I downloaded the i386 DVD for Fedora 11 via the torrent. However it
fails to verfy.
$ sha256sum Fedora-11-i386-DVD.iso
fc2e12f550462cc91202b65cc654b0e1999a6c04c6d6f1b998ef5f03073bfd09
Fedora-11-i386-DVD.iso
I thought torrents were self checking, so does this mean their is an
invalid iso
On 06/10/2009 05:15 PM, Steve Searle wrote:
I downloaded the i386 DVD for Fedora 11 via the torrent. However it
fails to verfy.
$ sha256sum Fedora-11-i386-DVD.iso
fc2e12f550462cc91202b65cc654b0e1999a6c04c6d6f1b998ef5f03073bfd09
Fedora-11-i386-DVD.iso
I thought torrents were self checking,
Steve Searle wrote:
I downloaded the i386 DVD for Fedora 11 via the torrent. However it
fails to verfy.
$ sha256sum Fedora-11-i386-DVD.iso
fc2e12f550462cc91202b65cc654b0e1999a6c04c6d6f1b998ef5f03073bfd09 Fedora-11-i386-DVD.iso
According to the CHECKSUM file included with the torrent, it
On 06/10/2009 05:48 PM, Kevin J. Cummings wrote:
Steve Searle wrote:
I thought torrents were self checking, so does this mean their is an
invalid iso image out there, and do I need to download it again?
The torrents are self checking, but I'm not sure what they check
(md5sum, sha1sum, or
Around 11:02pm on Wednesday, June 10, 2009 (UK time), Andre Robatino scrawled:
Which torrent was this downloaded from? Normally, if the contents are
bad, the comments will root it out pretty quickly.
I followed the link on the Fedora site's page:
http://torrent.fedoraproject.org/
I guess it
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 3:22 PM, Steve Searlest...@stevesearle.com wrote:
Around 11:02pm on Wednesday, June 10, 2009 (UK time), Andre Robatino scrawled:
Which torrent was this downloaded from? Normally, if the contents are
bad, the comments will root it out pretty quickly.
I followed the
Around 11:32pm on Wednesday, June 10, 2009 (UK time), Aldo Foot scrawled:
The copies from here show the correct key.
http://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora/releases/11/Fedora/i386/iso/
Yes - that matches the CHECKSUM file that came with the iso, and it is
signed correctly. However when I run
On 06/10/2009 06:22 PM, Steve Searle wrote:
Around 11:02pm on Wednesday, June 10, 2009 (UK time), Andre Robatino scrawled:
Which torrent was this downloaded from? Normally, if the contents are
bad, the comments will root it out pretty quickly.
I followed the link on the Fedora site's
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 3:37 PM, Steve Searlest...@stevesearle.com wrote:
Around 11:32pm on Wednesday, June 10, 2009 (UK time), Aldo Foot scrawled:
The copies from here show the correct key.
http://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora/releases/11/Fedora/i386/iso/
Yes - that matches the CHECKSUM file
Steve Searle wrote:
Around 11:02pm on Wednesday, June 10, 2009 (UK time), Andre Robatino scrawled:
Which torrent was this downloaded from? Normally, if the contents are
bad, the comments will root it out pretty quickly.
I followed the link on the Fedora site's page:
Steve Searle wrote:
Around 11:02pm on Wednesday, June 10, 2009 (UK time), Andre Robatino scrawled:
Which torrent was this downloaded from? Normally, if the contents are
bad, the comments will root it out pretty quickly.
I followed the link on the Fedora site's page:
Around 11:53pm on Wednesday, June 10, 2009 (UK time), Kevin J. Cummings
scrawled:
No, that can't be it, as it gives me the same (good) hash with and
without the -b/-t options.
From man sha256sum:
Note: There is no difference between binary and text mode option on GNU
system.
Are you
On 06/10/2009 06:44 PM, Kevin J. Cummings wrote:
Steve Searle wrote:
Around 11:02pm on Wednesday, June 10, 2009 (UK time), Andre Robatino
scrawled:
Which torrent was this downloaded from? Normally, if the contents are
bad, the comments will root it out pretty quickly.
I followed the link
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 3:48 PM, Andre Robatinoan...@bwh.harvard.edu wrote:
On 06/10/2009 06:44 PM, Kevin J. Cummings wrote:
Steve Searle wrote:
Around 11:02pm on Wednesday, June 10, 2009 (UK time), Andre Robatino
scrawled:
Which torrent was this downloaded from? Normally, if the contents
Aldo Foot wrote:
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 3:48 PM, Andre Robatinoan...@bwh.harvard.edu wrote:
On 06/10/2009 06:44 PM, Kevin J. Cummings wrote:
Steve Searle wrote:
Around 11:02pm on Wednesday, June 10, 2009 (UK time), Andre Robatino
scrawled:
Which torrent was this downloaded from? Normally,
Kevin J. Cummings wrote:
Aldo Foot wrote:
It probably was just an incomplete download.
Could be, he never mentioned the size of the ISO file.
Would that make a difference with a torrent download? I thought the
file was full size, but may have holes in it until the torrent
finishes. Doesn't
Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
Kevin J. Cummings wrote:
Aldo Foot wrote:
It probably was just an incomplete download.
Could be, he never mentioned the size of the ISO file.
Would that make a difference with a torrent download? I thought the
file was full size, but may have holes in it until the
17 matches
Mail list logo
