On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 8:55 PM, Simon Slater [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've noticed the incorrect unread count on virtual folders too. If I
browse other folders then come back, often the count is corrected.
In my case, once it goes wrong it tends to stay wrong. However one of
the Evo devels
On Sat, 2008-12-06 at 12:31 -0500, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
I'm not seeing this, but I don't use Exchange. (though I do see
problems with virtual folders, e.g. the unread counts are often
wrong). Evo 2.24 has new indexing code which uses SQLite, and some
people seem to be having trouble
On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 18:52 -0500, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
In F10, Evolution's filtering of incoming mail takes forever--much
longer (according to my impression) than in F8. In addition, I
frequently see errors related to checking for junk mail along the lines
of: Pipe to spamassassin failed.
On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 18:52 -0500, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
Anyone else seeing this behavior? Any suggestions for
fixes/workarounds?
I've got the same setup for my work laptop, and yes, it's damn slow.
Much slower than in Fedora 9. I'm also experiencing other weird bugs:
- read/unread doesn't
On Sat, 06 Dec 2008 09:49:37 -0500
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm considering trying out brutus, but I don't know if it'll be any
better (not to mention I'll need to run a Windows VM via kvm to run the
brutus server side).
My experiences with wine have never been good, but
On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 18:52 -0500, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
In F10, Evolution's filtering of incoming mail takes forever--much
longer (according to my impression) than in F8. In addition, I
frequently see errors related to checking for junk mail along the lines
of: Pipe to spamassassin failed.
On Sat, 06 Dec 2008 09:08:58 -0500
Linuxguy123 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have the same impression. It took a serious step backwards with the
last update.
My impression has been backwards is the only direction evolution has been
marching for the last several releases. Finally led me to
On Sat, 2008-12-06 at 23:32 +1930, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 7:22 PM, Matthew Saltzman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In F10, Evolution's filtering of incoming mail takes forever--much
longer (according to my impression) than in F8. In addition, I
frequently see errors
On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 23:34 -0500, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 19:05 -0500, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Fri, 05 Dec 2008 18:52:35 -0500
Matthew Saltzman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone else seeing this behavior? Any suggestions for
fixes/workarounds?
If you are
In F10, Evolution's filtering of incoming mail takes forever--much
longer (according to my impression) than in F8. In addition, I
frequently see errors related to checking for junk mail along the lines
of: Pipe to spamassassin failed. The same thing happens if I use
bogofilter in place of
On Fri, 05 Dec 2008 18:52:35 -0500
Matthew Saltzman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone else seeing this behavior? Any suggestions for
fixes/workarounds?
If you are really totally wired to evolution and exchange
connector, my only advice is to setup a Windows virtual machine
where you can run
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 7:22 PM, Matthew Saltzman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In F10, Evolution's filtering of incoming mail takes forever--much
longer (according to my impression) than in F8. In addition, I
frequently see errors related to checking for junk mail along the lines
of: Pipe to
On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 19:05 -0500, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Fri, 05 Dec 2008 18:52:35 -0500
Matthew Saltzman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone else seeing this behavior? Any suggestions for
fixes/workarounds?
If you are really totally wired to evolution and exchange
connector, my only
13 matches
Mail list logo
