Recently I've found Yumex to be unreliable, getting stuck when trying to
do updates. Yet the updates can be made using yum from the command line.
Also it seems to take far too long to update the status of RPMs
installed and available. Hopefully this will be fixed shortly and I can
again feel
On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 11:44:42 +
n2xssvv.g02gfr12930 wrote:
Recently I've found Yumex to be unreliable, getting stuck when trying to
do updates. Yet the updates can be made using yum from the command line.
Also it seems to take far too long to update the status of RPMs
installed
On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 07:03:07AM -0500, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 11:44:42 +
n2xssvv.g02gfr12930 wrote:
Recently I've found Yumex to be unreliable, getting stuck when trying to
do updates. Yet the updates can be made using yum from the command line.
Also it seems
On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 04:16:11PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
the guts of package management. However, PackageKit is neither
unreliable nor barely communicating in my experience, and I use it
most of the time in Fedora. Yum also has bits that allow it to
communicate with PackageKit when run
the guts of package management. However, PackageKit is neither
unreliable nor barely communicating in my experience, and I use it
most of the time in Fedora. Yum also has bits that allow it to
communicate with PackageKit when run on the command line. This system
works quite well.
This one
On 01/07/2010 04:08 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
The yum command line tool is great for anyone who wants to see more of
the guts of package management. However, PackageKit is neither
unreliable nor barely communicating in my experience, and I use it
most of the time in Fedora.
Well, ...
* ...
I have two new F-12 installs, one each 32 and 64 bit boxes. Yumex
fails on both, although I think it may have worked initially after
the Omegalive install. My memory is a bit fuzzy on that point, but
it could have resulted from an update if that is the case.
Yumex asks
Am Mittwoch, den 23.12.2009, 11:09 -0500 schrieb Bob Goodwin:
/usr/bin/yumex: line 5: 3234 Segmentation fault (core dumped)
/usr/bin/python /usr/bin/yumex/yumex.pyc $*
Does anyone have a solution or do I just have to wait 'til it's
fixed? Or do I have something
On 12/23/2009 11:09 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
I have two new F-12 installs, one each 32 and 64 bit boxes. Yumex
fails on both, although I think it may have worked initially after
the Omegalive install. My memory is a bit fuzzy on that point, but
it could have resulted from an update
On 23/12/09 12:35, Jim wrote:
On 12/23/2009 11:09 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
I have two new F-12 installs, one each 32 and 64 bit boxes. Yumex
fails on both, although I think it may have worked initially after
the Omegalive install. My memory is a bit fuzzy on that point, but
it could
On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 12:35:20 -0500, Jim wrote:
whack
you need to remove the ;
gtk2-immodule-xim-2.18.5-3.fc12
This package is causing Yumex to crash.
That fixed it! +1 for Jim.
-- cmg
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman
Am Freitag, den 18.12.2009, 21:26 -0500 schrieb Jim:
FC12/KDE
Yumex crashes just after starting, it checks package repos then crashes,
A attachment is attached showing yumex start from command line ,and
output to
/var/log/messages.
Same here. F12/Gnome. Tried
Am Freitag, den 18.12.2009, 21:26 -0500 schrieb Jim:
FC12/KDE
Yumex crashes just after starting, it checks package repos then crashes,
A attachment is attached showing yumex start from command line ,and
output to /var/log/messages.
Same twice here on my desktop and my laptop, exactly
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 9:32 PM, NoSpaze nosp...@gmail.com wrote:
Am Freitag, den 18.12.2009, 21:26 -0500 schrieb Jim:
FC12/KDE
Yumex crashes just after starting, it checks package repos then crashes,
A attachment is attached showing yumex start from command line ,and
output to
/var/log
Le 20/12/2009 17:08, NoSpaze a écrit :
Am Freitag, den 18.12.2009, 21:26 -0500 schrieb Jim:
FC12/KDE
Yumex crashes just after starting, it checks package repos then crashes,
A attachment is attached showing yumex start from command line ,and
output to /var/log/messages.
Same twice
On 12/20/2009 11:08 AM, NoSpaze wrote:
Am Freitag, den 18.12.2009, 21:26 -0500 schrieb Jim:
FC12/KDE
Yumex crashes just after starting, it checks package repos then crashes,
A attachment is attached showing yumex start from command line ,and
output to /var/log/messages.
Same twice
FC12/KDE
Yumex crashes just after starting, it checks package repos then crashes,
A attachment is attached showing yumex start from command line ,and
output to
/var/log/messages.
$ yumex
\running
Current Settings
autorefresh: True
branding_title: 'Yum Extender NextGen
On 09/14/2009 10:12 PM, lanas wrote:
I'm used with kyum up to now. Since it has disappeared from recent
the F11 to which I'm upgrading from F8, I started to become familiar
with the command-line yum. How then, is yumex when compared with
kyum ? Do they have the same search functionalities
On 09/15/2009 12:12 PM, lanas wrote:
I'm used with kyum up to now. Since it has disappeared from recent
the F11 to which I'm upgrading from F8, I started to become familiar
with the command-line yum. How then, is yumex when compared with
kyum ? Do they have the same search functionalities
Hi Suvayu,
Thanks!
Please confirm that replacing the base URL with the nearest server address
no negative consequences.
Regards,
Jwalant Natvarlal Soneji, BE IT, India
2009/9/15 Suvayu Ali fatkasuvayu+li...@gmail.comfatkasuvayu%2bli...@gmail.com
On Monday 14 September 2009 06:42 PM, Jwalant
Hi Jwalant,
Could you please stick to the posting guidelines for the list? Top
posting makes reading and replying in context rather cumbersome. Now
about the issue at hand ...
2009/9/15 Jwalant Natvarlal Soneji jwalant.son...@gmail.com:
Hi Suvayu,
2009/9/15 Suvayu Ali
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 7:12 PM, lanas la...@securenet.net wrote:
I'm used with kyum up to now. Since it has disappeared from recent
the F11 to which I'm upgrading from F8, I started to become familiar
with the command-line yum. How then, is yumex when compared with
kyum ? Do they have
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 10:45 AM, suvayu ali
fatkasuvayu+li...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Jwalant,
Could you please stick to the posting guidelines for the list? Top
posting makes reading and replying in context rather cumbersome. Now
about the issue at hand ...
2009/9/15 Jwalant Natvarlal Soneji
On Tuesday 15 September 2009 02:37 PM, Kam Leo wrote:
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 10:45 AM, suvayu ali
fatkasuvayu+li...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Jwalant,
Could you please stick to the posting guidelines for the list? Top
posting makes reading and replying in context rather cumbersome. Now
about the
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 7:08 PM, Suvayu Ali fatkasuvayu+li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday 15 September 2009 02:37 PM, Kam Leo wrote:
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 10:45 AM, suvayu ali
fatkasuvayu+li...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Jwalant,
Could you please stick to the posting guidelines for the list?
installed
yumex.
Thanks,
Jwalant Natvarlal Soneji, BE IT, India
Sent from Pune, MH, India
2009/9/13 David Timms dti...@iinet.net.au
yum -d 10 whatever
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http
Jwalant Natvarlal Soneji wrote:
This is the result:
###
[r...@jjj ~]# yum -d 10 whatever
Loading aliases plugin
Loading allowdowngrade plugin
Loading auto-update-debuginfo plugin
Loading basearchonly plugin
Loading blacklist plugin
Loading changelog plugin
Loading downloadonly plugin
On 09/14/2009 03:23 PM, James Wilkinson wrote:
Jwalant Natvarlal Soneji wrote:
This is the result:
###
[r...@jjj ~]# yum -d 10 whatever
Loading aliases plugin
Loading allowdowngrade plugin
Loading auto-update-debuginfo plugin
Loading basearchonly plugin
Loading blacklist plugin
Loading
Thank you very much.
Meanwhile, what I did was to copy the base URL and paste it in to the
browser address bar. Tried to open each URL, removing last tag if not found.
This way, it put me to the nearest URL (IITK, India). And then selected F10,
i386/686, and thus got the new URL, which I pasted
I'm used with kyum up to now. Since it has disappeared from recent
the F11 to which I'm upgrading from F8, I started to become familiar
with the command-line yum. How then, is yumex when compared with
kyum ? Do they have the same search functionalities for instance ?
--
fedora-list mailing
On Monday 14 September 2009 06:42 PM, Jwalant Natvarlal Soneji wrote:
Meanwhile, what I did was to copy the base URL and paste it in to the
browser address bar. Tried to open each URL, removing last tag if not found.
This way, it put me to the nearest URL (IITK, India). And then selected F10,
Hi,
What could be the issue?
It is on Fedora 10.
Thanks,
Jwalant Natvarlal Soneji, BE IT, India
Sent from Pune, MH, India
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines:
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 1:32 AM, Jwalant Natvarlal Soneji wrote:
What could be the issue?
It is on Fedora 10.
I presume you can otherwise use the network -- DNS working, etc. So
did you try yum clean all? I think you can even do it from one of
the menus in yumex.
--
fedora-list mailing list
did you try yum clean all? I think you can even do it from one of
the menus in yumex.
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
--
fedora
clean all? I think you can even do it from one of
the menus in yumex.
Did that, no luck.
Thanks,
Jwalant Natvarlal Soneji, BE IT, India
Is yum OK ?
Result from
yum -d 10 whatever
could be helpful.
DaveT.
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I ran yumex to see if there were updates that needed to happen. I selected all
that was there (134) and it died with this stuff on the console:
12:07:31 : --- Package openal.i386 0:0.0.9-0.15.20060204cvs.fc9 set to be
updated
12:07:31 : --- Package
I cropped your post to the problem - related to swig. You've a couple
of options; uncheck it so Yumex does not try to update it, or if you
don't need it, remove swig. If you wait a bit, the missing package will
probably appear in the repo in the near future and resolve the issue.
Here's
On Tuesday 04 August 2009, Steven W. Orr wrote:
I ran yumex to see if there were updates that needed to happen. I selected
all that was there (134) and it died with this stuff on the console:
12:07:31 : --- Package openal.i386 0:0.0.9-0.15.20060204cvs.fc9 set to be
updated 12:07:31
charles zeitler wrote:
running 'xhost + ' fixed it.
duh.
A more secure solution is to use an X11-aware tool such as kdesu instead of
sudo. xhost + is an insecure hack.
Kevin Kofler
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe:
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 2:27 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
charles zeitler wrote:
running 'xhost + ' fixed it.
duh.
A more secure solution is to use an X11-aware tool such as kdesu instead of
sudo. xhost + is an insecure hack.
Kevin Kofler
--
fedora-list
on a fresh install of fedora 11,
trying to run yumex gives me
the following:
No protocol specified
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/share/yumex/yumex.py, line 29, in module
import gtk,gobject
File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/gtk-2.0/gtk/__init__.py, line 79,
in module
are you running as root from the terminal ?
On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 3:10 AM, charles zeitlercfzeit...@gmail.com wrote:
on a fresh install of fedora 11,
trying to run yumex gives me
the following:
No protocol specified
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/share/yumex/yumex.py
On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 1:12 AM, Itamar Reis Peixoto ita...@ispbrasil.com.br
wrote:
are you running as root from the terminal ?
On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 3:10 AM, charles zeitlercfzeit...@gmail.com
wrote:
on a fresh install of fedora 11,
trying to run yumex gives me
the following
On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 1:10 AM, charles zeitler cfzeit...@gmail.com wrote:
on a fresh install of fedora 11,
trying to run yumex gives me
the following:
No protocol specified
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/share/yumex/yumex.py, line 29, in module
import gtk,gobject
2009/2/16 Steven W. Orr ste...@syslang.net:
My yumex run seems to now have a problem that it didn't have before:
[r...@saturn ~]# 10:01:25 : Yum Config Setup
Loaded plugins: priorities, refresh-packagekit
10:01:28 : Setup signed metadata support
10:01:28 : Yum Version : 3.2.21
10:01:28
On Tuesday, Feb 17th 2009 at 09:28 -, quoth Mart?n Marqu?s:
=2009/2/16 Steven W. Orr ste...@syslang.net:
= My yumex run seems to now have a problem that it didn't have before:
=
= [r...@saturn ~]# 10:01:25 : Yum Config Setup
= Loaded plugins: priorities, refresh-packagekit
= 10:01:28 : Setup
2009/2/17 Steven W. Orr ste...@syslang.net:
On Tuesday, Feb 17th 2009 at 09:28 -, quoth Mart?n Marqu?s:
Thanks for replying. Is there a replacement incantation in the yum config
files for livna to rpmfusion?
In my case a livna update a few months ago installed the
rpmfusion-release
Martín Marqués:
Why not remove livna all together? Livna doesn't really exist. It was
replaced with rpmfusion.
Kevin Kofler:
Livna is still the place to get libdvdcss from.
Naturally, if you do not need that package, you can remove Livna. As
far as I recall, the last time I looked, it was
My yumex run seems to now have a problem that it didn't have before:
[r...@saturn ~]# 10:01:25 : Yum Config Setup
Loaded plugins: priorities, refresh-packagekit
10:01:28 : Setup signed metadata support
10:01:28 : Yum Version : 3.2.21
10:01:28 : GUI Setup Completed
10:01:28 : Setup Yum
Mick M. wrote:
When I log in I double-click the firefox icon and then the yumex icon.
While firefox is thinking about starting - yumex connects and starts,
No password was asked for.
Are you sure you didn't just start yumex or some other program using
consolehelper before? Consolehelper
Kevin Kofler wrote:
Are you sure you didn't just start yumex or some other program using
consolehelper before? Consolehelper will remember root authorization for a
while (as long as you don't log out, and I think there's also a time limit)
so you don't have to reenter the root password all
Hi;
I run F10 and KDE.
The system is fully updated.
I start programs from desktop icons.
When I log in I double-click the firefox icon and then the yumex icon.
While firefox is thinking about starting - yumex connects and starts,
No password was asked for.
If I just double-click yumex
2.6.27.5-37.fc9.i386
yumex error...yumex window disappeared when I closed the error window
Error Type: class 'yum.update_md.UpdateNoticeException'
Error Value: No id element found
File : /usr/share/yumex/yumex.py , line 737, in module
mainApp = YumexApplication()
File : /usr/share
Fred Silsbee wrote:
2.6.27.5-37.fc9.i386
yumex error...yumex window disappeared when I closed the error window
Error Type: class 'yum.update_md.UpdateNoticeException'
Error Value: No id element found
File : /usr/share/yumex/yumex.py , line 737, in module
mainApp = YumexApplication
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:fedora-list-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fred Silsbee
Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2008 4:26 PM
To: Fedora List
Subject: yumex error but yum update ran without problem (nothing to
update)
2.6.27.5-37.fc9.i386
yumex error
On Friday, Nov 14th 2008 at 14:34 -, quoth Alex Makhlin:
=Hi all,
=
=I just installed the latest fedora updates and now Yumex no longer works. I am
=getting the following errors when trying to open Yumex.
=
=Error Type: class 'yum.update_md.UpdateNoticeException'
=Error Value: No id element
Hi all,
I just installed the latest fedora updates and now Yumex no longer
works. I am getting the following errors when trying to open Yumex.
Error Type: class 'yum.update_md.UpdateNoticeException'
Error Value: No id element found
File : /usr/share/yumex/yumex.py , line 737, in module
Dave Feustel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 15-OCT-2008 21:24:51.90
I just tried to run yumex in X. After I entered the
root password, a screen came up showing an indicator
which got to 40%, and then the mouse locked up and
the disk light was solid on. I rebooted.
Is this normal for yumex?
No.
I use
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 09:34:49AM +0200, Jouk Jansen wrote:
Dave Feustel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 15-OCT-2008 21:24:51.90
I just tried to run yumex in X. After I entered the
root password, a screen came up showing an indicator
which got to 40%, and then the mouse locked up and
the disk
Dave Feustel wrote:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 09:34:49AM +0200, Jouk Jansen wrote:
Dave Feustel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 15-OCT-2008 21:24:51.90
I just tried to run yumex in X. After I entered the
root password, a screen came up showing an indicator
which got to 40%, and then the mouse locked
I just tried to run yumex in X. After I entered the
root password, a screen came up showing an indicator
which got to 40%, and then the mouse locked up and
the disk light was solid on. I rebooted.
Is this normal for yumex?
Thanks.
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
Richard England wrote:
Using yumex to update my F9 installation, this morning, and I
encountered the following:
09:30:02 : Transaction Check Error: file
/etc/avahi/avahi-autoipd.action from install of
avahi-autoipd-0.6.22-10.fc9.i386 conflicts with file from package
avahi-0.6.17-1.fc7
Hi;
Just a small issue.
Is there a way (e.g. a .*rc file or an /etc/.. config) by which I can
change and save gui configurations in yumex?
For example, I would like to make the overall geometry slightly wider
and change the size of the display columns in 'package view'.
--
Regards Bill
Fedora
On Sunday 14 September 2008, William Case wrote:
Hi;
Just a small issue.
Is there a way (e.g. a .*rc file or an /etc/.. config) by which I can
change and save gui configurations in yumex?
For example, I would like to make the overall geometry slightly wider
and change the size of the display
Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sunday 14 September 2008, William Case wrote:
Hi;
Just a small issue.
Is there a way (e.g. a .*rc file or an /etc/.. config) by which I can
change and save gui configurations in yumex?
For example, I would like to make the overall geometry slightly wider
and change
g wrote:
DB wrote:
My problem comes when I try to remove
something (e.g. CUPS) when yumex seems to consider every application
i can imagine several reason of wanting to remove a program, cups
among them.
would yours be that you do not print with mentioned system, or that
you want
DB wrote:
Hi G,
neither! I had been trying a) to get my Epson all-in-one to work as per
book b) trying to get a pdf printer installed.
ok.
the Master CUPS the servant providing a service. One should be able
to remove either the Master or the Servant without destroying the other,
just
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 3:27 PM, DB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good evening (at least it is in Austria!)
I'm new to Linux Fedora, last messed with Unix in about '89...
I've (eventually) installed F9, with a selection of odds ends, and
found that yumex SEEMED to be a better way of updating
short and quick, left out in last.
to the attention of Them what looks after Yum, but I can't find out
how to contact the yum team.
if you want help restoring to 100%, above ok. you could try yum update, maybe
restore. not that full on yum yet. see 'man yum', 'man yumex'.
for help
On Tue, 2008-07-01 at 21:36 +0200, DB wrote:
g wrote:
DB wrote:
My problem comes when I try to remove
something (e.g. CUPS) when yumex seems to consider every application
i can imagine several reason of wanting to remove a program, cups
among them.
would yours be that you do
Good evening (at least it is in Austria!)
I'm new to Linux Fedora, last messed with Unix in about '89...
I've (eventually) installed F9, with a selection of odds ends, and
found that yumex SEEMED to be a better way of updating installing than
the Gnome Add/Remove Software. My problem comes
DB wrote:
Good evening (at least it is in Austria!)
I'm new to Linux Fedora, last messed with Unix in about '89...
I've (eventually) installed F9, with a selection of odds ends, and
found that yumex SEEMED to be a better way of updating installing than
the Gnome Add/Remove Software. My
On Mon, 2008-06-30 at 22:27 +0200, DB wrote:
I've (eventually) installed F9, with a selection of odds ends, and
found that yumex SEEMED to be a better way of updating installing than
the Gnome Add/Remove Software. My problem comes when I try to remove
something (e.g. CUPS) when yumex seems
DB wrote:
My problem comes when I try to remove
something (e.g. CUPS) when yumex seems to consider every application
i can imagine several reason of wanting to remove a program, cups among them.
would yours be that you do not print with mentioned system, or that you want to
print
On a newly installed FC5, with selinux set to Enforcing
I have some problem when updating some packages with yumex.
I get some scriptlet error:
error: %pre(avahi-0.6.9-8.FC5.i386) scriptlet failed, exit status 255
error: install: %pre scriptlet failed (2), skipping avahi-0.6.9-8.FC5
error
Tim Lauridsen wrote:
On a newly installed FC5, with selinux set to Enforcing
I have some problem when updating some packages with yumex.
I get some scriptlet error:
error: %pre(avahi-0.6.9-8.FC5.i386) scriptlet failed, exit status 255
error: install: %pre scriptlet failed (2), skipping avahi
On Tue, 2006-03-21 at 14:48 +0100, Tim Lauridsen wrote:
It look like it have something to do with the
'system_u:object_r:rpm_exec_t' attribute, yumex dont have that attribute.
How do i get this attribute
FC5+:
http://sepolicy-server.sourceforge.net/index.php?page=module-overview
FC4
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote:
On Tue, 2006-03-21 at 14:48 +0100, Tim Lauridsen wrote:
It look like it have something to do with the
'system_u:object_r:rpm_exec_t' attribute, yumex dont have that attribute.
How do i get this attribute
FC5+:
http://sepolicy-server.sourceforge.net
78 matches
Mail list logo
