Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
Michael Comperchio wrote:
When I run the 'Update System' 'cuz it's telling me I have updates... I
get the following errors:
libavcodec.so.51 is needed by package gstreamer-ffmpeg-0.10.5-1.fc10.i386
libavcodec.so.51 is needed by package
On Tue, 20 Jan 2009 16:54:20 -0700, Craig wrote:
For your question, it's not always clear where the packages came from
since there's no official way to do that (not that there haven't been
proposals for that).
Not true. There have been proposals, such as continueing to let a
project's package
On Tue, 20 Jan 2009 17:50:33 -0700, Craig wrote:
[mich...@merlin ~]$ yum repolist
Loaded plugins: protectbase, refresh-packagekit
if protectbase is stopping it. I'm not a user of protectbase and I
somewhat think that plugins such as protectbase cause problems that
users aren't capable of
On Tue, 20 Jan 2009 15:31:52 -0500, R. wrote:
I think I have had actually had to use --force about twice in four
years, in some circumstance where part of a package was messed up but
the system didn't' know that.
That doesn't sound right. The RPM database certainly knows about
packages
Here is a copy of my post. I guess I could have been more specific
about the dangers. I did a second post in response to Craig that
went into more detail.
R. G. Newbury wrote:
From: Michael Comperchio mcmp...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: updateing ARGHH.
Ok so here's what 'yum' thinks
Here is the response to Craig that goes into more detail.
Craig White wrote:
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 13:08 -0600, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
--force is a bit of overkill here. All you should need is
--replacepkgs. The --replacefiles option that is part of the
--force options can turn around a
On Wed, 2009-01-21 at 09:50 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Tue, 20 Jan 2009 16:54:20 -0700, Craig wrote:
For your question, it's not always clear where the packages came from
since there's no official way to do that (not that there haven't been
proposals for that).
Not true. There
wrote:
From: Michael Comperchio mcmp...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: updateing ARGHH.
Ok so here's what 'yum' thinks...
ffmpeg-libs-0.4.9-0.52.20080908.fc10.i386 : Libraries for ffmpeg
Repo: installed
Matched from:
Other : Provides-match: libavcodec.so.51
I'm just
Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
Here is a copy of my post. I guess I could have been more specific
about the dangers. I did a second post in response to Craig that
went into more detail.
Sorry - I am having a bad day - this was supposed to be off list!
Mikkel
--
Do not meddle in the affairs
Craig White wrote:
Why are you repeating this?
Back channel e-mails?
Craig
Yes - I am having a bad day, and two messages that were not supposed
to go to the list ended up there. A total of 4 hours on hold this
morning has turned my brain to mush. I am sorry about the error.
Mikkel
--
I
From: Michael Comperchio mcmp...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: updateing ARGHH.
Ok so here's what 'yum' thinks...
ffmpeg-libs-0.4.9-0.52.20080908.fc10.i386 : Libraries for ffmpeg
Repo: installed
Matched from:
Other : Provides-match: libavcodec.so.51
I'm just not the sharpest
R. G. Newbury wrote:
From: Michael Comperchio mcmp...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: updateing ARGHH.
Ok so here's what 'yum' thinks...
ffmpeg-libs-0.4.9-0.52.20080908.fc10.i386 : Libraries for ffmpeg
Repo: installed
Matched from:
Other : Provides-match: libavcodec.so.51
I'm
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 13:55 -0500, R. G. Newbury wrote:
From: Michael Comperchio mcmp...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: updateing ARGHH.
Ok so here's what 'yum' thinks...
ffmpeg-libs-0.4.9-0.52.20080908.fc10.i386 : Libraries for ffmpeg
Repo: installed
Matched from:
Other
Craig White wrote:
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 13:55 -0500, R. G. Newbury wrote:
From: Michael Comperchio mcmp...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: updateing ARGHH.
Ok so here's what 'yum' thinks...
ffmpeg-libs-0.4.9-0.52.20080908.fc10.i386 : Libraries for ffmpeg
Repo: installed
Matched
Subject: Re: updateing ARGHH.
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 13:55 -0500, R. G. Newbury wrote:
Ok so here's what 'yum' thinks...
ffmpeg-libs-0.4.9-0.52.20080908.fc10.i386 : Libraries for ffmpeg
Repo: installed
Matched from:
Other : Provides-match: libavcodec.so.51
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 15:05 -0500, Michael Comperchio wrote:
Craig White wrote:
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 13:55 -0500, R. G. Newbury wrote:
From: Michael Comperchio mcmp...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: updateing ARGHH.
Ok so here's what 'yum' thinks...
ffmpeg-libs-0.4.9
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 15:31 -0500, R. G. Newbury wrote:
Subject: Re: updateing ARGHH.
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 13:55 -0500, R. G. Newbury wrote:
Ok so here's what 'yum' thinks...
ffmpeg-libs-0.4.9-0.52.20080908.fc10.i386 : Libraries for ffmpeg
Repo: installed
Craig White wrote:
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 15:05 -0500, Michael Comperchio wrote:
Craig White wrote:
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 13:55 -0500, R. G. Newbury wrote:
From: Michael Comperchio mcmp...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: updateing ARGHH.
Ok so here's what 'yum' thinks...
ffmpeg
Craig White wrote:
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 13:08 -0600, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
--force is a bit of overkill here. All you should need is
--replacepkgs. The --replacefiles option that is part of the
--force options can turn around a bite you if you are not careful.
On the other hand, if
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 19:24 -0500, Michael Comperchio wrote:
Well... I removed completely
xine-lib-extras-freeworld k3b-extras-freeworld gstreamer-ffmpeg
this allowed the yum update to complete. At this point I still had the atrpms
being included. Once someone suggested suggested that I
R. G. Newbury wrote:
Craig, if you took the time to rethink your desire to jump on comments
like an attack dog and rephrased them to be personally neutral, you
might not get called names in response. Your ad-hominem attacks on me
don't make you look any better, nor any smarter. And to be
Michael Comperchio wrote:
When I run the 'Update System' 'cuz it's telling me I have updates... I
get the following errors:
libavcodec.so.51 is needed by package gstreamer-ffmpeg-0.10.5-1.fc10.i386
libavcodec.so.51 is needed by package
xine-lib-extras-freeworld-1.1.16-1.fc10.i386
Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
Michael Comperchio wrote:
When I run the 'Update System' 'cuz it's telling me I have updates... I
get the following errors:
libavcodec.so.51 is needed by package gstreamer-ffmpeg-0.10.5-1.fc10.i386
libavcodec.so.51 is needed by package
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Michael Comperchio mcmp...@gmail.com wrote:
Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
Michael Comperchio wrote:
When I run the 'Update System' 'cuz it's telling me I have updates... I
get the following errors:
libavcodec.so.51 is needed by package
Kam Leo wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Michael Comperchio mcmp...@gmail.com wrote:
Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
Michael Comperchio wrote:
When I run the 'Update System' 'cuz it's telling me I have updates... I
get the following errors:
libavcodec.so.51 is needed by
On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 12:58:32 -0500, Michael wrote:
Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
Michael Comperchio wrote:
When I run the 'Update System' 'cuz it's telling me I have updates... I
get the following errors:
libavcodec.so.51 is needed by package gstreamer-ffmpeg-0.10.5-1.fc10.i386
On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 14:39:59 -0500
Michael Comperchio wrote:
So what do I do now?
yum remove xine-lib-extras-freeworld k3b-extras-freeworld
yum update
yum install xine-lib-extras-freeworld k3b-extras-freeworld
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com
DRY CLEANER
On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 14:39:59 -0500, Michael wrote:
[r...@merlin Michael]# yum update
--- Package ffmpeg.i386 0:0.4.9-28_r15845.fc10 set to be updated
This is a package from atrpms, which contains newer library versions.
It looks like you lose the rpmfusion.org ffmpeg-libs package during
this
28 matches
Mail list logo
