On Wednesday 18 June 2008 22:44:39 Gene Heskett wrote:
Anne suggested setting it so it doesn't eject, but then the drive generally
has no clue about how to access the disk, so that fails also.
Your problem may be different from mine, then. All I know is that I burned
just one DVD after I
On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 17:44:39 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
The drive itself must read the equ of LSN0 from the disk, deduce the file
system
and configure itself, all the while poking at the disk to see what it really
is. This process, on any drive I've ever owned, can take upwards of 75
On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 19:19:28 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 18:23:28 -0400
Gene Heskett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I personally am not inclined to blame it on the
kernel unless some error message was changed and whatever k3b uses to keep
track of that stuff is now getting
On Thursday 19 June 2008, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 17:44:39 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
The drive itself must read the equ of LSN0 from the disk, deduce the file
system and configure itself, all the while poking at the disk to see what
it really is. This process, on any drive
On Thursday 19 June 2008 12:17:20 Gene Heskett wrote:
That brings up another question. I hear folks praising konquerer for its
file manager abilities, but to me a file manager is a 2 pane operation ala
mc. I always fall back to mc cuz it Just Works(TM), it can do lots of
things krusader
On Thursday 19 June 2008, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Thursday 19 June 2008 12:17:20 Gene Heskett wrote:
That brings up another question. I hear folks praising konquerer for its
file manager abilities, but to me a file manager is a 2 pane operation ala
mc. I always fall back to mc cuz it Just
On Thursday 19 June 2008 12:49:27 Gene Heskett wrote:
On Thursday 19 June 2008, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Thursday 19 June 2008 12:17:20 Gene Heskett wrote:
That brings up another question. I hear folks praising konquerer for
its file manager abilities, but to me a file manager is a 2 pane
On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 10:13:03 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
I left a DVD-R being written by K3B, and when I came back
later, it said the verify failed because there were
no tracks to verify.
However, when I mounted the dvd and did a sha1sum of the
files I'd backed up, they matched perfectly the
On Wednesday 18 June 2008 15:13:03 Tom Horsley wrote:
I left a DVD-R being written by K3B, and when I came back
later, it said the verify failed because there were
no tracks to verify.
However, when I mounted the dvd and did a sha1sum of the
files I'd backed up, they matched perfectly the
On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 11:07:45 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
That is because the verify phase of k3b will not wait till the drive has
recognized the disk after the eject cycle, so it errors out. I have squawked
about that on the k3b bz, to no avail.
Unfortunately, there are multiple issues. One
On Wednesday 18 June 2008, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 11:07:45 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
That is because the verify phase of k3b will not wait till the drive has
recognized the disk after the eject cycle, so it errors out. I have
squawked about that on the k3b bz, to no
On Wednesday 18 June 2008, Rex Dieter wrote:
Gene Heskett wrote:
On Wednesday 18 June 2008, Tom Horsley wrote:
I left a DVD-R being written by K3B, and when I came back
later, it said the verify failed because there were
no tracks to verify.
That is because the verify phase of k3b will not wait
On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 18:23:28 -0400
Gene Heskett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I personally am not inclined to blame it on the
kernel unless some error message was changed and whatever k3b uses to keep
track of that stuff is now getting an answer it doesn't like or doesn't know
how to translate.
13 matches
Mail list logo
