On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 10:11 AM, BeartoothHOS bearto...@comcast.net wrote:
Bug 605817 - bug/feature request : Main Menu lacuna
at bugzilla.gnome.org
You can make a URL directly to the bug:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=605817
Just so you know.
--
fedora-list mailing list
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 5:09 AM, James Allsopp
jamesaalls...@googlemail.com wrote:
I was wondering if anyone could solve this problem, whenever I log into
F12 or start music, I get a burst of static through my speakers. I've
done some research and found out about this, but is this likely to be
Ok, I proceed fully knowing that, from here on, I will carry a
reputation as a senseless pedant. But this kind of stuff drives me
nuts.
In the transition from F11 to F12, the context menu in Nautilus lost
Create Archive and gained Compress in its place. I want the old
menu item back, which is not
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Aaron Konstam akons...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
When you right click on a panel and the choose to dd to Panel, one of
the things you can add is gnote. This appears as a yellow icon in gnome,
unopened. No search window appears until you click on the gnote icon.
But
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Sam Sharpe lists.red...@samsharpe.net wrote:
It's in file-roller:
Thanks.
I didn't actually notice until you pointed it out and while I don't
actually care either way, your reasoning makes sense - which is a
valid argument for an RFE.
Since I'm not
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Aaron Konstam akons...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
In that screen in system-config-printer did you fill in the:
user-name and passwd boxes. Evidently that is sometimes needed,, and
filling those boxes should solve your problem.
I never knew that there were user-name
I'm running F12 (preupgraded from F11, which was formerly preupgraded
from F10, etc.) here on my work machine. Since the upgrade to F12,
whenever I print to our Windows-shared printer, I'm presented with a
User/Password challenge. The User defaults to my local user name,
which is not the name
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Aaron Konstam akons...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
print using this magic phrase:
smb://domain/sweerver/printername
as in:
smb://WORKGROUP/patrica/HPLaswerJ2
No passwds needed. system-config-pinter will indicate this form of
printer access.
Thanks for replying!
I
Hello!
I just got a brand-new machine with Windows 7 pre-installed on its
massive hard drive. Of course, Fedora is more my style, but I'd like
to keep the original OS intact and dual boot.
My question is this then: How safe is it really to allow the installer
to resize the existing partition
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 5:27 AM, Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca wrote:
having never done any SDL programming before (so be gentle), what
would i need to do to get started in terms of loading framebuffer
support for my first program?
SDL is pretty easy stuff, really. Someone with
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 8:46 AM, Tim wrote:
Alan Evans:
I presume you can otherwise use the network -- DNS working, etc. So
did you try yum clean all? I think you can even do it from one of
the menus in yumex.
Why do you suggest yum clean all? Would you also suggest format and
re-install
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
IOW the sensible procedure is:
yum clean metadata
iff that doesn't solve the problem: yum clean all
It doesn't happen often enough that I would care about the difference.
It's not like I sit staring at the updater while it regets the
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
IOW the sensible procedure is:
yum clean metadata
iff that doesn't solve the problem: yum clean all
And another thing: The OP actually stated he was using yumex. I just
double-checked and yumex doesn't have a menu option to clean the
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 1:32 AM, Jwalant Natvarlal Soneji wrote:
What could be the issue?
It is on Fedora 10.
I presume you can otherwise use the network -- DNS working, etc. So
did you try yum clean all? I think you can even do it from one of
the menus in yumex.
--
fedora-list mailing list
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 3:20 PM, Steven Stern wrote:
When I click Open Containing Folderon the Firefox download window, it
asks me to choose an application. What application should that be?
Known bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497710
Different things work for different
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Linuxguy123linuxguy...@gmail.com wrote:
Half the posts on this list are for sound issues. Clearly whatever F11
is using isn't working. So what is the plan for F12 ? When will the
Fedora sound system be given an appropriate level of priority such that
sound
A recent (last month or so) update changed the launch icon for Firefox
in my panel. Whereas it was smaller and sharper looking, now it's
larger and, subjectively, uglier.
I put a screenshot here: http://alanevans.org/lists/fedora-list-20090821.png
I distinctly recall that the icon used to be
Just one followup to this, and then I'll shut up, I promise.
I booted a Fedora 11 LiveCD, did a yum install thunderbird and put
the launcher on the panel for reference:
http://alanevans.org/lists/fedora-list-20090821a.png
Then I did yum update firefox and suddenly:
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 7:12 AM, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
Alan Evans wrote:
Ok. Given the totality of my experience so far combined with the many
replies I've received in this thread, I was inclined to believe that
starting with a Mac-formatted disk was really causing me serious
trouble
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 12:23 AM, Howard Wilkinson wrote:
Alan Evans wrote:
Just did a fresh install of F11 on a P4. The SATA hard disk was
repatriated from a broken iMac.
I didn't have install disks handy, so I downloaded the netinstall
image and installed the whole thing over my home
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 1:27 AM, Frank Murphy
(Frankly3D)frankl...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/08/09 23:11, Alan Evans wrote:
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 2:44 PM, Frank Murphy (Frankly3D) wrote:
Did you try
when in rescue mode
chroot /mnt/sysimage
grub-install /dev/sda1
and see what happens
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 1:34 AM, Frank Murphy (Frankly3D) wrote:
On 09/08/09 09:32, Alan Evans wrote:
--snip--
Reading some of your newer replies.
My mistake
This should have been
grub-install /dev/sda2
Thanks for the reply. Unfortunately, the result is identical.
Is there any way you can
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 1:45 AM, Frank Murphy (Frankly3D) wrote:
No, I meant if you try and boot normally.
from the hard disk, without any cd\dvd
Sorry, I thought I must be misunderstanding your question. Removing
the rescue disc from the CD drive results in:
DISK BOOT FAILURE, INSERT SYSTEM
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 2:14 AM, Frank Murphy (Frankly3D) wrote:
I don't have a LiveCD handy, only the netinstall CD. Downloading a
LiveCD would take me a very long time.
Send me you postal address *offlist*.
and I will send you on one.
That's very kind of you, sir, but hardly efficient.
If
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 7:19 AM, Mikkel L.
Ellertsonmik...@infinity-ltd.com wrote:
G.Wolfe Woodbury wrote:
On 08/09/2009 04:17 AM, Alan Evans wrote:
I'm still confused about how anaconda can possibly mount a partition
(two, including the boot partition) when fdisk thinks the partition
table
Just did a fresh install of F11 on a P4. The SATA hard disk was
repatriated from a broken iMac.
I didn't have install disks handy, so I downloaded the netinstall
image and installed the whole thing over my home DSL. This took nearly
a day and a half, and I don't want to repeat that process if I
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 2:44 PM, Frank Murphy (Frankly3D) wrote:
Did you try
when in rescue mode
chroot /mnt/sysimage
grub-install /dev/sda1
and see what happens.
Unknown partition table signature
Unknown partition table signature
Unknown partition table signature
Unknown partition table
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Alan Evansame.fed...@gmail.com wrote:
Just did a fresh install of F11 on a P4. The SATA hard disk was
repatriated from a broken iMac.
I didn't have install disks handy, so I downloaded the netinstall
image and installed the whole thing over my home DSL. This
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 8:47 AM, Paul W. Frieldssticks...@gmail.com wrote:
A note on the supposedly useless interface -- my question is, why do
people care so much about a progress bar anyway? When I get an update
alert, I right-click, tell the system to install updates, and go about
my work.
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 8:29 AM, daniel shiyooou...@gmail.com wrote:
hi guys,
i've installed fedora 10 on my laptop, there is a problem with the
activate and deactivate button in the system-config-network 1.5.95, they
are grey all the time. system-config-network worked fine on fedora 8,
Came to work this morning and updater icon told me that updates were
available on my F11 system. Pretty routine, I told it to go ahead and
do the update.
What wasn't routine was the subsequent error dialog complaining of
Local file conflict between packages:
Test Transaction Errors: file
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 9:20 AM, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Mon, 3 Aug 2009 09:04:32 -0700 Alan Evans wrote:
Anyway, today I can't update. Can anything be done? Or should this get
bugzilla'd? And if so, against what?
Usually if you just wait a few days the 32 and 64 bit repos get back
in sync
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 9:20 AM, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Mon, 3 Aug 2009 09:04:32 -0700 Alan Evans wrote:
Anyway, today I can't update. Can anything be done? Or should this get
bugzilla'd? And if so, against what?
Usually if you just wait a few days the 32 and 64 bit repos get back
in sync
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
iirc
bold=going to be installed
normal=updating
That can't be it. Today's updates were all already installed packages.
Where should users go to find out? It's in none of the docs that I can
find.
From my current evidence, it seems to be:
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 10:32 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Mon, 3 Aug 2009 10:30:43 -0700 Alan Evans wrote:
That can't be it. Today's updates were all already installed packages.
Where should users go to find out? It's in none of the docs that I can
find.
man yum.conf
search down for 'color
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
Alan Evans wrote:
Normal, non-bold, means that
the package is to be reinstalled because the available package is the
same version as the installed package. In such a case, I'm curious why
yum thinks it needs to be updated at all.
It's
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Frank Cox wrote:
The Radeon X1550 that I had in the computer previous to this one worked
perfectly with Fedora 10, as well.
And the X1550 seems to me to work even better with Fedora 11. Yes, I'm serious.
I'm beginning to think that I may be the only one for
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 7:42 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
All PIIIs are single cores, AFAIK.
Of course I knew that. In my mind, dual and dual core are the same
thing and don't necessarily mean that the cores are on the same die.
Kind of like when I say a Sun E1 is 64-core, I don't mean on a
Is it just me? Since the update to F11, OpenOffice Calc is *slow*. Really slow.
Like, go to an empty cell and type a number and hit enter then several
seconds pass before the screen redraws and the number appears in the
cell.
It was never a speed demon, but before F11, entering data wasn't an
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 10:46 AM, David L wrote:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 10:40 AM, Alan Evans wrote:
Like, go to an empty cell and type a number and hit enter then several
seconds pass before the screen redraws and the number appears in the
cell.
I don't see this behavior.
Actually, I
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 4:52 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 06/05/2009 05:07 AM, Alan Evans wrote:
I recall some time ago, perhaps FC8 or 9, that trying to remove
wireless-tools would threaten to remove nearly every package on the
system, including the kernel. Was that because yum was broken
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 7:01 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Alan Evans wrote:
It's broken because a package not being required by anything else doesn't
mean it isn't needed. For example, it could be an application which is
being removed because you just removed a plugin for it or a second
application
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Sharpe, Sam J wrote:
You're asking to remove X, and I know of Y and Z which are only
required by X - so you should probably remove X,Y, AND Z at the same
time
This is my understanding as well. And since:
[a...@agena ~]$ rpm -q --whatrequires basesystem
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 7:36 AM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Alan Evans wrote:
I have a small number of 32-bit packages on my desktop. If I try to
remove, for example, glibc.i686, then it tries to take
basesystem.noarch with it as a dependency!
You must be missing some x86_64
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 9:14 AM, M A Young m.a.yo...@durham.ac.uk wrote:
Have you got two basesystem packages installed? The F11 basesystem package
is basesystem-10.0-2.noarch.rpm.
[a...@agena ~]$ rpm -qa | grep basesystem
basesystem-10.0-1.noarch
[a...@agena ~]$
--
fedora-list mailing list
2009/6/4 Martín Marqués :
2009/6/4 Alan Evans:
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 9:14 AM, M A Young wrote:
Have you got two basesystem packages installed? The F11 basesystem package
is basesystem-10.0-2.noarch.rpm.
[a...@agena ~]$ rpm -qa | grep basesystem
basesystem-10.0-1.noarch
[a...@agena
2009/6/4 Martín Marqués:
Ohh. AFAICS, the subject of this thread is update to F11 with yum
True. But I was originally replying to Sam Sharpe, who claimed to have
no 32-bit packages on his system when that was apparently impossible
for me. I really wasn't expecting the sub-thread to last long.
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 2:49 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Alan Evans wrote:
Actually, not that either. A closer examination of yum output reveals:
removing basesystem-10.0-1.noarch. It is not required by anything
else.
This is being tagged for removal by the remove-with-leaves plugin
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 4:16 PM, Beartooth wrote:
My 701 has a 4GB solid state drive, which I think is the same, and either
a 4 GB or an 8 GB camera card. Tell me of those tweaks -- pretty please!
With sugar on it.
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2009-January/msg01418.html
(I'm
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 1:52 PM, Beartooth bearto...@comcast.net wrote:
And to
comment on one point there, are you aware of all the forums and wikis at
http://forum.eeeuser.com/
No, I was not. I'll peruse them some other time, perhaps. But I did
laugh: 4 separate forums devoted to various
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 10:20 AM, Beartooth bearto...@comcast.net wrote:
If that works on the 701 (which is a lot smaller, in every sense,
and slower than the 1000), it'll be the best news in a month of Sundays.
I installed the Omega spin on my 900A. I don't know how that compares
to the 701,
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 9:39 PM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
Craig White wrote:
The F9 repos were recently (in the past week) updated to use sha256
hashes for the repodata. It's possible that this has caused the
problem, though I am fairly certain that updating from a clean F9
install was tested
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
Alan Evans wrote:
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 8:57 AM, Dave Feustel wrote:
How about backing up your userspace to usb flashdrive and installing F10
from scratch after a reformat of your disk drive?
Did I not make it clear that installing
Hello, helpful, friendly types.
I have an old laptop that, for whatever reason, I can't install F10 on
directly. I can't remember what the problem was, exactly, but the
installer pukes or freezes or somesuch. So the machine has languished
on a shelf for several months.
Anyway, I decided to give
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 8:57 AM, Dave Feustel wrote:
How about backing up your userspace to usb flashdrive and installing F10
from scratch after a reformat of your disk drive?
Did I not make it clear that installing F10 from scratch was not an option?
--
fedora-list mailing list
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 9:31 AM, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
First, download
ftp://ftp.uci.edu/mirrors/fedora/linux/updates/9/i386.newkey/fedora-release-9-5.transition.noarch.rpm
and install it.
Then download preupgrade, and use it to upgrade to Fedora 10.
If I have not forgotten anything,
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 1:35 PM, M A Young wrote:
It sounds like yum or one of its dependencies is broken (or missing). You
could always try updating yum to the F10 version via rpm, and seeing if
updating it, or any of its dependencies fixes your yum problem.
I have to admit that I was
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 5:39 AM, Mike Cloaked wrote:
Usually a good way to find where a command is would be to use the which
command. In this case:
[m...@gestalt ~]$ which lsof
/usr/sbin/lsof
How is that going to work if /usr/sbin isn't already in your path?
--
fedora-list mailing list
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 8:13 AM, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
Alan Evans wrote:
How is that going to work if /usr/sbin isn't already in your path?
It does work. Try it yourself.
$ which lsof
/usr/sbin/lsof
$ echo $PATH
/usr/lib/qt-3.3/bin:/usr/kerberos/bin:/usr/lib/ccache:/usr/local/bin
FWIW, I've got dual-head working with an ATI Radeon X1550. Nothing
special about my system except a custom xorg.conf. I'm using the
standard radeon driver, so I don't worry at all about kernel updates.
Just to let you know that it just works, with the custom config caveat.
--
fedora-list
On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 7:56 AM, Jose Celestino wrote:
Words by Tim [Sun, Apr 05, 2009 at 01:20:31AM +1030]:
There's one thing worse than vi, and that's emacs. ;-)
And vice-versa :)
That, sir, is the finest response I have ever seen.
You've settled the entire vi/emacs war in two words. I
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 8:07 AM, Erik P. Olsen epod...@gmail.com wrote:
Okay, maybe the piece of cake was a little larger than what I remember :-)
I actually went to http://www.virtualbox.org, downloaded the package for
Fedora and did a yum localinstall
And they don't have a pre-made version
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Mikkel L. Ellertson
mik...@infinity-ltd.com wrote:
Alan Evans wrote:
And they don't have a pre-made version for F10 available at that site
that I can find.
Fedora 9 (Sulphur) / 10 (Cambridge) i386 | AMD64
That's what I get for scanning over the page quickly
Clark Martin wrote:
Alan Evans wrote:
I would have thought that the key-repeat wouldn't differ functionally
from rapidly tapping the key.
Most computer keyboards transmit to the computer a key down and key up for
each key. This is true for modifiers as well (shift, control, etc
Tim wrote:
Alan Evans wrote:
It surely used to work. But I just confirmed it doesn't work now.
Is any keypress having any effect? Things like USB keyboards aren't
always available until some drivers are up and alive.
I tested on my netbook, so the keyboard was part of the machine. As I
held
Craig White wrote:
I find that holding the keys down can be counter-productive. I suspect
that the code discards the buffer contents before looking for a key
press and that's why 'rapid taps' as Anne puts it seems to be the only
method that works.
I would have thought that the key-repeat
Nigel Henry wrote:
Hi Alan.
Hi.
Are you trying this on F10, because I can't get into interactive startup on
it.
I'm using the Omega spin, which didn't exist before F10, so yes.
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe:
Tom Horsley wrote:
Nigel Henry wrote:
On F9 I had to press the I a few times to enter interactive startup, on
earlier Fedora versions only one press is necessary, but on F10, I can't get
into interactive startup at all.
That's odd. I've never been able to see any effect from pressing I on
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Mail Lists wrote:
gdm has become, frankly, really awful.
Can we just make kdm the default - it is so much simpler to configure
and it behaves the way any rational administrator expects.
kdm is part of Fedora anyway ... leave gnome as the default desktop,
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 9:18 AM, Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca wrote:
sure, i'm willing to help out, but it (finally) dawned on me that
there's always going to be a fundamental drawback with the way jigdo
is being supported. when the re-spin is created, it will of course be
current
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 10:30 PM, antonio montagnani wrote:
have a look here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488225
Thanks. CC'd myself there.
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 7:15 AM, Aaron Konstam wrote:
On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 15:52 -0700, Alan Evans wrote:
I see nothing relevant in /var/log/messages. Should I be looking
somewhere else for printer-related messages?
cups messages are in: /var/log/cups in files like error_log
Of course. Duh
Sometime recently, printing stopped working in some applications.
I can go into System-Administration-Printing and print a test page.
And I can print without problem with OpenOffice Writer.
Firefox won't print anymore. It pops up the dialog with the progress
bar stating it's printing, which
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Arthur Pemberton wrote:
By your comment one would think that installing mysql-server brings
some great evil with it.
Maybe not that bad, but one might legitimately feel dirty because of it, anyway.
In a similar case for me, I had a web server which was fully
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 5:51 AM, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote:
where does yum keep its prefered mirrors list in FC10?
I have looked in /etc/yum* and not found any cached urls.
Sorry, don't know the answer to your question. But if I'm correctly
divining the reason behind your
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 6:08 AM, Mark Haney wrote:
Alan Evans wrote:
As I understand it, Gentoo doesn't suffer this because each user is
compiling their own package sets. Updating libfoo doesn't require
recursively redownloading every package that requires it because the
user already has
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 8:41 AM, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote:
I am installing FC10 on an ASUS with an SSD drive right now to see how it
behaves.
For me it's been quite satisfactory.
Quick suggestions (if you are of the GNOME persuasion) include using
openbox instead of metacity
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 7:43 AM, Dan Track dan.tr...@gmail.com wrote:
I was recently asked a question about how much RAM should there be
within a server given that the APP uses 8GB of Memory, should I buy
10Gig of memory and have a small harddrive and no swap space? Would
this configuration
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 8:24 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
SATA Hard drive speeds - 70 megs to 150 megs a second unless you're RAIDing
DDR2 RAM speeds - 6000 megs a second and up.
If performance is a key issue, which I'm sure it is, you don't want swap.
Of course I'm perfectly aware that RAM
Has anyone successfully installed jEdit on Fedora 10? How did you do it?
Honestly, I've never used it myself. Although it looks to be a very
capable editor. Most of the developers at my company just switched to
it (Windows users, all), so I thought it would be prudent to test it
out myself.
I
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
Have you tried enabling the jpackage repository?
http://www.jpackage.org/
Not successfully.
I downloaded the jpackage17.repo file, but yum just errored out on
every mirror. I forced the repo file to pretend that I wanted Fedora-9
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 5:54 AM, Timothy Murphy gayle...@eircom.net wrote:
My experience is that if NM is running,
it is not a good idea to run system-config-network.
In fact, I don't think it is ever a good idea to run system-config-network.
Indeed. Now that it seems NM is capable enough for
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 1:36 PM, Aaron Konstam wrote:
On Tue, 2009-01-13 at 07:27 -0800, Alan Evans wrote:
Indeed. Now that it seems NM is capable enough for my needs, I intend
to do yum remove system-config-network as soon as I get this situation
sorted.
You don't want to remove it. Just
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote:
Is FC9 the way to go, or should I take the dive with FC10? What are others
running on their Eee?
I installed F10 (actually, the Omega spin) on my 900A and I'm
extremely pleased. I did a few customizations, such as
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote:
Alan Evans wrote:
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com
wrote:
I installed F10 (actually, the Omega spin) on my 900A and I'm
extremely pleased. I did a few customizations
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 1:51 PM, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote:
Of course a /home directory, just not in its own partition. Only 3
partitions: /boot, swap, and /
I even forwent the separate /boot partition.
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe:
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 6:47 PM, Alan Evans wrote:
I screwed up.
I wanted to temporarily assign static IP settings for eth0, and like a
dufus I used system-config-network. Unchecked Controlled by Network
Manager and entered the desired addresses. This worked fine as far as
it went.
When I
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 8:06 PM, Mail Llists li...@sapience.com wrote:
Try cleaning the gnome registry - much fun is stored there. However, if
you are using gnome not kde it may clean more than you want. If you're using
kde then .. well you get the idea.
Thanks for taking the time to suggest a
I screwed up.
I wanted to temporarily assign static IP settings for eth0, and like a
dufus I used system-config-network. Unchecked Controlled by Network
Manager and entered the desired addresses. This worked fine as far as
it went.
When I was finished with the temporary settings, I went back and
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 10:18 PM, Ed Greshko ed.gres...@greshko.com wrote:
With the USB mounted become root Then chown alan /media/disk.
The ownership information is maintained in the ext2 structure. So, the
next time it is mounted it will retain ownership by alan.
I find this acceptable.
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 7:20 PM, Jim Cornette fc-corne...@wowway.com wrote:
You might be able to use JFFS2 for the flash. We use JFFS2 for out Flash
storage on embedded devices.
Hmmm. I would actually not mind trying that at all.
But how do I get my root (and only) FS to be JFFS2? It's not an
Howdy!
When I insert a USB thumb drive formatted with vfat, it gets
automagically mounted under /media with appropriate permissions so the
logged in user can write to the device. But if the thumb drive is
formatted ext2, only root can write to it.
$ mount
/dev/sdb1 on /media/Devel type ext2
Hello, Friendly Fedora Folks:
My problem seems possibly related to some recently reported issues,
but I'm unable to fit suggested solutions to my issue. Anyway, here
goes:
I have an Asus EeePC 900A. It predictably took me about 2.5 minutes to
figure out that I wanted nothing at all to do with
On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 11:01 AM, fred smith
fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us wrote:
On Sat, Jan 03, 2009 at 10:34:24AM -0800, Alan Evans wrote:
I discovered (on my eeepc 901) that adding relatime to /etc/fstab causes
subsequent kernel installs to go bad in that they create bad initrd file
I have a system with extremely limited mass storage. So I went hunting
for anything I might remove to save disk space. Anyway, I thought to
myself, Self, firstboot doesn't do anything useful anymore; let's
remove it!
But yum tells me that removing firstboot will take
system-config-keyboard with
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 2:37 PM, Seann Clark wrote:
If it is
multithreaded, like say Apache, then, under load you will see it peg all
your CPU's/Cores instead of just one. I see this type of behavior on my home
server, which has quad core dual Xeon's, and when I stress test HTTP all
eight
Nobody ever complains when something works right, so I thought I'd
lead by example. And there's been a number of messages lately
reporting that preupgrade doesn't work right.
Upgrades typically take a long time, so I figured the long holiday
weekend was the perfect opportunity. I
Does anybody have VMWare Workstation 6.0.5 working with the latest F9
kernel updates?
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 6:33 PM, Alan Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anybody have VMWare Workstation 6.0.5 working with the latest F9
kernel updates?
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 10:36 AM, Iarly Selbir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
try run the vmware-config.pl again.
I'm guessing, then, that your
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 10:45 AM, Wayne Feick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
VMware Workstation 6.5 is out now, with some nice new features like Unity.
With this release, simply running vmware once as root will automatically
rebuild all the needed modules for you.
Is my 6.0 license good for 6.5 in
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
