On Saturday, Apr 25th 2009 at 21:55 -, quoth Bill Davidsen:
=Is there a benefit from not just using a login key (in authorized keys) to
=eliminate the need for passwords and also have the security of a single
=command which could be executed using the key?
=
=I do my backups that way, just
On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 23:20 -0400, Steven W. Orr wrote:
Bill, I would have to say that the answer is yes. Besides the fact
that logging in via a passwordless system is more convenient, it's
also more secure; you're username and password is never in the clear.
It's not, anyway, with a SSH
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Dan Track wrote:
Hi Guys,
I've written a simple for loop see below:
for i in orion earth;do scp /etc/hosts /etc;done
I have a small scripting knowledge so would appreciate some help. What
I'd like to do is somehow change the above so that the script prompts
me for a
2009/4/26 Mikkel L. Ellertson mik...@infinity-ltd.com:
It depends on what you are trying to do. If it is a task that you do
often, then it is worth while. But for tasks like this, that you do
infrequently, it is handy to have a key pair with a good pass
phrase. You use ssh-agent and ssh-add to
Dan Track wrote:
Hi Guys,
I've written a simple for loop see below:
for i in orion earth;do scp /etc/hosts /etc;done
I have a small scripting knowledge so would appreciate some help. What
I'd like to do is somehow change the above so that the script prompts
me for a password and when I give
Hi Guys,
I've written a simple for loop see below:
for i in orion earth;do scp /etc/hosts /etc;done
I have a small scripting knowledge so would appreciate some help. What
I'd like to do is somehow change the above so that the script prompts
me for a password and when I give the script the
Dan Track wrote:
2009/4/24 Manuel Aróstegui man...@todo-linux.com:
On Fri, 2009-04-24 at 10:12 +0100, Dan Track wrote:
Hi Guys,
I've written a simple for loop see below:
for i in orion earth;do scp /etc/hosts /etc;done
I have a small scripting knowledge so would appreciate some help.
On Fri, 2009-04-24 at 11:16 +0100, Sharpe, Sam J wrote:
Dan Track wrote:
2009/4/24 Manuel Aróstegui man...@todo-linux.com:
On Fri, 2009-04-24 at 10:12 +0100, Dan Track wrote:
Hi Guys,
I've written a simple for loop see below:
for i in orion earth;do scp /etc/hosts /etc;done
Manuel Aróstegui wrote:
On Fri, 2009-04-24 at 10:12 +0100, Dan Track wrote:
Hi Guys,
I've written a simple for loop see below:
for i in orion earth;do scp /etc/hosts /etc;done
I have a small scripting knowledge so would appreciate some help. What
I'd like to do is somehow change the above so
On Fri, 2009-04-24 at 10:12 +0100, Dan Track wrote:
Hi Guys,
I've written a simple for loop see below:
for i in orion earth;do scp /etc/hosts /etc;done
I have a small scripting knowledge so would appreciate some help. What
I'd like to do is somehow change the above so that the script
Dan Track wrote:
Hi Guys,
I've written a simple for loop see below:
for i in orion earth;do scp /etc/hosts /etc;done
I have a small scripting knowledge so would appreciate some help. What
I'd like to do is somehow change the above so that the script prompts
me for a password and when I
On 04/24/2009 04:42 AM, Dan Track wrote:
Hi Guys,
I've written a simple for loop see below:
for i in orion earth;do scp /etc/hosts /etc;done
Have you noticed that your loop body (do ...; done) contains no
reference to the loop variable $i?
poc
--
fedora-list mailing list
Dave Ihnat wrote:
On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 04:22:16PM -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote:
That won't work if filenames contain blanks, something I fight daily.
For blanks, do something like find . -name *log -exec rm -fr {} \;
I have a tiny program called zeroify which reads a line from input up to a
On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 09:10 -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote:
I have a tiny program called zeroify which reads a line from input
up to a
newline, replaced the newline with a zero byte, and pushes it out
stdout. Then I
can use the -0 option of xargs and not worry about special
characters.
You
Hi
I have script to remove files but it can't work in
directory
ls *log | sort -r | sed -e 1,1d | xargs rm -f
those folders are:
Nov28-log
Nov29-log
Nov30-log
Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To
adrian kok wrote:
Hi
I have script to remove files but it can't work in
directory
ls *log | sort -r | sed -e 1,1d | xargs rm -f
those folders are:
Nov28-log
Nov29-log
Nov30-log
Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
You have to change the
I did try it and it doesn't work!
Thank you
--- James Kosin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
adrian kok wrote:
Hi
I have script to remove files but it can't work in
directory
ls *log | sort -r | sed -e 1,1d | xargs rm -f
those folders are:
Nov28-log
Nov29-log
Nov30-log
adrian kok wrote:
Hi
I have script to remove files but it can't work in
directory
ls *log | sort -r | sed -e 1,1d | xargs rm -f
those folders are:
Nov28-log
Nov29-log
Nov30-log
By 'folders', do you mean that these are directories? You need to 'rm
-rf' directories to remove the with
adrian kok wrote:
Hi
I have script to remove files but it can't work in
directory
ls *log | sort -r | sed -e 1,1d | xargs rm -f
those folders are:
Nov28-log
Nov29-log
Nov30-log
What is it you are trying to do here? Are you trying to remove files in the
directory leaving the directory
On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 04:42 +0800, adrian kok wrote:
Hi
I have script to remove files but it can't work in
directory
ls *log | sort -r | sed -e 1,1d | xargs rm -f
those folders are:
Nov28-log
Nov29-log
Nov30-log
You need to explain what you're trying to do exactly.
Also, what's
On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 04:10:50PM -0500, RGH wrote:
The problem is that you're getting things like Nov28-log: back, with
the trailing colon. Try this:
ls -1d *log | xargs rm -Rf
Note that the first option is a one, not an el.
Or for that matter, just echo *log instead of ls.
--
On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 04:22:16PM -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote:
That won't work if filenames contain blanks, something I fight daily.
For blanks, do something like find . -name *log -exec rm -fr {} \;
Of course, that's assuming the name pattern is what you want. You can
also specify if you want
Dave Ihnat wrote:
On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 04:10:50PM -0500, RGH wrote:
ls -1d *log | xargs rm -Rf
Note that the first option is a one, not an el.
Or for that matter, just echo *log instead of ls.
Neither of those are reliable. If there are enough matches to require
xargs, then both ls
Dave Ihnat wrote:
On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 04:22:16PM -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote:
That won't work if filenames contain blanks, something I fight daily.
For blanks, do something like find . -name *log -exec rm -fr {} \;
Of course, that's assuming the name pattern is what you want. You
Gordon Messmer wrote:
Dave Ihnat wrote:
On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 04:10:50PM -0500, RGH wrote:
ls -1d *log | xargs rm -Rf
Note that the first option is a one, not an el.
Or for that matter, just echo *log instead of ls.
Neither of those are reliable. If there are enough matches to
On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 08:35:15PM -0500, RGH wrote:
Gordon Messmer wrote:
Dave Ihnat wrote:
On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 04:10:50PM -0500, RGH wrote:
ls -1d *log | xargs rm -Rf
Note that the first option is a one, not an el.
Or for that matter, just echo *log instead of ls.
Neither of
On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 10:36:13AM +1000, Cameron Simpson wrote:
On 19Sep2008 15:51, NiftyFedora Mitch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 3:43 PM, Cameron Simpson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| On 19Sep2008 14:08, Dennis Kaptain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| | Can anyone rattle
Point... just that the OP never stated that the files were in
exactly one dir and that duplicate file names were or were not possible.
Yes close timestamps are also an issue (see stat).
Hi. OP here. Files are all in the same dir. Duplicates obviously not an
issue. Everything is working.
I've been googling to find ways of doing this but I'm not finding what
I'm looking for. I think this should be fairly easy, so I'm hoping a
script guru out there can tell me what I need.
I have some files that are all named like:
myfile387465893495643658734.txt
myfile547647453645635632454.txt
James Pifer wrote:
I've been googling to find ways of doing this but I'm not finding what
I'm looking for. I think this should be fairly easy, so I'm hoping a
script guru out there can tell me what I need.
I have some files that are all named like:
myfile387465893495643658734.txt
Can anyone rattle this off of the top of their head?
`ls -t myfile*.txt | head -1` might work for you.
ls -t by itself may give you more than one filename per line.
Use ls -t1
that will assure you get only one file name output from head.
Dennis K
I've been googling to find ways of doing this but I'm not finding what
I'm looking for. I think this should be fairly easy, so I'm hoping a
script guru out there can tell me what I need.
I have some files that are all named like:
myfile387465893495643658734.txt
On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 13:50 -0700, Mike Wright wrote:
James Pifer wrote:
I've been googling to find ways of doing this but I'm not finding
what
I'm looking for. I think this should be fairly easy, so I'm hoping a
script guru out there can tell me what I need.
I have some files that
On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 14:08 -0700, Dennis Kaptain wrote:
Can anyone rattle this off of the top of their head?
`ls -t myfile*.txt | head -1` might work for you.
ls -t by itself may give you more than one filename per line.
Use ls -t1
that will assure you get only one file
On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 14:08 -0700, Dennis Kaptain wrote:
Can anyone rattle this off of the top of their head?
`ls -t myfile*.txt | head -1` might work for you.
ls -t by itself may give you more than one filename per line.
Use ls -t1
that will assure you get only one file
ls -t by itself may give you more than one filename per line.
Use ls -t1
that will assure you get only one file name output from head.
Single-column output is automatically selected any time that the output
of ls is redirected to anything which is not a tty, so the -1 option is
not
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 2:18 PM, James Pifer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 13:50 -0700, Mike Wright wrote:
James Pifer wrote:
I've been googling to find ways of doing this but I'm not finding
what
I'm looking for. I think this should be fairly easy, so I'm hoping a
script
On 19Sep2008 14:08, Dennis Kaptain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Can anyone rattle this off of the top of their head?
|
| `ls -t myfile*.txt | head -1` might work for you.
|
| ls -t by itself may give you more than one filename per line.
| Use ls -t1
| that will assure you get only one file
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 3:43 PM, Cameron Simpson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 19Sep2008 14:08, Dennis Kaptain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Can anyone rattle this off of the top of their head?
|
| `ls -t myfile*.txt | head -1` might work for you.
|
| ls -t by itself may give you more than
On 19Sep2008 15:51, NiftyFedora Mitch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 3:43 PM, Cameron Simpson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| On 19Sep2008 14:08, Dennis Kaptain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| | Can anyone rattle this off of the top of their head?
| | `ls -t myfile*.txt | head -1`
On 20Sep2008 10:36, I wrote:
| Something like the find incantation of another post is the easy way:
|
| find . -type f -name 'myfile\*.txt' | ls -t | sed 1q
Gah. My brain is off. Something more like this:
files=`find . -type f -name 'myfile\*.txt'`
ls -t -- $files | sed 1q
Won't work if
41 matches
Mail list logo
