Hi
I like the FAQ they have in the EOL announcement. Fedora could learn
from this.
http://www.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=announcemsgNo=407
Rahul
--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
On 12/22/2009 09:07 PM, Seth Vidal wrote:
FWIW - I agree with both jesse and jarod. Official builds are from main
branch. Anything built anywhere else will never be official.
How about scratch builds?
Rahul
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
On 12/23/2009 09:04 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 08:50:11PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 12/22/2009 09:07 PM, Seth Vidal wrote:
FWIW - I agree with both jesse and jarod. Official builds are from main
branch. Anything built anywhere else will never be official.
How about
On 12/24/2009 12:52 AM, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
It grants no patent rights to Distributors, aside from those already
granted to Novell in the previous covenant. What it practically means is
that once you distribute, you stop being considered an End User by
Microsoft, and are no longer
On 12/24/2009 05:49 AM, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
Care to explain the term environment-modules for me please?
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/EnvironmentModules
Rahul
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
On 12/23/2009 07:54 PM, Dan Burkland wrote:
I have used the proprietary driver for its superb handling of 3D acceleration
over nouveau. However, with the release of 2.6.33 near, I may give Nouveau as
it now supports KMS (It may have in the past I'm not quite sure).
Dan
On 12/24/2009 06:22 AM, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 09:17:00 -0800
Kam Leo wrote:
Is there any way to convince it to pick a much much larger font
size during boot?
Have you tried tacking on vga=0x317 or other setting to grub?
As I expected, KMS knows better than me what to
Hi,
I recently submitting Deja-dup, a backup program written in Vala for
review at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540761
Vala is described in more detail at http://live.gnome.org/Vala. Deja-dup
like many Vala programs include both the Vala source code and the C
source code to avoid
To infrastructure team,
As noted in
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-announce-list/2009-December/msg00011.html,
fedora-india list is moving from redhat.com to lists.fedoraproject.org
and the new location will be indian-us...@lists.fp.o
Although this is good for consistency, when I created
To infrastructure team,
As noted in
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-announce-list/2009-December/msg00011.html,
fedora-india list is moving from redhat.com to lists.fedoraproject.org
and the new location will be indian-us...@lists.fp.o
Although this is good for consistency, when I created
On 12/22/2009 02:51 AM, Jon Stanley wrote:
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 11:57 AM, Rahul Sundaram
wrote:
Although this is good for consistency, when I created this list, it was
never intended to be a end user focussed list and the focus is on
discussions between contributors. Unlike, other user
On 12/22/2009 03:57 AM, Jon Stanley wrote:
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Rahul Sundaram
wrote:
We can do what?
Oops. somehow quoted an entirely irrelevant portion of your message :)
We can call the list whatever you like. indian-community sounds as
good as any to me.
Alright. Great
On 12/21/2009 10:18 PM, Eric Tanguy wrote:
I can't find where to report bug against gnome-system-log ?
Thanks
Eric
Bugzilla lists source RPM names.
# rpm -qf /usr/bin/gnome-system-log
gnome-system-log
# rpm -qi gnome-system-log shows that gnome-utils is the srpm.
Therefore, report it to
On 12/20/2009 08:10 PM, William Case wrote:
Hi;
I have replaced TomBoy (which I used throughout the day) with Gnote.
I want to set Gnote in my startup file so that it starts with the icon
in the notification bar but the search window NOT open.
I can get what I want when I start gnote
On 12/22/2009 07:11 AM, Jim wrote:
Can some one tell what happen to gnome-volume-manager in FC12 ?
Obsoleted by Nautilus for several releases IIRC.
Rahul
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines:
On 12/17/2009 03:20 PM, Christof Damian wrote:
I just find it annoying that some people seem to have File a bug. in
their signature, when one should assume that on fedora-devel everyone
would file a bug for valid problems. It might and should be different
on fedora or the forums.
They do
On 12/17/2009 03:04 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
And of course I installed it only a day before the final release
came out! Is it something I can repair or do I need to start over.
My b.w. usage is limited and I watch it carefully, another gigabyte
download is significant although
On 12/17/2009 03:23 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
After the first yum update:
Linux box6 2.6.31.6-166.fc12.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Dec 9 10:46:22 EST
2009 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Grub shows the original as:
vmlinuz-2.6.31.6-162.fc12.x86_64
Notice that it appears to have
On 12/17/2009 04:13 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
The question then becomes what is box 6? Is it capable of running as a a
64 bit computer? I do a lot of reconfiguration immediately after install
and yum collected 64 bit apps wherever possible and it all seems to be
working!
Do I need to
On 12/17/2009 06:11 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
Can someone tell me how to determine if a computer can run 64 bit
Fedora?
I have two similar Dell desk top computers with what appears to be
the same processor, one of which has had F-12 64 bit installed on it
and seems to be
Hi,
Omega is a completely free and open source Linux based operating system
and a Fedora remix suitable for desktop and laptop users. It is a
installable Live image for regular PC (i686 architecture) systems. It
has all the features of Fedora and number of additional software
including multimedia
On 12/17/2009 12:46 PM, Christof Damian wrote:
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 19:58, Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de
wrote:
pavucontrol currently crashes (and pulseaudio) for me on one machine
and I need this functionality.
File a bug.
Could everyone on this list please assume that I
On 12/17/2009 01:14 AM, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
Will there ever be an x86_64 version?
Don't have a x86_64 box myself but I will try and generate a image somehow.
Rahul
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
On 12/17/2009 12:44 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
Are there any differences between this and
Omega012-i686-Live-RC1.iso that I just installed. I had some trouble
making it work as an NFS clent ... Other than that it looks good.,,
Yeah. RC1 had a important kernel issue (wrong arch) that has
On 12/17/2009 11:56 AM, Marcel Rieux wrote:
sha256sum -c *-CHECKSUM
sha256sum: Omega-12-i686-Live-CHECKSUM: no properly formatted SHA256
checksum lines found
There still is a problem.
Yeah. I have fixed the instructions and the file. Your checksum does
match btw.
Beside, since both the
Hi
It is a application that lets you minimize any app to the system tray
and is compatible with GNOME, Xfce, KDE etc. It has a dormant upstream
and I haven't had time to look into all the crash reports from Abrt. If
noone picks it up, I will orphan it in a week.
$ yum info alltray
Loaded
On 12/13/2009 09:04 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
Am I alone in finding the Fedora Installation Guide at
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/install-guide/f12/en-US/html/
almost completely useless?
The only installation method described with any clarity
is the creation and use of a Fedora DVD.
But
On 12/09/2009 10:11 AM, Robyn Bergeron wrote:
I'll add this to the wiki, but just wanted to throw this out there -
I know there is probably (a) a budget of sorts, and (b) budgets for a
lot of us who wouldn't have corporate sponsorship from our employer
(ie - students and such)
I would be
On 12/11/2009 02:07 PM, Huzaifa Sidhpurwala wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I have forked libtar as libtar-ng, because the upstream does not have
time to maintain it anymore.
Here is the bz:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546169
Now the
On 12/11/2009 03:56 PM, Florian Festi wrote:
Without knowing the history:
Best solution would be to ask former upstream for permission to continue
the project under its original name
That was already denied
https://lists.feep.net:8080/pipermail/libtar/2009-May/000259.html
Rahul
--
On 12/11/2009 04:38 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 16:14:40 +0530, Rahul wrote:
On 12/11/2009 03:56 PM, Florian Festi wrote:
Without knowing the history:
Best solution would be to ask former upstream for permission to continue
the project under its original name
That
On 12/11/2009 04:05 PM, Richard Hughes wrote:
2009/12/11 Rahul Sundaram :
File a bug report against gnome-packagekit. Seems to be a recurring bug.
In the future, can you tell people to search for existing bugs in
bugzilla _before_ they file bugs please.
The person I replied to is a long
On 12/11/2009 04:18 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
Too bad you replied in public where others may read it who are not long
time users/contributors and follow your advice.
If they are following advice, then they should follow my advice as
written in detail at
On 12/11/2009 08:34 PM, Tim wrote:
It'll take quite some effort, not impossible, but very
difficult, to get a signed compromising package into the repos.
Unfortunately, I don't think it's that difficult. Why do you believe it is?
Rahul
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To
On 12/11/2009 10:49 PM, Greg Woods wrote:
On Fri, 2009-12-11 at 22:16 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 12/11/2009 08:34 PM, Tim wrote:
It'll take quite some effort, not impossible, but very
difficult, to get a signed compromising package into the repos.
Unfortunately, I don't think it's
On 12/11/2009 11:08 PM, Kelly Jones wrote:
Ever since I yum install mencoder, my X server's been flaky +
frequently crashing.
I remember yum installing/upgrading libraries when I ran the command
above, but don't remember what the libraries were.
How do I find out what yum
On 12/12/2009 03:14 AM, Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote:
Rahul Sundaram sunda...@fedoraproject.org writes:
If they are following advice, then they should follow my advice as
written in detail at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Bugs_and_feature_requests
I'm not usually a fan of adding programs
Hi
Omega, a Fedora Remix has a RC1 out for your feedback.
http://omega.dgplug.org/12/Live/i686/tmp/Omega-12-i686-Live-RC1.iso
It is a 1.3 GB Live image for x86_32 bit systems that has
Openoffice.org, multimedia codecs, games, extra utilities and rolls in
all of the recent updates. More details
On 12/12/2009 07:42 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
Cool. I'd like to install onto a usb-flash to give to my girlfriend, but
when I tried F12 (not remix) it came up without the needed broadcom legacy
firmware. Is this included? If not, any guide to how to roll my own that
would include this?
Hi
http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/fedora-12-a-visually-pleasing-highly-configurable-linux-distro-you-might-want-to-try/
I know in my heart of hearts that Fedora is a good distro, even if it’s
not my cup of tea. It’s backed by Red Hat, it is the first to include
the latest in hardware support and
Hi
http://danlynch.org/blog/2009/12/f12/
Fedora advocates always point to the fact that it often has new
innovations before other distros. The developers work really hard on
this and I think they see themselves as trail blazers in a way. They
push a lot of their work back upstream and that’s
On 12/10/2009 01:29 PM, Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote:
Rahul Sundaram sunda...@fedoraproject.org writes:
You can use
http://spot.fedorapeople.org/chromium/
Thanks. Yes, I've been happily using that one for a while. It is
pretty darn usable.
Do you by any chance know what keeps it out
On 12/11/2009 07:24 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
A tiny orange octogon keeps popping up on my toolbar. Mousing over it
brings up a tooltip bubble: There is 1 update available.
Clicking on the icon runs gpk-update-viewer, which immediately tells me
that no updates are available. Closing
On 12/09/2009 10:17 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 12/09/2009 04:14 PM, James Antill wrote:
On Wed, 2009-12-09 at 15:26 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
So, yeh, if _you_ want to support slower machines
Well, I do not want to, I can't avoid to ...
... _you_ will have
to do the work, you
Hi,
As per policy at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers,
I have filed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546072
Rahul
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
On 12/10/2009 04:02 AM, Debayan Banerjee wrote:
2009/12/10 Debayan Banerjee
2009/12/10 Rahul Sundaram
Hi,
As per policy at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers,
I have filed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546072
This person used
On 12/09/2009 09:52 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Wed, 2009-12-09 at 08:36 -0600, Steven Stern wrote:
The repo is installed when installing the new, officially supported
Chrome beta from http://www.google.com/chrome/index.htm
Anyone know how this relates to the existing Chromium
On 12/10/2009 06:34 AM, Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote:
Steven Stern subscribed-li...@sterndata.com writes:
The repo is installed when installing the new, officially supported
Chrome beta from http://www.google.com/chrome/index.htm
I was intending to install it until I got to the licensing
On 12/09/2009 05:41 AM, idwsh6...@sneakemail.com wrote:
I tried to use preupgrade with a modified releases.txt that points to a local
repository. But preupgrade is still going to the mirrors over the internet.
Does anyone have an example releases.txt that demonstrates how to do
preupgrade
On 12/08/2009 03:59 AM, Mat Booth wrote:
2009/12/7 Panu Matilainen
Now that FESCo has approved new major RPM version for F-13 and the public
beta is officially out... it's going to hit rawhide in a few hours.
I remember hearing a rumour about automagic OSGi dependency
resolution... Is
On 12/02/2009 07:09 PM, Jindrich Novy wrote:
Hi all,
the Parallel XZ just reached usable state so if you want to take
advantage of parallel LZMA compression, please give it a try before
its inclusion into Fedora.
PXZ homepage is:
http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/pxz/
Are you moving this to
On 12/08/2009 05:35 AM, Steven Stern wrote:
We've been running on Thunderbird 3, beta 4 for a while now. The
current beta release is RC2, released on 12/1. Is the plan to stay on
beta 4 until the release of version 3 or will the updates repo pick up
the release candidates?
The latest RC is
On 12/05/2009 10:46 AM, Shakthi Kannan wrote:
Hi,
I am interested in mentoring candidates for Fedora Electronic Lab
(FEL), primarily focussing on:
* Packaging software for FEL
* Development for upstream (as required)
* Documentation
Wiki profile:
On 12/05/2009 03:27 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
On 06/12/09 04:49, Roger wrote:
On 12/05/2009 08:44 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
I just installed [yum] system-config-display and get the following
message when I try to use it:
All I want to do is determine what display parameters I am using?
On 12/02/2009 03:57 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
is there a way to request new yum groups related to a particular
issue? i'm thinking of embedded linux developers, who might want to
install the Embedded Linux group, which would contain packages like
squashfs-tools, mtd-tools, mtd-tools-ubi
On 12/01/2009 02:59 AM, Muayyad AlSadi wrote:
I consider real men to be a gender-neutral complement. I know women who
gladly receive it and exchange it amongst themselves.
Since we're offering Casey money to do things¹ today:
I will send you a check for $5 if you admit that real men is _in
On 11/30/2009 01:33 AM, Ikem Krueger wrote:
The Bugzappers also always happy to have more people volunteer to help with
X.org bug triage; it's a lot of work to keep on top of.
I'd like to help. But the wikipage for testing Xorg issues* is a way
to much to read, given the case you follow all
On 11/27/2009 11:38 AM, Dave Airlie wrote:
Don't use radeonhd, the Fedora X team don't support it and never have.
I'm thinking it should reallyt be removed from the distro at this point
That makes sense. Why don't we drop this from Rawhide? Shipping
unsupported drivers like this is
On 11/28/2009 02:12 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
I just did a new install on a spare laptop. I chose the Software
Development option.
Emacs did not get installed.
Also, although neither mysql-devel, nor postgresql-devel, nor even
libtool-ltdl-devel got installed, I ended up with a huge
On 11/28/2009 02:13 AM, Dave Airlie wrote:
We (Red Hat or Fedora) currently don't have access to any sort of
conformance suite for our GL though Intel and VMware have started at
least doing more and more regression test work lately so less and less
crap is making it way into the mainline and
On 11/28/2009 02:21 AM, Felix Miata wrote:
What makes your statement invalid is your use of the word essential. Bling
and essential are mutually exclusive characteristics WRT to normal desktop
users. I didn't use the word useless. And yes, 3D is way more - way more
overhead, way more
On 11/27/2009 10:29 PM, Guillaume Kulakowski wrote:
Hi,
I package GrNotify but the project is dead. I have reported some bug
to upstream and I have proposed some patch but no new release since 9
months. I think remove it from Fedora but I don't know any replacement
solution.
That do you
On 11/28/2009 02:32 AM, Debayan Banerjee wrote:
2009/11/28 Rahul Sundaram
Why? It's just shows your personal preference for a editor. Emacs is
certainly not needed for software development.
Well one does need an editor for development. Assuming vim and emacs
have roughly equal user bases
On 11/28/2009 02:49 AM, Felix Miata wrote:
On 2009/11/28 02:53 (GMT+0530) Rahul Sundaram composed:
On 11/28/2009 02:21 AM, Felix Miata wrote:
What makes your statement invalid is your use of the word essential. Bling
and essential are mutually exclusive characteristics WRT to normal desktop
On 11/28/2009 03:14 AM, John Poelstra wrote:
Bruno Wolff III said the following on 11/27/2009 11:59 AM Pacific Time:
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 09:41:17 -0800,
John Poelstra poels...@redhat.com wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/13/Schedule
Is there a calendar page for that that
On 11/28/2009 03:26 AM, Felix Miata wrote:
On 2009/11/28 03:37 (GMT+0530) Rahul Sundaram composed:
Compositing is sooner or later going to be enabled by default everywhere.
Somehow those niche users managed 10-20 years ago before there was such a
thing as 3D support in XFree86/Xorg
On 11/28/2009 02:26 AM, John Stanton wrote:
Hi,
I always suck at these things, but here goes.
I have been using Fedora for the past year and am loving it. I am
looking to gain more experience and skills. Also I am wanting to
contribute however I can to the fedora project.
I can also
On 11/28/2009 01:29 AM, Mike Cloaked wrote:
Indeed and a minute ago I notice that currently the OS page shows F11 50.7%
and F12 11.6% - I wonder if the ratio of F12 to F11 users will change
markedly over the next month?
You can look at the current growth rate and for previous releases at:
On 11/26/2009 07:54 PM, Terry Barnaby wrote:
That is true, but a major amount of work in getting a release out must
be testing it. Those Fedora people involved in the testing, which are
also user-testers, have their own systems with there own hardware and are
fully conversant with delving
On 11/26/2009 08:09 PM, Terry Barnaby wrote:
I have not entered any bugzilla numbers as yet. I spent days with F11 and
previous releases diagnosing reporting and attempting to fix bugs. No
graphics updates were ever made available for F11 and still Fedora cannot
run even Blender on most of
On 11/26/2009 08:34 PM, Terry Barnaby wrote:
Yes, clear bug reports are needed but they also need the follow through
to a fix and updated packages.
Agreed. File specific bug reports and post the links here.
Rahul
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
On 11/26/2009 08:38 PM, Linuxguy123 wrote:
On Thu, 2009-11-26 at 20:13 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Specific bug reports are definitely going to
help.
Here are 4 to start with:
1) Cronometer crashes KDE session.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504173
Filed against wrong
On 11/25/2009 05:26 PM, Jorge Manta Bulhoes wrote:
Hello,
I have a big problem in Fedora 12, and I'm a step away from format all
and kick it back to F11.
All my gnome menus disapeard and can't get them back.
I don't have file menus in evolution, terminal, gimp and all gnome utils.
On 11/25/2009 02:22 PM, Luc MAIGNAN wrote:
Hi,
I wanted to migrate all my servers from F11 To F12.
Some work well.
But some on the reboot after preupgrade, anaconda gives me an error in a
python script : error : unsupported locale settings and the
installation halts
Any idea ?
I don't
On 11/25/2009 10:06 PM, William Case wrote:
Hi;
Is the LiveCD updated as bugs are discovered and fixed, or do I get all
fixes subsequent to installation from the update repo?
In other words, if I download and burn the LiveCD now, it will remain
the same when it comes to installing F12 on
On 11/25/2009 09:11 PM, Beartooth wrote:
That url is the troubleshooting site I meant. I've tried both
ways. The first fails because I can't get enough cruft out of /boot;
Ok. So whats the size of your /boot and how much space is left? How many
kernels do you have installed? You can use
On 11/25/2009 10:58 PM, Craig White wrote:
I think perhaps preupgrade should automatically remove all but the
latest and if not the same, the currently running kernel to make all
possible space in /boot.
By automatically, if you mean, do after prompting, it isn't a bad
idea. Please file a
On 11/26/2009 01:07 AM, Peter Boy wrote:
F12 has some new features (see release notes) which come in quite handy
for me and I'm luckily using some of them.
I am curious, which features in particular?
Rahul
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe:
On 11/24/2009 08:35 PM, Simon Andrews wrote:
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 11/24/2009 02:21 AM, Ben Williams wrote:
If release engineering would like to release liveusb.iso for people to
use to install or just to look at the new features, that is fine But
from the #fedora channel the # of people
On 11/24/2009 10:32 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Hi, guys. Just a quick note - Matej Cepl pointed out that the
already-agreed BugZappers plan to switch to using the Triaged keyword
only for Fedora 13 and later presents problems. Most significantly, it's
impossible to reliably construct a
On 11/24/2009 11:57 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 20:47 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
We are not discarding CD images all together. If you feel there is a
compelling reason to continue with a Live CD, I am afraid you will have
to step up and do it. The tools are easy
On 11/25/2009 12:24 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 12:24 -0600, Sir Gallantmon wrote:
Why not label it x86_32 instead of i386? That is far less confusing and
illustrates that it is 32-bit on the x86 architecture, since x86_64 says it
is 64-bit on x86 architecture.
Because
On 11/25/2009 12:56 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Should there be a RFE bug or rel-eng ticket created so this e-mail
thread is not for nothing? It's been discussed since the beginning of
time AFAIK.
Tickets have been filed and closed before, IIRC.
Rahul
--
fedora-devel-list mailing
On 11/24/2009 01:13 PM, Luc MAIGNAN wrote:
Hi,
I need to setup a wiki system for my company. I need something simple to
use, but robust, customizable with a database support (MySql or PostgreSql)
What is the best choice ?
Thanks for advices
Mediawiki is what Fedora uses and it works
On 11/24/2009 11:32 PM, Beartooth wrote:
I've tried all the tricks on this list a/o the troubleshooting
site, over and over. I finally gave up : downloaded and burned a DVD --
and *still* hit the catch-22 error, with too little space in mnt/sysimage/
boot.
Now what?
On 11/24/2009 11:45 PM, Steven Stern wrote:
When I go to java.com, it tells me I don't have the recommended
version of Java installed. Java applets seem to run OK within firefox.
It appears that F12 uses openjdk at version 1.6.0. Is is a problem to
be behind the java.com version of 6.17
On 11/24/2009 11:47 PM, Valent Turkovic wrote:
Is new Omega 12 (Fedora remix/respin) finished?
Not yet. I am waiting to roll in the initial set of updates to get a
solid release.
Rahul
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe:
On 11/25/2009 12:58 AM, Valent Turkovic wrote:
Could you please share your current kickstart file? .ks file is
independent on updates, right?
Have you thought of packaging omega kickstart file and puting it in
rpmfusion as an package? Will there be some website for Omega or Wiki
page?
RPM
On 11/25/2009 01:10 AM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 11/24/2009 11:47 PM, Valent Turkovic wrote:
Is new Omega 12 (Fedora remix/respin) finished?
Not yet. I am waiting to roll in the initial set of updates to get a
solid release.
Bravo! I haven't looked at Omega in some
On 11/24/2009 10:14 PM, Vincent Onelli wrote:
Hi,
Is f12 now officially released?
Vinny
Yes, for about a week. Go grab it from http://fedoraproject.org
Rahul
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines:
On 11/25/2009 04:45 AM, Louis E Garcia II wrote:
Has anyone been able to get msn video conferencing working with empathy?
Mic and cam icons show up next to contacts but when trying I can see
myself with my cam but I can't see them. I think video is not fully
baked yet in empathy or I'm missing
On 11/25/2009 09:57 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Starting with F12/Gnome 2.28 I have a light red box in nautilus only
with the Download folder. It informs you that you can use Personal File
Sharing with this folder.
How do you remove this prompt?
I do not have it on one system, but I do
On 11/25/2009 11:06 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
On 11/24/2009 10:26 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
You can remove gnome-user-shar
...
I want to have Bluetooth sharing so I need to keep that package. Both
machines have Bluetooth. Both have gnome-user-share installed.
Ok. Do you have
Hi,
http://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20091123#feature
After spending several days with Fedora, I find that I'm happy with
this release. The live CD by itself was a bit underwhelming, but the
distribution as a whole has been excellent. This is probably the most
stable and most polished
Hi
http://www.linuxplanet.com/linuxplanet/reports/6910/1/
For example, Fedora 12 offers netbook enhancements that Frields noted
came from a community contributor.
In Frields's view, what Fedora does is it provides a set of building
blocks of well-engineered open source software.
Anybody that
On 11/24/2009 02:21 AM, Ben Williams wrote:
If release engineering would like to release liveusb.iso for people to
use to install or just to look at the new features, that is fine But
from the #fedora channel the # of people installing off of the livecd
images are very high (if you want to
On 11/24/2009 03:39 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
The netinst.iso would involve less downloaded content than the 700M live
image. How would it not fit their needs?
Perhaps net installation can be promoted as a spin and given
appropriate amount of attention in http://spins.fedoraproject.org
On 11/24/2009 09:54 AM, Otto Haliburton wrote:
from the descriptions I have seen on this thread there is a possibility that
it was, although remote. Maybe it is the tone of what you are saying. Tone
it down and be more tolerant is by far a more rational approach. People
won't report their
On 11/23/2009 06:05 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
on a fresh (and barely configured) f12 system, i tried to view my
first online .wmv file and was redirected here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageKit_Items_Not_Found#Missing_Codec
which is moderately informative in terms of telling
On 11/24/2009 03:00 AM, Jim wrote:
What is the latest fedora-release and fedora-release-notes rpms.
I have ;
fedora-release-12-2
fedora-release-notes-12.0.2-1.fc12
I'm not getting any updates and a lot of can't find a lot of fedora repos
# yum clean metadata
Try again. If that doesn't
1 - 100 of 2502 matches
Mail list logo
