On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 08:24:20 -0700
Daniel B. Thurman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
As I am writing from M$-Outlook, I found that Evo (and possibly
KMail), filled up my inbox folders expotentally with multiple
copies of multiple emails. I had to shut down all email clients
on F8 to see if the
Steve T wrote:
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 8:42 PM, Craig White [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I was dealing with Exchange server, I surely would be using Evolution
and the Exchange connector.
I have been using Exchange connector on and off for several years and it
has become better.
However it is
On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 14:04 -0700, Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
Even though EVO's GUI sucks for configurability (fonts for each pane,
default
message title-bar for each directory(folder) {I want Subject: Sender:
Date and
not Sender:Subject:Date for example}, default thread message collapse
for
On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 23:30 -0700, Mike Chambers wrote:
On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 14:04 -0700, Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
Even though EVO's GUI sucks for configurability (fonts for each
pane,
default
message title-bar for each directory(folder) {I want Subject:
Sender:
Date and
not
I've been using kmail for several years. Tried evo and hated it - of course
that was years ago, so it may be quite different now. Tried Thunderbird, but
there were too many things in kmail that I couldn't do in t'bird, so here I
stay :-)
I also used to use kmail a lot but eventually gave
On Thursday 12 June 2008 15:22:54 Chris Jones wrote:
I've been using kmail for several years. Tried evo and hated it - of
course that was years ago, so it may be quite different now. Tried
Thunderbird, but there were too many things in kmail that I couldn't do
in t'bird, so here I stay
Anne Wilson wrote:
On Thursday 12 June 2008 15:22:54 Chris Jones wrote:
I've been using kmail for several years. Tried evo and
hated it - of
course that was years ago, so it may be quite different
now. Tried
Thunderbird, but there were too many things in kmail that
I couldn't do
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 8:42 PM, Craig White [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I was dealing with Exchange server, I surely would be using Evolution
and the Exchange connector.
I have been using Exchange connector on and off for several years and it
has become better.
However it is still very
On Thursday 12 June 2008 16:24:20 Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
(I wonder if Daniel was using dimap when he complained of
multiple copies of
messages? That's the reason I gave up, when I tested it.)
As I am writing from M$-Outlook, I found that Evo (and possibly
KMail), filled up my inbox
Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
Anne Wilson wrote:
On Thursday 12 June 2008 15:22:54 Chris Jones wrote:
each having it's own particulars.
I think I'll try seakmonkey next, and see what it offers.
Dan
Don't be surprised if it is the same as Thunderbird for you. My wife
runs it and I don't see
Robin Laing wrote:
Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
Anne Wilson wrote:
On Thursday 12 June 2008 15:22:54 Chris Jones wrote:
each having it's own particulars.
I think I'll try seakmonkey next, and see what it offers.
Dan
Don't be surprised if it is the same as Thunderbird for you. My wife
runs
On Tue, 2008-06-10 at 18:01 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Too general. The SpamAssassin plugin was inclined to leave extra
processes lying around and was more trouble than it was worth (SA is
really more suitable for mail servers), but recent Evo's also support
the Bogofilter plugin which
On Wednesday 11 June 2008 07:57:24 Mike Chambers wrote:
On Tue, 2008-06-10 at 18:01 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Too general. The SpamAssassin plugin was inclined to leave extra
processes lying around and was more trouble than it was worth (SA is
really more suitable for mail servers),
On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 10:09 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Wednesday 11 June 2008 07:57:24 Mike Chambers wrote:
On Tue, 2008-06-10 at 18:01 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Too general. The SpamAssassin plugin was inclined to leave extra
processes lying around and was more trouble than it
On Wednesday 11 June 2008 13:39:42 Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 10:09 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Wednesday 11 June 2008 07:57:24 Mike Chambers wrote:
On Tue, 2008-06-10 at 18:01 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Too general. The SpamAssassin plugin was inclined to
On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 11:56 -0700, Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
On Monday 09 June 2008 11:08:46 am linuxguy wrote:
I've been using Evolution as my email client since RH8. I hate it
because it seems to get confused if one opens up an email or
changes
[snip!]
Is anyone using Thunderbird
On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 14:04 -0700, Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 11:56 -0700, Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
On Monday 09 June 2008 11:08:46 am linuxguy wrote:
I've been using Evolution as my email client since RH8. I hate
it
because it seems to get confused if one opens
2008/6/11 Daniel B. Thurman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[ snip ]
Well... I'd have to say that KMail is not for me. It *really* sucks with
threading turned on.
Are you referring to KMail in DE 3.5? Kmail has (or is soon to be updated)
--
Fedora 7 : sipping some of that moonshine
( www.pembo13.com )
On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 14:12 -0700, Craig White wrote:
[...]
still...for exchange server and evolution, I would recommend that you
set up the Exchange connector instead of IMAP.
Yes, as bad as the Exchange connector is, my recent experience without
it convinced me that IMAP is ever so much
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 6:18 PM, Matthew Saltzman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 14:12 -0700, Craig White wrote:
[...]
still...for exchange server and evolution, I would recommend that you
set up the Exchange connector instead of IMAP.
Yes, as bad as the Exchange connector
Reik Red wrote:
Arthur Pemberton wrote:
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 9:50 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wait a minute. People are talking about using maildir format instead
of mbox format. Fine. But the original question was about local/offline
storage,
not the server storage.
You can still
On Monday 09 June 2008 22:05:23 Aaron Konstam wrote:
And what happens if you have 150,000 individual messages and you want to
delete a thread? You think that will be faster than with a single mbox
file? I doubt it.
Of course. Read again what I said.
Anne
signature.asc
Description: This is
On Monday 09 June 2008 22:24:36 Rick Stevens wrote:
I believe mbox would be much slower. Deleting a thread would force the
system to search through the entire file to find the messages, delete
them, then compact the file to close up the space (there'd be a lot of
fairly big holes in that
On Monday 09 June 2008 20:36:42 Arthur Pemberton wrote:
2008/6/9 Anne Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Monday 09 June 2008 19:56:51 Dan Thurman wrote:
2) I have tried Kmail and again, it has it's own set of problems,
one involving threads,
Such as?
KMail used to crash a lot,
That
On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 18:42 -0700, Craig White wrote:
On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 11:56 -0700, Dan Thurman wrote:
On Monday 09 June 2008 11:08:46 am linuxguy wrote:
I've been using Evolution as my email client since RH8. I hate it
because it seems to get confused if one opens up an email or
On Tue, 2008-06-10 at 08:41 -0500, Aaron Konstam wrote:
On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 18:42 -0700, Craig White wrote:
On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 11:56 -0700, Dan Thurman wrote:
On Monday 09 June 2008 11:08:46 am linuxguy wrote:
I've been using Evolution as my email client since RH8. I hate it
On Tue, 2008-06-10 at 15:09 -0500, Aaron Konstam wrote:
On Tue, 2008-06-10 at 06:53 -0700, Craig White wrote:
On Tue, 2008-06-10 at 08:41 -0500, Aaron Konstam wrote:
On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 18:42 -0700, Craig White wrote:
On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 11:56 -0700, Dan Thurman wrote:
On Monday
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 1:08 PM, linuxguy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been using Evolution as my email client since RH8. I hate it
because it seems to get confused if one opens up an email or changes
mail folders while it is downloading emails from the server.
When it does this, it goes
On Monday 09 June 2008 19:08:46 linuxguy wrote:
My email setup is 6 different gmail accounts, being sorted into about 25
folders via rules. The largest folder has about 150,000 messages in
it. The smallest one has 5,000 messages in it.
Is anyone using Thunderbird like this ? How does it
On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 12:08 -0600, linuxguy wrote:
I've been using Evolution as my email client since RH8. I hate it
because it seems to get confused if one opens up an email or changes
mail folders while it is downloading emails from the server.
When it does this, it goes into a death
On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 19:21 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Monday 09 June 2008 19:08:46 linuxguy wrote:
My email setup is 6 different gmail accounts, being sorted into about 25
folders via rules. The largest folder has about 150,000 messages in
it. The smallest one has 5,000 messages in
linuxguy wrote:
On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 19:21 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Monday 09 June 2008 19:08:46 linuxguy wrote:
My email setup is 6 different gmail accounts, being sorted into about 25
folders via rules. The largest folder has about 150,000 messages in
it. The smallest one has 5,000
linuxguy wrote:
I've been using Evolution as my email client since RH8. I hate it
because it seems to get confused if one opens up an email or changes
mail folders while it is downloading emails from the server.
When it does this, it goes into a death spiral of saving folder and
Retrieving
On Mon, 09 Jun 2008 12:31:54 -0600
linuxguy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 19:21 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Monday 09 June 2008 19:08:46 linuxguy wrote:
My email setup is 6 different gmail accounts, being sorted into
about 25 folders via rules. The largest folder has
On Monday 09 June 2008 11:08:46 am linuxguy wrote:
I've been using Evolution as my email client since RH8. I hate it
because it seems to get confused if one opens up an email or changes
[snip!]
Is anyone using Thunderbird like this ? How does it compare ? How hard
is it to move over to it
On Monday 09 June 2008 19:31:54 linuxguy wrote:
On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 19:21 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Monday 09 June 2008 19:08:46 linuxguy wrote:
My email setup is 6 different gmail accounts, being sorted into about
25 folders via rules. The largest folder has about 150,000 messages
2008/6/9 Anne Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Monday 09 June 2008 19:56:51 Dan Thurman wrote:
2) I have tried Kmail and again, it has it's own set of problems,
one involving threads,
Such as?
KMail used to crash a lot, and was terrible at filtering. And then got
ignored quite a bit with 4.0
On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 11:56 -0700, Dan Thurman wrote:
On Monday 09 June 2008 11:08:46 am linuxguy wrote:
I've been using Evolution as my email client since RH8. I hate it
because it seems to get confused if one opens up an email or changes
[snip!]
Is anyone using Thunderbird like this ?
Rick Stevens wrote:
I believe mbox would be much slower. Deleting a thread would force the
system to search through the entire file to find the messages, delete
them, then compact the file to close up the space (there'd be a lot of
fairly big holes in that file).
Compacting only happens if
Wait a minute. People are talking about using maildir format instead
of mbox format. Fine. But the original question was about local/offline storage,
not the server storage.
The server side in the original question was gmail+IMAP. Who knows
what gmail does internally, but that does not seem
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 9:50 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wait a minute. People are talking about using maildir format instead
of mbox format. Fine. But the original question was about local/offline
storage,
not the server storage.
You can still (sometimes) choose between mbox and mail dir
On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 16:05 -0500, Aaron Konstam wrote:
On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 19:56 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Monday 09 June 2008 19:31:54 linuxguy wrote:
On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 19:21 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Monday 09 June 2008 19:08:46 linuxguy wrote:
My email setup is 6
42 matches
Mail list logo
