On Mon, 2008-06-30 at 10:49 +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
Dnia 2008-06-27, pią o godzinie 13:52 +0100, Timothy Murphy pisze:
Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
One problem for a lot of people is that NM does not open the network
connection until the user logs in. This is a problem for anything
2008/6/27 Andrew Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
And they are nothing at all like the [whatever the opposite of flat
earth folks are] who think things like NetworkManager and PulseAudio are
the holy grail because there are circumstances where these are valuable
tools in spite of the huge volume of
On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 14:13 -0400, max bianco wrote:
It already does everything, its never given me a problem. Wired or
wireless take your pick. Of course when I decide to buy a piece of
hardware, I generally avoid the cheap crap
I can't say that I've had a hardware problem with it, but just
On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 14:00 -0700, Craig White wrote:
snip
The thing I love about flat earth folks who disparage things like
NetworkManager and PulseAudio is that they are consistently blind to the
fact that there are circumstances where these are valuable tools.
Craig
Indeed.
Yes.
And
Phil Meyer wrote:
People who keep home directories across installs are the ones facing the
most issues with NM on F9.
What does NM read or write in the home directory?
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
One problem for a lot of people is that NM does not open the network
connection until the user logs in. This is a problem for anything
that needs a network connection before you log in.
I agree.
What is the rationale behind this decision?
It seems very strange.
On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 13:52 +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote:
Incidentally, is there such a thing as NetworkManagerDispatcher now?
Apparently not. It would seem that NetworkManager does it all, rather
than have a separate service for scripts. Just wait, soon it will do
everything... :-\
--
the efforts plugged into
the fedora project in general... but just wishing we understood the thinking
behind the changes in fc9...
- Original Message -
From: Tom Horsley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: fedora-list@redhat.com
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 5:37 AM
Subject: Re: What is the matter
fedora wrote:
Hi every
What is the matter with fedora 9?
it introduced a NetworkManager which prohibits networking.
NetworkMangler has been around since FC6 (at least), by making it the
default it became impossible to ignore. It does the right thing in cases
where you have one hardwire
Bill Davidsen wrote:
fedora wrote:
Hi every
What is the matter with fedora 9?
it introduced a NetworkManager which prohibits networking.
NetworkMangler has been around since FC6 (at least), by making it the
default it became impossible to ignore. It does the right thing in
cases where you
Stephen Berg (Contractor) wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote:
fedora wrote:
Hi every
What is the matter with fedora 9?
it introduced a NetworkManager which prohibits networking.
NetworkMangler has been around since FC6 (at least), by making it the
default it became impossible to ignore. It does
Stephen Berg (Contractor) wrote:
it introduced a NetworkManager which prohibits networking.
NetworkMangler has been around since FC6 (at least), by making it the
default it became impossible to ignore. It does the right thing in
cases where you have one hardwire or wireless connection which
Stephen Berg (Contractor) wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote:
After about a dozen installs of Fedora 9 I cannot agree with you on
that. On every system save one there is only one network connection, in
each of those cases it's been /dev/eth0 and NM would not enable the
connection by default.
Maybe
On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 14:46 -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:
fedora wrote:
Hi every
What is the matter with fedora 9?
it introduced a NetworkManager which prohibits networking.
NetworkMangler has been around since FC6 (at least), by making it the
default it became impossible to ignore
On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 14:34 -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:
Craig White wrote:
First of all, Tom didn't qualify his comments on NetworkManager which is
very useful in some instances and apparently is installed as the default
networking daemon if you install from Live CD. His suggestion to turn
Hi every
i have found the couse or at least a work araund for slow working
openoffice:
if your openoffice is not responsive when clicking toolbar buttons in
the head line, the cause may be in your .gnome*, your .gconf*, or your
.x* directories. when i removed all of them and logged-in from
Hi every
What is the matter with fedora 9?
it introduced a NetworkManager which prohibits networking.
programs are acessible only as root user: xsane just does nothing as
non-root user.
openoffice blocks its drop-downs in the main menu for 20 seconds, if you
are not root. if you are root
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 6:53 PM, fedora [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
could the relevant persons please provide an update to fedora 9 as soon as
possible? thanks very much.
there are a lot of updates and fixes, just type
yum update
very angry
cool down please, there is a very big effort
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 17:53:37 +0200
fedora [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it introduced a NetworkManager which prohibits networking.
Don't know about the other problems, but for me this makes
networking function just like always:
chkconfig --level 2345 NetworkManager off
chkconfig --level 2345
the thinking
behind the changes in fc9...
- Original Message -
From: Tom Horsley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: fedora-list@redhat.com
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 5:37 AM
Subject: Re: What is the matter with fedora 9?
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 17:53:37 +0200
fedora [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
]
To: fedora-list@redhat.com
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 5:37 AM
Subject: Re: What is the matter with fedora 9?
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 17:53:37 +0200
fedora [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it introduced a NetworkManager which prohibits networking.
Don't know about the other problems, but for me
fc9 and rolled back to fc8.
:( sorry again for the miscom...
- Original Message -
From: Craig White [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: For users of Fedora fedora-list@redhat.com
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 8:14 AM
Subject: Re: What is the matter with fedora 9?
First of all, Tom didn't qualify
22 matches
Mail list logo
