Michael Pawlowsky wrote:
Are there any other people using FC in a production enterprise environment?
Production, certainly. We have 7 fedora servers all providing public
facing services over a range of different functionalities. All are
running F11.
The constant upgrades are driving me
Quoting Michael Pawlowsky mi...@clearskymedia.ca:
Are there any other people using FC in a production enterprise environment?
The constant upgrades are driving me nuts. We have machines at
FC8-FC9-FC10 and FC-11.
The main reason we are using FC is because one it's free (in a sense).
The next
On 12/11/09 10:48, Simon Andrews wrote:
Michael Pawlowsky wrote:
Are there any other people using FC in a production enterprise
environment?
Production, certainly. We have 7 fedora servers all providing public
facing services over a range of different functionalities. All are
running
That's a remarkable upgrade feat, I managed Fedora 7 to 8 and then 10 to
11, but all the way from Fedora 1, respect. Just curious did you upgrade
The early ones were a bit fun but doable. ftp.linux.org.uk started with a
late Red Hat (RH9 I think) and has done the same but live updated each
Are there any other people using FC in a production enterprise
environment?
The constant upgrades are driving me nuts. We have machines at FC8-FC9-
FC10 and FC-11.
The main reason we are using FC is because one it's free (in a sense).
The next one is that it does include more recent
On 11/12/2009 04:05 AM, Michael Pawlowsky wrote:
Is FC simply a bad choice for enterprise production.
I'm starting to want to try CentOS soon. Unfortunately this will mean
not always being able to take advantage of the latest features in
software and so on.
So I was just wondering what
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 17:35:14 -0500,
Michael Pawlowsky mi...@clearskymedia.ca wrote:
The main reason we are using FC is because one it's free (in a sense).
The next one is that it does include more recent versions of
packages that we use and are looking for the latest versions to take
To make things more difficult, our servers need to be up 24/7.
Is FC simply a bad choice for enterprise production.
It depends on your environment but probably - yes
I'm starting to want to try CentOS soon. Unfortunately this will mean
not always being able to take advantage of the
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Alan Cox a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk wrote
Latest and Stable are usually opposite ends of the same scale.
Centos is boring - in all the good senses of the word.
That's so true, but it gets the job done. :-)
~af
--
fedora-list mailing list
Hi, Michael,
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 17:35, Michael Pawlowsky mi...@clearskymedia.ca wrote:
Is FC simply a bad choice for enterprise production.
I'm starting to want to try CentOS soon. Unfortunately this will mean not
always being able to take advantage of the latest features in software and
On Wednesday 11 November 2009 22:35:14 Michael Pawlowsky wrote:
The constant upgrades are driving me nuts. We have machines at FC8-FC9-
FC10 and FC-11.
The main reason we are using FC is because one it's free (in a sense).
The next one is that it does include more recent versions of packages
Michael Pawlowsky wrote:
Are there any other people using FC in a production enterprise
environment?
The constant upgrades are driving me nuts. We have machines at
FC8-FC9-FC10 and FC-11.
The main reason we are using FC is because one it's free (in a sense).
The next one is that it does
On Wed, 2009-11-11 at 17:35 -0500, Michael Pawlowsky wrote:
Are there any other people using FC in a production enterprise
environment?
Yes.
The constant upgrades are driving me nuts. We have machines at FC8-FC9-
FC10 and FC-11.
I still have a FC4 server. It's a pain to keep updating
On Wed, 2009-11-11 at 23:31 +, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
For example, you cannot go from ext3 filesystem to ext4 without
reformatting the drive.
Actually you can, so it's not a good example for the point you're making
(and which I agree with BTW).
poc
--
fedora-list mailing list
On Thursday 12 November 2009 01:29:19 Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Wed, 2009-11-11 at 23:31 +, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
For example, you cannot go from ext3 filesystem to ext4 without
reformatting the drive.
Actually you can, so it's not a good example for the point you're making
(and
On 2009-11-11, at 6:33 PM, Ryan Lynch wrote:
I really don't understand something, here. First, you blast Fedora for
its high-speed upgrade treadmill. OK, fair enough--that gets on my
nerves, too, at times.
But then, near the end of your email, you complain that Red Hat/CentOS
lacks the
On 2009-11-11, at 6:45 PM, Clint Dilks wrote:
Fedora is just not a good choice in this situation, we tried running
Fedora in this way for a time but it just becomes unmanageable. One
short term suggestion I would make is that you maintain your own
copies of the repositories that you use
17 matches
Mail list logo
