domain name registry with mail hops

2009-08-03 Thread Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED
Any recommendations for a domain name registry service that will also forward e-mail? Speedy and reliable forwarding is a virtue. Thanks, Mike. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines:

Re: httpd fails after boot

2009-07-24 Thread Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED
On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 20:26:34 -0500, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote: [...] Well, /etc/init.d/httpd already sources /etc/sysconfig/httpd if there is one. I would think it would be better to source /etc/sysconfig/httpd in /root/.bashrc rather then sourcing /root/.bashrc in /etc/init.d/httpd .

httpd fails after boot

2009-07-23 Thread Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED
On my Fedora 7 (I know its old) I have been upgrading my httpd.config, including adding some Includes and RewriteCond(ENV:...). I just noticed that after a boot, the web server fails. This can be corrected with: /etc/init.d/httpd restart which returns OK on both the stop and start. I note also

Re: httpd fails after boot

2009-07-23 Thread Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED
On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 16:25:48 +, Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote: On my Fedora 7 (I know its old) I have been upgrading my httpd.config, including adding some Includes and RewriteCond(ENV:...). I just noticed that after a boot, the web server fails. This can be corrected with: /etc/init.d

Re: httpd fails after boot

2009-07-23 Thread Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED
On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 17:00:33 +, Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote: On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 16:25:48 +, Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote: [...] I just examined the Rewrite log and I found that it does not recognize the environment variable. I have S85httpd at levels 3 and 5. Where do

Re: httpd fails after boot

2009-07-23 Thread Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED
On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 20:38:45 +0100, Sharpe, Sam J wrote: [...] I just examined the Rewrite log and I found that it does not recognize the environment variable.  I have S85httpd at levels 3 and 5.  Where do the environment variables /etc/bashrc get set? I don't think they ever do. I

Re: httpd fails after boot

2009-07-23 Thread Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED
On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 21:59:44 +0100, Sharpe, Sam J wrote: [...] If you look at /etc/init.d/httpd, you will see: if [ -f /etc/sysconfig/httpd ]; then . /etc/sysconfig/httpd fi So the initialisation script sources that file. If you want to set Environment variables that are

Re: httpd fails after boot

2009-07-23 Thread Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED
On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 16:40:50 -0500, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote: Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote: On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 21:59:44 +0100, Sharpe, Sam J wrote: [...] If you look at /etc/init.d/httpd, you will see: if [ -f /etc/sysconfig/httpd ]; then . /etc/sysconfig/httpd fi So

Re: httpd fails after boot

2009-07-23 Thread Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED
On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 18:04:08 -0500, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote: Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote: Ah - now I understand. He could always sounds /etc/sysconfig/httpd from the config for the shell. If he wants it for all users, then two small scripts in /etc/profile.d for sh and c type shells. (http.sh

Re: httpd fails after boot

2009-07-23 Thread Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED
On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 17:04:31 -0500, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote: Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote: On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 16:40:50 -0500, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote: What does /etc/sysconfig/httpd look like? Is it possible that you are using the wrong format? You do not really want to change the /etc

Re: httpd fails after boot

2009-07-23 Thread Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED
On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 19:09:01 -0500, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote: [...] If you put the variables you need in /etc/sysconfig/httpd, you could then source that file anywhere else you need the same variables set. If you just need it for one user, you could add something like this to .bashrc. If you

Apache 443 already in use

2009-07-21 Thread Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED
I am trying to bring up an https server on my Fedora 7 (I know its old) which has been successfully running an http server for a long time. It complained that port 443 was already in use. On a whim, I commented out: #Listen 192.168.1.32:443 and to my surprise, it all appeared to work correctly.

Re: dig: single line

2009-03-13 Thread Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED
On Fri, 13 Mar 2009 15:01:44 +, Bill Crawford wrote: On Thursday 12 March 2009 01:46:09 Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote: Yes, I need the IP address so I can make a TCP/IP connection. Just out of curiosity, how are making the connection? Most applications can take a hostname

dig: single line

2009-03-11 Thread Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED
Is there a way to get dig to return at most one line? For example (on FC7), : #dig +short +search +nomultiline www.ieee.org a165.g.akamai.net. 204.2.177.34 204.2.177.41 is not exactly nomultiline. Thanks, Mike. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe:

Re: dig: single line

2009-03-11 Thread Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED
On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 09:30:00 +1030, Tim wrote: On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 22:18 +, Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote: Is there a way to get dig to return at most one line? For example (on FC7), : #dig +short +search +nomultiline www.ieee.org a165.g.akamai.net. 204.2.177.34 204.2.177.41

Re: dig: single line

2009-03-11 Thread Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED
On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 19:31:34 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 23:32 +, Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote: The head suggestion won't work, because in the above example, it is the second line I want. A trivial excercise for old Shell hands, e.g. program | head

Re: dig: single line

2009-03-11 Thread Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED
On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 19:46:53 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Thu, 2009-03-12 at 00:13 +, Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote: On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 19:31:34 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 23:32 +, Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote: The head suggestion won't work

Re: dig: single line

2009-03-11 Thread Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED
On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 00:35:03 +, Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote: On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 19:46:53 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Thu, 2009-03-12 at 00:13 +, Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote: On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 19:31:34 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 23:32 +

Re: dig: single line

2009-03-11 Thread Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED
On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 11:58:28 +1030, Tim wrote: On Thu, 2009-03-12 at 00:13 +, Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote: Yes, but the dig command sometimes returns the result on the first line, and sometimes on the second, so it is necessary to test what you get. Perhaps you should say what sort

C++ noshowbase ignored

2009-02-03 Thread Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED
In FC7, the line ... cout a = 0x setfill('0') hex noshowbase setw(8) a dec setfill(' ') endl; ... results in: a = 0x0x91a1218 Is there something I can do about this? Thanks, Mike. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe:

Re: C++ noshowbase ignored

2009-02-03 Thread Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED
On Tue, 03 Feb 2009 18:46:49 -0500, Todd Denniston wrote: Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote, On 02/03/2009 02:47 PM: In FC7, the line ... cout a = 0x setfill('0') hex noshowbase setw(8) a dec setfill(' ') endl; ... results in: a = 0x0x91a1218

Re: C++ noshowbase ignored

2009-02-03 Thread Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED
On Tue, 03 Feb 2009 12:10:17 -0800, Ulrich Drepper wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote: Is there something I can do about this? Use an actually supported version of the compiler and runtime. Later versions (at least F9) don't have

FC7: Kernel panic on boot

2009-01-23 Thread Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED
Lately, when booting FC7, I often get some hex numbers followed by something like:: Kernel Panic - not syncing. Attempted to kill the idle task. A reboot usually succeeds. Any suggestions? Thanks, Mike. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe:

hardware test

2009-01-21 Thread Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED
Can someone recommend software to test my hardware? ASUS motherboard, 1G ram, 80G hard drive. Nothing on the box is to be saved. Thanks, Mike. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines:

Re: ntpd sync fails on boot

2009-01-10 Thread Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED
On Sat, 10 Jan 2009 15:28:40 +1030, Tim wrote: On Fri, 2009-01-09 at 18:43 +, Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote: On my FC7 system, on boot up: ntpd: Synchronizing with time server: always fails. However, after the boot, if I log on and restart ntpd, the sync always succeeds. I also

ntpd sync fails on boot

2009-01-09 Thread Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED
On my FC7 system, on boot up: ntpd: Synchronizing with time server: always fails. However, after the boot, if I log on and restart ntpd, the sync always succeeds. I note that the time server it uses is right next door, on my LAN on the same hub. Thanks for your suggestions. (Yes I know FC7

Re: ntpd sync fails on boot

2009-01-09 Thread Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED
On Fri, 09 Jan 2009 11:58:25 -0700, Craig White wrote: [...] sounds like an old discussion... perhaps ntpd starts before network is up and running - i.e. running 'NetworkManager' What is output of (as root) chkconfig --list NetworkManager chkconfig --list network Craig Here is the

Re: ntpd sync fails on boot

2009-01-09 Thread Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED
On Fri, 09 Jan 2009 13:12:35 -0700, Craig White wrote: On Fri, 2009-01-09 at 20:04 +, Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote: On Fri, 09 Jan 2009 11:58:25 -0700, Craig White wrote: [...] yeah - not a NetworkManager issue at all. # cat /etc/ntp/step-tickers # List of servers used

Re: ntpd sync fails on boot

2009-01-09 Thread Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED
On Fri, 09 Jan 2009 14:49:34 -0700, Craig White wrote: On Fri, 2009-01-09 at 21:42 +, Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote: On Fri, 09 Jan 2009 13:12:35 -0700, Craig White wrote: On Fri, 2009-01-09 at 20:04 +, Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote: On Fri, 09 Jan 2009 11:58:25 -0700, Craig White

Re: ntpd sync fails on boot

2009-01-09 Thread Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED
On Fri, 09 Jan 2009 15:21:42 -0500, Todd Denniston wrote: [...] any ntpd messages in /var/log/messages during boot? If ntpd detects what the problem is, it often gives a clue there. do you see any messages on boot where network is being delayed? Is it only the ntpdate failing or is ntpd

Re: ntpd sync fails on boot

2009-01-09 Thread Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED
On Fri, 09 Jan 2009 16:38:23 -0700, Craig White wrote: On Fri, 2009-01-09 at 23:04 +, Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote: [...] 1 - you're using mbrc32 in /etc/ntp/step-tickers but 192.168.9.21 in /etc/ntp.conf No, mbrc32 (192.168.9.32) is the machine that I am rebooting and has

Re: ntpd sync fails on boot

2009-01-09 Thread Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED
On Fri, 09 Jan 2009 23:57:02 +, Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote: On Fri, 09 Jan 2009 16:38:23 -0700, Craig White wrote: [...] as root... # fixfiles onboot # shutdown now -r [...] fixfiles onreboot is not available on my fixfiles. I did: fixfiles restore and then rebooted. It cleaned up

Re: ntpd sync fails on boot

2009-01-09 Thread Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED
My time server is a CentOS 5 box and gets its time from tock.usno.navy.mil . I just rebooted it to see if its ntpd could sync on boot. It did it, although it took about half a dramatic minute. Mike. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe:

Re: ntpd sync fails on boot

2009-01-09 Thread Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED
On Fri, 09 Jan 2009 17:51:48 -0700, Craig White wrote: [...] I would recommend that you take DNS /etc/hosts out of this equation by changing mbrc21 with the ip address but beyond that - I simply don't know Craig I did that and it didn't help. Maybe I should think of upgrading the system.

Re: Slow Second Access to Internet

2008-10-31 Thread Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED
On Fri, 31 Oct 2008 14:49:46 -0400, Jerry Feldman wrote: On 10/28/2008 08:19 PM, Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote: In summery, it appears at this time that the repeated DNS problem (if it is really that) is isolated to Firefox. A couple of things first. There is a daemon, nscd that causes DNS

Re: Slow Second Access to Internet

2008-10-31 Thread Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED
On Fri, 31 Oct 2008 16:24:30 -0700, Nifty Fedora Mitch wrote: On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 02:49:46PM -0400, Jerry Feldman wrote: [...] Good stuff. Yes, it solved the problem If it is 'only' Firefox look at the network setup of both. It is common for ISPs and even wireless hot spots to

Slow Second Access to Internet

2008-10-28 Thread Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED
In my FC7, using Firefox, if for example, I access www.google.com, I get an essentially instantaneous response. If I then close the browser, reopen it, and again try to access google, there is a long delay, perhaps a minute before I get the response. (I note that my browser is set to delete all

Re: Slow Second Access to Internet

2008-10-28 Thread Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008 09:11:50 -0700, Peter Langfelder wrote: [...] It seems your DNS lookup is intermittently slow. I'd log into the router/web gateway (192.168.1.1 in your browser or so) and run the DNS lookup diagnostic test - if it is shows similar behaviour, you will know it's a problem

Re: Slow Second Access to Internet

2008-10-28 Thread Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008 14:05:03 -0400, Mark Haney wrote: Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote: [...] Does this happen with any other browsers? I know Pan can be really sluggish at times, so I tend to discount that app as far as network reaction times go. Does opera or Konqueror do that? I haven't

Re: Slow Second Access to Internet

2008-10-28 Thread Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008 11:55:29 -0500, George Yanos wrote: For once, a reason not to ignore mail from the guy named e-mail ignored. [...] Thanks for your appreciation. Of course, I have several e-mail addresses. The yahoo address is used only for newsgroups. Every few weeks I log on and

automatic ssh agent

2008-10-08 Thread Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED
Could you please remind me of the name of the file that creates an ssh agent on start? Thanks, Mike. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

run bash script on a MAC?

2008-09-30 Thread Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED
On my FC7 box I wrote a bash script that my daughter wants to run on her MAC. I know nothing of the MAC. Would this work? BTW, the script is essentially a for loop that renames files. Thanks for your help. Mike. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe:

out of available locker entries

2008-09-17 Thread Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED
On 2.6.22.1-41.fc7, I get: # rpm -q httpd rpmdb: Lock table is out of available locker entries rpmdb: Unknown locker ID: 909 error: db4 error(22) from db-close: Invalid argument error: cannot open Packages index using db3 - Cannot allocate memory (12) error: cannot open Packages database in

Re: cifs WinXP problem

2008-08-31 Thread Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED
On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 01:37:47 -0400, Robert L Cochran wrote: If the Windows XP box has the Windows firewall turned on, are you allowing inbound and outbound traffic for cifs? I don't know the port numbers off the top of my head, and my knowledge of cifs is smaller than a grain of sand. Bob

Re: cifs WinXP problem

2008-08-31 Thread Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED
On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 11:16:29 -0500, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote: [...] Dumb question - is abdc30 in /etc/host, /etc/samba/lmhosts, or resolvable in some other way? Mikkel [...] It is defined in /etc/hosts . Mike. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe:

Re: cifs WinXP problem

2008-08-31 Thread Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED
On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 03:39:04 +0930, Tim wrote: On Sun, 2008-08-31 at 13:14 +, Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote: The Security Center display shows that ZoneAlarm Pro is on, even after I shut ZoneAlarm down! Under some circumstances, shutting zonealarm down would just send the interface away

Re: cifs WinXP problem

2008-08-31 Thread Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED
On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 20:47:30 +, Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote: On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 11:16:29 -0500, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote: [...] Dumb question - is abdc30 in /etc/host, /etc/samba/lmhosts, or resolvable in some other way? Mikkel [...] It is defined in /etc/hosts . Mike

Re: cifs WinXP problem

2008-08-31 Thread Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED
On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 17:32:46 -0500, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote: [...] This is the way it is supposed to be: The default order is lmhosts, host, wins, bcast and without any entry in the smb.conf file the name resolution methods will be attempted in this order. Did you double check that the

Re: cifs WinXP problem

2008-08-31 Thread Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED
On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 19:42:56 -0500, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote: [...] I should have copied the definition from the man page. host: Do a standard host name to IP address resolution, using the system /etc/hosts , NIS, or DNS lookups. Also, lmhosts is /etc/samba/lmhosts, and not /etc/lmhosts.

cifs WinXP problem

2008-08-30 Thread Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED
Sorry to trouble you with what may be a Microsoft problem. On my LAN, I replaced one of my Win2k boxes with a new WinXP box. I use cifs to connect with MS boxes from an FC7 box. Here is the main part of the start script in init.d : case $1 in start) mount -t cifs -o user=administrator%

Re: PAN Failure -- Help

2008-08-13 Thread Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED
On Wed, 13 Aug 2008 08:30:29 -0500, Roger Heflin wrote: [...] The error is not terribly useful, I doubt there is going to be a better suggestion than to try a few files at a time, though you may be able to run strace -o pan.out -f pan on the command line and see what was the last file being

Re: F8 vs F9

2008-08-13 Thread Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED
On Wed, 13 Aug 2008 06:51:15 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: Mark Haney wrote: Ed Greshko wrote: The answer is either yes, no, or maybe. And you get 10 points for asking one of the silliest questions I've seen asked her in quite some time. Why is it silly? Basically because it doesn't

Re: F8 vs F9

2008-08-12 Thread Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 22:25:31 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote: I need to install a few new systems in the next few weeks. My requirements are: apache; C++ code development; netfilter; KDE; openvpn; and above all, stability. I have heard a rumor that I might be better

PAN Failure -- Help

2008-08-12 Thread MIKE - EMAIL IGNORED
I am talking to you from my laptop (running F8 and pan-0.132-2.fc8) because my desktop (running F7 and pan-0.131-1.fc7) suddenly stopped working. When I start pan (under KDE), its GUI flashes briefly and then disappears. Other things, including Firefox and Apache seem fine so far. Thanks for

Re: PAN Failure -- Help

2008-08-12 Thread MIKE - EMAIL IGNORED
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 20:24:57 -0500, Roger Heflin wrote: MIKE - EMAIL IGNORED wrote: I am talking to you from my laptop (running F8 and pan-0.132-2.fc8) because my desktop (running F7 and pan-0.131-1.fc7) suddenly stopped working. When I start pan (under KDE), its GUI flashes briefly

.serverauth.*

2008-08-09 Thread Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED
On my FC7 system, ls -a yields 42 files of the form .serverauth.* where the wild card is a number. For example: .serverauth.3016 What are these? Are they evil? Thanks, Mike. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: