Aldo Foot wrote:
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 4:01 PM, Bob Goodwinbobgood...@wildblue.net wrote:
It appears to me that NFS requires ports 111 and 2049, both of which
I have opened in the firewall via firestarter. But that doesn't
seem to be enough, after struggling to make a connection it
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 10:21:52 -0400
Bob Goodwin wrote:
I have not been able to make nfs4 work however although it appears to be
present in F-10?
http://osdir.com/ml/network.guarddog/2005-09/msg2.html
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com
--
fedora-list
Frank Cox wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 10:21:52 -0400
Bob Goodwin wrote:
I have not been able to make nfs4 work however although it appears to be
present in F-10?
http://osdir.com/ml/network.guarddog/2005-09/msg2.html
Thanks Frank, that fills in some more parts of the
Aldo Foot wrote:
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 4:01 PM, Bob Goodwinbobgood...@wildblue.net
wrote:
It appears to me that NFS requires ports 111 and 2049, both of which
I have opened in the firewall via firestarter. But that doesn't
seem
It appears to me that NFS requires ports 111 and 2049, both of which
I have opened in the firewall via firestarter. But that doesn't
seem to be enough, after struggling to make a connection it also
needed some high numbered ports, right now, 43509, but that changes
from time to
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 4:01 PM, Bob Goodwinbobgood...@wildblue.net wrote:
It appears to me that NFS requires ports 111 and 2049, both of which
I have opened in the firewall via firestarter. But that doesn't
seem to be enough, after struggling to make a connection it also
needed
Bob Goodwin bobgood...@wildblue.net writes:
It appears to me that NFS requires ports 111 and 2049, both of which
I have opened in the firewall via firestarter. But that doesn't
seem to be enough, after struggling to make a connection it also
needed some high numbered ports,
