Bill Davidsen wrote:
Roberto Ragusa wrote:
The decision to not save buffers and cached is debatable. Even if
it is memory which can be read again from the disk, it is MUCH
faster to read from the swap image in a contiguous fashion, than
to seek everywhere for minutes after a suspend.
That
Bill Davidsen wrote:
In suspend to disk, see the output of the 'free' command. The data in
the 'buffers' and 'cached' need not be saved, the buffers are written to
the filesystem and the cached data are discarded. So the room you really
need is the swap in use plus the memory in use. And it
Roberto Ragusa wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote:
In suspend to disk, see the output of the 'free' command. The data in
the 'buffers' and 'cached' need not be saved, the buffers are written to
the filesystem and the cached data are discarded. So the room you really
need is the swap in use plus the
Tim wrote:
On Fri, 2009-07-03 at 23:14 +0700, muhammad panji wrote:
2 G of swap is enough
If you want to do suspend to disc, you need swap space at least as large
as your RAM, as that's where it dumps a copy of memory to while
suspending.
Let me clarify a tad, this is a bit more complex
On 07/01/2009 03:28 PM, Mick M. wrote:
Hi;
I would like some input on disk partitions.
I bought a 1TB sata drive, it works fine,
At the moment my system has 3 drives 1 160M IDE and 2 sata 250M and 1TB.
The IDE is for XP, as it will not see the SATA drives.
I want to remove the IDE drive
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 2:28 AM, Mick M.off_b...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi;
I would like some input on disk partitions.
I bought a 1TB sata drive, it works fine,
At the moment my system has 3 drives 1 160M IDE and 2 sata 250M and 1TB.
The IDE is for XP, as it will not see the SATA drives.
I
-Original Message-
From: fedora-list-boun...@redhat.com
[mailto:fedora-list-boun...@redhat.com] On Behalf Of muhammad panji
Sent: Friday, July 03, 2009 9:14 AM
To: Community assistance, encouragement,and advice for using Fedora.
Subject: Re: new disk layout
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009
muhammad panji wrote:
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 2:28 AM, Mick M.off_b...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi;
I would like some input on disk partitions.
I bought a 1TB sata drive, it works fine,
At the moment my system has 3 drives 1 160M IDE and 2 sata 250M and 1TB.
The IDE is for XP, as it will not see the
On Fri, 2009-07-03 at 23:14 +0700, muhammad panji wrote:
2 G of swap is enough
If you want to do suspend to disc, you need swap space at least as large
as your RAM, as that's where it dumps a copy of memory to while
suspending.
If you don't want to suspend to disc, then you can size your swap
On 07/01/2009 03:28 PM, Mick M.
wrote:
Hi;
I would like some input on disk
partitions.
I bought a 1TB sata drive, it works fine,
At the moment my system has 3 drives 1 160M IDE and 2
sata 250M and 1TB.
The IDE is for XP, as it will not see the SATA
drives.
I want to remove
Mick M. wrote:
Hi;
I would like some input on disk partitions.
I bought a 1TB sata drive, it works fine,
At the moment my system has 3 drives 1 160M IDE and 2 sata 250M and 1TB.
The IDE is for XP, as it will not see the SATA drives.
I want to remove the IDE drive and install XPx64 on the new
Hi;
I would like some input on disk partitions.
I bought a 1TB sata drive, it works fine,
At the moment my system has 3 drives 1 160M IDE and 2 sata 250M and 1TB.
The IDE is for XP, as it will not see the SATA drives.
I want to remove the IDE drive and install XPx64 on the new drive as a
12 matches
Mail list logo
