David Chipman wrote:
PS: These ombuds may be more for issues related to online/broadcast
content, and not technologies involved, but it's something to try!
Even on content issues, pressure groups rule. Most cases where the
ombudsman acts are when the case could go to court, for instance, in
Frank Murphy wrote:
It appears to be the java confusing totem,
as it will play if linked directly:
http://www.radio-canada.ca/util/endirect/rdidirect.asx
Honestly, I don't have the slightest idea on the matter. I know there was
a gstreamer update today:
Jul 30 14:57:45 Updated:
Note: Sorry, thee preceding mess wasn't the answer I was planning to send.
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 07/28/2009 09:56 AM, gil...@altern.org wrote:
Tim replied that asx files were needed in pages where the video is
embedded. You didn't answer Tim.
It wasn't a question.
No, you got this
On Friday 31 July 2009 01:43:39 gil...@altern.org wrote:
Yes. You have been told many times already. Fedora CANNOT include
mplayer due to legal reasons (ie) some of these codecs infringe on US
patents and redistribution of codecs for a distribution legally based in
US would invite
On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 05:43 +0500, gil...@altern.org wrote:
Codecs that can be included by everybody and good quality (good),
codecs
that are of not good enough quality (bad), misc (bad-extras), codecs
that are good quality but have patent issues (ugly) and finally a
interface to ffmeg
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 05:43 +0500, gil...@altern.org wrote:
Codecs that can be included by everybody and good quality (good),
codecs
that are of not good enough quality (bad), misc (bad-extras), codecs
that are good quality but have patent
Anyway, Linux is quite working fine for myself. I can watch video and listen
radio online.
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 1:52 PM, Ed Greshko ed.gres...@greshko.com wrote:
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 05:43 +0500, gil...@altern.org wrote:
Codecs that can be included by
On 28/07/09 04:51, gil...@altern.org wrote:
Then, nobody would have known that Totem doesn't work at Radio-Canada or,
who knows, maybe anytime it has to deal with an .asx file.
End.
As an aside,
the Fluendo bundle
doesn't even work on the Canada site.
and they are licensed codecs, I
.
and they are licensed codecs, I believe?
Hi all,
I've ben following this discussion since it wsa called Ranter or
Evangelist. There have been good (if misdirected) points made by all.
Now, about the CBC/SRC websites, they do have Ombudsmen. For the English
service, the ombud is Mr. Vince Carlin, at ombuds
On 26/07/09 21:35, gil...@altern.org wrote:
On Sat, 2009-07-25 at 09:23 +0500, gil...@altern.org wrote:
And I've only
had the briefest look at the Radio Canada website you've mentioned,
primarily because I can't read French. It's too difficult trying to
figure out what to do on a website
On 25/07/09 05:23, gil...@altern.org wrote:
snip
I'm eager to know if any of you managed to read wmv at Radio-Canada.
There's even a
link on the homepage:
http://www.radio-canada.ca/
for RDI en Direct, which is also wmv.
Silverlight is required on Windows for that link.
Checked on my
Frank Murphy wrote:
On 25/07/09 05:23, gil...@altern.org wrote:
snip
I'm eager to know if any of you managed to read wmv at Radio-Canada.
There's even a
link on the homepage:
http://www.radio-canada.ca/
for RDI en Direct, which is also wmv.
Silverlight is required on Windows for that
I didn't say using wmv was the problem
If you don't, well, I do. Using proprietary formats on state television is
ABSOLUTELY inacceptable.
So fix the tv company.
So, MPlayer must be included instead of Totem. From what I read
everywhere, MPlayer does better. If the devil is behind
On 27/07/09 09:12, Ed Greshko wrote:
That is interestingbut do you consider is significant in any way?
Yes, I always thought Moonlight was required.
I mean this in light of
Everything works fine on RHELv4 with mplayer and its plugins.
Then is RHEL including *forbidden* codecs?
Frank Murphy wrote:
On 27/07/09 09:12, Ed Greshko wrote:
That is interestingbut do you consider is significant in any way?
Yes, I always thought Moonlight was required.
I see...
I mean this in light of
Everything works fine on RHELv4 with mplayer and its plugins.
Then is RHEL
On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 16:12:26 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
Frank Murphy wrote:
On 25/07/09 05:23, gil...@altern.org wrote:
snip
I'm eager to know if any of you managed to read wmv at
Radio-Canada. There's even a
link on the homepage:
http://www.radio-canada.ca/
for RDI en Direct,
On Monday 27 July 2009 03:06:34 gil...@altern.org wrote:
I didn't say using wmv was the problem
If you don't, well, I do. Using proprietary formats on state television is
ABSOLUTELY inacceptable.
Then go complain to the TV station and educate *them* that they made a bad
choice of format.
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 7:39 PM, Marko Vojinovicvvma...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday 27 July 2009 03:06:34 gil...@altern.org wrote:
I didn't say using wmv was the problem
If you don't, well, I do. Using proprietary formats on state television is
ABSOLUTELY inacceptable.
Then go complain to
gil...@altern.org wrote:
I can't file the bugzilla. If I do, developers will point out all the
shenanigans involved in getting from asx to mwv, pretend that it's a
Linux
users scare away technique used by Microsoft -- and they'd be right
about
this -- and I'm completely lost in those
gil...@altern.org wrote:
gil...@altern.org wrote:
I can't file the bugzilla. If I do, developers will point out all the
shenanigans involved in getting from asx to mwv, pretend that it's a
Linux
users scare away technique used by Microsoft -- and they'd be right
about
this -- and
On 07/28/2009 08:31 AM, gil...@altern.org wrote:
Now, while you use this software and Rahul Sundaram even thinks it's
great, you say I should take time filling bugs reports.
I have never said it is great. Just that it works for me. You fail to
understand that Fedora cannot include the
Ed wrote:
Then, do the list a favor If you find something wrong with
something you *don't* usekeep you fingers off the keyboard.
Then, nobody would have known that Totem doesn't work at Radio-Canada or,
who knows, maybe anytime it has to deal with an .asx file.
End.
--
fedora-list
gil...@altern.org wrote:
Ed wrote:
Then, do the list a favor If you find something wrong with
something you *don't* usekeep you fingers off the keyboard.
Then, nobody would have known that Totem doesn't work at Radio-Canada or,
who knows, maybe anytime it has to deal with
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
I have never said it is great. Just that it works for me. You fail to
understand that Fedora cannot include the gstreamer codecs or mplayer
due to legal and not technical reasons.
Let's see. Totem uses the gstreamer codecs and Totem is included in
Fedora. When you include
On 07/28/2009 09:56 AM, gil...@altern.org wrote:
Tim replied that asx files were needed in pages where the video is
embedded. You didn't answer Tim.
It wasn't a question. I didn't find any need to answer it. I have no
need to watch the site in question and the problems in that site is of
no
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 09:26 +0500, gil...@altern.org wrote:
Tim replied that asx files were needed in pages where the video is
embedded. You didn't answer Tim.
Um, no, I didn't... You're expanding what I said, incorrectly.
Sure, asx files *can* be one of the methods used. And they're not
RAhul Sandaram wrote:
On 07/25/2009 09:53 AM, gil...@altern.org wrote:
Jul 23 15:45:05 Updated: brasero-libs-2.26.3-1.fc11.x86_64
Maybe the 32 bit version that you use always worked, I have no idea. I
inquired about this too and had no answer.
I can't discuss the matter further NOW. Sorry.
On Sat, 2009-07-25 at 09:23 +0500, gil...@altern.org wrote:
I don't remember receiving a single answer to the problem I was
facing: WMV didn't play at Radio-Canada with Totem.
You're not likely to get answers to questions in an e-mail that's
unrelated to the message topic. People look at the
Tim wrote:
On Sat, 2009-07-25 at 09:23 +0500, gil...@altern.org wrote:
I don't remember receiving a single answer to the problem I was
facing: WMV didn't play at Radio-Canada with Totem.
You're not likely to get answers to questions in an e-mail that's
unrelated to the message topic.
On Sat, 2009-07-25 at 09:23 +0500, gil...@altern.org wrote:
And I've only
had the briefest look at the Radio Canada website you've mentioned,
primarily because I can't read French. It's too difficult trying to
figure out what to do on a website that's in a foreign language. I
won't be the
David Christopher Chipman wrote:
Hi Tim,
If you're interested in helping him out, why don't you try cbc.ca? It's
the same organization (Radio-Canada is the name of the French language
broadcasting services of the CBC (Canadian Broadcasting Corporation).
I don't believe the CBC uses WMV. All
On 07/26/2009 12:28 PM, gil...@altern.org wrote:
If bugzilla had any effect don't you think that users would stop doing the
let's see if this other application works dance all the time? My feeling
is bugzilla works only for kernel developers.
Your feeling is wrong since bugzilla is hardly
On 07/26/2009 12:28 PM, gil...@altern.org wrote:
If bugzilla had any effect don't you think that users would stop doing
the
let's see if this other application works dance all the time? My
feeling
is bugzilla works only for kernel developers.
Your feeling is wrong since bugzilla is hardly
On 07/27/2009 04:34 AM, gil...@altern.org wrote:
They use git, which is not really a bugzilla, but bugs do get fixed before
release.
Git is a source code management system and not a bug tracker. You are
confusing things.
You are absolutely right. THE problem is the SRC using the WMV format
On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 01:13:59 +0530
Rahul Sundaram sunda...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On 07/26/2009 12:28 PM, gil...@altern.org wrote:
If bugzilla had any effect don't you think that users would stop doing the
let's see if this other application works dance all the time? My feeling
is
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 07/27/2009 04:34 AM, gil...@altern.org wrote:
They use git, which is not really a bugzilla, but bugs do get fixed
before
release.
Git is a source code management system and not a bug tracker. You are
confusing things.
You are absolutely right. THE problem is the
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
You are absolutely right. THE problem is the SRC using the WMV format and
Microsoft servers with all their shenanigans.
I didn't say using wmv was the problem although if they had included it
in a open format - Ogg, Firefox 3.5 in Fedora 11 would have played it
Ed Greshko wrote:
I think the OP is looking to have someone verify his findings. So,
consider the problem verified.
Lord! Thank you so much?
Now, the Question becomes is does the OP want to file the bugzilla or
allow someone else to do it for him.
I can't file the bugzilla. If I do,
gil...@altern.org wrote:
Ed Greshko wrote:
I think the OP is looking to have someone verify his findings. So,
consider the problem verified.
Lord! Thank you so much?
Now, the Question becomes is does the OP want to file the bugzilla or
allow someone else to do it for him.
On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 01:13 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
They don't seem to supply a WMV file directly instead providing some
javascript based tricks. There are many instances like these which are
the fault of web developers relying on IE specific things.
It's typical to use an indirect
On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 01:38 +0500, gil...@altern.org wrote:
As I just said to Tim, when all that counts is to see if a video plays
correctly or not, language is irrelevant.
That site is full of stuff, I can't tell what I'm looking for.
--
[...@localhost ~]$ uname -r
2.6.27.25-78.2.56.fc9.i686
Tim wrote:
On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 01:38 +0500, gil...@altern.org wrote:
As I just said to Tim, when all that counts is to see if a video plays
correctly or not, language is irrelevant.
That site is full of stuff, I can't tell what I'm looking for.
http://tinyurl.com/mnxvaf
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 12:21:26 -0500,
Mikkel L. Ellertson mik...@infinity-ltd.com wrote:
Even that is not a sure measure. How many people are using user
agent switchers to fool sites about what browser they are using?
At home I don't supply one when using firefox. (I used to have a patched
On 07/25/2009 09:53 AM, gil...@altern.org wrote:
Jul 23 15:45:05 Updated: brasero-libs-2.26.3-1.fc11.x86_64
Maybe the 32 bit version that you use always worked, I have no idea.
I inquired about this too and had no answer.
I can't discuss the matter further NOW. Sorry.
Since you are
'tonio wrote:
The stories about Microsoft releasing code, was more of a another way to
cover up for a GPL violation :(
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/07/23/microsoft_hyperv_gpl_violation/
http://www.osnews.com/story/21882/Microsoft_s_Linux_Kernel_Code_Drop_Result_of_GPL_Violation
Not
On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 10:24 +0500, gil...@altern.org wrote:
(1) BTW, the only Karl 1.2 on this list is the allusion made by Tim.
http://www.google.ca/search?q=%22karl+1.2%22ie=utf-8oe=utf-8aq=trls=org.mozilla:en-US:officialclient=firefox-a
When I'm told I have a model, I'd really appreciate
gil...@altern.org wrote:
Peter Gordon wrote:
On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 11:33 +0500, gil...@altern.org wrote:
Microsoft has 90% of market share, Linux only 1% and people at Microsoft
certainly are very glad. So, why should we be sad? Wouldn't this be
giving Microsoft an edge in gladness?
First
gil...@altern.org wrote:
So, Karl Larson said that immetrial things like having a CD/DVD burner
that doesn't work in a final release was a bad idea? I suppose that having
to reselect what you want to copy in klipper for 4-5 years looks very
immaterial to you. Then, why don't you correct
gil...@altern.org wrote:
I would bet that Ubuntu has pretty much all bugs I have noted until now
So, I can't see what's the difference.
Don't guess. Try it and find out.
I tried it and found out. After using Amarok for 15 minutes, i couldn't
log in anymore: both my passwords had been
On 07/25/2009 04:17 AM, gil...@altern.org wrote:
That's what rawhide is for. I see no purpose in releasing a final version
with, for instance, Brasero not working, and Totem not much either, I'm
afraid.
You have repeated this too many times but both work just fine for me. If
you have
On Sat, 25 Jul 2009 03:16:24 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 07/25/2009 04:17 AM, gilpel altern org wrote:
That's what rawhide is for. I see no purpose in releasing a final version
with, for instance, Brasero not working, and Totem not much either, I'm
afraid.
You have repeated this too
On 23/07/09 01:05, Michael Leung wrote:
I think Linux is much more than 1%.
Maybe we can get Back patches and colours
Regards,
Frank
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines:
Peter Gordon wrote:
On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 11:33 +0500, gil...@altern.org wrote:
Microsoft has 90% of market share, Linux only 1% and people at Microsoft
certainly are very glad. So, why should we be sad? Wouldn't this be
giving
Microsoft an edge in gladness?
First of all, Linux market
'Tonio wrote:
Micro$oft is losing out to google, Twitter, Facebook and others. In a
last ditch effort. Micro$oft is releasing code to linux. Check out
this at distrowatch.
http://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20090720
Since Linux is strongon th server market, they want to attract them
On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 10:24 +0500, gil...@altern.org wrote:
(1) BTW, the only Karl 1.2 on this list is the allusion made by Tim.
http://www.google.ca/search?q=%22karl+1.2%22ie=utf-8oe=utf-8aq=trls=org.mozilla:en-US:officialclient=firefox-a
When I'm told I have a model, I'd really appreciate to
--- On Thu, 7/23/09, gil...@altern.org gil...@altern.org wrote:
From: gil...@altern.org gil...@altern.org
Subject: Re: Ranter or evangelist?
To: Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.
fedora-list@redhat.com
Date: Thursday, July 23, 2009, 10:32 PM
'Tonio wrote
--- On Tue, 7/21/09, gil...@altern.org gil...@altern.org wrote:
From: gil...@altern.org gil...@altern.org
Subject: Re: Ranter or evangelist?
To: Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.
fedora-list@redhat.com
Date: Tuesday, July 21, 2009, 11:33 PM
On Tue, 2009
On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 11:33 +0500, gil...@altern.org wrote:
Microsoft has 90% of market share, Linux only 1% and people at Microsoft
certainly are very glad. So, why should we be sad? Wouldn't this be giving
Microsoft an edge in gladness?
First of all, Linux market share is a very difficult
On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 01:46 -0700, Peter Gordon wrote:
GNU/Linux, indeed most F/OSS on the other hand, has been spread by
advocacy, passed among friends, et al. We don't have more than 12
million users because we're defacto. Not by a long shot. We as a
community have EARNED those
I think Linux is much more than 1%.
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 6:25 PM, Antonio Olivares
olivares14...@yahoo.comwrote:
--- On Tue, 7/21/09, gil...@altern.org gil...@altern.org wrote:
From: gil...@altern.org gil...@altern.org
Subject: Re: Ranter or evangelist?
To: Community assistance
On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 01:23 +0500, gil...@altern.org wrote:
I'm sure people who are playing the game of reverse engineering the
codecs and making sure that everything works despite all Microsoft
attempts (1) will keep on doing so in another 18 years from now, even
with only 0....1% of
On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 08:08 +0500, gil...@altern.org wrote:
Excuse me for being rude
No.
Oh, and I'm middle-aged, and run a debt free business. Being doing so
for over twenty years. i.e. I live in the real world, and one that's
well managed.
The one needing to get a clue, here, is you. You
On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 04:20 +0930, Tim wrote:
On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 01:23 +0500, gil...@altern.org wrote:
I'm sure people who are playing the game of reverse engineering the
codecs and making sure that everything works despite all Microsoft
attempts (1) will keep on doing so in another 18
On 7/21/2009 6:52 PM, Craig White wrote:
On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 04:20 +0930, Tim wrote:
On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 01:23 +0500, gil...@altern.org wrote:
I'm sure people who are playing the game of reverse engineering the
codecs and making sure that everything works despite all Microsoft
attempts
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Daviddgbo...@comcast.net wrote:
On 7/21/2009 6:52 PM, Craig White wrote:
On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 04:20 +0930, Tim wrote:
On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 01:23 +0500, gil...@altern.org wrote:
I'm sure people who are playing the game of reverse engineering the
codecs and
On 7/21/2009 6:52 PM, Craig White wrote:
On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 04:20 +0930, Tim wrote:
On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 01:23 +0500, gil...@altern.org wrote:
I'm sure people who are playing the game of reverse engineering the
codecs and making sure that everything works despite all Microsoft
attempts
On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 08:08 +0500, gil...@altern.org wrote:
Excuse me for being rude
No.
Oh, and I'm middle-aged, and run a debt free business. Being doing so
for over twenty years. i.e. I live in the real world, and one that's
well managed.
The one needing to get a clue, here, is you.
On Mon, 20 Jul 2009 13:24:27 +0530, Rahul wrote:
There is no Pirut in Fedora 11.
It's still provided as a virtual package by gnome-packagekit.
That alone can be a source of confusion, particularly if old
howtos/faqs continue to work.
$ sudo yum install pirut
[...]
Tim:
The system can't really make magic decisions that a user is doing
something dumb, e.g. wildcarding, in a too simplistic manner. Users
need to learn not to do wildcarding without due care. Usually, they
learn that through committing mistakes.
*You* asked for it, you got it. It's not
On Mon, 2009-07-20 at 09:31 +0500, gil...@altern.org wrote:
It's really weird. I already said that you have a gift for explaining,
which means you're certainly not completely dumb. How come you can't
understand the importance of market share for Linux?
a. This is Linux, other than for the few
On 7/20/2009 5:36 AM, Tim wrote:
On Mon, 2009-07-20 at 09:31 +0500, gil...@altern.org wrote:
It's really weird. I already said that you have a gift for explaining,
which means you're certainly not completely dumb. How come you can't
understand the importance of market share for Linux?
a.
RAhul Sundaram wrote:
There is no Pirut in Fedora 11.
I thought that was how the graphical interface was called. I checked. it's
gpk-application 2.27.3 , just as for everybody, I guess.
If you search for a word in
PackageKit, it will use wild cards to get the full list of packages that
On 07/20/2009 11:51 PM, gil...@altern.org wrote:
This looks nice, but it's pain to get XMMS working for a newbie and the
application is considered legacy. Wouldn't it be nice if it wasn't in the
list of applications that are suggested to install with mplayer? I'm sure
people who love XMMS
On Mon, 2009-07-20 at 09:31 +0500, gil...@altern.org wrote:
It's really weird. I already said that you have a gift for explaining,
which means you're certainly not completely dumb. How come you can't
understand the importance of market share for Linux?
a. This is Linux, other than for the few
On Mon, 2009-07-20 at 09:31 +0500, gil...@altern.org wrote:
It's really weird. I already said that you have a gift for explaining,
which means you're certainly not completely dumb. How come you can't
understand the importance of market share for Linux?
a. This is Linux, other than for the few
gil...@altern.org wrote:
I've suggested you read From Microsoft Word to Microsoft World, Tim. I
haven't received one single word of comment. Have you just taken a look at
the document? Do you read fuckin' manuals other than about programming?
Did you ever read about administration principles?
Of course, if you've been following the FSF circus, you might have learned
that GPL3 was out on 29 June 2007:
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.txt
Countrary to GPL2, I must admit I never read this mumbo-jumbo legalese. I
doubt Torvalds ever did either. I believe the kernel is still GPL2.
So,
Of course, if you've been following the FSF on the matter, you might have
learned that the GPL3 was published on 29 June 2007:
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.txt
Unfortunately, countrary to the GPL2. I never got to read this senseless
mumbo-jumbo, I can't even fathom under which version
On Sat, 18 Jul 2009 19:34:22 -0400 (EDT), gilpel altern org wrote:
I've used XMMS in the past and my experience was so bad that I wouldn't
have reinstalled it for all the money in the world. (All the money... Hum,
maybe :) And I installed Rhythmbox when Antonio suggested this
application. I
Tim:
This project works differently than Apple Computers.
gil...@altern.org:
And, after 18 years, we have 1% of market share on the desktop.
Commercial software considers market domination to be an indicator of
success. Others consider it successful when it does what they want it
to,
On Sat, 2009-07-18 at 14:30 -0700, jackson byers wrote:
the cmdline operation of mplayer does work for me
and no skips!
[unlike totem which has a gui, but lots of skips]
mplayer with a gui that worked,
with its own volume control would be nice
There's gnome-mplayer (there's probably a KDE
Tim wrote
There's gnome-mplayer (there's probably a KDE variant), and smplayer, to
try out, at least.
I have used GUI programs like XMMS or Audacious to play streams, but
sometimes you need to tweak the preferences, to increase cache sizing,
to avoid skips. Totem is too much of a black box (not
Michael Schwendt wrote:
Do you still have a /var/log/yum.log?
Or perhaps you can draw conclusions from looking at the output of
rpm -qa --last|less?
less /var/log/yum.log | grep xmms
Jul 11 12:47:25 Installed: 1:xmms-libs-1.2.11-5.20071117cvs.fc11.x86_64
Jul 11 12:47:26 Installed:
On Sun, 19 Jul 2009 16:33:31 -0400 (EDT), gilpel altern org wrote:
Michael Schwendt wrote:
Do you still have a /var/log/yum.log?
Or perhaps you can draw conclusions from looking at the output of
rpm -qa --last|less?
less /var/log/yum.log | grep xmms
Jul 11 12:47:25 Installed:
On Sun, 19 Jul 2009 16:33:31 -0400 (EDT), gilpel altern org wrote:
Michael Schwendt wrote:
Do you still have a /var/log/yum.log?
Or perhaps you can draw conclusions from looking at the output of
rpm -qa --last|less?
less /var/log/yum.log | grep xmms
Jul 11 12:47:25 Installed:
On Sun, 2009-07-19 at 16:33 -0400, gil...@altern.org wrote:
Is anybody anywhere taking notice of the problems new Fedora users
experience on this mailing list?
Ever read The boy who cried wolf?
--
[...@localhost ~]$ uname -r
2.6.27.25-78.2.56.fc9.i686
Don't send private replies to my
On Sun, 2009-07-19 at 19:22 -0400, gil...@altern.org wrote:
Since I wanted to make sure I'd have all components needed to have a
nice working MPlayer system, I just installed pretty much everything
that was suggested. Had I looked more closely, I would have deselected
anything with the name
On Sun, 2009-07-19 at 19:22 -0400, gil...@altern.org wrote:
Since I wanted to make sure I'd have all components needed to have a
nice working MPlayer system, I just installed pretty much everything
that was suggested. Had I looked more closely, I would have deselected
anything with the name
On Mon, 20 Jul 2009 08:04:14 +0500 (GMT-5), gilpel wrote:
On Sun, 2009-07-19 at 19:22 -0400, gil...@altern.org wrote:
Since I wanted to make sure I'd have all components needed to have
a nice working MPlayer system, I just installed pretty much
everything that was suggested. Had I looked
Tim:
This project works differently than Apple Computers.
gil...@altern.org:
And, after 18 years, we have 1% of market share on the desktop.
Commercial software considers market domination to be an indicator of
success. Others consider it successful when it does what they want it
to,
Tim wrote
There's gnome-mplayer (there's probably a KDE variant), and smplayer, to
try out, at least.
I have used GUI programs like XMMS or Audacious to play streams, but
sometimes you need to tweak the preferences, to increase cache sizing,
to avoid skips. Totem is too much of a black box
On Thu, 16 Jul 2009 22:26:51 -0400 (EDT), gilpel wrote:
Why is it that, when I insert an audio disk, I see it as an audio disk
on
my desktop, but when I click it, GNOME shows the .wav files that are
present. No application is suggested, even under Open, to play the
damned music. If I go to
Shannon McMackin wroteÈ
Here's a better guide for you to follow...
http://www.fedoraguide.info/index.php?title=Main_Page
Thanks! I didn't have it in my bookmarks.
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
On Sat, 18 Jul 2009 02:57:19 -0400 (EDT), gilpel altern org wrote:
If I go to Application, sound and video, the first option,
Audio Player, opens XMMS.
When I've used XMMS, in the past,
Yup, in the past, you too? We're in the present, you know?
Then don't install it. It doesn't get
On Sat, 18 Jul 2009 01:03:37 -0400 (EDT), gilpel altern org wrote:
Rhythmbox does pretty much the same as Amarok, it plays CDs and it uses
GTK. At first sight, it looks to me like a good candidate. If its size is
larger than XMMS, it should be downloaded after installation.
Rhythmbox is
Tim:
Though it could be that you haven't installed any capable
applications that inform Gnome that they're available as a CDDA handler.
gil...@altern.org
What's the capable application?
One that's capable of playing CDs, as opposed to one that isn't.
Why isn't the capable application
On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 10:33 -0700, jackson byers wrote:
any suggestions for command line playing of radio internet streams?
mplayer http://example.com
or, mplayer -playlist http://example.com
(with example.com being just an example internet address, not an actual
one).
--
[...@localhost ~]$
On Sat, 2009-07-18 at 01:03 -0400, gil...@altern.org wrote:
But suggesting to friends that they use XMMS and type meaningless
scribbles to make a CD play would make one look like a loonie and
suggesting to install something else will rightfully bring the
following question: Why is it not the
Tim wrote:
jackson byers wrote:
any suggestions for command line playing of radio internet streams?
mplayer http://example.com
or, mplayer -playlist http://example.com
[by...@f10 ~]$ mplayer http://www.abacast.com/media/pls/kcsm/kcsm-kcsm-sc32.pls
MPlayer SVN-r28461-4.3.2 (C) 2000-2009
Tim wrote:
On Sat, 2009-07-18 at 01:03 -0400, gil...@altern.org wrote:
But suggesting to friends that they use XMMS and type meaningless
scribbles to make a CD play would make one look like a loonie and
suggesting to install something else will rightfully bring the
following question: Why is
1 - 100 of 118 matches
Mail list logo
