whoosh wrote:
On 01-Aug-08 17:36:50 Bill Davidsen wrote:
whoosh wrote:
all gcc's so far have accepted the following code,
until now using gcc on Fedora 9:
void f( va_list *pargs )
{
va_list args = *pargs ;
...
}
64 bit Fedora 9's gcc regards this as an error, all the other gcc's eg
on 32
whoosh wrote:
On 01-Aug-08 03:22:56 Sam Varshavchik wrote:
whoosh writes:
On 01-Aug-08 03:00:09 Tom Horsley wrote:
On Fri, 01 Aug 2008 02:36:54 +0100
whoosh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
64 bit Fedora 9's gcc regards this as an error, all the other gcc's eg
on 32 bit Fedora Core 3 have no
On Thursday, Jul 31st 2008 at 21:36 -, quoth whoosh:
=
=all gcc's so far have accepted the following code,
=
=until now using gcc on Fedora 9:
=
=
=void f( va_list *pargs )
={
=va_list args = *pargs ;
=...
=}
=
=64 bit Fedora 9's gcc regards this as an error, all the other gcc's eg
=on 32
whoosh wrote:
all gcc's so far have accepted the following code,
until now using gcc on Fedora 9:
void f( va_list *pargs )
{
va_list args = *pargs ;
...
}
64 bit Fedora 9's gcc regards this as an error, all the other gcc's eg
on 32 bit Fedora Core 3 have no problem with this.
I use this
On 01-Aug-08 03:22:26 Kevin Kofler wrote:
whoosh whoosh777 at blueyonder.co.uk writes:
is there a way to switch off the signedness errors, where
-Wno-pointer-sign
Kevin Kofler
excellent, I had given up!
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe:
On 01-Aug-08 03:22:56 Sam Varshavchik wrote:
whoosh writes:
On 01-Aug-08 03:00:09 Tom Horsley wrote:
On Fri, 01 Aug 2008 02:36:54 +0100
whoosh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
64 bit Fedora 9's gcc regards this as an error, all the other gcc's eg
on 32 bit Fedora Core 3 have no problem with this.
On 01-Aug-08 15:00:59 Steven W. Orr wrote:
On Thursday, Jul 31st 2008 at 21:36 -, quoth whoosh:
=
=all gcc's so far have accepted the following code,
=
=until now using gcc on Fedora 9:
=
=
=void f( va_list *pargs )
={
=va_list args = *pargs ;
=...
=}
=
=64 bit Fedora 9's gcc regards this as
On 01-Aug-08 17:36:50 Bill Davidsen wrote:
whoosh wrote:
all gcc's so far have accepted the following code,
until now using gcc on Fedora 9:
void f( va_list *pargs )
{
va_list args = *pargs ;
...
}
64 bit Fedora 9's gcc regards this as an error, all the other gcc's eg
on 32 bit
all gcc's so far have accepted the following code,
until now using gcc on Fedora 9:
void f( va_list *pargs )
{
va_list args = *pargs ;
...
}
64 bit Fedora 9's gcc regards this as an error, all the other gcc's eg
on 32 bit Fedora Core 3 have no problem with this.
I use this a lot in order
On Fri, 01 Aug 2008 02:36:54 +0100
whoosh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
64 bit Fedora 9's gcc regards this as an error, all the other gcc's eg
on 32 bit Fedora Core 3 have no problem with this.
The standard regards it as an error as well, and if you looked up
the insane argument passing
On 01-Aug-08 03:00:09 Tom Horsley wrote:
On Fri, 01 Aug 2008 02:36:54 +0100
whoosh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
64 bit Fedora 9's gcc regards this as an error, all the other gcc's eg
on 32 bit Fedora Core 3 have no problem with this.
The standard regards it as an error as well, and if you looked
whoosh whoosh777 at blueyonder.co.uk writes:
is there a way to switch off the signedness errors, where
-Wno-pointer-sign
Kevin Kofler
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
whoosh writes:
On 01-Aug-08 03:00:09 Tom Horsley wrote:
On Fri, 01 Aug 2008 02:36:54 +0100
whoosh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
64 bit Fedora 9's gcc regards this as an error, all the other gcc's eg
on 32 bit Fedora Core 3 have no problem with this.
The standard regards it as an error as
13 matches
Mail list logo
