On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 20:38 -0800, john wendel wrote:
I booted the subject CD on a Dell Optiplex 720 (dual core AMD cpu) and
as far as I can tell, it worked great. The question I have is about the
output of ifconfig.
Running ifconfig shows 2 active ethernet interfaces, eth0 and eth1. Each
On Thu, 2009-12-17 at 08:43 -0600, Aaron Konstam wrote:
I suspect you have wireless capabilities on you machine and eth1 is
traditionally the wireless NIC.
*Traditionally* a wireless NIC is wlan, not eth.
--
[...@localhost ~]$ uname -r
2.6.27.25-78.2.56.fc9.i686
Don't send private replies to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 17/12/2009 16:14, Tim a écrit :
On Thu, 2009-12-17 at 08:43 -0600, Aaron Konstam wrote:
I suspect you have wireless capabilities on you machine and eth1 is
traditionally the wireless NIC.
*Traditionally* a wireless NIC is wlan, not eth.
I
On Fri, 2009-12-18 at 01:44 +1030, Tim wrote:
On Thu, 2009-12-17 at 08:43 -0600, Aaron Konstam wrote:
I suspect you have wireless capabilities on you machine and eth1 is
traditionally the wireless NIC.
*Traditionally* a wireless NIC is wlan, not eth.
--
Tim as you are I am non
I booted the subject CD on a Dell Optiplex 720 (dual core AMD cpu) and
as far as I can tell, it worked great. The question I have is about the
output of ifconfig.
Running ifconfig shows 2 active ethernet interfaces, eth0 and eth1. Each
interface has a different MAC address and shows
