, at least.
That might be ok to log, indeed. polkitd need not be running, though. It
is activated as needed.
It would make sense for polkitd to
Hi, guys. Just a quick note - Matej Cepl pointed out that the
already-agreed BugZappers plan to switch to using the Triaged keyword
only for Fedora 13 and later presents problems. Most significantly, it's
impossible to reliably construct a Bugzilla search which will find bugs
that have been
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 11:48 -0500, Seth Vidal wrote:
when the policies are updated it is policy kit that has to be involved.
polkitd is running, at least.
That might be ok to log, indeed. polkitd need not be running, though. It
is activated
On 11/24/2009 10:32 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Hi, guys. Just a quick note - Matej Cepl pointed out that the
already-agreed BugZappers plan to switch to using the Triaged keyword
only for Fedora 13 and later presents problems. Most significantly, it's
impossible to reliably construct a
For those brave souls still running or trying to run rawhide just wanted to
let you know that KDE is broken. As we speak most Qt based apps will just
crash with a message about a missing symbol. To top that we are also
preparing for KDE 4.4 beta 1; so don't expect a quick resolution, in fact
On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 22:35 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 11/24/2009 10:32 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Hi, guys. Just a quick note - Matej Cepl pointed out that the
already-agreed BugZappers plan to switch to using the Triaged keyword
only for Fedora 13 and later presents problems. Most
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 11:35:13AM -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
PolicyKit itself is not running anything. It is just answering the
question of a mechanism: 'is X allowed to do foo ?'. It would make more
sense for the mechanisms that use PolicyKit to log privileged actions
that they do or deny
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 11:47:03AM -0500, Seth Vidal wrote:
I'd recommend filing this as a bug.
I definitely will -- I just want to get some feedback first.
--
Matthew Miller mat...@mattdm.org http://mattdm.org/
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 10:27 -0500, Seth Vidal wrote:
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009, James Antill wrote:
On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 22:32 +, Colin Walters wrote:
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 10:02 PM, James Morris jmor...@namei.org wrote:
Possibly (it could simply be that an updated policy is weaker
On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 12:29 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
1. In fact, a PAM-backed authority for PolicyKit might be interesting and
useful -- but there's a tangent.
What do you think PolicyKit is using for authentication ?
See
On 11/24/2009 04:17 PM, Jos Vos wrote:
Hi,
I had the crazy idea to try F12 again on an IBM system (SurePOS 565,
specific Point-of-Sale hardware, with 82915G/GV/910GL), on which RHEL4
was the last RHEL/Fedora version I could install without problems
(see also
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 12:44:00PM -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
1. In fact, a PAM-backed authority for PolicyKit might be interesting and
useful -- but there's a tangent.
What do you think PolicyKit is using for authentication ?
See
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 06:00:20PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
Try adding the kernel parameters nomodeset and xdriver=vesa or
xdriver=intel and vga=ask and select any of the 24 bit values offered..
If install is successful then boot into run level 3 and run Xorg
-configure and adapt
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 10:38 +0100, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
Hi all,
some Fedora users just pointed me out that the x86 DVD image names
are not accurate. The install DVD is called Fedora-12-i386-DVD.iso
while
On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 20:47 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
We are not discarding CD images all together. If you feel there is a
compelling reason to continue with a Live CD, I am afraid you will have
to step up and do it. The tools are easy enough to learn and I am
willing to help you or
I don't want to ship a desktop that doesn't let the user do useful
things.
And you can ship a desktop SPIN that way. But the base pkgs should
not install with an insecure set of choices.
if you want the spin to have a post-scriptlet which allows more
things, then that's the choice of the
On 11/24/2009 11:57 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 20:47 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
We are not discarding CD images all together. If you feel there is a
compelling reason to continue with a Live CD, I am afraid you will have
to step up and do it. The tools are easy
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 06:00:20PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
Try adding the kernel parameters nomodeset and xdriver=vesa or
xdriver=intel and vga=ask and select any of the 24 bit values offered..
If install is successful then boot into run level 3 and run Xorg
-configure and adapt
On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 13:18 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
Like I said, this is a tangent, and I'm certainly not expecting anyone to
work on this. But it'd be cool if they did.
Just as everybody else is struggling to get away from pam's awful
apis...I don't think this would be a step forward;
Gregory Maxwell (gmaxw...@gmail.com) said:
If some some spin decided to make every user run as root, ship with no
firewalling,
have password-less accounts, or have insecure services enabled by
default, etc.
You mean Sugar as configured on the XO? (It has passwordless user,
who can su without
BTW it looks like the nomodeset parameter is missing in the list of
boot options at these two places:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Anaconda/Options
That's because it's not an anaconda option.
- Chris
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Ben Williams wrote:
(yes i know the size sux, but not
everyone has highspeed internet thats why they are downloading the livecd
and not the dvd)
Another interpretation would be: The contents of the DVD does not
satisfy the needs of many people.
I am in that
On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 17:13 +0100, Roman Rakus wrote:
On 11/20/2009 01:06 PM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
snip
1-4 are more RFEs for bugzilla, but I'll try to elaborate here and
start some discussion:
1. Can Fedora enable anonymous/unauthenticated bug submission.
We're thinking about
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 01:27:40PM -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
Like I said, this is a tangent, and I'm certainly not expecting anyone to
work on this. But it'd be cool if they did.
Just as everybody else is struggling to get away from pam's awful
apis...I don't think this would be a step
On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 13:28 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
I don't want to ship a desktop that doesn't let the user do useful
things.
And you can ship a desktop SPIN that way. But the base pkgs should
not install with an insecure set of choices.
if you want the spin to have a
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009, Bill Nottingham wrote:
I don't want to ship a desktop that doesn't let the user do useful
things.
And you can ship a desktop SPIN that way. But the base pkgs should
not install with an insecure set of choices.
if you want the spin to have a post-scriptlet which allows
On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 19:28 +0100, Jos Vos wrote:
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 06:00:20PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
Try adding the kernel parameters nomodeset and xdriver=vesa or
xdriver=intel and vga=ask and select any of the 24 bit values offered..
If install is successful then
On 11/24/2009 06:28 PM, Jos Vos wrote:
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 06:00:20PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
Try adding the kernel parameters nomodeset and xdriver=vesa or
xdriver=intel and vga=ask and select any of the 24 bit values offered..
If install is successful then boot into run
On 2009/11/24 12:24 (GMT-0600) Sir Gallantmon composed:
Why not label it x86_32 instead of i386? That is far less confusing and
illustrates that it is 32-bit on the x86 architecture, since x86_64 says it
is 64-bit on x86 architecture.
+1
--
The husband should fulfill his marital duty to
his
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 01:27:40PM -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
Like I said, this is a tangent, and I'm certainly not expecting anyone to
work on this. But it'd be cool if they did.
Just as everybody else is struggling to get away from pam's awful
On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 10:44 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
As I noted somewhat flippantly in another thread, this comes with the
problem that, theoretically, a user who has the privileges to install
packages at a relaxed security level could arbitrarily raise the
security level of the system
On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 12:24 -0600, Sir Gallantmon wrote:
Why not label it x86_32 instead of i386? That is far less confusing and
illustrates that it is 32-bit on the x86 architecture, since x86_64 says it
is 64-bit on x86 architecture.
Because that's not what uname says. Change that, and
On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 10:54 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 12:24 -0600, Sir Gallantmon wrote:
Why not label it x86_32 instead of i386? That is far less confusing and
illustrates that it is 32-bit on the x86 architecture, since x86_64 says it
is 64-bit on x86 architecture.
On Sun, 2009-11-22 at 19:21 +0100, Martin Sourada wrote:
So,
since I've already received 3 separate bug reports caused by BadIDChoice
X Error in subtitleeditor [1][2][3] (haven't had enough time to debug
and try to fix it yet though) by abrt, I wonder if there is any room for
duplicity
On 11/25/2009 12:24 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 12:24 -0600, Sir Gallantmon wrote:
Why not label it x86_32 instead of i386? That is far less confusing and
illustrates that it is 32-bit on the x86 architecture, since x86_64 says it
is 64-bit on x86 architecture.
Because
Le mardi 24 novembre 2009 à 10:44 -0600, Chris Adams a écrit :
Once upon a time, Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net said:
Le Mar 24 novembre 2009 17:01, Chris Adams a écrit :
That's not an answer. What is the real maintenance cost?
I already explained yesterday : there are
On 11/23/2009 07:01 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 6:43 PM, Jesse Keating jkeat...@j2solutions.net
wrote:
This is precisely the dialog that has been removed from F12 and is not
planned to be returned.
My understanding was that this was removed because collecting the
Adam Williamson wrote:
it doesn't change the fact that, logically speaking, either the DVD or
CD images is wrong. Or at least, less right. I can see no sustainable
argument that they should be different.
The same is true for the directory labels (i386/ for install images and
i686/ for live
On 11/25/2009 12:56 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Should there be a RFE bug or rel-eng ticket created so this e-mail
thread is not for nothing? It's been discussed since the beginning of
time AFAIK.
Tickets have been filed and closed before, IIRC.
Rahul
--
fedora-devel-list mailing
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Should there be a RFE bug or rel-eng ticket created so this
e-mail thread is not for nothing? It's been discussed since
the beginning of time AFAIK.
There's already one:
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/2476
which was closed as wontfix.
signature.asc
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
The base arch of the family is i386, just like we call the ppc spin
ppc even though it only supports a subset of the ppc family, ditto
sparc, arm, etc...
Then why the Live DVD and the Install DVD have different names?
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 11:47:03AM -0500, Seth Vidal wrote:
I'd recommend filing this as a bug.
Bug 541040 - Enable logging in PolicyKit (for policy changes and for
authorizations.)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541040
--
Matthew Miller mat...@mattdm.org
On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 20:38 +0100, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
The base arch of the family is i386, just like we call the ppc spin
ppc even though it only supports a subset of the ppc family, ditto
sparc, arm, etc...
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 01:29:11PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
You mean Sugar as configured on the XO? (It has passwordless user,
who can su without a password.)
Annnd if you set a root password, stuff breaks.
--
Matthew Miller mat...@mattdm.org
Senior Systems Architect
On 11/21/2009 11:50 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
Given that Epoch can make an update go from a higher %{version} to a lower
one (which even may be a completely normal scenario for upstream project
splits), you can't avoid making Epoch the most-significant portion of RPM
version comparison. One
Jesse Keating wrote:
Yes, we may rename the Live images to i386. When they were first
introduced, we had both an i586 and an i686 kernel in Fedora, and the
Live images were only usable on i686, they had no i586. Now that
we don't have i586 anymore, we can change the live image name
to
2009/11/24 Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com:
snip
Finally, we considered - and rather approved of - the proposal that's
been floated on this list (and was floating in the meeting by Will
Woods) to consider using the mechanism used by the kernel developers for
kernel oopses: instead of being
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Jan Klepek jan.kle...@brandforge.sk wrote:
What if package maintainer would need to followup on the issue?
Last bug reported from abrt for subdownloader package was useless, there
was not enough info that I could reproduce issue and I'm waiting if
reporter
I was thinking and thought id get an idea out there.
rather than ship 2 dvds one for i386 and one for x86_64 we would ship one dvd
that has the package set for both arches. they would likely only have the
packages for a desktop install on them we would need to have both arches under
2.4GiB,
On 11/24/2009 02:50 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
I was thinking and thought id get an idea out there.
rather than ship 2 dvds one for i386 and one for x86_64 we would ship one
dvd
that has the package set for both arches. they would likely only have the
packages for a desktop install on
for me sounds a good idea
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 5:50 PM, Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote:
I was thinking and thought id get an idea out there.
rather than ship 2 dvds one for i386 and one for x86_64 we would ship one dvd
that has the package set for both arches. they would likely
Chris Ball (c...@laptop.org) said:
If some some spin decided to make every user run as root, ship
with no firewalling, have password-less accounts, or have
insecure services enabled by default, etc.
You mean Sugar as configured on the XO? (It has passwordless
user, who
On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 15:34 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Chris Ball (c...@laptop.org) said:
If some some spin decided to make every user run as root, ship
with no firewalling, have password-less accounts, or have
insecure services enabled by default, etc.
You mean
Adam Williamson (awill...@redhat.com) said:
It's true, but note that the XO software is technically a Remix
rather than a Spin, so there aren't any technical requirements
on it to satisfy the use of the Fedora mark. (I think I'd agree
with Greg's point regarding official Fedora
On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 14:22 -0500, Peter Jones wrote:
On 11/23/2009 07:01 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 6:43 PM, Jesse Keating jkeat...@j2solutions.net
wrote:
This is precisely the dialog that has been removed from F12 and is not
planned to be returned.
My
I dunno, that sounds like a bad idea because it relies on said internet
connection.
A unified x86_32 and x86_64 Live image is unlikely though, given that any
efforts to make this possible have been scorned because of two things:
saying that packages solve the arch problem (because any changes to
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 12:41 PM, Orcan Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Ben Williams wrote:
(yes i know the size sux, but not
everyone has highspeed internet thats why they are downloading the livecd
and not the dvd)
Another interpretation would be:
On 11/24/2009 03:49 PM, James Antill wrote:
On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 14:22 -0500, Peter Jones wrote:
That reason isn't /quite/ right. One big problem is that if you train a
user to input the root password over and over, what he learns is to type
the root password into a dialog box. The result
On 11/24/2009 02:15 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
We came up with several possible courses of action. First, we
acknowledge that abrt team is working on improving duplicate detection,
but Matej noted that this is intrinsically hard work and abrt will
likely never be able to eliminate or even
Once upon a time, Peter Jones pjo...@redhat.com said:
Not that I actually believe in these systems that are i686 or newer and won't
boot off of usb-storage devices, but if they were to exist, you wouldn't be
able to do what you're saying on them.
I have run into such systems unfortunately.
On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 16:21 -0500, Peter Jones wrote:
On 11/24/2009 02:15 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
We came up with several possible courses of action. First, we
acknowledge that abrt team is working on improving duplicate detection,
but Matej noted that this is intrinsically hard work
1 - 100 of 315 matches
Mail list logo
