Re: F9 - cups - windows shared printer

2008-07-28 Thread Tim Waugh
On Tue, 2008-07-22 at 09:39 -0500, Aaron Konstam wrote: I have yet to find out how you can configure a computer to print to printers distributed by a remote print serve as well as a local printer without editing its cupsd.conf file. Any suggestions? Use CUPS browsing (Aaron, I'm sure we've

Re: F9 - cups - windows shared printer

2008-07-28 Thread Tim Waugh
On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 15:58 -0700, Craig White wrote: We'll get to the bottom of it - and I'm pretty patient and suspect that Tim will sound off in a few days. :-) This is a samba bug, introduced by the upstream CUPS maintainer when he added proxy authentication support to smbspool:

Re: F9 - cups - windows shared printer

2008-07-28 Thread Craig White
On Mon, 2008-07-28 at 13:58 +0100, Tim Waugh wrote: On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 15:58 -0700, Craig White wrote: We'll get to the bottom of it - and I'm pretty patient and suspect that Tim will sound off in a few days. :-) This is a samba bug, introduced by the upstream CUPS maintainer when he

Re: F9 - cups - windows shared printer

2008-07-28 Thread Tim Waugh
On Mon, 2008-07-28 at 06:22 -0700, Craig White wrote: OK - so next time, instead of removing 'AuthInfoRequired negotiate' I would be better off changing it to 'AuthInfoRequired none' - got it. No, I don't think that will have any effect; the smb backend will still reset it to 'negotiate'. The

Re: F9 - cups - windows shared printer

2008-07-28 Thread Craig White
On Mon, 2008-07-28 at 14:35 +0100, Tim Waugh wrote: On Mon, 2008-07-28 at 06:22 -0700, Craig White wrote: OK - so next time, instead of removing 'AuthInfoRequired negotiate' I would be better off changing it to 'AuthInfoRequired none' - got it. No, I don't think that will have any effect;

Re: F9 - cups - windows shared printer

2008-07-27 Thread g
you had tried to print with. but if you were going to google anything, why not google the relevant keywords... googleing for; cups AuthInfoRequired negotiate } From: Andy Eager eageraj at tpg.com.au } Subject: F9 - cups - windows shared printer } Newsgroups: gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general

Re: F9 - cups - windows shared printer

2008-07-26 Thread Craig White
On Sat, 2008-07-26 at 19:08 +1000, Andy Eager wrote: OK, for anyone interested (and as a way of documenting the problem), I finally got to the bottom of this issue. It has absolutely nothing to do with users, groups, cups authentication, Firefox or much else discussed in this thread!! I

Re: F9 - cups - windows shared printer

2008-07-25 Thread Aaron Konstam
On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 20:51 +, g wrote: Craig White wrote: snip came back when I tried to print from Firefox... so maybe you *and* firefox need to be in 'lp' group. gbwg -- tc,hago. The group of the user and firefox is irrelevant. --

Re: F9 - cups - windows shared printer

2008-07-25 Thread Aaron Konstam
On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 15:58 -0700, Craig White wrote: On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 22:52 +, g wrote: Craig White wrote: snip On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 21:21 +, g wrote: Craig White wrote: snip I hope that you won't mind that I will continue to ignore your suggestions

Re: F9 - cups - windows shared printer

2008-07-25 Thread Mikkel L. Ellertson
Tim wrote: On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 19:01 -0700, Craig White wrote: It's no different than adding myself to lp group. While that might allow me to print, it doesn't really solve the problem and I can get it to print anyway. It does raise the point that some definition of what some system groups

Re: F9 - cups - windows shared printer

2008-07-25 Thread g
Aaron Konstam wrote: snip The group of the user and firefox is irrelevant. anyway, i added 'gbwg' only because i had added 'firefox'. maybe in case of 'lp' at this time. yet back when i set up cups in mandrake 8 and 9, it was necessary. it was also necessary that i was in 'sane' and 'xsane'

Re: F9 - cups - windows shared printer

2008-07-25 Thread Craig White
On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 18:14 +, g wrote: Aaron Konstam wrote: snip The group of the user and firefox is irrelevant. anyway, i added 'gbwg' only because i had added 'firefox'. maybe in case of 'lp' at this time. yet back when i set up cups in mandrake 8 and 9, it was necessary. it was

Re: F9 - cups - windows shared printer

2008-07-25 Thread g
Craig White wrote: snip leap to conclusions do we? only when information is left out. 1 - it's not only with Firefox...problem originally surfaced printing you were not elicit of evolution. 2 - why on earth would you think that this problem doesn't show up on in my curiousness of

Re: F9 - cups - windows shared printer

2008-07-25 Thread Craig White
On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 18:56 +, g wrote: Craig White wrote: snip leap to conclusions do we? only when information is left out. 1 - it's not only with Firefox...problem originally surfaced printing you were not elicit of evolution. 2 - why on earth would you think that this

Re: F9 - cups - windows shared printer

2008-07-24 Thread Craig White
On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 13:21 +, g wrote: Andy Eager wrote: snip I have no idea how this crap got into cups or even why authentication should be necessary to print locally. Anyway, it has nothing to do with the security deny/allow stuff in cupsd.conf this got me wondering. craig,

Re: F9 - cups - windows shared printer

2008-07-24 Thread g
Craig White wrote: snip came back when I tried to print from Firefox... so maybe you *and* firefox need to be in 'lp' group. gbwg -- tc,hago. g . in a free world without fences, who needs gates. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe:

Re: F9 - cups - windows shared printer

2008-07-24 Thread g
Craig White wrote: snip I hope that you won't mind that I will continue to ignore your suggestions thinking that they are not useful and even if they worked, that isn't the intended behavior and thus no solution at all. not at all. what ever churns your butter. if such an easy change is too

Re: F9 - cups - windows shared printer

2008-07-24 Thread Craig White
On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 21:21 +, g wrote: Craig White wrote: snip I hope that you won't mind that I will continue to ignore your suggestions thinking that they are not useful and even if they worked, that isn't the intended behavior and thus no solution at all. not at all. what ever

Re: F9 - cups - windows shared printer

2008-07-24 Thread g
Craig White wrote: snip On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 21:21 +, g wrote: Craig White wrote: snip I hope that you won't mind that I will continue to ignore your suggestions thinking that they are not useful and even if they worked, that isn't the intended behavior and thus no solution at all. not

Re: F9 - cups - windows shared printer

2008-07-24 Thread Craig White
On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 22:52 +, g wrote: Craig White wrote: snip On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 21:21 +, g wrote: Craig White wrote: snip I hope that you won't mind that I will continue to ignore your suggestions thinking that they are not useful and even if they worked, that

Re: F9 - cups - windows shared printer

2008-07-24 Thread g
Craig White wrote: snip We'll get to the bottom of it - and I'm pretty patient and suspect that Tim will sound off in a few days. in all sincerity, i do wish you much luck. this weekend i hope to get f9 respin burned and installed. i will be setting up cups with 3 printers and do look forward

Re: F9 - cups - windows shared printer

2008-07-24 Thread Aldo Foot
also, a request for others who are using cups, if they would check cupsd.conf and printers.conf files to see if authentication line is present. I use CUPs (F8). No AuthInfoRequired line present. ~af -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe:

Re: F9 - cups - windows shared printer

2008-07-24 Thread Craig White
On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 17:19 -0700, Aldo Foot wrote: also, a request for others who are using cups, if they would check cupsd.conf and printers.conf files to see if authentication line is present. I use CUPs (F8). No AuthInfoRequired line present. of course not because if it was

Re: F9 - cups - windows shared printer

2008-07-24 Thread Aldo Foot
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 5:35 PM, Craig White [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 17:19 -0700, Aldo Foot wrote: also, a request for others who are using cups, if they would check cupsd.conf and printers.conf files to see if authentication line is present. I use CUPs (F8). No

Re: F9 - cups - windows shared printer

2008-07-24 Thread g
Craig White wrote: snip of course not because if it was there, you would be complaining. yet for some reason, he is on who is not having a problem. why? i do not know. do you? people should ignore geleem's request what is wrong with a survey? even if you do not care to hear of others

Re: F9 - cups - windows shared printer

2008-07-24 Thread g
Aldo Foot wrote: snip He's just stirring things up to start another 100-message thread, eh? ;-) not even. just trying to learn and understand. -- tc,hago. g . in a free world without fences, who needs gates. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe:

Re: F9 - cups - windows shared printer

2008-07-24 Thread Craig White
On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 01:24 +, g wrote: Craig White wrote: snip of course not because if it was there, you would be complaining. yet for some reason, he is on who is not having a problem. why? i do not know. do you? people should ignore geleem's request what is wrong with a

Re: F9 - cups - windows shared printer

2008-07-22 Thread Timothy Murphy
Craig White wrote: I routinely set up cups to offer print queues for users whether Linux (automatic discovery, automatic setup), Macintosh (via cups or via netatalk) and Windows (via Samba, providing APW) and cups has been a remarkable print server/service with very few problems. Just a

Re: F9 - cups - windows shared printer

2008-07-22 Thread Craig White
On Tue, 2008-07-22 at 14:19 +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote: Craig White wrote: I routinely set up cups to offer print queues for users whether Linux (automatic discovery, automatic setup), Macintosh (via cups or via netatalk) and Windows (via Samba, providing APW) and cups has been a

Re: F9 - cups - windows shared printer

2008-07-21 Thread Craig White
On Sun, 2008-07-20 at 18:07 +, g wrote: Craig White wrote: snip AuthInfoRequired negotiate got into /etc/cups/printers.conf in the printer definition and removing the line completely solved it. I have no idea how it got there because you use a computer and it forgot 1st law?

Re: F9 - cups - windows shared printer

2008-07-21 Thread g
Craig White wrote: snip sometimes, I haven't a clue to references that you make - i.e. - 1st law? execute as instructed. which is where i have found assembler to be better at than using an 'interpreter/compiler'. if you can understand 'machine code', using assembler makes for a closer

Re: F9 - cups - windows shared printer

2008-07-20 Thread g
Craig White wrote: I returned my inkjet printer to service after some time and hadn't used this printer with Linux since F7 if not before F7. In 'Administration = Printing', I can print test page no problem (obviously as root). But as a user, I get an error that seems to be authentication but I

Re: F9 - cups - windows shared printer

2008-07-20 Thread g
g wrote: snip and appropriate section of cupsd.conf... Location /printers/officejet Order Deny,Allow Deny From All Allow From 127.0.0.1 Allow From 192.168.2.0 AuthType None /Location which clearly tells me that no authentication should be necessary How do I fix this? i am not using f9, nor

Re: F9 - cups - windows shared printer

2008-07-20 Thread Craig White
On Sun, 2008-07-20 at 13:50 +, g wrote: g wrote: snip and appropriate section of cupsd.conf... Location /printers/officejet Order Deny,Allow Deny From All Allow From 127.0.0.1 Allow From 192.168.2.0 AuthType None /Location which clearly tells me that no authentication

Re: F9 - cups - windows shared printer

2008-07-20 Thread g
Craig White wrote: snip AuthInfoRequired negotiate got into /etc/cups/printers.conf in the printer definition and removing the line completely solved it. I have no idea how it got there because you use a computer and it forgot 1st law? interesting anyway. do printers set up with this