Re: New support lists?

2008-07-29 Thread Jeff Moe
Alan Cox alan at lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk writes: And my opinion of Red Hat is shit now, since they have a representative like Alexandre fronting for them. Red Hat doesn't. Alexandra just persists in abusing his redhat.com address to advertise his own BLAG distribution in the wrong place.

Re: Why is Fedora not a Free GNU/Linux distributions?

2008-07-21 Thread jeff moe
Kevin Kofler kevin.kofler at chello.at writes: Alexandre Oliva aoliva at redhat.com writes: If you find any such problems in BLAG 8 (never formally released) or BLAG 9 (released easier today), please report them. Here's some I found at a quick glance:

Re: Why is Fedora not a Free GNU/Linux distributions?

2008-07-15 Thread jeff moe
Kevin Kofler kevin.kofler at chello.at writes: Antonio Olivares olivares14031 at yahoo.com writes: A Because Fedora includes Firmware and those guys don't. Bullsh*t! BLAG 7 ships: [gmane tells me to prune] I am the maintainer of BLAG and I basically agree with what you've said

Re: Why is Fedora not a Free GNU/Linux distributions?

2008-07-15 Thread jeff moe
Kevin Kofler kevin.kofler at chello.at writes: Alexandre Oliva aoliva at redhat.com writes: If you find any such problems in BLAG 8 (never formally released) or BLAG 9 (released easier today), please report them. Here's some I found at a quick glance: Thank you for your

Re: Why is Fedora not a Free GNU/Linux distributions?

2008-07-15 Thread jeff moe
Kevin Kofler kevin.kofler at chello.at writes: I wrote: Claims to be GPLv2, but only the firmware loader is GPLv2 (actually dual GPLv2 or BSD). Or rather, GPLv2+ or MIT. So in total, the correct License tag for midisport-firmware would be: (GPLv2+ or MIT) and Redistributable, no