Re: Problems with yum update (iptstate)

2009-11-11 Thread Tim
Patrick: Please don't post HTML to this list. See the Guidelines. L: please do not police users. Nowadays, it is very hard to avoid html email, face reality. Negated. Please continue to do so, Patrick, and others. Without the members keeping the list on track, it becomes a useless mess of

Re: Problems with yum update (iptstate)

2009-11-11 Thread Kam Leo
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 11:30 AM, Tim ignored_mail...@yahoo.com.au wrote: Patrick: Please don't post HTML to this list. See the Guidelines. L: please do not police users. Nowadays, it is very hard to avoid html email, face reality. Negated.  Please continue to do so, Patrick, and others.  

Re: Problems with yum update (iptstate)

2009-11-11 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 11/12/2009 03:12 AM, Kam Leo wrote: On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 11:30 AM, Tim ignored_mail...@yahoo.com.au wrote: Patrick: Please don't post HTML to this list. See the Guidelines. L: please do not police users. Nowadays, it is very hard to avoid html email, face reality. Negated. Please

Re: Problems with yum update (iptstate)

2009-11-11 Thread Kam Leo
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Rahul Sundaram sunda...@fedoraproject.org wrote: On 11/12/2009 03:12 AM, Kam Leo wrote: On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 11:30 AM, Tim ignored_mail...@yahoo.com.au wrote: Patrick: Please don't post HTML to this list. See the Guidelines. L: please do not police users.

Re: Problems with yum update (iptstate)

2009-11-11 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 11/12/2009 04:10 AM, Kam Leo wrote: That's asking a lot from users who only have a GUI based computing experience. Many don't have a clue as to what HTML is. Many don't know what Linux or a mailing list is either. That's why we are here to help each other, to learn. We politely request

Re: Problems with yum update (iptstate)

2009-11-11 Thread Ed Greshko
Kam Leo wrote: On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Rahul Sundaram sunda...@fedoraproject.org wrote: On 11/12/2009 03:12 AM, Kam Leo wrote: On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 11:30 AM, Tim ignored_mail...@yahoo.com.au wrote: Patrick: Please don't post HTML to this list. See the

Re: Problems with yum update (iptstate)

2009-11-11 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Wednesday 11 November 2009 22:40:46 Kam Leo wrote: On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Rahul Sundaram sunda...@fedoraproject.org wrote: On 11/12/2009 03:12 AM, Kam Leo wrote: On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 11:30 AM, Tim ignored_mail...@yahoo.com.au wrote: Patrick: Please don't post HTML to

Re: Problems with yum update (iptstate)

2009-11-11 Thread Aldo Foot
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Kam Leo kam@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Rahul Sundaram sunda...@fedoraproject.org wrote: On 11/12/2009 03:12 AM, Kam Leo wrote: On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 11:30 AM, Tim ignored_mail...@yahoo.com.au wrote: Patrick: Please don't post HTML

Re: Problems with yum update (iptstate)

2009-11-11 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 13:42:42 -0800, Kam Leo kam@gmail.com wrote: Those of you who object to HTML formatted messages can help this list. You can a) add a filter and delete them from your mailbox or b) not reply, Doing both would be a good thing. Most of the time the posts are

Problems with yum update (iptstate)

2009-11-10 Thread [F]usion[S]tream - Gmail
There is a problem with the iptstate package. Removing iptstate, upgrading, and then trying to reinstall it also fails to work. # yum update Loaded plugins: presto, refresh-packagekit Setting up Update Process Resolving Dependencies -- Running transaction check --- Package dhclient.i586

Re: Problems with yum update (iptstate)

2009-11-10 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
Please don't post HTML to this list. See the Guidelines. poc -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: Problems with yum update (iptstate)

2009-11-10 Thread L
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 11:15 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan pocallag...@gmail.com wrote: Please don't post HTML to this list. See the Guidelines. please do not police users. Nowadays, it is very hard to avoid html email, face reality. poc -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To

Re: Problems with yum update (iptstate)

2009-11-10 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Wed, 2009-11-11 at 13:29 +1100, L wrote: n Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 11:15 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan pocallag...@gmail.com wrote: Please don't post HTML to this list. See the Guidelines. please do not police users. Nowadays, it is very hard to avoid html email, face reality. People can do

Re: Problems with yum update (iptstate)

2009-11-10 Thread Todd Zullinger
L wrote: please do not police users. Patrick merely pointed out the list guidelines. There is nothing wrong with that, especially when someone has apparently missed them in the list welcome message and the footer of ever post. For reference, those guidelines are at:

Re: Problems with yum update (iptstate)

2009-11-10 Thread Steven Stern
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/10/2009 06:15 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: Please don't post HTML to this list. See the Guidelines. poc Posting as plain text: Resolving Dependencies - -- Running transaction check - --- Package dhclient.i586 12:4.1.0p1-4.fc11 set to be

Re: Problems with yum update (iptstate)

2009-11-10 Thread Roger
please do not police users. Nowadays, it is very hard to avoid html email, face reality. The above seems unwarranted and the list is quite correct in requesting plain text messages. Actually it's easy to avoid html emails and as it's not the list's reality, perhaps it's misunderstanding

Re: Problems with yum update (iptstate)

2009-11-10 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:22:36 -0600, Steven wrote: Posting as plain text: Resolving Dependencies - -- Running transaction check - --- Package dhclient.i586 12:4.1.0p1-4.fc11 set to be updated - --- Package f-spot.i586 0:0.6.1.3-1.fc11 set to be updated - --- Package f-spot-screensaver.i586