Re: Where is 2.6.32?

2010-01-02 Thread Bill Davidsen
john wendel wrote: On 12/31/2009 12:14 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote: Konstantin Svist wrote: On 12/31/2009 09:10 AM, Bill Davidsen wrote: And leaves you with no Fedora patches and the disk performance regression issues of 2.6.32. Also a tainted kernel which some developers will ignore if you get a

Re: Where is 2.6.32?

2009-12-31 Thread john wendel
On 12/31/2009 12:14 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote: Konstantin Svist wrote: On 12/31/2009 09:10 AM, Bill Davidsen wrote: And leaves you with no Fedora patches and the disk performance regression issues of 2.6.32. Also a tainted kernel which some developers will ignore if you get a trace, etc. I thou

Re: Where is 2.6.32?

2009-12-31 Thread Bill Davidsen
Konstantin Svist wrote: On 12/31/2009 09:10 AM, Bill Davidsen wrote: And leaves you with no Fedora patches and the disk performance regression issues of 2.6.32. Also a tainted kernel which some developers will ignore if you get a trace, etc. I thought it's only tainted if there are non-GPL mod

Re: Where is 2.6.32?

2009-12-31 Thread Konstantin Svist
On 12/31/2009 09:10 AM, Bill Davidsen wrote: > And leaves you with no Fedora patches and the disk performance > regression issues of 2.6.32. Also a tainted kernel which some > developers will ignore if you get a trace, etc. I thought it's only tainted if there are non-GPL modules compiled in. For

Re: Where is 2.6.32?

2009-12-31 Thread Bill Davidsen
john wendel wrote: On 12/30/2009 06:08 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote: Konstantin Svist wrote: How come Fedora is still on 2.6.31? Is .32 held back on purpose or are there issues merging it? It took less than a week for .31.9 to be pushed through... but I don't see .32 in updates-testing and it's been

Re: Where is 2.6.32?

2009-12-30 Thread Konstantin Svist
On 12/30/2009 06:08 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote: > My personal experience with building 2.6.32.recent is that if they > enhance the video drivers any more we will be running text only. Let > the developers have the holiday off, and hopefully they will have run > 2.6.32 on their laptops and be motivated

Re: Where is 2.6.32?

2009-12-30 Thread Konstantin Svist
On 12/30/2009 07:39 PM, john wendel wrote: > F11 with kernel.org 2.6.32.2 + Nvidia driver working fine here. You > really should learn to build a kernel from sources, once you get the > config file done, the rest is easy. I've done this way: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Docs/CustomKernel But don'

Re: Where is 2.6.32?

2009-12-30 Thread john wendel
On 12/30/2009 06:08 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote: Konstantin Svist wrote: How come Fedora is still on 2.6.31? Is .32 held back on purpose or are there issues merging it? It took less than a week for .31.9 to be pushed through... but I don't see .32 in updates-testing and it's been almost a whole mont

Re: Where is 2.6.32?

2009-12-30 Thread Bill Davidsen
Konstantin Svist wrote: How come Fedora is still on 2.6.31? Is .32 held back on purpose or are there issues merging it? It took less than a week for .31.9 to be pushed through... but I don't see .32 in updates-testing and it's been almost a whole month... My personal experience with building 2.6

Re: Where is 2.6.32?

2009-12-30 Thread Mail Lists
On 12/30/2009 08:07 AM, Mike Cloaked wrote: > Paulo Cavalcanti gmail.com> writes: > >> >> > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-December/msg01138.html-- > Paulo Roma CavalcantiLCG - UFRJ >> > > Ahh - thank you - there is usually a good reason for these things... > > > >

Re: Where is 2.6.32?

2009-12-30 Thread Mike Cloaked
Paulo Cavalcanti gmail.com> writes: > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-December/msg01138.html-- Paulo Roma CavalcantiLCG - UFRJ > Ahh - thank you - there is usually a good reason for these things... -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe:

Re: Where is 2.6.32?

2009-12-30 Thread Paulo Cavalcanti
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 9:12 AM, Mike Cloaked wrote: > Mail Lists sapience.com> writes: > > > > > On 12/29/2009 07:54 PM, Konstantin Svist wrote: > > > How come Fedora is still on 2.6.31? Is .32 held back on purpose or are > > > there issues merging it? > > > It took less than a week for .31.9 to

Re: Where is 2.6.32?

2009-12-30 Thread Mike Cloaked
Mail Lists sapience.com> writes: > > On 12/29/2009 07:54 PM, Konstantin Svist wrote: > > How come Fedora is still on 2.6.31? Is .32 held back on purpose or are > > there issues merging it? > > It took less than a week for .31.9 to be pushed through... but I don't > > see .32 in updates-testing a

Re: Where is 2.6.32?

2009-12-29 Thread Mail Lists
On 12/29/2009 07:54 PM, Konstantin Svist wrote: > How come Fedora is still on 2.6.31? Is .32 held back on purpose or are > there issues merging it? > It took less than a week for .31.9 to be pushed through... but I don't > see .32 in updates-testing and it's been almost a whole month... > Its no