2009/11/28 Terry Barnaby wrote:
If the NetworkManager service is running, but not managing the current
network connection, then Firefox starts up in offline mode.
Is this a bug in NetworkManager or Firefox ?
This is odd behaviour and needs to be fixed. I would suggest open up a
bug against
On 11/28/2009 07:31 AM, Terry Barnaby wrote:
On 11/27/2009 08:12 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 20:04 +, Terry Barnaby wrote:
Hi,
I did take part in the Radeon test day. Unfortunately the tests did not
really cover 3D and it was difficult to test this using the Live
On 11/28/2009 08:35 AM, Rakesh Pandit wrote:
2009/11/28 Terry Barnaby wrote:
If the NetworkManager service is running, but not managing the current
network connection, then Firefox starts up in offline mode.
Is this a bug in NetworkManager or Firefox ?
This is odd behaviour and needs to be
2009/11/28 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com:
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 7:05 AM, Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net wrote:
Once upon a time, Orcan Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com said:
I wish
vi had some tutorial the way emacs does, so one don't get lost in it.
In vim, hit F1.
It's :help
--
Guido
2009/11/28 Orcan Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 11:19 PM, Braden McDaniel wrote:
I'm an emacs user who's nearly completely useless in vi. But, really...
it just doesn't matter if emacs isn't installed by default. If you want
it, you know how to get it. And let's be
On Fri, 27 Nov 2009, Dave Airlie wrote:
Don't use radeonhd, the Fedora X team don't support it and never have.
I'm thinking it should reallyt be removed from the distro at this point
as it makes things worse rather than better. remove your xorg.conf
and turn modesetting on and if its still
Well, a couple of Fedoras back, X didn't work except with radeonhd, but now
radeon appears to support this one as well; I switched to it, and the CPU
issue is gone even with KMS. Now fonts (esp small ones) look very smudgy
though. But I suppose there are already bug(s) open on this.
Don't
Am 2009-11-27 04:53, schrieb Kevin Kofler:
Terry Barnaby wrote:
I have just tried to test install F12 on some of my systems, (5 different
ones). All of these bar 1 has problems with the graphics (X11 lockups,
system lockups and other problems) mainly in 3D but also in 2D.
That's surprising as
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 10:02 PM, Debayan Banerjee wrote:
Well one does need an editor for development. Assuming vim and emacs
have roughly equal user bases, chosing emacs over vim for the
distribution shows Fedora packagers' personal preference too. I guess
both vim and emacs should be
Hi.
On 28.11.2009 12:29, nodata wrote:
X is *really* slow to me until the desktop has finished loading. So slow
I can't select a username from the login screen unless I wait for a
while. This didn't happen in F11.
Could that be the same as
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541878
Compose started at Sat Nov 28 08:15:06 UTC 2009
Broken deps for i386
--
anjal-0.1.0-1.fc13.i686 requires libevolution-mail-shared.so.0
anjal-0.1.0-1.fc13.i686 requires libefilterbar.so.0
blacs-mpich2-1.1-33.fc12.i686
On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 12:25:27 -0800, Carl wrote:
The rasmol source has a dual GPLv2/RASMOL license, so for Fedora we can
consider that it is licensed gplv2. There are some libraries that are
included that are licensed lgpl.
This is covered by:
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 01:51:52PM +, Rawhide Report wrote:
mingw32-plib-static-1.8.5-0.fc13.noarch requires mingw32-plib =
0:{version}-{release}
Hmmm ... this is a packaging bug, and since the package was just added
it should have been caught during review.
Rich.
--
Richard
Hello All!
2009/11/28 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com:
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 01:51:52PM +, Rawhide Report wrote:
mingw32-plib-static-1.8.5-0.fc13.noarch requires mingw32-plib =
0:{version}-{release}
Hmmm ... this is a packaging bug, and since the package was just added
it
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
You assume normal desktop users don't have requirement for 3D which is
just plain wrong. Every modern desktop has made 3D a key part of the
user interface. Even in Linux, this is increasingly the trend with
Compiz and now GNOME Shell.
And KWin compositing / desktop
Debayan Banerjee wrote:
Well one does need an editor for development. Assuming vim and emacs
have roughly equal user bases, chosing emacs over vim for the
distribution shows Fedora packagers' personal preference too. I guess
both vim and emacs should be available.
Both vim and Emacs are
Peter Lemenkov wrote:
Stefan, it's time for the next rebuild (with this bogus Requires
removed), I think.
The Requires is not bogus, it's just missing the % signs.
Kevin Kofler
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
Sir Gallantmon wrote:
Why not label it x86_32 instead of i386? That is far less confusing
and illustrates that it is 32-bit on the x86 architecture, since x86_64
says it is 64-bit on x86 architecture.
Because x86_32 is not an architecture name. You are just creating it from
x86_64.
32 bit
Rawhide Report wrote:
Compose started at Sat Nov 28 08:15:06 UTC 2009
Broken deps for i386
kipi-plugins-0.8.0-3.fc13.i686 requires libcxcore.so.2
kipi-plugins-0.8.0-3.fc13.i686 requires libcvaux.so.2
kipi-plugins-0.8.0-3.fc13.i686 requires libcv.so.2
kipi-plugins-0.8.0-3.fc13.i686
knol wrote:
Author: knol
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/getmail/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv25409
Added Files:
getmail-4.14.0.tar.gz
Log Message:
another try
--- NEW FILE getmail-4.14.0.tar.gz ---
[...snip binary...]
More important than getmail.spec not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
koji scratch build now works.
http://www.five-ten-sg.com/rasmol.spec
http://www.five-ten-sg.com/rasmol-2.7.5-5.fc12.src.rpm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 2009-11-28 at 15:25 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
If some of the source files use a less restrictive licensing scheme,
such as the LGPL, Fedora's current licensing guidelines want you to
specifiy that with and AND in the License tag.
On Sat, 2009-11-28 at 13:17 +0200, Pekka Savola wrote:
On Fri, 27 Nov 2009, Dave Airlie wrote:
Don't use radeonhd, the Fedora X team don't support it and never have.
I'm thinking it should reallyt be removed from the distro at this point
as it makes things worse rather than better. remove
2009/11/29 Carl Byington wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
koji scratch build now works.
http://www.five-ten-sg.com/rasmol.spec
http://www.five-ten-sg.com/rasmol-2.7.5-5.fc12.src.rpm
[..]
Cool! Update your review request.
--
Rakesh Pandit
https://fedoraproject.org/
On 11/28/2009 08:36 AM, Terry Barnaby wrote:
On 11/28/2009 07:31 AM, Terry Barnaby wrote:
On 11/27/2009 08:12 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 20:04 +, Terry Barnaby wrote:
Hi,
I did take part in the Radeon test day. Unfortunately the tests did not
really cover 3D and it
On Sat, 2009-11-28 at 07:31 +, Terry Barnaby wrote:
Some really useful info in How_to_debug_Xorg_problems. I couldn't easily
find it from the main wiki home page however. Maybe a link to this page
marked
Graphics issues could be made on the front page (focus users on improving
the
well, whether it should have been caught or not, at least it's fixed
now... (builds are going on as I type)
Sorry,
Stefan
2009/11/28, Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu:
Rawhide Report wrote:
Compose started at Sat Nov 28 08:15:06 UTC 2009
Broken deps for i386
kipi-plugins-0.8.0-3.fc13.i686
I would argue otherwise, considering the flexibility of both vim and Emacs.
Personally, I like Emacs, and I have a hard time dealing with vi and its
derivatives. But, this really isn't the place to start YET ANOTHER Emacs vs.
vi[m] vs. {INSERT YOUR PREFERRED EDITOR} flamewar.
Argue that on IRC,
Hi all,
I am trying to build cryptopp in rawhide.
cryptopp builds fine in in F11 and F12:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1831996
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1831965
But in rawhide cryptopp code is broken (at least cryptest program).
cryptest runs in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 11/28/2009 02:32 AM, Debayan Banerjee wrote:
2009/11/28 Rahul Sundaram
Why? It's just shows your personal preference for a editor. Emacs is
certainly not needed for software development.
Well one does need an editor for
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 4:03 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 11:23 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
My proposal is to use alternatives for parallel installation, the
way java does. Then the user can switch between jack1 and jack2 as he
wants.
Is it okay with everyone if I write
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541792
Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487913
Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487913
--- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-11-28
06:06:13 EDT ---
This srpm does not build at
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487913
Dan Kenigsberg dan...@cs.technion.ac.il changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477387
Bug 477387 depends on bug 487913, which changed state.
Bug 487913 Summary: Review Request: culmus-fancy-fonts - Fancy fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487913
Dan Kenigsberg dan...@cs.technion.ac.il changed:
What|Removed |Added
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for fontpackages:
145e2684017fc2f593d1abd018bfb343 fontpackages-1.36.tar.xz
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
Author: nim
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv24145/devel
Modified Files:
.cvsignore fontpackages.spec import.log sources
Log Message:
1.36
Index: .cvsignore
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for fontpackages:
3d4bf7609a75e183c8e252bc9b563138 fontpackages-1.37.tar.xz
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
Author: nim
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv1414/devel
Modified Files:
.cvsignore fontpackages.spec import.log sources
Log Message:
1.37
Index: .cvsignore
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=107254
User nmailhot changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=95057
User nmailhot changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=87686
User nmailhot changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533919
Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533919
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-11-28
10:02:31 EDT ---
Created an attachment
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for fontpackages:
5c1ec4068beca311a2f01f1940958e19 fontpackages-1.38.tar.xz
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
Author: nim
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv18417/devel
Modified Files:
.cvsignore fontpackages.spec import.log sources
Log Message:
1.38
Index: .cvsignore
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477387
Bug 477387 depends on bug 487913, which changed state.
Bug 487913 Summary: Review Request: culmus-fancy-fonts - Fancy fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487913
Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487913
Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for fontpackages:
f2cc943a755422ff2d100c7e8d723f2a fontpackages-1.39.tar.xz
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
Author: nim
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6719/devel
Modified Files:
.cvsignore fontpackages.spec import.log sources
Log Message:
1.39
Index: .cvsignore
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617
Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617
Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617
--- Comment #35 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-11-28
12:35:03 EDT ---
Created an attachment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617
Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541792
Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for fontpackages:
a0e5cc0a64a05ecbf0a4ac0f1c90d51a fontpackages-1.40.tar.xz
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
Author: nim
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv18983/devel
Modified Files:
.cvsignore fontpackages.spec import.log sources
Log Message:
1.40
Index: .cvsignore
I have tried following the instructions, and have tried what I
consider reasonalble alternatives, but I have yet to get flash-reader
working on my 64bit machine under firefox.
The libflashplayer.so that I download appears to be a 32bit shared object
which in itself seems suspect.
Can someone
On 28/11/09 08:26, Reg Clemens wrote:
I have tried following the instructions, and have tried what I
consider reasonalble alternatives, but I have yet to get flash-reader
working on my 64bit machine under firefox.
http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=205642
--
Regards,
Frank
On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 23:20:23 -0500, Matthew wrote:
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 10:55:17PM -0500, Steven W. Orr wrote:
I can't believe this is a real bug. I'm submit it to bugzilla. It's in F10,
11
and 12. I'd be curious to know just how old this bug is.
Contents of mlocate.cron is:
Il Mon, 23 Nov 2009 20:55:15 -0500, Tony Nelson ha scritto:
I'll keep also the show-leaves one. I'd like to keep the system clean,
as I was used to do in Debian.
But Fedora lacks unmarkauto, so you may get more leaves than you might
want. It also makes yum slower. :-(
So, how do you,
Hello Everyone,
On November 26, 2009, Craig White wrote:
Since I upgraded to F12, I have noticed that it is very slow to respond
to clicks in the task bar - i.e., a long delay if I click the 'fedora'
start button or any of the applications in the 'Task Switcher' widget.
Discernibly
Can someone point me to a good step by step howto to set up Windows XP installed
from an iso in a VM in F12 using kvm. There are some XP applications that only
work in XP itself rather than in wine or Crossover.
I have not tinkered with virtualised machines before so this is a learning curve
for
On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 13:26:39 + Marko Vojinovic wrote:
[ ... ]
I simply want to connect to my wireless automatically upon boot and not being
asked for any passwords. I have also enabled autologin in kdm in order to get
logged in automatically (this works beautifully, btw).
So how do
On Saturday 28 November 2009 08:26:51 Reg Clemens wrote:
Can someone PLEASE give me detailed instructions on how to get flash-player
working on this machine, or point me as some (working) instructions on the
web.
(1) Clean up all potential mess from previous attempts (like nspluginwrapper,
On Saturday 28 November 2009 11:21:51 Mike Cloaked wrote:
Can someone point me to a good step by step howto to set up Windows XP
installed from an iso in a VM in F12 using kvm. There are some XP
applications that only work in XP itself rather than in wine or Crossover.
I have not tinkered
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 1:01 PM, Marko Vojinovic vvma...@gmail.com wrote:
Can someone point me to a good step by step howto to set up Windows XP
installed from an iso in a VM in F12 using kvm. There are some XP
applications that only work in XP itself rather than in wine or Crossover.
I
2009/11/28 Paul Smith phh...@gmail.com:
--SNIP--
I can also recommend VirtualBox. I am running XP on VirtualBox, which
is fast and simple.
Paul
Can you, virtualisation gurus, point me out how to set up shared
folder in VirtualBox for guest Window$ XP? It looks like an easy task
but I'm
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 1:11 PM, Hiisi very-c...@rambler.ru wrote:
I can also recommend VirtualBox. I am running XP on VirtualBox, which
is fast and simple.
Can you, virtualisation gurus, point me out how to set up shared
folder in VirtualBox for guest Window$ XP? It looks like an easy task
Tim:
We had the smolt thing that sends a hardware report off to a database.
There's a certain presumption that regular monthly updates by your
client indicates that your hardware does actually work.
See: http://smolt.fedoraproject.org/ (and don't forget to have a look
at the various
2009/11/28 Paul Smith phh...@gmail.com:
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 1:11 PM, Hiisi very-c...@rambler.ru wrote:
--SNIP--
Can you, virtualisation gurus, point me out how to set up shared
folder in VirtualBox for guest Window$ XP? It looks like an easy task
but I'm unable to see it anywhere from
On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 22:33:40 -0500 (EST)
Robert P. J. Day wrote:
the setup seems correct, except for the persistent blanking.
thoughts?
I went through that for years thinking it was an ATI driver
problem, but finally found it was the display itself
(in my case a Westinghouse Digital HDTV
Hiisi wrote:
2009/11/28 Paul Smith phh...@gmail.com:
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 1:11 PM, Hiisi very-c...@rambler.ru wrote:
--SNIP--
Can you, virtualisation gurus, point me out how to set up shared
folder in VirtualBox for guest Window$ XP? It looks like an easy task
but I'm unable to see
On 28/11/09 14:49, Mike Cloaked wrote:
--snip--
Interesting replies - thank you - but noticeable that the fedora provided
facility of kvm has been mentioned by no-one!
Additionally can you experts tell me whether you can use usbkeys in the VM,
and also whether or not there is communication
Original Message
Subject:root's ssh-agent $SSH_AUTH_SOCK
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 00:10:20 +
From: Martin Airs camberw...@gmail.com
Reply-To: camberw...@gmail.com
To: fedora-devel-l...@redhat.com
Good evening all,
I've setup an authorized key for a
On 11/28/2009 02:04 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 12:10:20AM +, Martin Airs wrote:
I've setup an authorized key for a server I regularly use, but when I tried
to run ssh-add as root, it wouldn't work until I had copied the
SSH_AUTH_SOCK environment variable from my
On Sat, 2009-11-28 at 06:49 -0800, Mike Cloaked wrote:
Interesting replies - thank you - but noticeable that the fedora provided
facility of kvm has been mentioned by no-one!
In my opinion, kvm is not quite ready for prime time. First of all, it
doesn't work at all unless your system has
On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 06:49:44 -0800 (PST)
Mike Cloaked wrote:
Interesting replies - thank you - but noticeable that the fedora provided
facility of kvm has been mentioned by no-one!
I'm running XP under KVM (obviously you need KVM capable hardware),
and it works fine, but when installing under
On Sat, 2009-11-28 at 04:43 -0600, Steven P. Ulrick wrote:
Hello Everyone,
On November 26, 2009, Craig White wrote:
Since I upgraded to F12, I have noticed that it is very slow to respond
to clicks in the task bar - i.e., a long delay if I click the 'fedora'
start button or any of
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 09:53:47AM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
Have you tried it? The code in the file isn't an error; it's just very
obscure bash syntax. That is, $( /some/file ) is obscure, and $(
/some/file filter-command ) is *really* obscure. Doesn't seem to be
documented in the
Hi,
i've a LUKS encrypted external 640GB WD USB Drive with ext4. When i plug
in the drive with Fedora 11, a prompt appears to enter the password.
After this, the drives icon is easy accessible on the desktop.
Now i've tried this with Fedora 12. Nothing happend, the drive doesn't
appears in
Brian Wood wrote:
I'm having some trouble getting internet/ssh working over
a Linksys wireless usb adapter -- model WUSB54GSC.
I did get it working one time, but don't know why or if
I did something to make it work. I see the access
point I want to use and connect to it. That seems to work.
On Saturday 28 November 2009 08:26:51 Reg Clemens wrote:
Can someone PLEASE give me detailed instructions on how to get flash-player
working on this machine, or point me as some (working) instructions on the
web.
(1) Clean up all potential mess from previous attempts (like
On 11/28/2009 05:22 PM, Reg Clemens wrote:
On Saturday 28 November 2009 08:26:51 Reg Clemens wrote:
Can someone PLEASE give me detailed instructions on how to get flash-player
working on this machine, or point me as some (working) instructions on the
web.
(1) Clean up all
Greg Woods wrote:
On Sat, 2009-11-28 at 06:49 -0800, Mike Cloaked wrote:
Interesting replies - thank you - but noticeable that the fedora provided
facility of kvm has been mentioned by no-one!
In my opinion, kvm is not quite ready for prime time. First of all, it
doesn't work at all unless
Tom Horsley wrote:
On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 06:49:44 -0800 (PST)
Mike Cloaked wrote:
Interesting replies - thank you - but noticeable that the fedora provided
facility of kvm has been mentioned by no-one!
I'm running XP under KVM (obviously you need KVM capable hardware),
and it works fine, but
On Sat, 2009-11-28 at 12:37 -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote:
Greg Woods wrote:
Just to clarify, are you talking about KVM or how it behaves with a layer of
libvirt added?
I'm talking about using it through the GUI provided with Fedora. Since
in our environment our operations staff has to be
Il Sat, 28 Nov 2009 11:13:19 +, Patrick O'Callaghan ha scritto:
man package-cleanup (yum install yum-utils if you don't have it)
Ok, wonderful.
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines:
fred smith wrote:
Hi!
I've looked thru the forums and done some googling but I don't see an
answer THAT WORKS for this question:
How to change the default GDM background/wallpaper to some other image?
I've tried all the things listed in the forums and none of them works,
including (but not
Hello all,
I Had the miss-fortune to loos f11 working flawlessly up to the last
update. I email for help, I promptly received some suggestions
unfortunately did not help, the hard driver was damaged. thank you so
much for help anyway.
I thought that this was my time to upgrade to F12. I started by
OK, I seem to have backed myself into a hole in the ground.
I have recently installed F11.
I noticed that sound was not playing on the few videos that would play from
youtube (the rest of the videos are waiting for me to get flash working a
separate problem).
I tried aplay, me and root.
On Saturday 28 November 2009 14:49:44 Mike Cloaked wrote:
Interesting replies - thank you - but noticeable that the fedora provided
facility of kvm has been mentioned by no-one!
As others can say, it requires appropriate hardware, and is a bit rough on the
edges. Other than that, the user
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Could you explain a little more what you are trying to do?
If you're just trying to change the wallpaper, what happens when you
just use the standard menu to do that? Or are you trying to do
something more?
What behavior do you get when you (from memory)
I start firefox (64bit) with one tab pointed at start.fedoraproject.com
I try to save a bookmark to this page by bringing up the bookmark this page
dialog from the menubar. I click on the show all bookmarks folders arrow
and I get a dialog box showing all my bookmarks and bookmark folders. I
Additionally can you experts tell me whether you can use usbkeys in the VM,
In order to have full support for USB you need to use the closed-source
VirtualBox from SUN
Or... you can use KVM and Fedora's built-in Virt Manager. It does
support USB and PCI device passthrough.
I'm not sure where
On Saturday 28 November 2009 17:22:05 Reg Clemens wrote:
On Saturday 28 November 2009 08:26:51 Reg Clemens wrote:
Can someone PLEASE give me detailed instructions on how to get
flash-player working on this machine, or point me as some (working)
instructions on the web.
On 11/28/09 03:53, quoth Michael Schwendt:
On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 23:20:23 -0500, Matthew wrote:
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 10:55:17PM -0500, Steven W. Orr wrote:
I can't believe this is a real bug. I'm submit it to bugzilla. It's in F10,
11
and 12. I'd be curious to know just how old this bug
1 - 100 of 136 matches
Mail list logo
