Need a package added to the compose for F-10 and F-11

2009-08-12 Thread Rich Megginson
The package 389-adminutil is needed to build 389-admin and 389-dsgw, but I don't want to push out 389-adminutil to stable by itself without the other 389 packages - I'd like to push out to stable all of the 389 packages at the same time. Therefore, I'd like 389-adminutil added to the compose

Re: More mock problems

2009-06-09 Thread Rich Megginson
Toshio Kuratomi wrote: On 06/08/2009 03:15 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: Ah, so it is. Thanks! So now my only hurdle is the missing popt-devel - any ideas? That one looks like a genuine packaging bug. We don't use rpm-devel on the builders so no one saw it. The header files for popt

Re: More mock problems

2009-06-09 Thread Rich Megginson
Toshio Kuratomi wrote: On 06/09/2009 06:51 AM, Rich Megginson wrote: Toshio Kuratomi wrote: The header files for popt are in the main popt package in RHEL5/CentOS5 so that's what actually needs to be required in this instance, not popt-devel. Can I just do rpm --nodeps

Re: More mock problems

2009-06-08 Thread Rich Megginson
Rich Megginson wrote: Kevin Kofler wrote: Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 00:40 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: Neal Becker wrote: rpmdb: Program version 4.7 doesn't match environment version 4.5 You need at least RPM 4.6 on the host systems to build

Re: More mock problems

2009-06-08 Thread Rich Megginson
Toshio Kuratomi wrote: On 06/08/2009 11:48 AM, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 11:55 -0600, Rich Megginson wrote: Kevin Kofler wrote: Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 00:40 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: Neal

Re: More mock problems

2009-06-08 Thread Rich Megginson
Toshio Kuratomi wrote: On 06/08/2009 02:28 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: Ok, that got me further, but I'm still failing. I had to do rpm --force -Uvh net-snmp*.fedorabuilder.x86_64.rpm But I'm stuck on rpm - both yum and rpm install are failing: liblua-5.1.so()(64bit) is needed by rpm