On Mon, 4 Jan 2010, Mike McLean wrote:
On 12/30/2009 02:05 AM, William F. Acker WB2FLW +1 303 722 7209 wrote:
I've always noticed that when a package is updated, sometimes the i686
version isn't put into the x86_64 repo for updates. As a workaround, I
Can you give some examples? If multilib
On 04/01/10 21:47, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
On 01/04/2010 04:25 PM, Ian Weller wrote:
I know Gwibber is widely used by Fedora users because there are a
crapton of abrt reports for it and I just can't keep up with it. :)
If no one else wants it, I will take it. I'd prefer to
I'm about to build PackageKit 0.6.0 into rawhide, which bumps the
soname. I'll take care of rebuilding gnome-packagekit and kpackagekit
which is (I think) are the only users of the low level library API.
The other applications using the _session_ DBus connections should
continue to work as this
Hello,
I'd like to take over the libssh2 package according to
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers
all reasonable efforts have been made to contact the maintainer:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/523796
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/539444
These still need upstream attention. I'll badger them but it might
take a while:
cduce
ocaml-camlp5
The following should be fixed in tomorrow's report:
ocaml-ocamlnet
ocaml-json-wheel
ocaml-preludeml
ocaml-pxp
ocaml-xmlrpc-light
I intend to give up the following packages:
fedorainfinity-backgrounds
libbeagle
libcroco
libexif
libspectre
preferences-menus
Any takers ?
Matthias
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 15:37, Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com wrote:
I intend to give up the following packages:
fedorainfinity-backgrounds
I've been using it since Fedora 8 (never liked any other Fedora
wallpaper as much as this one), so I can't let it be retired. :)
I'll take it.
Hello.
Does Fedora dead? I have submit new qstat packages and filed bugs
against applications which are using its [qstat] old binary name.
There were several weeks when qstat update on hold due to bug #533777
Should we obsolete blocking pacakge(s)?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
--
How much do we adhere to our Packaging Guidelines for static libraries?
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Packaging_Static_Libraries
What had started with a few Yum queries for corner-cases (see
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2009-December/msg00012.html )
On Tue, 2010-01-05 at 15:54 +0100, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 15:37, Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com wrote:
I intend to give up the following packages:
fedorainfinity-backgrounds
I've been using it since Fedora 8 (never liked any other Fedora
wallpaper as much as
Jon Ciesla wrote:
Jussi Lehtola wrote:
On Wed, 2009-12-30 at 16:35 +0530, Huzaifa Sidhpurwala wrote:
Jussi Lehtola wrote:
Even though any proven packager could do the change, that bug does not
fall in the items listed in the proven packager policy [1]. You
haven't
listed any problems
Am Dienstag, den 05.01.2010, 10:33 + schrieb Richard Hughes:
I'm about to build PackageKit 0.6.0 into rawhide, which bumps the
soname. I'll take care of rebuilding gnome-packagekit and kpackagekit
which is (I think) are the only users of the low level library API.
Plus
Matthias Clasen wrote:
I intend to give up the following packages:
libspectre
I can help out here.
-- Rex
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Matthias Clasen wrote:
I intend to give up the following packages:
[snip]
FYI:
libexif
This is used by a lot of stuff, including kdegraphics (but also WINE and
several GNOME packages).
libspectre
This one is used by Okular (kdegraphics) and Evince.
I guess one of us KDE SIG folks might
2010/1/5 Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com:
I intend to give up the following packages:
libexif
I will take this one.
--
LG Thomas
Dubium sapientiae initium
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 13:37:17 -0800,
John Reiser jrei...@bitwagon.com wrote:
On 01/04/2010 10:18 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 07:57:54 -0600,
Jon Cieslal...@jcomserv.net wrote:
I've actually come across this WRT UPX as well.
Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com writes:
How much do we adhere to our Packaging Guidelines for static libraries?
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Packaging_Static_Libraries
Mispackaged -static libraries:
mysql-devel from mysql-5.1.42-2.fc13.src.rpm
On Tue, 2010-01-05 at 09:46 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
Matthias Clasen wrote:
I intend to give up the following packages:
libspectre
I can help out here.
Already sold to Marek, but I'm sure he'll welcome you as a comaintainer
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 3:49 AM, Kamil Dudka kdu...@redhat.com wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to take over the libssh2 package according to
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers
all reasonable efforts have been made to contact the maintainer:
For the impatient:
Starting with today's rawhide, the these kind of constructs in specs
no longer work:
%{?!foo: %define foo bar}
For the generally desired effect, the above simply becomes:
%{?!foo: %global foo bar}
This is already recommended by the Fedora guidelines, but
Kevin Kofler wrote:
Matthias Clasen wrote:
I intend to give up the following packages:
[snip]
FYI:
libexif
This is used by a lot of stuff, including kdegraphics (but also WINE and
several GNOME packages).
indeed, I missed that, can jump on that one too.
-- Rex
--
On 01/05/2010 11:30 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Tue, 2010-01-05 at 11:03 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
On the other hand, with the
guideline being so widely ignored, I'm not in a hurry to do work to
comply with it ...
Isn't that a chicken/egg problem?
It really is. I mean, we could create the
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 06:34:12PM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
For the impatient:
Starting with today's rawhide, the these kind of constructs in specs
no longer work:
%{?!foo: %define foo bar}
For the generally desired effect, the above simply becomes:
%{?!foo: %global foo
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 11:48:47AM -0500, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
On 01/05/2010 11:30 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Tue, 2010-01-05 at 11:03 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
On the other hand, with the
guideline being so widely ignored, I'm not in a hurry to do work to
comply with it ...
Isn't
Tom spot Callaway wrote:
On 01/05/2010 11:30 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Tue, 2010-01-05 at 11:03 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
On the other hand, with the
guideline being so widely ignored, I'm not in a hurry to do work to
comply with it ...
Isn't that a chicken/egg problem?
On 01/05/2010 11:50 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
What exactly do you mean 'no longer work' ? Can we expect to get a formal
RPM build error for this bogus construct, or will it silently build and
do the wrong thing ? From your long description, it sounds like the latter,
which means
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 12:16:13PM -0500, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
On 01/05/2010 12:08 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
Not for all packaging policies, but for some I think that would be a
good idea. Pick a set of policies we think are particularly important
to enforce can be automatically
Tom \spot\ Callaway tcall...@redhat.com writes:
On 01/05/2010 11:30 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Tue, 2010-01-05 at 11:03 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
On the other hand, with the
guideline being so widely ignored, I'm not in a hurry to do work to
comply with it ...
Isn't that a chicken/egg
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 02:28:28PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
These still need upstream attention. I'll badger them but it might
take a while:
cduce
ocaml-camlp5
Wow, upstream fixed them just after I posted. I'll try to have these
done before tomorrow's Rawhide build too.
On 01/05/2010 12:08 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
Not for all packaging policies, but for some I think that would be a
good idea. Pick a set of policies we think are particularly important
to enforce can be automatically checked, and declare any non-compliant
ones will be dropped in the next
On Tue, 2010-01-05 at 16:59 +0100, Thomas Janssen wrote:
2010/1/5 Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com:
I intend to give up the following packages:
libexif
I will take this one.
Thanks, its yours if you take it:
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/libexif
--
On 01/05/2010 12:27 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
But there's a general issue that new things keep getting added
to the packaging guidelines and there's no very good mechanism to
detect whether existing packages ever get updated to comply.
You're right. I'm hopeful that the items which can be checked
On 01/05/2010 12:23 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 12:16:13PM -0500, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
On 01/05/2010 12:08 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
Not for all packaging policies, but for some I think that would be a
good idea. Pick a set of policies we think are
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 10:38:50AM -0700, Jerry James wrote:
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 10:23 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com
wrote:
That sounds good as long as AutoQA is reliable, not generating false
positives. I'd still also suggest that we have a rule drop all
packages reported
The alloc function in the LZMA SDK allows you to pass it a pointer to
your own allocater function. (I don't know whether or not the xz library works
like that. [Ed: Yes, it does.]) Would that be enough for UPX?
Maybe. Some changes would be required to UPX, on both the compression
and
On Tue, 2010-01-05 at 12:27 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Tom \spot\ Callaway tcall...@redhat.com writes:
On 01/05/2010 11:30 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Tue, 2010-01-05 at 11:03 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
On the other hand, with the
guideline being so widely ignored, I'm not in a hurry to do work
On 01/05/2010 05:48 PM, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
On 01/05/2010 11:30 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Tue, 2010-01-05 at 11:03 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
On the other hand, with the
guideline being so widely ignored, I'm not in a hurry to do work to
comply with it ...
Isn't that a chicken/egg
Hi,
A news of a new calculation of PI is on the net. Should we digg
(http://digg.com/d31EgvV) the article in order to promote the fact that
the author used Fedora 10 for he's success ?
Best regards,
Adrian
--
:: http://fedoraproject.ro :: http://forum.fedoraproject.ro ::
--
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 10:23 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote:
That sounds good as long as AutoQA is reliable, not generating false
positives. I'd still also suggest that we have a rule drop all
packages reported by the FTBFS tests which aren't fixed by time of
Beta.
What
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Adrian adrian.jo...@fedoraproject.ro wrote:
Hi,
A news of a new calculation of PI is on the net. Should we digg
(http://digg.com/d31EgvV) the article in order to promote the fact that the
author used Fedora 10 for he's success ?
Best regards,
Adrian
--
On Tue, 2010-01-05 at 20:22 +0200, Adrian wrote:
Hi,
A news of a new calculation of PI is on the net. Should we digg
(http://digg.com/d31EgvV) the article in order to promote the fact that
the author used Fedora 10 for he's success ?
This sounds like a question about Fedora advocacy, not
On Tuesday 05 of January 2010 17:24:46 Chris Weyl wrote:
Well, it's post-holiday season now and I'm starting to catch up on my
mail/bugs... These should be taken care of this week. Feel free to
ping me via email/bugzilla if you need anything before then.
Glad to see you alive! Please grant
On Tue, 5 Jan 2010 16:57:31 +0200
Andy Shevchenko andy.shevche...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello.
Does Fedora dead? I have submit new qstat packages and filed bugs
against applications which are using its [qstat] old binary name.
There were several weeks when qstat update on hold due to bug #533777
On Tue, 5 Jan 2010, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 06:34:12PM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
For the impatient:
Starting with today's rawhide, the these kind of constructs in specs
no longer work:
%{?!foo: %define foo bar}
For the generally desired effect, the above
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 7:21 PM, Kamil Dudka kdu...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tuesday 05 of January 2010 17:24:46 Chris Weyl wrote:
Well, it's post-holiday season now and I'm starting to catch up on my
mail/bugs... These should be taken care of this week. Feel free to
ping me via email/bugzilla if
On Tuesday 05 January 2010, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
On 01/05/2010 11:50 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
What exactly do you mean 'no longer work' ? Can we expect to get a formal
RPM build error for this bogus construct, or will it silently build and
do the wrong thing ? From your long
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 11:48:47AM -0500, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
On 01/05/2010 11:30 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Tue, 2010-01-05 at 11:03 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
On the other hand, with the
guideline being so widely ignored, I'm not in a hurry to do work to
comply with it ...
Isn't
On Tuesday 05 of January 2010 20:55:16 Peter Robinson wrote:
You can request ACL permissions through the Fedora pkgdb here
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/libssh2 and then
the maintainer can grant them
You can see I already did. It was more than a month ago, still waiting
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 09:37:26AM -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
I intend to give up the following packages:
libcroco
Any takers ?
I'll take this one.
Dodji
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 11:45:23AM +1000, Noriko Mizumoto wrote:
Paul W. Frields さんは書きました:
Diego posted the summary of what needs to be done here:
https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1455#comment:10
In short, we need a few people to step up and help with the process
Dear *,
Just to let you know that due to a server move the ip where
be.fedoraproject.org refers to has changed.
old ip : 195.207.18.41
new ip : 188.40.138.124
As I was not able to create a new ticket for this request at
https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure, so could someone can update
I was unable to find any records for be.fedoraproject.org in our zone
files, so you'd have to request this domain from scratch.
Darren L. VanBuren
=
http://theoks.net/
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 11:56, Frederic Hornain fhorn...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear *,
Just to let you know
Dear Darren,
Thanks a lot.
We just have to wait one day to make changes effective.
Thanks again.
Best Regards
Frederic ;)
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 9:36 PM, Darren VanBuren onekop...@gmail.com wrote:
Okay. I just made the change.
Darren L. VanBuren
=
http://theoks.net/
Changes are applied in DNS now.
See the included nslookup results.
[onekop...@theoks-net ~]$ nslookup be.fedoracommunity.org
Server: 208.67.222.222
Address:208.67.222.222#53
Non-authoritative answer:
Name: be.fedoracommunity.org
Address: 188.40.138.124
Darren L. VanBuren
On Tue, 2010-01-05 at 08:40 +0100, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
What happens with cvs.fedora.redhat.com? If it is shutdown
permanently where I can get current fedora kernel sources?
cvs.fedoraproject.org
--
David WoodhouseOpen Source Technology Centre
On Tue, 05 Jan 2010 07:50:47 +
David Woodhouse dw...@infradead.org wrote:
On Tue, 2010-01-05 at 08:40 +0100, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
What happens with cvs.fedora.redhat.com? If it is shutdown
permanently where I can get current fedora kernel sources?
cvs.fedoraproject.org
Thanks,
Hello,
I found a license cited below during srpm review. I'm not able to define
what kind of license is it. Could you help me with it? The source is a
part of iputils package together with other sources/binaries. There is
more type of licenses. Particular binaries contains sources of one
license
On Tue, 2010-01-05 at 00:39 +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
I installed bind and tried to use it as a basic cacheing nameserver,
which in principal just means running named and
pointing /etc/resolv.conf to 127.0.0.1. However resolv.conf keeps
getting overwritten by NetworkManager,
Are you
On Sun, 2010-01-03 at 21:42 -0800, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
While reinstalling f12 on a machine that I messed up, I was
following all my notes and directions and reached the point where the
install was successful and it was time to update. I did a su -l and
then typed yum update. I realized I
On Sat, 2010-01-02 at 18:54 -0500, KC8LDO wrote:
I did an awful lot of research using Google on the network file share
browsing issue I had with Fedora 11 using Nautilus. The two things
that stand out are something the ISP's are doing and also with the
NetBIOS name resolution order done by
On Sun, 2010-01-03 at 22:19 +0100, Alessandro Boggiano wrote:
I'd like to change the destination of the default GNOME directories :
the directories like Videos,Music, Documents.. ( I'm using GNOME
in Italian, so
the original name, maybe, are a little different).
Usually their definition is in
Tim:
If you're the sort that uses one huge partition for everything (and
that does seem to be the recommendation, these days), *and* you
never intend to add a second drive, then LVM is pointless to you.
R. G. Newbury:
ONE HUGE PARTITION? I'd like to know who is crazy enough to recommend
On Mon, 2010-01-04 at 14:47 +1100, Chris Smart wrote:
I was assuming that the partition was being formatted each time Fedora
was re-installed, but if he uses a separate partition for /home, then
that could well be it.
Unless you manually partition, and manually add options to do a file
system
On Tue, 2010-01-05 at 15:04 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
FWIW, I've not spent any time trying to get a pure nfs4 environment.
IMHO, it doesn't buy anything.
Getting away from usernames and numerical user IDs having to all be the
same on each computer?
--
[...@localhost ~]$ uname -r
All,
I have a client who lost root password for his machine running FC 11. I made an
attempt to recover password by booting in single mode. I am familiar with
editing the GRUB boot menu and appending linux single to make the server boot
in sigle mode.
My surprise, the machines boots
On Mon, 2010-01-04 at 22:48 -0800, Donald Russell wrote:
I have Fedora 12 running on an HP Pavilion a375c PC.
It has one of those multi-card reader things, and if I insert a
Memory Stick, an icon for it appears on my desk top and I can browse
files on it etc.
If I insert a Compact Flash
Tim wrote:
On Tue, 2010-01-05 at 15:04 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
FWIW, I've not spent any time trying to get a pure nfs4 environment.
IMHO, it doesn't buy anything.
Getting away from usernames and numerical user IDs having to all be the
same on each computer?
I think you are
On Tuesday 05 January 2010 08:15:12 Hosea Phiri wrote:
I have a client who lost root password for his machine running FC 11. I
made an attempt to recover password by booting in single mode. I am
familiar with editing the GRUB boot menu and appending linux single to
make the server boot in
On Tuesday 05 January 2010 05:00:02 Paul Allen Newell wrote:
Ed Greshko wrote:
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
And I cannot get my notebook to even go over 800x600 for the internal
display without using system-config-display to create a xorg.conf to
get higher resolution with FC12. How do I
I am trying to install fc12 i386 on a PC based on the Gigabyte
GA-EP45-UD3L motherboard with SATA RAID. It is an Intel chipset. I am
using RAID 1 (mirror).I have installed fc8 and fc11 successfully on this
hardware, but with fc12 on various attempts I either get that the
installer does not
-- Start Rootkit Hunter Scan --
Warning: Network TCP port 47107 is being used by
/usr/lib64/thunderbird-3.0/thunderbird-bin. Possible rootkit: T0rn
Use the 'lsof -i' or 'netstat -an' command to check this.
Results of lsof -i' and 'netstat -an'
Hosea Phiri wrote:
My surprise, the machines boots differently. I noticed one major thing
that looked different from other versions of Fedora I have used before.
It does not bring up the Grub menu. It does not even show the services
startup. It goes straight into login prompt bypassing all
On Tue, 2010-01-05 at 00:15 -0800, Hosea Phiri wrote:
I have a client who lost root password for his machine running FC 11.
I made an attempt to recover password by booting in single mode. I am
familiar with editing the GRUB boot menu and appending linux single
to make the server boot in sigle
On 01/05/2010 10:54 AM, Frank Murphy (Frankly3D) wrote:
-- Start Rootkit Hunter Scan --
Warning: Network TCP port 47107 is being used by
/usr/lib64/thunderbird-3.0/thunderbird-bin. Possible rootkit: T0rn
Use the 'lsof -i' or 'netstat -an'
Adding to what Marko wrote, since it sounds from the original post
like the system may be configured to ask for a password in single user
mode. If that's the case you'll need to boot from the Fedora install
disc and choose the rescue mode, or if not available use any Linux
rescue/recovery disk
On Tue, 2010-01-05 at 00:15 -0800, Hosea Phiri wrote:
I have a client who lost root password for his machine running FC 11.
I made an attempt to recover password by booting in single mode. I am
familiar with editing the GRUB boot menu and appending linux single
to make the server boot in sigle
On 05/01/10 11:06, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 01/05/2010 10:54 AM, Frank Murphy (Frankly3D) wrote:
-- Start Rootkit Hunter Scan --
Warning: Network TCP port 47107 is being used by
/usr/lib64/thunderbird-3.0/thunderbird-bin. Possible rootkit: T0rn
On Mon, 4 Jan 2010 22:31:41 -0800 Barry Yu wrote:
I started F12 installation and everything seamed going well, finally the F12
finished and
to reboot, after the BIOS process and then the system got stuck: only the
cursor
blinking a top left, entire screen is black, and that's it, can't go
Hi Marko,
Possibly my explanation was not clear enough. What I meant was that I know how
to do it using single user mode by editing grub entry. But on this specific
machine, I cannot use the approach because I am not getting grub menu.
However coming to problem itself, let me say that it is
Before sending to the list, I tried this approach. I pressed shift continuously
but failed. I know it works on Fedora, but I can't understand why it failed on
FC 11.
However, thanks for the tip.
From: Roberto Ragusa m...@robertoragusa.it
To: Community
Hm. I think that telling someone to ignore a message like this would be
like telling people hey there is a pandemia, but just ignore it.
Either there is a warning for a potential danger (if there is really a
danger) or there is no danger (and there should be no warning).
Otherwise, in the
On Tue, 2010-01-05 at 18:31 +1030, Tim wrote:
Keeping a /home between installs has some problems, too. You find
that
certain things don't like your old .configuration files.
That's true independently of how you partition. Even if you do
reformat /home, presumably you backup and restore your
On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 03:08:39PM +0100, steven bellens wrote:
2010/1/4 Dave Martin darkm...@vt.edu:
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 09:21:18PM -0700, Linuxguy123 wrote:
Please reply if you need to ( ie must) use the proprietary nvidia driver
instead of the nouveau driver.
Or some other video
On 01/05/2010 11:18 AM, Frank Murphy (Frankly3D) wrote:
On 05/01/10 11:06, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 01/05/2010 10:54 AM, Frank Murphy (Frankly3D) wrote:
-- Start Rootkit Hunter Scan --
Warning: Network TCP port 47107 is being used by
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 00:15, Tim ignored_mail...@yahoo.com.au wrote:
On Mon, 2010-01-04 at 22:48 -0800, Donald Russell wrote:
I have Fedora 12 running on an HP Pavilion a375c PC.
It has one of those multi-card reader things, and if I insert a
Memory Stick, an icon for it appears on my
On 01/05/2010 05:39 AM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
On Tuesday 05 January 2010 05:00:02 Paul Allen Newell wrote:
Ed Greshko wrote:
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
And I cannot get my notebook to even go over 800x600 for the internal
display without using system-config-display to create a
On Tue, 2010-01-05 at 05:17 +0100, Tom H wrote:
How does one convince NM not to interfere with resolv.conf?
Don't know for sure how to make interfaces managed by NM
stop doing it, but for my non-NM system I still have to
prevent resolv.conf from being scrogged by setting
PEERDNS=no
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 06:32:44PM +1030, Tim wrote:
On Sun, 2010-01-03 at 22:19 +0100, Alessandro Boggiano wrote:
I'd like to change the destination of the default GNOME directories :
the directories like Videos,Music, Documents.. ( I'm using GNOME
in Italian, so
the original name,
I have a system dual boot xp with windows 7 which working fine, I installed the
F12 into this system, after first part of the installation complete, and then
reboot, the BIOS check finished, and the system got stuck, only the cursor kept
blinking at top left and won't go further, fortunately
On Tuesday 05 January 2010 12:01:10 Hosea Phiri wrote:
Possibly my explanation was not clear enough. What I meant was that I know
how to do it using single user mode by editing grub entry. But on this
specific machine, I cannot use the approach because I am not getting grub
menu.
Ah, well,
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 12:28:55AM +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Tue, 2010-01-05 at 09:22 +1100, Chris Smart wrote:
Hi all, what's the best way to get a minimal Fedora system?
What do you mean by minimal?
If you mean just the base system kernel, libraries, and yum and its
On Tue, 05 Jan 2010 14:30:02 +
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
That seems to be working for the moment, but there's an element of magic
in it that makes me nervous. The default named.conf file is set up as a
simple cacheing nameserver for local queries, but where does named do
its recursive
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 4:00 AM, Gianluca Cecchi
gianluca.cec...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, 4 Jan 2010 22:31:41 -0800 Barry Yu wrote:
I started F12 installation and everything seamed going well, finally the
F12 finished and
to reboot, after the BIOS process and then the system got stuck: only
On Tue, 2010-01-05 at 18:22 +1030, Tim wrote:
On Tue, 2010-01-05 at 00:39 +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
I installed bind and tried to use it as a basic cacheing nameserver,
which in principal just means running named and
pointing /etc/resolv.conf to 127.0.0.1. However resolv.conf keeps
On Mon, 2010-01-04 at 19:08 -0600, Mikkel wrote:
On 01/04/2010 06:39 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
I installed bind and tried to use it as a basic cacheing nameserver,
which in principal just means running named and
pointing /etc/resolv.conf to 127.0.0.1. However resolv.conf keeps
On Tuesday 05 January 2010 11:18:53 Tim wrote:
On Tue, 2010-01-05 at 00:15 -0800, Hosea Phiri wrote:
I have a client who lost root password for his machine running FC 11.
I made an attempt to recover password by booting in single mode. I am
familiar with editing the GRUB boot menu and
On Tue, 2010-01-05 at 09:54 -0500, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Tue, 05 Jan 2010 14:30:02 +
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
That seems to be working for the moment, but there's an element of magic
in it that makes me nervous. The default named.conf file is set up as a
simple cacheing nameserver
On 05/01/10 02:44, Mikkel wrote:
On 01/04/2010 06:08 PM, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
I have an HP Photosmart 8450 installed on fedora 12. It prints
beautifully when it comes to colour pages on plain paper format A4.
However, when printing photos it fails. I simply cannot force it to
print 4 by 6 inch
On Tuesday 05 January 2010 14:21:19 Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 01/05/2010 05:39 AM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
Sorry to jump in this thread, but have you tried to use xrandr to set up
the resolution you want? That way you don't need to generate xorg.conf,
and can convince X to give you any
On Tue, 05 Jan 2010 15:24:00 +
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
There isn't. This is the default, unmodified named.conf.
So that probably means you are simply talking directly
to the root DNS servers and should be able to lookup
any public addresses. The problem you'd have with only
using
1 - 100 of 178 matches
Mail list logo
